logo
Survey: Majority polled think Najib should not be pardoned

Survey: Majority polled think Najib should not be pardoned

Yahoo09-05-2025

KUALA LUMPUR, May 9 — More than half of respondents in a survey on Malaysians' views about the criminal justice system said they oppose the pardon plea by former prime minister Datuk Seri Najib Abdul Razak.
The survey, conducted by Merdeka Center and commissioned by Projek Sama, a civil society group consisting mostly of academics, polled over 1,200 Malaysians between March and April this year.
Respondents were asked four primary questions, one of which specifically addressed their opinion on Najib's pardon. Only a third supported the plea, while over half opposed it, citing feelings of betrayal.
'Overall, 32.7 per cent of respondents supported his pardon plea on the grounds that he has contributed to the country, while 57.8 per cent believed that Najib should not be pardoned for various reasons,' the group said in a statement.
Among those who opposed the pardon, slightly over a third said their objection stemmed from the belief that Najib's scandal was a betrayal of the people and caused significant losses.
Another 15 per cent cited pending cases as their reason for opposing the former prime minister's pardon, while 8.1 per cent pointed to Najib's refusal to admit guilt despite his conviction.
Najib is currently seeking to serve his remaining sentence at home, even as he continues to face trials for multiple corruption and criminal breach of trust charges related to the 1MDB scandal.
Across ethnic backgrounds, Najib's pardon bid enjoyed the strongest support from Indian respondents at 62.2 per cent, followed by Muslim Bumiputeras at 50.5 per cent and Malays at 43 per cent.
Among ethnic Chinese, 95 per cent rejected his plea, while 51 per cent of Bumiputeras of other faiths also opposed it.
Across political leanings, unsurprisingly, Najib enjoyed the highest support from Barisan Nasional (BN) supporters, at 67 per cent.
Among Pakatan Harapan (PH) supporters, 87 per cent said they opposed Najib's pardon.
The Perikatan Nasional (PN) camp was evenly divided, with 46.1 per cent supporting the pardon bid and 44.6 per cent opposing it.
Among supporters of Gabungan Parti Sarawak (GPS), Gabungan Rakyat Sabah (GRS), and Warisan, slightly over half of respondents opposed the pardon, while 39.2 per cent were in favour.
The survey also found that opposition to Najib's pardon was markedly higher among urban dwellers at 63.6 per cent. However, those with household incomes below RM4,000 were mostly supportive.
Projek Sama said the survey was commissioned to commemorate May 9, the date marking the fall of the BN government led by Najib, driven by public anger over a consumption tax blamed for the soaring cost of living and the 1MDB scandal.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Snakes on a plane: Indian smuggler caught with venomous vipers
Snakes on a plane: Indian smuggler caught with venomous vipers

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Snakes on a plane: Indian smuggler caught with venomous vipers

A passenger smuggling dozens of venomous vipers was stopped after flying into the financial capital Mumbai from Thailand, Indian customs officials said. The snakes, which included 44 Indonesian pit vipers, had the snakes "concealed in checked-in baggage", Mumbai Customs said in a statement late Sunday. "An Indian national arriving from Thailand was arrested," it added. The passenger, details of whom were not released, also had three Spider-tailed horned vipers -- which are venomous, but usually only target small prey such as birds -- as well as five Asian leaf turtles. Mumbai Customs issued photographs of the seized snakes, including blue and yellow reptiles squirming in a bucket. The snakes are a relatively unusual seizure in Mumbai, with customs officers more regularly posting pictures of hauls of smuggled gold, cash, cannabis or pills of suspected cocaine swallowed by passengers. However, in February, customs officials at Mumbai airport also stopped a smuggler with five Siamang gibbons, a small ape native to the forests of Indonesia, Malaysia, and Thailand. Those small creatures, listed as endangered by the International Union for Conservation of Nature, were "ingeniously concealed" in a plastic crate placed inside the passenger's trolley bag, customs officers said. In November, customs officers seized a passenger carrying a wriggling live cargo of 12 turtles, and a month before, four hornbill birds, all on planes arriving from Thailand. In September, two passengers were arrested with five juvenile caimans, a reptile in the alligator family. bur-pjm/rsc

Indian MPs express concern over terror attack in Boulder, Colorado; Shashi Tharoor says ‘terror has no place'
Indian MPs express concern over terror attack in Boulder, Colorado; Shashi Tharoor says ‘terror has no place'

Business Upturn

time3 hours ago

  • Business Upturn

Indian MPs express concern over terror attack in Boulder, Colorado; Shashi Tharoor says ‘terror has no place'

By News Desk Published on June 2, 2025, 08:32 IST Members of the Indian MPs' delegation have expressed concern over the recent terror attack in Boulder, Colorado, which occurred on Monday. Senior Congress leader and Member of Parliament Shashi Tharoor posted on social media that the delegation learned about the incident 'with concern' and expressed relief that there was no loss of life reported in the attack. 'Members of the Indian MPs' delegation learned with concern about the terror attack in Boulder, Colorado today. We are relieved there was no loss of life,' Tharoor wrote on X (formerly Twitter). He further added that the Indian delegation stands in agreement with US Secretary of State Marco Rubio's view that 'terror has no place' in either country. 'We all share Secy of State @SecRubio's view that 'terror has no place' in our countries,' Tharoor added. The Boulder incident has drawn swift condemnation, though US authorities are still investigating the full details of the attack. Indian leaders have consistently expressed solidarity with the US on counter-terrorism efforts, and today's statement reinforces this shared stance. News desk at

Hey chatbot, is this true? AI 'factchecks' sow misinformation
Hey chatbot, is this true? AI 'factchecks' sow misinformation

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Hey chatbot, is this true? AI 'factchecks' sow misinformation

As misinformation exploded during India's four-day conflict with Pakistan, social media users turned to an AI chatbot for verification -- only to encounter more falsehoods, underscoring its unreliability as a fact-checking tool. With tech platforms reducing human fact-checkers, users are increasingly relying on AI-powered chatbots -- including xAI's Grok, OpenAI's ChatGPT, and Google's Gemini -- in search of reliable information. "Hey @Grok, is this true?" has become a common query on Elon Musk's platform X, where the AI assistant is built in, reflecting the growing trend of seeking instant debunks on social media. But the responses are often themselves riddled with misinformation. Grok -- now under renewed scrutiny for inserting "white genocide," a far-right conspiracy theory, into unrelated queries -- wrongly identified old video footage from Sudan's Khartoum airport as a missile strike on Pakistan's Nur Khan airbase during the country's recent conflict with India. Unrelated footage of a building on fire in Nepal was misidentified as "likely" showing Pakistan's military response to Indian strikes. "The growing reliance on Grok as a fact-checker comes as X and other major tech companies have scaled back investments in human fact-checkers," McKenzie Sadeghi, a researcher with the disinformation watchdog NewsGuard, told AFP. "Our research has repeatedly found that AI chatbots are not reliable sources for news and information, particularly when it comes to breaking news," she warned. - 'Fabricated' - NewsGuard's research found that 10 leading chatbots were prone to repeating falsehoods, including Russian disinformation narratives and false or misleading claims related to the recent Australian election. In a recent study of eight AI search tools, the Tow Center for Digital Journalism at Columbia University found that chatbots were "generally bad at declining to answer questions they couldn't answer accurately, offering incorrect or speculative answers instead." When AFP fact-checkers in Uruguay asked Gemini about an AI-generated image of a woman, it not only confirmed its authenticity but fabricated details about her identity and where the image was likely taken. Grok recently labeled a purported video of a giant anaconda swimming in the Amazon River as "genuine," even citing credible-sounding scientific expeditions to support its false claim. In reality, the video was AI-generated, AFP fact-checkers in Latin America reported, noting that many users cited Grok's assessment as evidence the clip was real. Such findings have raised concerns as surveys show that online users are increasingly shifting from traditional search engines to AI chatbots for information gathering and verification. The shift also comes as Meta announced earlier this year it was ending its third-party fact-checking program in the United States, turning over the task of debunking falsehoods to ordinary users under a model known as "Community Notes," popularized by X. Researchers have repeatedly questioned the effectiveness of "Community Notes" in combating falsehoods. - 'Biased answers' - Human fact-checking has long been a flashpoint in a hyperpolarized political climate, particularly in the United States, where conservative advocates maintain it suppresses free speech and censors right-wing content -- something professional fact-checkers vehemently reject. AFP currently works in 26 languages with Facebook's fact-checking program, including in Asia, Latin America, and the European Union. The quality and accuracy of AI chatbots can vary, depending on how they are trained and programmed, prompting concerns that their output may be subject to political influence or control. Musk's xAI recently blamed an "unauthorized modification" for causing Grok to generate unsolicited posts referencing "white genocide" in South Africa. When AI expert David Caswell asked Grok who might have modified its system prompt, the chatbot named Musk as the "most likely" culprit. Musk, the South African-born billionaire backer of President Donald Trump, has previously peddled the unfounded claim that South Africa's leaders were "openly pushing for genocide" of white people. "We have seen the way AI assistants can either fabricate results or give biased answers after human coders specifically change their instructions," Angie Holan, director of the International Fact-Checking Network, told AFP. "I am especially concerned about the way Grok has mishandled requests concerning very sensitive matters after receiving instructions to provide pre-authorized answers." burs-ac/nl

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store