
PECO factory sealed over non-payment of Rs1.9mn property tax
The Excise and Taxation Department of the Punjab government has sealed the factory premises of Pakistan Engineering Company Limited (PECO), a publicly listed company, due to non-payment of property tax amounting to Rs1.9 million.
The company disclosed the development in a notice to the Pakistan Stock Exchange (PSX) on Thursday.
'The management is actively engaging with the relevant authorities to resolve the matter and ensure restoration of access to the factory offices to avoid disruption in administrative functions,' PECO said, in its filing to the bourse.
PC initiates privatisation process of PECO
Concerning the announcement of a Right Issue by PECO made in January 2025, the company informed that it has not proceeded with the said Right Issue due to directives issued in two separate proceedings initiated by the Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan (SECP).
'The SECP has restricted PECO from proceeding with the Rights Issue, citing regulatory limitations primarily due to the company's name appearing in the CIB report in relation to an overdue liability,' it said.
PECO added that it is actively pursuing appropriate forums to clarify that the proposed Right Issue is 'aimed at addressing these very compliance concerns, and therefore, the restrictions should not apply in such a context'.
Initially established under the name of Batala Engineering Company (BECO) in 1950, PECO produced light engineering products.
Historically, the company manufactured high-quality machine tools, pumps, power looms, concrete mixers, cranes, power presses, electric motors, bicycles, steel rolled products, electricity transmission towers, structures and general fabrication.
The plant was originally set up at Badami Bagh, Lahore, spanning 34 acres, with the neighbouring area subsequently converted into the steel centre of Pakistan. Due to the rapid addition of products, the land area became inadequate for further expansion and 247 acres of land were acquired in 1960 at Kot Lakhpat industrial zone, Lahore, for relocating factory premises in the future.
After being taken over by the government in 1972 under the nationalisation reforms, it was rechristened Pakistan Engineering Company (PECO).

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Business Recorder
17 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Corporate legal framework: SECP, FJA hold first-of-its-kind training for Banking Court Judges
ISLAMABAD: The Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan (SECP), in collaboration with the Federal Judicial Academy (FJA), conducted first-of-its-kind training programme for Banking Court Judges on Pakistan's corporate legal framework. This three-day training, held at FJA from June 2–4, 2025, marked a milestone in judicial capacity building and regulatory-jurisdictional alignment. The participating judges are officially notified to preside over prosecutions initiated by SECP. This can include cases involving white-collar crime, financial fraud, regulatory violations, and offences under laws such as the Companies Act, 2017 and the Securities Act, 2015. The practical and in-depth training was delivered by SECP Commissioners, Executive Directors, and senior subject-matter experts. Sessions covered a wide spectrum of topics, from company registration, licensing regimes, and financial reporting, to capital market offences, investigative powers, and emerging regulatory challenges. The FJA has been instrumental in facilitating and curating the training to ensure it meets the judiciary's evolving professional needs. The programme culminated with a certificate distribution ceremony, with Honourable Justice Miangul Hassan Aurangzeb, Judge of the Supreme Court of Pakistan, as Chief Guest. This pioneering initiative underscores SECP's commitment to supporting judicial excellence and effective prosecution. It also sets the stage for a more informed, collaborative, and agile enforcement ecosystem — where regulators and courts work in tandem to uphold the law in an increasingly sophisticated financial environment. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025


Business Recorder
17 hours ago
- Business Recorder
SECP study outlines strategic roadmap reshaping Takaful sector
ISLAMABAD: The Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan (SECP) has published a comprehensive study titled 'Future of Takaful in Pakistan – A Diagnostic Study,' which assesses the current landscape of the Takaful sector, and outlines a strategic roadmap reshaping the Takaful sector in Pakistan. The study provides a detailed analysis of the Takaful sector's performance, market share trends, and comparison with conventional insurance, while highlighting the evolution of the regulatory framework since the introduction of Takaful in Pakistan in 2005. It also benchmarks Pakistan's Takaful sector against international markets, including Malaysia, Saudi Arabia, Sudan, and Indonesia. Despite being part of the insurance sector for nearly two decades, Takaful currently constitutes only around 12% of the total insurance contributions in Pakistan. The study identifies key challenges impeding the sector's growth, such as limited public awareness, trust deficits in governance, inadequate product positioning, human resource constraints, regulatory gaps, and limited domestic Retakaful capacity. Recognizing the broader shift toward an Islamic financial the study proposes a series of targeted policy recommendations and action points to support this transition, including regulatory reforms, awareness initiatives, and stakeholder collaboration. The report can be accessed on the SECP's official website. The SECP encourages all stakeholders — including policymakers, regulators, insurers, and Shariah governance professionals—to review the study and actively participate in the collective effort to build a vibrant, takaful ecosystem in Pakistan. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025


Business Recorder
2 days ago
- Business Recorder
Corporate board elections
Introduction: A reform that misses the mark In July 2023, the Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan (SECP) amended the Code of Corporate Governance through S.R.O. 906(I)/2023, introducing a new regulation (7A) that mandates separate, category-wise voting for director elections in listed companies. Ostensibly designed to streamline compliance with board diversity requirements—such as the presence of female and independent directors—this amendment has produced the opposite of good governance. Rather than fostering inclusion or transparency, these reforms have imposed severe procedural limitations on minority shareholders, undermining the time-tested cumulative voting method enshrined in the Companies Act, 2017. As a result, the amended framework risks institutionalizing majority dominance and relegating shareholder democracy to a symbolic formality. The case in point: an unwinnable election In 2024, a minority shareholder controlling 12.51 percent equity in a listed company prepared to contest upcoming board elections under Section 159(3) of the Companies Act. With seven board seats available and the company's free float limited to 25%, the shareholder aimed to secure one board seat —an achievable strategy under the earlier cumulative voting framework that allowed aggregation of votes to elect at least one director. However, the company's new voting process, aligned with Regulation 7A, subdivided the election into three separate categories: female, independent, and other directors. Critically, it rigidly allocated voting rights to each category based on the number of seats designated for that group. For the 'Other Directors' category — where the minority nominee had filed — this meant that a candidate needed at least 20.10 percent of the total votes to win a single seat. In a company where the controlling shareholders held over 75% of the voting power, the outcome was a foregone conclusion. Even with controlling 12.51% equity, the minority shareholder found the contest practically unwinnable. Facing a futile effort, the nominee withdrew his candidacy. The company subsequently announced that all remaining candidates stood unopposed — rendering the election process an administrative formality. The problem: a procedural lockout This episode is not an isolated event, but a clear illustration of the deeper structural flaws introduced by the 2023 reforms: — Voting power is fragmented: By dividing voting into fixed categories, Regulation 7A prevents shareholders from strategically allocating their full voting strength—effectively neutralizing minority influence. — Cumulative voting is undermined: While the Companies Act guarantees cumulative voting to empower minority blocs, the new mechanism bypasses this intent by introducing category-based segmentation, which is arguably inconsistent with Sections 159 and 166 of the Act. — Uncontested elections are now the norm: The separation of ballots makes it easier for controlling shareholders to fill reserved seats (e.g., for female or independent directors) without competition, thereby complying with the letter of the law while violating its spirit. — Independence is compromised: Directors elected with majority backing, regardless of being labeled 'independent,' are unlikely to offer meaningful dissent or oversight — defeating the very purpose of their designation. Global best practices: where Pakistan falls short Across jurisdictions, mechanisms like cumulative voting or slate-based minority representation are considered essential tools for equitable corporate governance. For example: — The OECD Principles of Corporate Governance recognize cumulative voting as a legitimate and effective way to ensure minority shareholders have a voice in the boardroom. — Italy and the UK have adopted dual-voting or slate-voting structures that guarantee at least one board seat to the non-controlling shareholders. — Saudi Arabia and China require cumulative voting in listed companies to prevent entrenchment of control. Pakistan's shift to a segmented voting framework moves away from these norms, replacing proportional representation with category-specific majoritarianism. In practical terms, this means the controlling shareholders not only dominate the board but now do so with the veneer of compliance and procedural legitimacy. Recommendations: restoring balance and credibility To preserve the integrity of corporate governance in Pakistan and re-empower minority shareholders, the following reforms should be considered: Restore cumulative voting across a unified slate: Reinstate the cumulative voting method as originally provided in the Companies Act, allowing shareholders to allocate votes freely among all candidates. Introduce reserved minority representation: Mandate at least one board seat to be filled exclusively through votes cast by non-controlling shareholders, ensuring true minority representation. Enhance transparency through vote disclosure: Require companies to disclose, in advance, the vote thresholds typically needed to win a seat under the new system. This would help shareholders make informed decisions and organize support. Strengthen oversight and post-election review: SECP should introduce a mandatory review of election results, including unopposed outcomes, to assess whether procedural reforms are delivering on their governance objectives. Conclusion: a call to rebalance power The intention behind SECP's 2023 amendment may have been noble—ensuring compliance with board diversity mandates. But in its current form, Regulation 7A disables one of the few levers minority shareholders have to assert their rights. The cumulative result is a system where even a shareholder with controlling 12.51% equity cannot credibly contest an election, and where the majority's grip on governance is quietly tightened. Pakistan must not let formalism replace fairness. Regulatory reform must advance both diversity and equity. Otherwise, shareholder participation risks becoming an illusion—legally permitted, procedurally blocked, and practically futile. It is time to revisit these reforms—not to abandon them—but to realign them with the foundational principles of transparency, inclusivity, and balance that underpin good governance worldwide. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025