High-cost loans, Trump turmoil hurting Africa, says G20 panel chief
Critically needed economic growth in Africa is being held back by high borrowing costs imposed by international lenders, with unpredictable US policy changes adding to the strain, the head of the G20 panel on the continent said.
Seasoned politician and anti-apartheid activist Trevor Manuel chairs the panel of experts working on proposals to address issues affecting Africa, including high debt, to be presented at a summit of the Group of 20 leading economies in November.
African nations are not necessarily more indebted than major economies but they face higher debt servicing costs, Manuel told AFP in an interview.
The "unbelievably expensive and prohibitive" cost of capital for African nations has hobbled their development, said Manuel, who served as finance minister in post-apartheid South Africa for more than a decade.
"We know that the risk premiums in general on Africa are much higher than they need to be, and that impacts them on the debt service costs," he added.
More than half of Africa's 1.3 billion people live in countries with debt interest payments higher than social spending on health, education and infrastructure, according to the South African government.
South Africa is the only African nation in the G20 and has made debt sustainability for developing countries one of the priorities of its presidency of the group of 19 countries, the African Union and European Union.
African countries will pay close to $89 billion in external debt service alone this year, with 20 low-income countries at risk of debt distress, it says.
Manuel said the panel will seek to persuade the entire G20 to engage with multilateral development banks, in particular the World Bank and International Monetary Fund, to address the issue of borrowing costs.
- 'Unbelievably difficult' -
Abrupt changes in global order since US President Donald Trump took office in January, such as sweeping aid cuts and trade tariffs, will have long-lasting ramifications for the continent, Manuel said.
Trump's "capricious" announcement in April of major trade tariffs effectively did away with the African Growth and Opportunity Act, a major US-African trade deal that had helped to build some African economies, he said.
He cited as examples the tiny kingdom of Lesotho, which faces 50 percent tariffs on exports to the United States, including jeans and golf shirts, and Madagascar, which sends vanilla pods and is threatened with 47 percent tariffs.
"It becomes unbelievably difficult for small countries that try and develop export markets, for their products to be struck by these sudden announcements," Manuel said. "There's no time for adjustment."
Adding to the pressure is the termination of USAID programmes and a push for NATO countries to increase defence spending, which restricts what they have available for overseas development assistance.
"The impact on the African continent is going to be very severe," said Manuel. "We can't abstract Africa from the rest of the globe."
"The realm of policymaking requires a greater degree of predictability and certainty than what we see at the moment," he said.
"The fact that there are these occasional outbursts that aren't informed by reality as I see it... makes it even more complex."
- Intra-Africa -
Manuel said his panel's work on better understanding the African economy and developing solutions was likely to continue beyond this year's G20, for example, via the UN Economic Commission for Africa and the African Union.
This included looking at "intra-African dynamics" such as the role of the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) launched in 2019.
Conflicts also cost the continent, he said, citing the war in Sudan and unrest that has held back a major gas project in impoverished northern Mozambique.
"When countries spend more on war than what they do on the upliftment of people, then we face profound consequences," Manuel said.
He said a strong United Nations and African Union were important in "persuading countries to do the right things" in the long term, beyond the sometimes disruptive short electoral cycles that usher in new leadership and policy changes.
"If you don't have those kinds of objectives, which frequently will not be completed within a particular electoral cycle, I think we run ourselves into the ground."
br/ho/rl/cms
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
21 minutes ago
- New York Post
Tesla shares jump 5% after all-out Trump-Musk feud wipes out $150B market value
Tesla shares jumped more than 5% Friday — a day after an all-out feud between CEO Elon Musk and President Trump tanked the stock and wiped out $152 billion in market value. Investors were hopeful for signs that the two might reconcile after Tesla suffered its worst single-day drop in more than four years, though Trump said Friday he has no interest in speaking with his former top ally. 'You mean the man who has lost his mind?' Trump told ABC News when asked about the possibility that the pair would speak on a call. 3 President Trump and Elon Musk speak in the Oval Office before leaving the White House in March. AFP via Getty Images Musk, the world's richest person, lost about $27 billion on Thursday as he taunted Trump, saying he wouldn't have won the election without his help. The president fired back by threatening to kill his companies' government contracts. Despite Thursday financial hit, the Tesla and SpaceX boss remains the richest person in the world with a net worth of $395.8 billion, according to Forbes. Tesla short sellers, meanwhile, reaped $4 billion in profits Thursday in one of their largest single-day gains ever, according to estimates from S3 Partners. So far this year, investors have made $7 billion betting against the carmaker. Tesla is currently the second most shorted stock in the US by total value of the position. 'Musk needs Trump and Trump needs Musk for many reasons and these two becoming friends again will be a huge relief for Tesla shares,' Wedbush Securities analyst Dan Ives wrote in a note Friday morning. Musk's attacks on Thursday took aim at the Trump-backed spending bill that narrowly passed through the House and awaits Senate approval. The tax package would end EV tax credits worth as much as $7,500 for buyers – threatening to dock Tesla's annual profit by $1.2 billion, JPMorgan analysts said Thursday. 3 Trump and Musk have been in the middle of an all-out feud. AFP via Getty Images It would also impose a new annual $250 fee on EV drivers. Meanwhile, the Senate recently moved to block California's EV sales mandates, which could slice another $2 billion off Tesla's sales, according to JPMorgan. Those measures combined threaten to erase about half of the more than $6 billion in earnings before interest and taxes that Tesla is expected to report this year, analysts led by Ryan Brinkman wrote in a report last month. 3 Musk has been taunting the president on social media. AFP via Getty Images Tesla sales have plummeted in major markets across Europe, allowing Chinese rival BYD to overtake Tesla in some countries. The brand's reputation has also taken a beating as protests broke out across the country – and some Tesla showrooms and vehicles were vandalized or set ablaze – as demonstrators decried Musk's role in slashing government spending, including funds for the Department of Education and US Agency for International Development.
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Mid-cap stocks offer 'a place to play' amid trade uncertainty
Markets (^GSPC, ^IXIC, ^DJI) remain near recent highs as investors wait on trade deal details ahead of the July truce deadline. Robinhood Markets chief investment officer, Stephanie Guild, joins Morning Brief to discuss how diversification and sector positioning could help investors navigate the uncertainty. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Morning Brief here. We're still within 200 points of the S&P 500 high at this juncture with no deals right now. I mean okay, US UK uh if if we want to count that. But at the end of the day for all of the talk that we're seeing emerge from both sides and whether that is the US and China, whether that's the US and India. We're still waiting for the details of these deals to really figure out how investors can also trade on that. So what should investors be using as their checklist as we do see some of the details come out around these deals if we do see them prior to the end of this truce period, which is up in just about a month here. July 9th. Yeah the first one anyway. Um I think there's I think there's a couple of things. One is that whenever I hear like I think a good barometer has actually been listening to Treasury percent, Treasurer percent. I think he's like when he went out on Face the Nation on Sunday like some of the things he said has already started like he talked about how the deficit is not going to be as big issue and that the CBO was not taking into account, you know, some of the the tariff revenue. And then, you know, I think it was yesterday they said actually we're going to cut the deficit by 400 billion over the next 10 years. I mean, who knows what will happen over the next 10 years, but at least the plan is not to raise it. And that is good for interest rates, right? And interest rates do drive valuation. So I think that's he to me has been a good barometer because what he does say comes true. And I do think there's going to, I personally think there's going to be deals. So the way we started managing money we have a stra uh product called Robin Hood strategies and in it we've actually been um pretty diversified where we have allocations to some international equities because that's why I think like you have to have some of that diversification not just thinking about the US in this global environment because if there are deals, then those non-US investments are going to probably do well, and then you'll have some cyclical growth names do well here as well. Can we double click on the cyclical growth names and why do you think that that is potentially a better investment than the likes of continuing to double down on an Nvidia for example? I'm not saying don't do things like Nvidia, but I think markets have gotten pretty well valued, right? Like I think you know even with earnings estimates coming down, valuations are fair at best if you look out to 2026, right? They're around 20 times. In the mid-cap space for example though, you've actually seen valuations come down because you've seen earnings estimates come down, but you've actually seen like prices come down even more and they haven't rallied back. And so that's why I say like in the mid-cap space is a maybe a place to play. Um and then you end up getting you know kind of a mix of things that um of pro-cyclical things, right? And then things that are maybe a little more defensive versus I I'm still not a fan of small caps for example because it's just still too focused on there. But I also think like financials is a a place to consider um because I do think what everyone's forgotten about in the midst of tariffs is that there is this other side of the administration's policy, which is like M&A and deregulation and financials is probably a place that will benefit from that. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Migrants and ICE officers contend with heat, smog and illness after detoured South Sudan flight
WASHINGTON (AP) — Migrants placed on a deportation flight originally bound for South Sudan are now being held in a converted shipping container on a U.S. naval base in Djibouti, where the men and their guards are contending with baking hot temperatures, smoke from nearby burn pits and the looming threat of rocket attacks, the Trump administration said. Officials outlined grim conditions in court documents filed Thursday before a federal judge overseeing a lawsuit challenging Immigration and Customs Enforcement efforts to swiftly remove migrants to countries they didn't come from. Authorities landed the flight at the base in Djibouti, about 1,000 miles (1,600 kilometers) from South Sudan, more than two weeks ago after U.S. District Judge Brian E. Murphy in Boston found the Trump administration had violated his order by swiftly sending eight migrants from countries including Cuba and Vietnam to the east African nation. The judge said that men from other countries must have a real chance to raise fears about dangers they could face in South Sudan. The men's lawyers, though, have still not been able to talk to them, said Robyn Barnard, senior director of refugee advocacy at Human Rights First, whose stated mission is to ensure the United States is a global leader on human rights. Barnard spoke Friday at a hearing of Democratic members of Congress and said some family members of the men had been able to talk to them Thursday. The migrants have been previously convicted of serious crimes in the U.S., and President Donald Trump's administration has said that it was unable to return them quickly to their home countries. The Justice Department has also appealed to the Supreme Court to immediately intervene and allow swift deportations to third countries to resume. The case comes amid a sweeping immigration crackdown by the Republican administration, which has pledged to deport millions of people who are living in the United States illegally. The legal fight became another flashpoint as the administration rails against judges whose rulings have slowed the president's policies. The Trump administration said the converted conference room in the shipping container is the only viable place to house the men on the base in Djibouti, where outdoor daily temperatures rise above 100 degrees Fahrenheit (38 degrees Celsius), according to the declaration from an ICE official. Nearby burn pits are used to dispose of trash and human waste, and the smog cloud makes it hard to breathe, sickening both ICE officers guarding the men and the detainees, the documents state. They don't have access to all the medication they need to protect against infection, and the ICE officers were unable to complete anti-malarial treatment before landing, an ICE official said. 'It is unknown how long the medical supply will last,' Mellissa B. Harper, acting executive deputy associate director of enforcement and removal operations, said in the declaration. The group also lacks protective gear in case of a rocket attack from terrorist groups in Yemen, a risk outlined by the Department of Defense, the documents state. ___ Associated Press writer Rebecca Santana contributed to this story.