Trump vowed to be a 'peacemaker' but foreign conflicts only ramping up on his watch
President Donald Trump, in January's inaugural address, predicted his "proudest legacy will be that of a peacemaker and a unifier."
Six months into his second term, conflicts are raging on three fronts around the world.
Iran and Israel are trading strikes amid fears of an all-out war in which the U.S. could become involved. Russia carried out one of its deadliest attacks on Ukraine's capital in months overnight earlier this week. In Gaza, people are struggling to find food and dozens have been killed in recent incidents near aid locations.
"He's clearly not a peacemaker, but he's not a warmaker, either," Aaron David Miller, a State Department diplomat in the Clinton and George W. Bush administrations -- now at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace -- told ABC News.
MORE: Trump on his 'unconditional surrender' demand to Iran: 'I've had it'
Trump vowed speedy ends to the Israel-Hamas war and Russia's invasion of Ukraine, two conflicts that broke out in the previous administration that Trump has labeled "Biden's wars." On the campaign trail, he often railed against "endless wars" and mused that he could resolve the Russia-Ukraine war in 24 hours -- a comment that once in office he walked back as an "exaggeration."
"He has made comments on all of them that this could be done quickly or easily and that there are solutions to these three problems," Miller said. "And yet, he has not been successful in even identifying what I would consider to be a potentially effective strategy for managing or let alone resolving them. And therein lies the challenge."
While Trump has made new diplomatic efforts a priority amid his flurry of initiatives during his first months, he's expressed increasing frustration with the foreign leaders involved and continually condemns what he calls "the death" the conflicts have wrought.
"He has followed through on his promises to try," said Elliott Abrams, a senior fellow for Middle Eastern studies at the Council on Foreign Relations who worked as special representative for Iran and Venezuela in Trump's first administration. "He has tried in Ukraine and he has tried in Gaza and he's tried in Iran, and none of them has worked out."
One claim of success on the foreign policy front that Trump frequently makes, and says he can replicate by pushing trade deals, is how he says he stopped the recent fighting between India and Pakistan. Trump's claimed he hasn't received enough credit: "I got it stopped. I don't think I had one story."
Trump departed a Group of Seven summit early, citing tensions in the Middle East and ordering his national security team to huddle in the Situation Room upon his return to Washington. He's received a range of options, including using U.S. military assets to strike Iranian nuclear facilities.
Trump didn't rule out the possibility, telling reporters on Wednesday: "I may do it. I may not do it. I mean, nobody knows what I'm going to do."
The president's messaging on the conflict has been mixed.
MORE: Diplomatic breakthrough or military action? Trump's choice on Iran: ANALYSIS
Trump had publicly warned Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu any strikes could derail talks between the U.S. and Iran on a nuclear deal. But after Israel's attacks last Friday on Tehran, Trump seemed to change his tune, telling ABC News they were "excellent" and saying they could drive Tehran to the negotiating table.
In the last few days, he's floated sending Vice President JD Vance and Special Envoy Steve Witkoff to speak with the Iranians while also demanding Iran's "unconditional surrender." Officials have said the U.S. has not been involved in Israel's offensive, while Trump claimed "we now have complete and total control of the skies over Iran."
"His words and deeds are chaotic and inconsistent," Miller said of Trump. "And the notion that he's unpredictable and that helps him certainly hasn't proven to be the case so far in these three conflicts."
The White House and Vice President Vance have defended Trump's position on Iran, saying he's long been clear and consistent that the nation can't have a nuclear weapon.
Abrams concedes Trump's messaging might be "confusing" but is representative of a rapidly changing situation on the ground in Tehran.
"One thing he's trying to make clear to the Ayatollah is that if he attacks American ships from bases he's done, that's the end of the regime. That is something any president should do," Abrams said.
As the administration ramps up its focus on Israel and Iran, other areas are at a standstill.
"On Gaza, no one has come up with a workable plan," Abrams said. "It's a wicked problem. [Joe] Biden didn't come up with a plan in his 15 months after October 7 and Trump hasn't come up with a workable one."
An initial three-phrase peace deal aimed at ending the war in Gaza, which was brokered by members of both the Biden and Trump administrations, collapsed in March. Since then, proposals for a temporary ceasefire have fallen through.
In Eastern Europe, Trump took a different approach than his predecessor in engaging with both the leaders of Ukraine and Russia, often saying his personal relationship with Vladimir Putin would produce results.
Some progress appeared to be made when Russian and Ukrainian officials held their first face-to-face meeting since the invasion began back in mid-May. But talks have since stalled, with the Trump administration taking a step back while Ukraine and Russia have been intensifying attacks in recent weeks.
"The president did a lot of huffing and puffing on the need for peace, but he hasn't been prepared to really push Putin in that direction," said Stephen Sestanovich, a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations who served as the State Department's ambassador-at-large for the former Soviet Union.
MORE: Trump attacks Putin over Ukraine onslaught but will he impose consequences?
William Taylor, a former U.S. ambassador to Ukraine during the Obama administration currently serving as a senior fellow at the Atlantic Council, said Putin is not going to be swayed diplomatically.
"Putin is going to be swayed by a combination of military and economic pressure," Taylor said. "So President Trump should do that."
No new commitments have been made for U.S. arms deliveries to Ukraine and no new sanctions have been placed on Russia, however, and there are now reports that the Trump administration disbanded a group focused on pressuring Russia.
"For someone who claims to have mastered the art of the deal, this is a pretty spectacular failure," Sestanovich said of Trump's approach to the Russia-Ukraine war so far.
Anna Kelly, White House Deputy press secretary, responded to the criticism, saying in a statement, 'President Trump is leading the world in ending this brutal war, which he inherited from his incompetent predecessor Joe Biden. No one cares about the opinions of armchair quarterback 'experts' who have done nothing to make the world safer.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

21 minutes ago
Families of trans kids worry about what's next after Supreme Court rules on gender-affirming care
NASHVILLE, Tenn. -- A U.S. Supreme Court decision Wednesday upholding Tennessee's ban on gender-affirming care for minors is leaving transgender children and their parents uncertain and anxious about the future. The court handed President Donald Trump's administration and Republican-led states a significant victory by effectively protecting them from at least some of the legal challenges against many efforts to repeal safeguards for transgender people. The case stems from a Tennessee law banning puberty blockers and hormone treatments for transgender minors. Opponents of gender-affirming care say people who transition when they're young could later regret it. Families of transgender children argue the ban amounts to unlawful sex discrimination and violates the constitutional rights of vulnerable Americans. Eli Givens, who is transgender and testified against Tennessee's gender-affirming care bill in 2023, said it's devastating that lawmakers 'who have called us degenerates, have told us that we're living in fiction' are celebrating the court's ruling. The nonbinary college student from Spring Hill received mastectomy surgery in 2022 at age 17. They said the legislation inspired their advocacy, and they attended the Supreme Court arguments in the case last December, on their 20th birthday. 'We're not making a world that trans youth are welcomed or allowed to be a part of,' Givens said. 'And so, it's just a really scary kind of future we might have.' Jennifer Solomon, who supports parents and families at the LGBTQ+ rights group Equality Florida, called the ruling a decision 'that one day will embarrass the courts.' 'This is a decision that every parent should be concerned about,' she said. 'When politicians are able to make a decision that overrides your ability to medically make decisions for your children, every family should worry.' Chloe Cole, a conservative activist known for speaking about her gender-transition reversal, posted on social media after the court's decision that 'every child in America is now safer.' Cole was cited as an example by Tennessee Republicans as one of the reasons the law was needed. Matt Walsh, an activist who was one of the early backers of Tennessee's law, applauded the high court. Three years ago, Walsh shared videos on social media of a doctor saying gender-affirming procedures are 'huge moneymakers' for hospitals and a staffer saying anyone with a religious objection should quit. 'This is a truly historic victory and I'm grateful to be a part of it, along with so many others who have fought relentlessly for years,' Walsh posted on social media. Rosie Emrich is worried the court decision will embolden legislators in New Hampshire, where legislation banning hormone treatments and puberty blockers for children is expected to reach the governor's desk. Lawmakers are weighing whether to block the treatments from minors already receiving them, like Emrich's 9-year-old child. 'It's definitely disappointing, and I'm trying to figure out how I'm going to talk to my kid about it,' Emrich said. Emrich said she and her husband have considered moving from New Hampshire and are waiting to see what will happen. 'The hard part is, like, I've grown up here, my husband has grown up here, we very much want to raise our family here,' she said. 'And we don't want to leave if we don t have to.' Erica Barker and her family moved from Jackson, Mississippi, to North Las Vegas, Nevada, a little over two years ago so one of her children could start receiving gender-affirming care. Barker's transgender daughter, then 12, had been in therapy for three years, and the family agreed it was time for medical treatments. Mississippi passed a ban on gender-affirming care for minors the next year, which Barker said she saw coming. Barker said the move was complicated, involving a new job for her husband and two mortgages when their Mississippi home was slow to sell, but it also brought access to care for her daughter, now 14. 'Our hearts are hurting for folks who are not having the same experience,' Barker said. In another state with a ban on gender-affirming care for minors, Oklahoma resident Erika Dubose said finding care for her 17-year-old nonbinary child, Sydney Gebhardt, involves a four-hour drive to Kansas and getting prescriptions filled in Oregon and mailed to their home. 'I just wish the younger folks wouldn't have to go through this,' Gebhardt said. 'These folks deserve to be focusing on their academics and hanging out with their friends and making memories with their families and planning out a safe and happy future.' Sarah Moskanos, who lives near Milwaukee, said her 14-year-old transgender daughter went through nearly a decade of counseling before she started medical gender-affirming care but has been sure since the age of 4 that she identified as a girl. 'I would say that there is decades of research on this very thing,' she said. 'And we know what works and we know what will save trans kids' lives is gender-affirming care.' Wisconsin doesn't have a gender-affirming care ban, but Moskanos said getting her daughter that care has not been easy. She now worries about what the future holds. 'We are but one election cycle away from disaster for my kid,' she said. Mo Jenkins, a 26-year-old transgender Texas native and legislative staffer at the state Capitol, said she began taking hormone therapy at 16 years old and has been on and off treatment since then. 'My transition was out of survival,' Jenkins said. Texas outlawed gender-affirming care for minors two years ago, and in May, the Legislature passed a bill tightly defining a man and a woman by their sex characteristics. 'I'm not surprised at the ruling. I am disheartened,' Jenkins said. 'Trans people are not going to disappear.' ___ Mulvihill reported from Cherry Hill, New Jersey, and Seewer reported from Toledo, Ohio. Associated Press journalists Susan Haigh in Hartford, Connecticut; Kenya Hunter in Atlanta; Laura Bargfeld in Chicago; Nadia Lathan in Austin, Texas; and Daniel Kozin in Pinecrest, Florida, contributed to this report.


Newsweek
21 minutes ago
- Newsweek
California's Economy Has a Trump Problem
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The Californian economy is expected to undergo "a mild contraction," with unemployment expected to hit 6.1 percent this year according to a new report by UCLA's Anderson Forecast, which makes projections about both the state and the national economy. The report attributes the contraction in part to the impact of the White House's policies on tariffs and its crackdown on illegal immigration, which it projects will fuel inflation and drag on economic growth for the remainder of 2025. Why It Matters President Donald Trump was inaugurated for the second time in January with the promise of delivering a new "golden age" for the United States. However, if the Anderson Forecast is correct, and his flagship policies on tariffs and immigration are causing economic growth to drag, the president will come under pressure to explain how this pledge will be met. The Anderson Forecast, produced by UCLA's Anderson School of Management, is one of the most closely watched set of predictions for the economy of California. What To Know The forecast projects that the Californian economy "will grow slower than the U.S.'s in 2025, with several quarters of negative job growth" and says it is "already experiencing a mild contraction, with job losses and stagnation in key sectors." This, and the projected slowdown in the national economy resulting in "near zero" real GDP growth in the second half of 2025, are attributed to "aggressive trade policies, fiscal instability and labor market disruptions" fueled by the federal government. The forecast projects the national economy will make only a "modest recovery" through 2027. According to the Anderson Forecast, the Californian economy will grow by just 0.1 percent in 2025, followed by 0.8 percent in 2026 and 2.5 percent in 2027. Non-agricultural payroll jobs will decline slightly in the state this year, while inflation will hit 6.1 percent in 2025 before falling back to 4.4 percent in 2027. Stock image of the California state flag hanging from a downtown office building in San Francisco. President Donald Trump, inset. Stock image of the California state flag hanging from a downtown office building in San Francisco. President Donald Trump, inset. Smith Collection/Gado/BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI/AFP/GETTY The report says that the sectors "that have historically driven California's superior growth," such as technology, entertainment and durable goods manufacturing, "are either stagnant or contracting." It reports that the Californian housing sector is also under pressure as a result of "rising input costs owing to tariffs" and "deportations reducing the construction workforce." On the national level, the forecast says tariffs "are increasing costs across manufacturing and trade-related sectors, contributing to inflation and weakening the competitiveness of U.S. goods." On April 2, which he dubbed "Liberation Day," Trump introduced sweeping new tariffs targeting most of America's trade partners, including levies of 20 percent on the European Union and 34 percent on China, which came on top of another 20 percent he had already imposed. Following a negative market reaction, most of these tariffs were paused and replaced with a flat 10-percent rate, but some higher duties remain in place, including a 25-percent rate for automobile-related imports. Trump has also imposed a major crackdown targeting illegal immigration, with Immigration and Customs Enforcement stepping up raids across the country and speeding up deportation proceedings. What People Are Saying Speaking to Newsweek, Professor Jerry Nickelsburg, director of UCLA's Anderson Forecast, said: "In the first three months of 2025, California lost 50,000 payroll jobs. The growth sectors over the past year have stopped growing and tech, manufacturing and entertainment have yet to take off. Income growth will be positive, but it is likely that employment growth will be slightly negative." Professor Chris Tilly, who teaches at the UCLA Luskin School of Public Affairs, told Newsweek that "the impact of President Trump's tariff policies and immigration crackdown will be severe nationwide, and especially severe in California." He said: "In California, one in three jobs is filled by an immigrant, and a large minority of California's immigrant workforce is undocumented. Critical California industries such as agriculture, construction, restaurants and hotels, and manufacturing are dependent on immigrant workforces, including undocumented workers. "Undocumented families in California, most of whom are long-term residents at this point, also make up an important part of the consumer base. Already, many undocumented migrants are not showing up for work, and are shopping less. Even legal immigrants and Latino citizens are going out less, and therefore spending less, out of fear of being stopped and questioned. If this continues, the effects on the California economy—as well as the economy of many other states—will be devastating." Tilly added: "The probable impact of Trump's tariffs is less certain, in part because there is so much uncertainty about what his tariff policy will end up being. But already there are major depressing effects on the ports and warehousing that are important contributors to California's economy. To the extent that other countries retaliate with tariffs on key California exports such as agricultural goods and high-tech products, that will further batter the economy." Professor Robert Blecker, an economist who used to teach at the American University in Washington, D.C., told Newsweek: "Trump's massive deportations of immigrant workers are likely to cause labor shortages and drive up labor costs in key sectors such as agriculture, construction, and services, while his on-again, off-again tariffs have depressed consumer and business confidence and threaten to drive up costs for households and firms alike." What Happens Next It remains to be seen if the Anderson Forecast's projections for the U.S. and Californian economies for the remainder of this year are correct. If they are, Trump is likely to come under heightened pressure over his economic and social policies, including tariffs and mass deportations.

Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Iranian missile slams into the main hospital in southern Israel, causing extensive damage
Separate Iranian strikes also hit a high-rise apartment building in Tel Aviv and other sites in central Israel. Authorities in Israel said at least 40 people were wounded. (AP video shot by: Alon Bernstein)