logo
49-year-old Mass. woman accused of ID theft for passport, license, DOJ says

49-year-old Mass. woman accused of ID theft for passport, license, DOJ says

Yahoo03-05-2025

A woman from Lawrence was charged in federal court on Friday after being accused of using someone else's identity to obtain a passport and other government issued IDs, according to a statement from U.S. Attorney Leah B. Foley's office.
Wendy Chavez, 49, was arrested on Thursday and charged with passport fraud, aggravated identity theft and misuse of a social security number. Chavez made her initial appearance in court Thursday afternoon and a detention hearing is scheduled for May 7.
The incident happened in June 2020 when Chavez is accused of submitting a passport renewal application using another person's name, date of birth and Social Security number, Foley's office said.
The passport was issued to Chavez.
Chavez is also accused of using the same identification information to acquire 'multiple' government-issued IDs, including a Massachusetts driver's license.
If convicted of false statement in a passport application, Chavez could face up to 10 year sin prison, three years of supervised release and a $250,000 fine, the statement reads.
The charge of aggravated identity theft calls for a mandatory minimum of two years in prison to be added to the felony committed while using the means of identification of another without lawful authority.
The charge of misuse of social security number provides for a sentence of up to five years in prison, three years of supervised release and $250,000 in fines.
Mass. lawmakers eye lesser charge to deter animal cruelty
'Summer-like' warmth Saturday in Mass., storms likely, National Weather Service reports
One dead after four-car crash on Route 28 in Reading
Wareham man accused of possessing thousands of child sex abuse material, DOJ says
Trump gets put on blast for historic gaffe that disrespects 'greatest generation'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump administration asks federal court not to dismiss charges against Milwaukee County judge
Trump administration asks federal court not to dismiss charges against Milwaukee County judge

Yahoo

time37 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump administration asks federal court not to dismiss charges against Milwaukee County judge

Protesters gather outside of the Milwaukee FBI office to speak out against the arrest of Milwaukee Circuit Court Judge Hannah Dugan (Photo by Isiah Holmes/Wisconsin Examiner) Prosecutors for the Trump administration filed a brief Monday requesting that a federal judge not dismiss the government's indictment against Milwaukee County Judge Hannah Dugan. Dugan faces criminal charges after Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents, along with agents from the Drug Enforcement Agency and FBI, arrived in the Milwaukee County Courthouse April 18 to arrest 31-year-old Eduardo Flores-Ruiz for being in the country illegally. Flores-Ruiz was set to appear in Dugan's courtroom that day for a status hearing on misdemeanor charges against him. When Dugan learned that the agents were outside her courtroom, she confronted them and learned they only had an administrative warrant, which was issued by an agency official and not a judge. An administrative warrant doesn't allow agents to enter private spaces in the courthouse such as Dugan's courtroom. Later, while the agents were waiting for Flores-Ruiz in the hallway outside the main courtroom door, Dugan sent him and his attorney out a side door into the hallway. One of the agents rode down the elevator with Flores-Ruiz and he was later arrested on the street. Dugan-DOJ-Filing Dugan was charged with concealing an individual to prevent arrest, a misdemeanor, and obstruction, which is a felony. Last month, Dugan's attorneys filed a motion to dismiss the case against her, arguing she was acting in her official capacity as a judge and therefore immune from prosecution for her actions and that the federal government is impinging on the state of Wisconsin's authority to operate its court system. The case drew national attention, with Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and FBI Director Kash Patel both making public statements about Dugan's arrest before she'd even been indicted. Legal experts have questioned the strength of the federal government's case and accused Trump officials of grandstanding to make a political point. In the Monday filing, federal prosecutors argued that dismissing the case would ignore previously established law that allows judges to face criminal charges. 'Such a ruling would give state court judges carte blanche to interfere with valid law enforcement actions by federal agents in public hallways of a courthouse, and perhaps even beyond,' the prosecutors argued. 'Dugan's desired ruling would, in essence, say that judges are 'above the law,' and uniquely entitled to interfere with federal law enforcement.' Dugan is set to appear for trial on July 21. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Feds warn: Hang up on phone scammers pretending to be border patrol agents
Feds warn: Hang up on phone scammers pretending to be border patrol agents

Yahoo

time37 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Feds warn: Hang up on phone scammers pretending to be border patrol agents

June 10 (UPI) -- The U.S. Customs and Border Protection law enforcement agency, or CBP, announced Tuesday that anyone who gets a call from someone who claims to be a CBP agent asking for personal information should just hang up. The CBP reports that its employees have continually received calls about people who have gotten unsolicited calls from scammers posing as U.S. Border Patrol agents and U.S. Customs and Border Protection officers. CBP Houston Acting Director of Field Operations Rod Hudson said in a press release that "If CBP suspects illegal activity, we will not call a suspect or a victim requesting money or Social Security numbers. To be clear, CBP will not make telephone calls threatening citizens that law enforcement is on the way or promising money for information." The Department of Homeland Security and CBP state that they don't solicit money over the phone. "Anyone receiving a call from U.S. Customs and Border Protection about self-deportation, or a shipment of drugs or money should recognize that it is a scam regardless of how authentic the caller may sound," Hudson added. The people who have been contacted by scammers allege the phony CBP agents say they've received drugs with the person's name on it, and if they don't give up personal details as requested, the police will come to their residence. The phishers have also given the names and phone numbers of actual CBP employees to better falsify their identity, and in some cases the fraudulent callers provide phony badge and case numbers. Another version of the swindle involves a prerecorded message that tells the victim to press one to speak with a CBP officer or agent, upon which the scammer attempts to gain the victim's banking information. The CBP also said in the release that it will never ask for bank account or credit card numbers or Social Security information, and it never uses wire transfers, cryptocurrency or gift cards. Scammers can also call with a phone number that appears legitimate, and those who have been called should not phone those numbers back in an attempt to decipher whether a call was real but should instead find the factual information online. Anyone who would like to report such calls can contact the Federal Trade Commission online to do so.

Trump administration argues it complied with court order to return Abrego Garcia
Trump administration argues it complied with court order to return Abrego Garcia

Yahoo

time38 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump administration argues it complied with court order to return Abrego Garcia

The Trump administration complied with a court order to facilitate the return of Kilmar Abrego Garcia after he was mistakenly deported to his native El Salvador, attorneys for the Department of Justice argued in a court filing on Tuesday. The filing came in the federal case in Maryland in which U.S. District Judge Paula Xinis had ordered the government to facilitate his return to the United States. Abrego Garcia was brought back to the U.S. on Friday to face criminal charges in Tennessee, following a series of court battles in which the Trump administration repeatedly said it was unable to bring him back. MORE: Prosecutors seek pre-trial detention hearing for Abrego Garcia following his return In a court filing on Sunday, lawyers for Abrego Garcia argued that, despite his return, the Maryland court case is not over because the court continues to have a role "to ensure that [Abrego Garcia's] case is handled as it would have been had he not been improperly sent to El Salvador" -- and that the government must be "held accountable" for "its blatant, willful, and persistent violations of court orders at excruciating cost to Abrego Garcia and his family." In Tuesday's court filing, Justice Department attorneys said that "Defendants have done exactly what Plaintiffs asked for and what this Court ordered them to do: Plaintiff Abrego Garcia has been returned to the United States." The government "made diligent efforts to pull down domestic barriers preventing Abrego Garcia from entering" the U.S. and engaged in diplomatic discussions with the Salvadoran government to bring him back, Justice Department attorneys said in their request for a stay of all case deadlines. The DOJ said it intends to file a motion to dismiss the case by next week. Calling Abrego Garcia's attorneys' request to continue the case "desperate and disappointing," the filing said, "In the face of Abrego Garcia's return to the United States, they baselessly accuse Defendants of 'foot-dragging' and 'intentionally disregard[ing] this Court's and the Supreme Court's orders.'" The government argued that, prior to Abrego Garcia's return, they were unable to share information "that would have demonstrated their good faith with the court's orders" due to restrictions on state secrets and other classified material. "But the proof is in the pudding -- Defendants have returned Abrego Garcia to the United States just as they were ordered to do," the filing said. "None of Plaintiffs' hyperbolic arguments change that or justify further proceedings in this matter." Abrego Garcia, a Salvadoran native who had been living with his wife and children in Maryland, was deported in March to El Salvador's CECOT mega-prison -- despite a 2019 court order barring his deportation to that country due to fear of persecution -- after the Trump administration claimed he was a member of the criminal gang MS-13, which his family and attorneys deny. A two-count indictment unsealed Friday alleges that Abrego Garcia participated in a yearslong conspiracy to haul undocumented migrants from Texas to the interior of the country, involving the domestic transport of thousands of noncitizens from Mexico and Central America, including some children, in exchange for thousands of dollars.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store