What is EPIC City? Why is Muslim-centered planned community around Texas mosque making headlines?
A Muslim-centered planned community around one of the Texas' largest mosques near Dallas has been making headlines after Senator revealed that the U.S. Department of Justice opened a federal civil rights investigation into it. Texas Governor Greg Abbott stated that construction related to "
EPIC City
" has been halted.
What is EPIC City?
EPIC City refers to East Plano Islamic Center. EPIC City would be near the community of Josephine, about 30 miles (48 kilometers) northeast of Dallas.
Plans for the mixed-used development include more than 1,000 homes and apartments, a faith-based school for kindergarten through 12th grade, a community college, assisted living for older residents and athletics fields.
What is EPIC City Controversy?
Cornyn requested the federal probe of the development last month, citing concerns it could discriminate against Christians and Jews. He announced in a post on X that U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi had notified him of the investigation.
Live Events
The developers of the proposed planned community tied to the East Plano Islamic Center, which has not yet been built, have said they are being bullied because they are Muslim.
The Council on American-Islamic Relations in the Dallas area also has criticized the state probes as bullying the Muslim community and a violation of constitutionally protected religious expression.
Abbott has posted about the development at least 11 times in recent weeks. He suggested the developers may have violated fair housing and financial laws, and accused the Islamic center of conducting illegal funerals.
The governor ordered multiple overlapping investigations. Not to be outdone, the state's conservative attorney general, Ken Paxton, added his own criminal inquiry.
FAQs
Q1. What is EPIC City?
A1. EPIC City refers to East Plano Islamic Center.
Q2. Where is EPIC City supposed to come up?
A2. EPIC City is supposed to come up in Texas.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India.com
2 hours ago
- India.com
The Third Eye: Envisioning India's National Security Policy
When Prime Minister Modi briefly addressed the nation in the wake of Operation Sindoor, on May 12, he laid down some postulates that could be deemed to be a part of the country's national security policy. Many strategic analysts had been advocating for a formal declaration of National Security Policy (NSP) little realising that the release of any of its details in public domain could benefit the opponent and also that such a policy might require revisiting because of the changes in geopolitical scenario affecting the international spectrum of friends and adversaries. Prime Minister Modi's statement that any further terror attack from Pakistan will be considered as an 'act of war' and responded to by our defence forces accordingly, certainly was an immutable part of our security doctrine that matched with India's call for 'zero tolerance towards terrorism of all kinds', made from all international platforms. We may attempt to visualise the lasting paradigms of foreign and internal policies that would constitute our NSP even when we choose not to release any such formal document. When the Cold War ended at the beginning of the 90s, countries -big and small -sensed relief from the tension that existed between the two superpowers and felt free to assert their place under the sun. It is no wonder therefore, that the post-Cold War era became an era of 'proxy wars' marked by a sudden rise in insurgencies, separatist movements and cross-border militancy- their number touching the figure of 200 according to some estimates. Meanwhile, Pakistan was given full credit by the US for the success of the anti-Soviet armed campaign- run on the war cry of Jehad- which caused the dismemberment of the USSR and ended the Cold War. What Pakistan did however, was to immediately think of replicating the success of Afghan Jehad in Kashmir and sent in the dreaded Harkat- ul -Ansar (HUA)-a mix of radical Islamic militants including elements of Taliban, to make what turned out to be a failed attempt to 'liberate' the valley. Faith-based terrorism is now a prime threat to the democratic world as a whole and it is good that both the US and Russia are against Islamic terror- the latter witnessed a terror attack on a concert hall in Moscow by ISIS-K, the competitor of Al Qaeda originating from Iraq-Syria region during the US-led 'war on terror'. The attack carried out in March 2024 by a group of four terrorists armed with automatic rifles resulted in the killing of 145 persons including many children and injuries to 500 others. Terrorism will remain a prime threat to India and our NSP rightly puts it on top of the security agenda. India's experience with Non-Aligned Movement during the Cold War years was a mixed bag. India apparently tilted towards one side in the combative ideological battle of the two superpowers- between International Communism propounded by the Soviet Union and Capitalism with free market practised by the US leading the West. Post-Cold War, India has come on its own on the basis of 'mixed economy' and shown the way for geopolitically remaining aligned only with friends across the international community on the basis of a mutually beneficial relationship. That India is against all military conflicts and is committed to world peace, has been clearly stated by Prime Minister Modi as a policy approach and this should serve India well in the long term. This stand goes with a conscious effort to make India economically strong and self-sufficient in defence and it is a matter of great satisfaction that Prime Minister Modi was personally taking initiatives on both fronts. The policy of inviting foreign investment in the defence sector on the condition that technology will be shared and production in India will be encouraged, is to be treated as a part of our security mandate. Foreign policy of India favours bilateral friendships in a multipolar world order and this has enabled the country to appropriately respond to military conflicts witnessed in many parts of the world. India has to be prepared to deal with the two adversaries on its borders acting in concert against this country. India's national security policy has to reckon with the threat posed by the Sino-Pak axis- particularly in Kashmir as was evident during the post-Pahalgam military confrontation between India and Pakistan. Indo-US friendship can be sustained by the shared opposition to 'Islamic terrorism' and also by the American firm support to India against any hostile acts of China. It should be indicated by India that its active participation in the Quad needed to be reciprocated by the US in preventing any Chinese aggressiveness in the Indian Ocean. Trump administration must look upon the Pak-Afghan belt as a festering ground for Islamic terrorism and India must continue to educate the former on the situation there, Biden administration seemed to have been somewhat negligent towards this region. The US needs to be constantly reminded that Pakistan had cleverly tried to be in the good books of America while harbouring radical terrorist groups on its soil, despite the fact that Islamic radicals regarded US as their prime enemy. At the same time Pakistan had brought about a settlement between the Taliban Emirate and China. American policymakers should take notice of this. The evolution of national security policy of India should be regarded as a work in progress with continuity on some fundamental points of strategic interest of India and scope for tactical adjustments depending upon geopolitical shifts and the world's economic trends. The national security policy of India would not be complete without defining the nation's approach to safeguarding its internal security, integrity and unity. A vast diverse country like India has been vulnerable to conflicts rooted in caste, creed and region and needed a set of policies that upheld fundamental rights, freedom of citizens to visit and settle down in any part of the state and access to justice. Maintenance of law and order should be strong across the length and breadth of the country and since this was a state subject the Centre's right to take note of any gross failure of a state on that front, should be further strengthened. This has become even more important in these times when the adversary can remotely instigate internal trouble by activating its 'sleeper cells' through digital media. It is heartening to note that the Union Home Minister is already working for better coordination between the central agencies and state Police forces as part of the national security policy.
Hans India
3 hours ago
- Hans India
The Third Eye: Envisioning India's national security policy
New Delhi: When Prime Minister Modi briefly addressed the nation in the wake of Operation Sindoor, on May 12, he laid down some postulates that could be deemed to be a part of the country's national security policy. Many strategic analysts had been advocating for a formal declaration of National Security Policy (NSP) little realising that the release of any of its details in public domain could benefit the opponent and also that such a policy might require revisiting because of the changes in geopolitical scenario affecting the international spectrum of friends and adversaries. Prime Minister Modi's statement that any further terror attack from Pakistan will be considered as an 'act of war' and responded to by our defence forces accordingly, certainly was an immutable part of our security doctrine that matched with India's call for 'zero tolerance towards terrorism of all kinds', made from all international platforms. We may attempt to visualise the lasting paradigms of foreign and internal policies that would constitute our NSP even when we choose not to release any such formal document. When the Cold War ended at the beginning of the 90s, countries -big and small -sensed relief from the tension that existed between the two superpowers and felt free to assert their place under the sun. It is no wonder therefore, that the post-Cold War era became an era of 'proxy wars' marked by a sudden rise in insurgencies, separatist movements and cross-border militancy- their number touching the figure of 200 according to some estimates. Meanwhile, Pakistan was given full credit by the US for the success of the anti-Soviet armed campaign- run on the war cry of Jehad- which caused the dismemberment of the USSR and ended the Cold War. What Pakistan did however, was to immediately think of replicating the success of Afghan Jehad in Kashmir and sent in the dreaded Harkat- ul -Ansar (HUA)-a mix of radical Islamic militants including elements of Taliban, to make what turned out to be a failed attempt to 'liberate' the valley. Faith-based terrorism is now a prime threat to the democratic world as a whole and it is good that both the US and Russia are against Islamic terror- the latter witnessed a terror attack on a concert hall in Moscow by ISIS-K, the competitor of Al Qaeda originating from Iraq-Syria region during the US-led 'war on terror'. The attack carried out in March 2024 by a group of four terrorists armed with automatic rifles resulted in the killing of 145 persons including many children and injuries to 500 others. Terrorism will remain a prime threat to India and our NSP rightly puts it on top of the security agenda. India's experience with Non-Aligned Movement during the Cold War years was a mixed bag. India apparently tilted towards one side in the combative ideological battle of the two superpowers- between International Communism propounded by the Soviet Union and Capitalism with free market practised by the US leading the West. Post-Cold War, India has come on its own on the basis of 'mixed economy' and shown the way for geopolitically remaining aligned only with friends across the international community on the basis of a mutually beneficial relationship. That India is against all military conflicts and is committed to world peace, has been clearly stated by Prime Minister Modi as a policy approach and this should serve India well in the long term. This stand goes with a conscious effort to make India economically strong and self-sufficient in defence and it is a matter of great satisfaction that Prime Minister Modi was personally taking initiatives on both fronts. The policy of inviting foreign investment in the defence sector on the condition that technology will be shared and production in India will be encouraged, is to be treated as a part of our security mandate. Foreign policy of India favours bilateral friendships in a multipolar world order and this has enabled the country to appropriately respond to military conflicts witnessed in many parts of the world. India has to be prepared to deal with the two adversaries on its borders acting in concert against this country. India's national security policy has to reckon with the threat posed by the Sino-Pak axis- particularly in Kashmir as was evident during the post-Pahalgam military confrontation between India and Pakistan. Indo-US friendship can be sustained by the shared opposition to 'Islamic terrorism' and also by the American firm support to India against any hostile acts of China. It should be indicated by India that its active participation in the Quad needed to be reciprocated by the US in preventing any Chinese aggressiveness in the Indian Ocean. Trump administration must look upon the Pak-Afghan belt as a festering ground for Islamic terrorism and India must continue to educate the former on the situation there, Biden administration seemed to have been somewhat negligent towards this region. The US needs to be constantly reminded that Pakistan had cleverly tried to be in the good books of America while harbouring radical terrorist groups on its soil, despite the fact that Islamic radicals regarded US as their prime enemy. At the same time Pakistan had brought about a settlement between the Taliban Emirate and China. American policymakers should take notice of this. The evolution of national security policy of India should be regarded as a work in progress with continuity on some fundamental points of strategic interest of India and scope for tactical adjustments depending upon geopolitical shifts and the world's economic trends. The national security policy of India would not be complete without defining the nation's approach to safeguarding its internal security, integrity and unity. A vast diverse country like India has been vulnerable to conflicts rooted in caste, creed and region and needed a set of policies that upheld fundamental rights, freedom of citizens to visit and settle down in any part of the state and access to justice. Maintenance of law and order should be strong across the length and breadth of the country and since this was a state subject the Centre's right to take note of any gross failure of a state on that front, should be further strengthened. This has become even more important in these times when the adversary can remotely instigate internal trouble by activating its 'sleeper cells' through digital media. It is heartening to note that the Union Home Minister is already working for better coordination between the central agencies and state Police forces as part of the national security policy. (The writer is a former Director Intelligence Bureau)
Indian Express
4 hours ago
- Indian Express
Shifting sands of Nilambur fray: Vijayan pick vs Cong stalwart's legacy vs ‘spoiler'
Nilambur is dripping in rain. It is quite a while since Kerala saw a wet election and like a well-begun monsoon gone awry, the bypoll in the Nilambur constituency seems to be turning less and less predictable. The state Assembly is into its slog overs – and this by-election wasn't meant to shake the earth, just set the tone for the coming big polls due early next year. The campaign was being watched more for its atmospherics than the outcome. The Opposition Congress-led UDF was a clear favourite here. Its candidate Aryadan Shoukath is a second-generation leader from a steadfast Congress family of this old Malabar teak town with considerable Muslim presence. His late father Aryadan Mohammad had won eight times as an MLA from here, going on to serve as a minister, and a trouble-shooter, in the erstwhile Congress-led coalition regime. Shoukath nurtured his father's formidable political legacy. As head of the Nilambur Municipality and before it was upgraded the panchayat, he caught national attention for his literacy, child welfare and health schemes. His support base includes Adivasis, who departed from custom and came down from the hills to attend his daughter's wedding in 2015. Many believed that Shoukath would have a smooth sailing in the bypoll. But what appeared to be a walkover is now looking like a contest, thanks to rival candidate M Swaraj of the ruling CPI(M). Handpicked by Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan, the choice 'cannot go wrong', say comrades. Several leaders from the CPI(M)-led LDF speak in unison for their chief, who seeks next year a third successive term, an uphill task in the shifty state. The June 19 Nilambur bypoll is no bellwether but its sheer proximity to the Assembly polls has pepped up the campaigns of the key contenders. That the CPI(M) is on overdrive is evident in the briefest of pit stops. In Pothukkallu panchayat at Kuttamkulam Kunnu, a tiny spot beyond the state highway and the Google map, Swaraj's roadshow has a ten-minute stop which cannot be better packaged. What follows could be the envy of event managers. In all of three minutes, the candidate is ceremonially ushered in by a percussion ensemble in traditional temple wear and serially garlanded by senior comrades. Next, he makes his two-minute campaign pitch and stops abruptly to direct a local talent to croon a one-minute snatch from the eternal Communist hymn for martyrdom, 'Balikuteerangale'. Within seconds, a box of sweets pops up and is emptied in no time, provoking a punchline from Swaraj: 'Ladoos are already here. We have won.' Earlier in the day, the Congress candidate's campaign looked less organised but more free flowing. At street meetings in his home turf, Shoukath slips out of his car almost unnoticed and instantly merges with clusters of voters many of whom he seems to know by first name. More than handshakes, he hugs and that gives him extra proximity to the voter ear into which he whispers. The hush-hush adds a certain mystique to the personal contact. After this, his amplified articulation from the makeshift dais is a mere formality. Shoukath is no pushover, says an insider who pauses to caution that there is a potential 'spoiler' in the fray, P V Anvar, the previous legislator whose resignation necessitated the byoll. Spurned by the state's two major fronts, the well-connected businessman-turned-politician, Anvar, contesting again as an Independent, has put up text-heavy hoardings that list in bullet points his pique and promise. Barely anyone halts to look up and read through the frozen power point presentation, though. Otherwise, it would have caused traffic snarls in this hilly terrain. A recurring presence on the winding roads is the BJP-led NDA's decked up vehicle seeking votes for its candidate Mohan George. Recorded audio plays in loop and the vehicle is empty but for the dutiful soul at the wheel. The BJP, led by state unit head Rajeev Chandrasekhar, must be keen to cross the Vindhyas, but that may not happen hurriedly across the Nilambur hills.
