Make Ceasefire Permanent, Ask Iran to End Nuclear Program
このページを 日本語 で読む
United States President Donald Trump announced that the warring nations of Israel and Iran have agreed to a "complete and total ceasefire."
According to US media reports, Qatar had mediated the ceasefire plan. It officially took effect at 7:00 AM local time on Tuesday, June 24.
Trump said he thought the ceasefire would "last permanently," although uncertainty remains. We urge both Israel and Iran to exercise maximum restraint, adhere to the ceasefire, and bring the war to an end. Black smoke rises from the Iranian state broadcasting headquarters following an attack by Israeli forces in Tehran on the 16th (©Kyodo)
Israeli aircraft began attacking Iranian nuclear facilities and other military targets on June 13. Their stated intention was to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons. Iran retaliated with ballistic missiles fired at Israel. Although Israel maintained the upper hand, it could not seriously damage Iran's nuclear facilities. Then, on June 21, the US dropped bunker buster bombs on three of Iran's nuclear facilities.
In the background, Iran had quickly and significantly increased its store of uranium fuel enriched to 60%, "a short technical step away" from weapons-grade levels, reported the Associated Press, quoting from a May 31 International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) report. There was concern that Tehran would be able to enrich this stock of uranium to 90% quickly to produce nuclear weapons.
Moreover, Iran has explicitly stated it does not recognize Israel's right to exist as a state. There were fears that if Iran acquired nuclear weapons, it could use them to attack Israel, either directly or by using pro-Iranian militant proxies. That in turn could set off a nuclear war.
Trump delivered a short speech immediately after the B-2 bombers dropped the bunker busters. In it, he urged Iran to make peace quickly, framing it as a choice between "peace or tragedy." The Trump administration has not hesitated to use force. Fairly speaking, it has pushed the Iranian leadership into a corner ー if the ceasefire holds. People gather near a damaged site, hauling a destroyed vehicle away, after what Syrian and Iranian media described as an Israeli air strike on Iran's consulate in the Syrian capital Damascus April 1, 2024. (©REUTERS/Firas Makdesi
However, we must be cautious about Iran's actions going forward. There are likely forces within the Iranian military and the Revolutionary Guard who undoubtedly harbor a desire for retaliation. They would not likely take kindly to such a one-sided thrashing. The same holds true for pro-Iranian militant groups. Military and terrorist attacks would not be surprising.
Concerns also remain that Iranian hardliners could block the Strait of Hormuz. That narrow neck of water is a major artery for global shipments of crude oil, including those bound for Japan. Alternatively, they could attack US naval vessels or tankers belonging to Western nations. Japan and Europe must urge Iran to exercise restraint.
The most important thing is to eliminate the root cause of the war. We would like to see Iran declare that it will not become a nuclear weapons power. It must cooperate with IAEA inspections and agree to the destruction of its uranium-enrichment facilities. The Iranians must also turn over to the IAEA any highly enriched uranium they might be concealing.
Withdrawing from the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, as some in the Islamic Consultative Assembly (Iranian Parliament) are calling for, or other such actions, must not happen.
Author: Editorial Board, The Sankei Shimbun
このページを 日本語 で読む
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Winnipeg Free Press
2 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
America First — it all depends on the day
Opinion When faced with making a major decision or delivering important legislation, U.S. President Donald Trump has a well-documented penchant for promising all will be accomplished in a proverbial 'two weeks.' And nearly every time he has made this declaration — about, for example, new tax legislation and a revamped health-care plan during his first term and more recently, ending the Russia-Ukraine war — 14 days later, no decisions have been made and no legislation has been forthcoming. Hence, his pronouncement on June 19 that he would decide whether to approve bombing Iran's key nuclear sites within two weeks was met with the usual eye-rolling and sarcastic tittering. Talk-show host Jimmy Kimmel ran a hilarious compilation of many of Trump's two-week declarations. 'He lies a lot,' said Kimmel. 'So who the hell knows what he's going to do.' Lo and behold, on June 21, Trump made a decision and U.S. B-2 bombers dropped massive bombs at three nuclear facilities. Trump immediately claimed the bombing 'completely and fully obliterated' Iran's nuclear program. That now seems unlikely, according to a classified U.S. intelligence report leaked to the press. Iran's program, the report noted, has been set back by months, but more than likely has not been eliminated. Predictably, the White House declared that assessment 'flat-out wrong.' Trump has never been consistent. No matter: the fact this military action does not fit into the isolationist 'America First' platform he campaigned on has already been rationalized away by diehard MAGA Republicans. The majority of them have perceived it as a one-time offensive intrusion into world affairs, an action outside the self-contained U.S. bubble. And that seems to be the case. Iran retaliated on June 23, by launching missiles at an American military base in Qatar, but air defense systems intercepted them before they did any damage. According to news reports, Iran informed officials in Qatar of the impending attack, which suggests Iran does not want to get into an all-out war with the U.S. And Trump said he won't retaliate. Early on June 24, Trump declared Iran and Israel had agreed to a cease-fire, yet both countries continued to attack each other, raising Trump's ire. By the end of the day, the fighting seemed to have stopped and the 'fragile cease-fire,' as the New York Times called it, appears to be holding — at least for the moment. As pragmatic — and, dare I say, strategically necessary — as was Trump's decision to try to stop the ruthless Iranian regime from becoming a nuclear power and to force cease-fire, it does not discount how, in less than six months, Trump has upended the military and economic alliances and policies that have effectively governed world affairs since the end of the Second World War. Yes, the so-called 'Cold War' between the U.S. and the former Soviet Union was a dangerous era of nuclear brinksmanship that nearly started a third world war. But that war did not happen; instead, the U.S. initiated the Marshall Plan to rebuild of war-torn western Europe, which led to decades of economic prosperity. Advances in technology had a generally positive impact on people's lives, and the defeat of Nazi Germany, fascist Italy and the militaristic Empire of Japan was a boon for the spread of democracy. Franklin D. Roosevelt, the U.S. president during the 1930s and the Second World War, was keen to aid Britain before and after the war started in September 1939, but he was hamstrung by the same kind of isolationist 'America First' policy that Trump so proudly touts. Until, that is, the Japanese attacked Pearl Harbor in December 1941. There were periods in the 1890s, and during the last 18 months of the First World War, when the U.S. was active in world affairs. But for the most part, from the American Revolution to December 1941, the country's leaders were determined to stay out of European entanglements. That dictum was established by president George Washington, who said in his 1796 farewell address, 'The great rule of conduct for us in regard to foreign nations is in extending our commercial relations, (and) to have with them as little political connection as possible.' More than a century later, during the November 1916 presidential campaign, incumbent Democrat candidate Woodrow Wilson used the slogan 'America First,' promising to keep the U.S. out of the First World War. That did not happen, as Germany's foolish decision to offer — in the Zimmermann telegram — to assist Mexico to reclaim territory lost to the Americans compelled Wilson to obtain Congress's support to enter the war, as is required by the U.S. constitution. Trump did not seek congressional approval for the military action against Iran, though such approval is (probably) required by the War Powers Resolution of 1973. After the First World War ended, the 'America First' policy kicked in again. The Republican-controlled senate ensured the U.S. was not part of the League of Nations, the predecessor of the United Nations, established to promote world peace. Without American support, the League faltered badly, allowing Mussolini, Hitler and Japan's leaders to do pretty well as they wanted until Britain finally took action against Hitler in September 1939. A lot of Americans, including famed aviator Charles Lindbergh, a supporter of the 'America First Committee,' had no problem with that. In a controversial speech in Des Moines, Iowa in September 1941, Lindbergh blamed FDR and his administration and the 'British and Jewish races' for deceiving the American public with war propaganda. Despite the praise Trump has received from several world leaders, most Republicans and even some Democrats for ordering the strike on Iran and negotiating a cease-fire, he remains the erratic and unpredictable would-be authoritarian he always has been. Now & Then is a column in which historian Allan Levine puts the events of today in a historical context.
Winnipeg Free Press
2 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Brazil's outspoken first lady is coming under fire, but she refuses to stop speaking out
SAO PAULO (AP) — In early May, an air of triumph filled a dinner in Beijing, where Brazil's President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva celebrated a diplomatic victory: businessmen travelling with him said they had secured billions of dollars in investments as the veteran leader renewed his international prestige standing alongside his Chinese counterpart, Xi Jinping. But then Brazilian first lady Rosângela da Silva, better known as Janja, raised her hand. Although no one was expected to speak, da Silva addressed Xi, saying that Chinese social media company TikTok posed a challenge for leftists, claiming its algorithm favors right-wingers. China's president reportedly answered. The exchange was leaked to Brazilian media by the time dessert was served. Lula's government is grappling with unpopularity that has dented his credentials as the frontrunner for reelection next year. Some analysts, including members of his government, attribute this partly to his wife's perceived overstepping in what was once a ceremonial role. Janja, a 58-year-old sociologist, has drawn criticism for insulting tech billionaire Elon Musk, mocking the suicide of a pro-Jair Bolsonaro supporter and advising the president on how to use the military during the Jan. 8, 2023 riots in the capital, Brasilia. Still, she insists she will speak out whenever it serves the public interest. A Datafolha poll released June 12 found that 36% of Brazilians think the first lady's actions hurt the government, while 14% say they are helpful. It was the pollster's first measure of the first lady's approval. The same poll showed Lula with a 40% job disapproval rating, an 8 percentage point increase from October 2024. Brazil's presidency said in a statement to The Associated Press on June 20 that da Silva adheres to the solicitor-general's office guidelines, adding that she 'acts as a citizen, combining her public visibility with the experience she has built throughout her professional career in support of relevant social issues and matters of public interest.' 'Undue interference' Under guidelines published by the solicitor-general's office, the president's spouse primarily fulfills 'a symbolically representative role on behalf of the president in a social, cultural, ceremonial, political or diplomatic nature.' For many of her critics, this does not grant her the authority to speak as a government representative. Brazilian media have reported that government ministers, lawmakers and staunch leftist campaigners are privately raising concerns about the first lady being a hindrance more than an asset. These worries have skyrocketed since the incident in China — even as Lula himself has praised his wife for speaking out. 'It looks like Brazil is governed by a couple,' said Beatriz Rey, a political science postdoctoral and research fellow at the University of Lisbon. 'When (the first lady) says there won't be any protocols to silence her, she disrespects our democratic institutions for she has no elected office, no government position. It is not about being a woman or a feminist. It is undue interference.' 'Present and vocal' Lula's first wife, Maria de Lourdes, died in 1971. His second, Marisa Letícia, died in 2017. Lula, 79, and Janja said they met in 2017 and started seeing each other frequently during the leftist leader's 580 days in jail in the city of Curitiba between 2018 and 2019. They married in 2022. Many supporters of Lula's Workers' Party partly attribute the criticism against the first lady to misinformation and disinformation. In May, the party launched the 'I am with Janja' social media campaign in her defense. But the week-long effort garnered less than 100,000 views and only a few hundred comments. 'Janja is an asset because she rejuvenates Lula, everyone in the government understands that, even her critics,' a Brazilian government source told the AP. 'No one wants to alienate her. But many important people in Brasilia, friends and allies of Lula, do understand that by overstepping she brings some of her rejection to the president.' The source, who spoke under condition of anonymity for lack of authorization to speak about the matter publicly, often travels with the president and the first lady. Adriana Negreiros, a journalist who profiled the first lady for a 2024 podcast titled 'Janja,' said that allies of the president who criticize her do it with extreme caution. '(Janja) dances, sings, speaks out, appears at official events and meetings with heads of state. She insists on being present and vocal,' Negreiros said. 'There's a lot of sexism and misogyny directed at her, no doubt. But not all criticism is sexist.' 'She will say what she wants' Da Silva said she doesn't go to dinners 'just to accompany' her husband. 'I have common sense. I consider myself an intelligent person. So I know very well what my limits are. I'm fully aware of that,' she told a podcast of daily Folha de S. Paulo. Da Silva did, however, express remorse during the same podcast for the expletive she used against Musk in 2024, once a close ally of U.S. President Donald Trump. Many of Lula's adversaries say they want the first lady to remain in the spotlight. 'The more she speaks, the more she holds a microphone, the more she helps the right wing,' said Nikolas Ferreira, one of Brazil's most popular right-wing lawmakers. Ferreira, a prominent social media figure, claims the role of regulating social media is a matter for Brazil's Congress, not for the first lady to debate with foreign leaders like Xi. Da Silva is also expected to play as a keen hostess at the BRICS summit in Rio on July 6-7, a role her husband is almost certain not to oppose. 'She will be wherever she wants,' Lula told journalists in March following criticism for sending the first lady as his representative to a nutrition summit in Paris that month. 'She will say what she wants and go wherever she wants.' ____ Follow AP's coverage of Latin America and the Caribbean at
Winnipeg Free Press
3 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Trump says US has signed a deal with China on trade, without giving details
BANGKOK (AP) — The U.S. and China have signed an agreement on trade, President Donald Trump said, adding he expects to soon have a deal with India. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick told Bloomberg TV that the deal was signed earlier this week. Neither Lutnick nor Trump provided any details about the agreement. 'We just signed with China the other day,' Trump said late Thursday. Lutnick said the deal was 'signed and sealed' two days earlier. It follows initial talks in Geneva in early May that led both sides to postpone massive tariff hikes that were threatening to freeze much trade between the two countries. Later talks in London set a framework for negotiations and the deal mentioned by Trump appeared to formalize that agreement. 'The president likes to close these deals himself. He's the dealmaker. We're going to have deal after deal,' Lutnick said. Monday Mornings The latest local business news and a lookahead to the coming week. China has not announced any new agreements, but it announced earlier this week that it was speeding up approvals of exports of rare earths, materials used in high-tech products such as electric vehicles. Beijing's limits on exports of rare earths have been a key point of contention. The Chinese Commerce Ministry said Thursday that Beijing was accelerating review of export license applications for rare earths and had approved 'a certain number of compliant applications.'
