MPs vote to decriminalise abortion in biggest change to reproductive rights in decades
MPs have voted to decriminalise abortion in a historic step that will usher in the most far-reaching change to reproductive rights in decades.
After an emotional and impassioned debate in the House of Commons, MPs voted by 379 to 137 in favour of decriminalising abortion in England and Wales.
The reform is designed to ensure women cannot be prosecuted for terminating their own pregnancy at any stage.
In recent years there has been a rise in calls for law reform, coinciding with a growing number of prosecutions of women accused of undergoing illegal abortions.
During the debate, MPs had argued that the UK's "Victorian" abortion law was "increasingly used against vulnerable women and girls".
But the move faced stiff opposition from the justice secretary Shabana Mahmood who described proposed reforms as "extreme".
Under the current law, abortion in England and Wales is a criminal offence but is legal up to 24 weeks, with the sign off from two doctors.
It is also allowed under limited circumstances after this time, including when the mother's life is at risk.
Women can also be prescribed medication to end a pregnancy at home if they are less than 10 weeks pregnant.
The issue hit the headlines in recent months with high-profile cases such as those of Nicola Packer and Carla Foster.
Ms Packer was cleared by a jury last month after she took prescribed abortion medicine at around 26 weeks pregnant, beyond the legal 10-week limit.
During her trial, more than four years after the police investigation began, she told jurors that she did not realise she had been more than 10 weeks pregnant.
The case of Ms Foster, jailed in 2023 for illegally obtaining abortion tablets to end her pregnancy when she was between 32 and 34 weeks pregnant, eventually saw her sentence reduced by the Court of Appeal and suspended, after a senior judge said that sending women to prison for abortion-related offences was "unlikely" to be a "just outcome".
Labour MP Tonia Antoniazzi said police had investigated more than 100 women for suspected illegal abortions in the past five years "including women who've suffered natural miscarriages and stillbirths".
In the Commons she told MPs: "Each one of these cases is a travesty, enabled by our outdated abortion law.
"Originally passed by an all-male parliament elected by men alone, this Victorian law is increasingly used against vulnerable women and girls."
Labour MP Lizzi Collinge told MPs that 88 per cent of abortions happen before nine weeks and that the change would protect women from 'brutal investigations', which she described as 'intrusive'.
But Conservative MP and Father of the House Sir Edward Leigh described the reforms as "not pro-woman" and argued they "would introduce sex-selective abortion".
And DUP MP Carla Lockhart insisted "both lives matter", saying the changes "would be bad for both women and unborn children".
The latest attempt to change the law follows repeated calls to repeal sections of the 19th-century law, the 1861 Offences Against the Person Act, after abortion was decriminalised in Northern Ireland in 2019.
MPs had due to debate similar amendments removing the threat of prosecution against women last year, before Parliament was dissolved for the general election.
Earlier this month, a debate at Westminster Hall heard calls from pro-change campaigners that women must no longer be "dragged from hospital bed to police cell" over abortion.
But opponents of decriminalisation warned against such a "radical step".
The Society for the Protection of Unborn Children (SPUC) urged MPs to vote against both amendments, saying they would bring about "the biggest expansion of abortion since 1967".
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Western Telegraph
11 minutes ago
- Western Telegraph
UK economic growth downgraded due to tariffs and cost hikes
Rising costs are set to cause 'weak' business investment and weigh on the Government's ambitions to accelerate growth in the UK economy, the Confederation of British Industry (CBI) said. The influential trade body's latest economic forecast indicated that the UK economy is on track to grow by 1.2% this year. It had previously predicted a rise of 1.6%. It also downgraded its growth forecast for 2026 from 1.5% to 1% for the year. The CBI highlighted that the UK has seen strong growth over the start of the year, rising by 0.7% in the first three months of 2025. But it suggested underlying activity 'remains sluggish' due to persistently weak demand and gloomy sentiment among businesses. It added that higher employment costs linked to the autumn budget, including rises to national insurance contributions and the increased national minimum wage, have impacted firms. It said this has fed into higher pricing and reduced capital expenditure and hiring among many firms. Meanwhile, higher US tariffs from President Trump's administration have also created headwinds for exports to the US and hindered investment from multinational companies in the UK. It comes after Donald Trump and the Prime Minister finalised a US-UK deal intended to slash trade barriers on goods from both countries while at the G7 summit in Canada earlier this week. Louise Hellem, chief economist at the CBI, said: 'Our latest economic forecast underlines the challenges facing businesses and the wider economy as they're buffeted by domestic and global headwinds. 'The unpredictable global outlook combined with rising employment costs, gloomy business sentiment, and subdued investment intentions means it's more important than ever that government pulls all the levers it can to set the UK on a path to sustainable growth. 'With GDP (gross domestic product) set to remain modest in 2026, there is an important opportunity for the government to fire up the growth agenda in the forthcoming Industrial Strategy. 'With the cumulative burden of increased costs being felt by firms across the economy, it is vital the Industrial Strategy helps drive a thriving environment for all businesses.'
Telegraph
15 minutes ago
- Telegraph
The grooming gangs report exposes the moral cowardice of officialdom
SIR – Now we know who has paid the price for multiculturalism: the white girls exploited by grooming gangs, whose pleas for help went unheeded by those who feared being viewed as racist (report, June 17). The refusal to face reality must be rooted out of the police, local and national politics, and all elements of officialdom. The multicultural experiment has been disastrous, allowing the maintenance of distinct, sometimes alien, cultures and parallel societies. It should be abandoned in favour of integration, requiring the acceptance of core British values: free speech and the rule of law. John Hicks Manchester SIR – Nick Timothy (Commentary, June 17) is right to describe these crimes as 'racially and religiously aggravated rape'. Just as officials were unwilling to register the ethnicity of the perpetrators because they feared being seen as racist, so they continue to refer to 'Asian men' instead of making clear that this behaviour reflected an extreme form of Islam that treats women as inferior and despises those who do not follow the religion. Annabel Burton Cheltenham, Gloucestershire SIR – When I became the police and crime commissioner of the Thames Valley in 2013, the excellent chief constable, Sara Thornton, had initiated a criminal investigation into essentially Pakistani grooming gangs in Banbury and Oxford. The push-back from social services was extraordinary. But despite the lack of cooperation by the very services that should have been protecting the underage girls, the prosecutions were successful, and heavy sentences resulted. It was clear that, if this was happening in Thames Valley, it would also be going on in conurbations in the Midlands and the North. Again there was a push-back against this suggestion. Dame Louise Casey, who visited me, understands this. The fact that not a single major grooming gang prosecution has taken place in London also needs some explaining. Anthony Stansfeld Kintbury, Berkshire SIR – After my retirement more than a decade ago, I did some voluntary work at our local library. In a quiet period I found a book called Girl A, by Anonymous. I took it out. I found that I could not read more than one chapter per day. It was the first published account of child rape gangs written by one of the victims. It should be compulsory reading for all politicians and other authorities who will now be called on to address this issue without the suppression of inconvenient truths. Howard Phillips London SW20
Daily Mail
21 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Record number of cyclists report drivers passing too close after major Highway Code rule change in 2022
The number of cyclists complaining to police about being overtaken too closely by drivers has reached record levels after a major change to the Highway Code three years ago. The new rule implemented from 29 January 2022 requires motorists to leave 'at least 1.5 metres' of space when passing cyclists at speeds up to 30mph. This was part of a wider - and highly contentious - overhaul of the Highway Code to better protect vulnerable road users, which included increased rights for cyclists to ride in groups, have priority at roundabouts and position themselves in the middle of lanes on safety grounds. Since the rules were imposed, submissions of video footage of cars, vans, coaches and other heavy vehicles overtaking within dangerous proximity to riders have more than doubled, an investigation has revealed. Some 15,779 clips of 'incidents' were submitted to forces in England and Wales last year, information obtained by IAM RoadSmart found. That is more than double the total of 7,249 in 2021. When the road safety charity polled drivers about the correct passing distance, almost three in five didn't know the legal minimum requirement under the 2022 rules. The Highway Code states that drivers should leave at least 1.5 metres - or 4.9 feet - of space when overtaking a cyclist at speeds of up to 30mph, with a larger gap at higher speeds. This is to allow for cyclists to safely move away from the kerbside to avoid potholes or debris on the road. But despite the rule change, cyclists have submitted an increasing number of clips of dangerously close overtakes captured on helmet cams and worn recording devices. These basic cameras typically cost around £50. IAM RoadSmart contacted all 43 police forces in England and Wales asking how many pieces of footage showing a close pass of a cyclist by a motorist were submitted as part of Operation Snap, an initiative introduced in 2017. Twenty forces provided data following the Freedom of Information request. The responses show the percentage of reports leading to a notice of intended prosecution being served rose from 38 per cent in 2021 to 54 per cent last year. Cyclist are able to submit footage of dangerous overtakes captured on their helmet cams. These typically cost from around £50 and are used by riders to protect themselves from motorists who don't give them right of way 50 major changes were introduced to the Highway Code in 2022 - many of them giving priority to cyclists over motor vehicles Avon and Somerset Police received the most complaints about close passes, with 3,501 people submitting footage of incidents last year. However, it was Bedfordshire Police that had the highest prosecution rate in 2024. A staggering 90 per cent of all reports resulted in a Notice of Intended Prosecution, it said. It was followed closely by Avon and Somerset Constabulary and Cambridgeshire Constabulary. Drivers found guilty of passing too closely can be charged with careless or dangerous driving, which could result in an unlimited fine, disqualification, or imprisonment. Despite the penalty risk, a separate survey of 655 licence holders indicated that most people are not up to scratch on the Highway Code. Some 58 per cent admitted they were not aware that the legal minimum gap when passing cyclists is now 1.5 metres. A third reported that they often see other drivers or motorcyclists performing what they would consider a 'close pass' and almost a fifth (17 per cent) frequently witness other vehicle users overtaking cyclists on blind bends, risking their own lives as well as others. IAM RoadSmart polled over 600 drivers about the distance they must give cyclists when overtaking. Almost three in five didn't know the legal minimum requirement Harriet Hernando, the charity's active travel spokesperson, said: 'It is extremely concerning that more than half of motorists don't know how much space to give a cyclist when overtaking. 'Passing too closely to a cyclist can be intimidating and dangerous, especially if they need to move out to avoid a pothole. 'It is small wonder then that record numbers of cyclists are installing cameras and submitting footage of dangerous or careless drivers to the police. 'While it is heartening to see that prosecution rates have increased, it would be better if it didn't reach that stage and motorists weren't doing it in the first place.' Drivers found guilty of passing too closely can be charged with careless or dangerous driving, which could result in an unlimited fine, disqualification, or imprisonment Provisional Department for Transport figures show 85 cyclists were killed on Britain's roads in 2024. Between 2019 and 2023, most cyclist fatalities occurred in collisions involving a car. Duncan Dollimore, head of campaigns at Cycling UK, reacted to the news of increased reporting of drivers passing cyclists too closely, saying the Highway Code changes introduced in 2022 have 'not seen the big safety impact we'd hoped for'. He added: 'The majority of people who drive simply aren't aware how much distance to give to people who cycle when overtaking. 'This is why it's crucial to educate all road users of their responsibility to protect those most vulnerable.' He called on the Government to 'address this oversight by better promoting the new Highway Code. The January 2022 changes to the road user's handbook also made clear that motorists need to give additional space to horse riders when overtaking. The minimum gap is 2 metres - or 6.5 feet - when passing people riding horses or using horse-drawn vehicles at speeds under 10mph. The same safe distance applies when passing pedestrians - particularly ramblers - walking in the road when there is no footpath available. Highway Code rule changes introduced in 2022 to give cyclists more priority Changes to the Highway Code to reflect the safe overtaking distance when motorists pass cyclists was not the only major overhaul to the rules to benefit cyclists. Of the 50 significant changes introduced on 27 January 2022, there are a further six rules updates to protect those pedalling. 1. Cyclists can ride in the middle of a lane (even if there is a cycle lane) The Highway Code says cyclists can ride in the centre of their lane on quieter roads, in slower-moving traffic and at the approach to junctions or road narrowings. When travelling along more congested roads with faster moving vehicles, cyclists should keep at least half a metre (just over 1.5 feet) away from the kerb edge - and can ride even closer to the middle of a lane where it is 'safer to do so'. These rules apply even when there is a cycle lane available, with the Highway Code stating that cyclists are not obliged to use the dedicated lanes it if they prefer not to. Cyclists are within their right to cycle two-abreast in a single lane. The 2022 Highway Code encourages this for large groups of riders, like the one pictured 2. Groups of cyclists encouraged to ride two-abreast Cyclists riding in groups need to be 'considerate of the needs of other road users' but can legally ride two abreast in a lane. In fact, the Highway Code's wording encourages this in particular scenarios, such as in larger groups, or when accompanying children or less experienced riders. That said, when a vehicle is approaching from behind, groups of cyclists are told they have a duty to allow a driver to overtake, for example by reverting to single file or stopping. In slow-moving traffic, cyclists are permitted to pass vehicles on the left or the right, whichever they choose 3. Cyclists can overtake on the left or right in traffic The Highway Code update in 2022 included provisions for cyclist to pass vehicles in slow-moving or stationary traffic both on the right and the left. However, it does urge particular caution to cyclists when passing (particularly on the left where drivers might not be expecting them to be) on the approach to junctions and especially when passing lorries and large vehicles that may not have seen them and are a major injury risk. 4. Cyclists have priority when going straight on at junctions The code recommends that people cycling should act like any other vehicle when dealing with junctions where there are no specific cyclist facilities in place. This includes positioning themselves in the centre of their chosen lane where they feel able to do this safely. This should make them more visible to drivers and prevent traffic overtaking them when they're trying to turn. The code update in 2022 also clarified that when people cycling are going straight ahead at a junction, they have priority over traffic waiting to turn into or out of a side road, unless road signs or markings indicate otherwise. People cycling are asked to watch out for motorists intending to turn across their path, as people driving ahead may not be able to see them. 5. Motorbike riders need to give priority to cyclists at roundabouts The Highway Code clarifies that anyone driving or riding a motorcycle should give priority to people cycling on roundabouts, meaning they should not attempt to overtake them in the lane they're travelling in and should allow cyclists to move across their path as they travel around the roundabout. And while cyclists and horse riders were already allowed to use the left-hand lane of a roundabout no matter which exit they were taking, additional guidance introduced in 2002 states that drivers have to take 'extra care' when entering a roundabout to make sure they do not cut across these road users. Drivers and told to use the 'Dutch Reach' technique when exiting vehicles on the roadside in a bid to prevent collisions with cyclists 6. Drivers and passengers to use 'Dutch Reach' technique when exciting cars The code recommends motorists and their passengers exit vehicles using a technique called the 'Dutch Reach'. Where drivers or passengers in a vehicle are able to do so, they should open the door using their hand on the opposite side to the door they are opening. For example, using their left hand to open a door on their right-hand side. This will physically force them to turn their head to look over their shoulder behind them, which means they are more likely to spot people about to cycle past their door. The code also says that cyclists should leave a door's width - or one metre - when passing a parked car to avoid being hit if a passenger or driver swings it open.
