Call for protection to stop parents being ‘punished' over Channel crossings

Independent

06-04-2025

Campaigners are calling for stronger protections to prevent parents being punished for trying to seek sanctuary with their children under a new offence over English Channel crossings.
Those who endanger or risk another life at sea during the dangerous journeys could face five years in jail as part of Government plans to curb crossings and crack down on people smugglers.
According to the Home Office, the offence is to stop more people being crammed into unsafe boats and would apply to those involved in physical aggression and intimidation, as well as anyone who resists rescue.
But the clause laid out in the Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill currently going through Parliament has been described as 'ill-defined' and could apply to a wide range of conduct beyond violence.
Regardless of any reassurances from ministers, charity Freedom From Torture has raised concerns that any future government would be 'free to apply this clause broadly'.
The draft law reads of the offence where a person 'did an act that caused, or created a risk of, the death of, or serious personal injury to, another person'.
This could include physical or psychological injury, and covers journeys by water to the UK from France, Belgium and the Netherlands.
Campaigners believe 'at the very least' the offence should be amended to clearly define the acts being criminalised.
Sile Reynolds, head of asylum advocacy at Freedom From Torture, told the PA news agency: 'If this Bill goes through, the Government risks punishing parents rather than protecting families seeking sanctuary.
'We're gravely concerned that the offences in the Bill are so broad they'll catch everyone in the same drag net.
'What's deeply disturbing is that the Government itself has recognised this could result in the prosecution of parents who make the unbearably difficult decision to bring their children on these dangerous journeys to reach safety in the UK.'
In the Bill's document on the European Convention on Human Rights, it reads that while it is 'very unlikely', there is 'no absolute bar' to prosecuting parents who have taken children on these journeys, which could result in the break-up of families.
It said any decision to prosecute a parent would be made by the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) on a case-by-case basis, and CPS policy is normally not to prosecute parents, and therefore is an 'appropriate safeguard'.
A refugee mother who fled torture at the hands of her family in Iraq with her children said the Bill will 'never stop' people from coming if violence and conflict continues in their home countries.
In comments shared through Freedom From Torture, Gulan, who wished to remain anonymous, said: 'We want to keep our children safe, but there aren't enough safe ways to escape.
'Instead of making things harder, the Government should create safe routes for families. It's really sad that we aren't getting full help to escape from danger.'
The mother-of-two escaped when her youngest child was five, after being locked up and tortured by her family, who said they would kill her for falling in love with a man from another religion.
She embarked on a nine-month 'terrifying' journey where she did not know their destination until authorities took them in once they arrived in Dover.
'We left everything behind to save my children, as there was no protection for us,' she said.
Gulan described how they were sold by smugglers to other smugglers once they reached specific locations and were not allowed to ask questions or find out where they were going.
'It was terrifying and depressing, and I don't want to remember it as it was another trauma layered on top of the violence we had experienced at home,' she added.
Eventually, she said in France the smuggler told them to sneak into the back of an overcrowded lorry heading for a goods boat.
She said since arriving in the UK her family have 'integrated into the community and found happiness'.
Ahlam Souidi, who runs Freedom From Torture's Women Together group for survivors, which includes Gulan, said of the women: 'They identify as victims – not criminals – and they believe it is essential that they are supported in rebuilding their lives, not punished and victimised for a second time.
'They urge us to consider the reality of their situations – what would you do if you were in their shoes?
'These are the realities that must be acknowledged and addressed with urgency. '
A Home Office spokesman said the upcoming law will secure Britain's borders by strengthening law enforcement's ability to identify, disrupt and prevent organised immigration crime faster and more effectively.
'The endangerment offence in the Bill is targeted solely at those individuals who put the safety and lives of others at risk during dangerous Channel crossings, something that no responsible parent would ever do to their child,' the spokesman added.
'As normal, prosecutors will look at all factors when considering a case.'