Nicaragua exits UNESCO over press freedom award
UNESCO has announced Nicaragua is withdrawing from the UN cultural and educational body because the organisation awarded a prize celebrating press freedom to Nicaraguan newspaper, La Prensa.
UNESCO's director general, Audrey Azoulay, announced that she had received a letter on Sunday morning from the Nicaraguan government announcing its withdrawal because of the attribution of the UNESCO/Guillermo Cano World Press Freedom Prize.
"I regret this decision, which will deprive the people of Nicaragua of the benefits of cooperation, particularly in the fields of education and culture," Azoulay said in a statement.
"UNESCO is fully within its mandate when it defends freedom of expression and press freedom around the world."
🔴 The Nicaraguan newspaper @laprensa has been announced as the laureate of the UNESCO/Guillermo Cano World #PressFreedom Prize 2025, on the recommendation of an international jury of media professionals.3 May is #WorldPressFreedomDay. More: https://t.co/rWtWh1PItu pic.twitter.com/iXTYqzxLKb
— UNESCO 🏛️ #Education #Sciences #Culture 🇺🇳 (@UNESCO) May 2, 2025
Nicaragua was one of 194 member states in UNESCO.
The body's members set up the press freedom prize in 1997, and the 2025 award was attributed on Saturday to La Prensa on the recommendation of an international jury of media professionals.
"The newspaper La Prensa has made valiant efforts to bring the truth to the people of Nicaragua," President of the international jury of media professionals Yasuomi Sawa said.
"Like other civil society organisations, La Prensa has faced severe repression. Forced into exile, this newspaper bravely maintains the flame of press freedom."
La Prensa is Nicaragua's oldest newspaper and was founded in 1926.
It has confronted and survived three dictatorships, censorship, closures, attacks, the imprisonment of its journalists, and the assassination of its director, Pedro Joaquín Chamorro Cardenal, in 1978, according to the Inter American Press Association.
Authorities in Nicaragua tried to financially suffocate the newspaper by blocking the importation of paper since 2018.
It was forced to focus on digital news and suspend its print edition in August 2021 after "it was subjected to a violent police raid resulting in the confiscation of its assets, the freezing of its bank accounts, and the unjust imprisonment of its general manager," the association said.
"La Prensa has never ceased reporting for a single day. Its editorial team crossed into Costa Rica under emergency conditions and continues its work in exile today," the association said.
The awards ceremony will take place in Brussels, Belgium, on the sidelines of the World Press Freedom Conference on Wednesday.
"Each year, this prize reminds us of the importance of standing by those who protect and bring information to life," Azoulay said.
In announcing their UNESCO withdrawal, Nicaraguan authorities accused La Prensa of promoting "military and political interventions by the United States in Nicaragua" and denounced the award of the prize as the "diabolical expression of a traitorous anti-patriotic sentiment," UNESCO said.
Nicaragua's angry departure is a blow for the organisation that is also in the crosshairs of US President Donald Trump.
In an executive order in February, Trump called for a review of American involvement in UNESCO.
In his first term as president, the Trump administration in 2017 announced that the US would withdraw from UNESCO, citing anti-Israel bias.
That decision took effect a year later.
The United States formally rejoined UNESCO in 2023 after a five-year absence, under the presidency of Joe Biden.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Israel-Iran conflict: latest developments
Israel and Iran traded fire for a third straight day on Sunday, with rising casualties and expanding targets marking a sharp escalation in the conflict between the longtime adversaries. Overnight Iranian strikes killed at least ten people in Israel, adding to the growing toll in both countries since Friday when Israel launched a massive wave of attacks targeting Iranian nuclear and military facilities, sparking retaliation. The exchange of strikes is the first time the arch-enemies have traded fire with such intensity, triggering fears of a prolonged conflict that could engulf the Middle East, even as international leaders urge de-escalation. Here are the latest developments: - Deadly Iranian strikes - Iran unleashed deadly barrages of missiles at Israel overnight Saturday into Sunday, killing at least ten people, including children, and wounding around 200, according to Israeli emergency services. Air raid sirens and booms rang out in Jerusalem and Tel Aviv early Sunday as Israel's military said millions of Israelis were "running for shelter as sirens sound" in dozens of cities and communities around the country. The first wave of Israeli strikes on Iran killed 78 people and wounded 320, according to Iran's ambassador to the United Nations, but Iranian authorities had not provided an updated toll as of early Sunday. Iran also struck sites used by Israeli warplanes for refuelling, the Revolutionary Guards said early Sunday. Israel said it had also intercepted seven drones launched towards its territory, as it worked to head off attacks while carrying out further strikes on Iran. Yemen's Iran-backed Huthi rebels on Sunday said they had launched several missiles at Israel. - Israel expands targets - After targeting Iranian military and nuclear facilities, including killing top brass and scientists, Israel expanded targets to air defences and oil infrastructure. Israeli strikes hit two fuel depots in Tehran, the Iranian oil ministry said Sunday, with AFP journalists reporting seeing fire at the oil depots in Shahran northwest of the Iranian capital. On Saturday, Israel's military said it was attacking dozens of missile launchers in Iran after announcing it had targeted air defences with a wave of strikes in the Tehran area. Iranian news agency Tasnim reported early Sunday that an Israeli strike had also targeted the country's defence ministry headquarters in Tehran and damaged one of its buildings. The defence ministry did not comment. - Faltering nuclear diplomacy - Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said Sunday that Israel had "crossed a new red line" by targeting Iran's nuclear sites, after Tehran on Saturday had pledged to limit its cooperation with the UN's nuclear watchdog, criticising it for its silence over Israeli strikes. "It is entirely clear that the Israeli regime does not want any agreement on the nuclear issue. It does not want negotiations and does not seek diplomacy," Araghchi told foreign diplomats, saying the attack launched on Friday was an "attempt to undermine diplomacy and derail negotiations". The fiercest ever exchange of fire between the arch foes came amid ongoing talks between Tehran and Washington seeking to reach a deal on Iran's nuclear programme. Before the Israeli strikes, the two sides had been set to hold a sixth round of negotiations in Oman on Sunday. Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian said Saturday that Tehran would not attend nuclear talks with the United States so long as Israel kept up its attacks on the Islamic republic. Western governments have repeatedly accused Iran of seeking a nuclear weapon, which it denies. - International unease - Others states have urged restraint and warned against a larger conflict. US President Donald Trump said he and Russian President Vladimir Putin had agreed in a phone call on Saturday that the conflict between Iran and Israel "should end." But on Sunday morning, Trump issued a warning to Iran saying it would experience "the full strength" of the US military if it attacks the United States, reiterating that Washington "had nothing to do" with Israel's strikes on Tehran's nuclear and intelligence facilities. Iraq -- a close ally of Tehran, but also a strategic partner of Iran's arch-foe the United States -- has approached the Iranian and US governments in a bid to prevent being caught up in a regional escalation. burs-sw/ysm

9 hours ago
Nicaragua's former President Violeta Chamorro dies at 95, family says
SAN JOSE, Costa Rica -- Violeta Chamorro, an unassuming homemaker who was thrust into politics by her husband's assassination and stunned the world by ousting the ruling Sandinista party in presidential elections and ending Nicaragua 's civil war, has died, her family said in a statement on Saturday. She was 95. The country's first female president, known as Doña Violeta to both supporters and detractors, she presided over the Central American nation's uneasy transition to peace after nearly a decade of conflict between the Sandinista government of Daniel Ortega and U.S.-backed Contra rebels. At nearly seven years, Chamorro's was the longest single term ever served by a democratically elected Nicaraguan leader, and when it was over she handed over the presidential sash to an elected civilian successor — a relative rarity for a country with a long history of strongman rule, revolution and deep political polarization. Chamorro died in San Jose, Costa Rica, according to the family's statement shared by her son, Carlos Fernando Chamorro, on X. 'Doña Violeta died peacefully, surrounded by the affection and love of her children and those who had provided her with extraordinary care, and now she finds herself in the peace of the Lord,' the statement said. A religious ceremony was being planned in San Jose. Her remains will be held in Costa Rica 'until Nicaragua returns to being a Republic,' the statement said. In more recent years, the family had been driven into exile in Costa Rica like hundreds of thousands of other Nicaraguans fleeing the repression of Ortega. Violeta Chamorro's daughter, Cristiana Chamorro, was held under house arrest for months in Nicaragua and then convicted of money laundering and other charges as Ortega moved to clear the field of challengers as he sought reelection. The Violeta Barrios de Chamorro Foundation closed its operations in Nicaragua in January 2021, as thousands of nongovernmental organizations have been forced to do since because Ortega has worked to silence any critical voices. It had provided training for journalists, helped finance journalistic outlets and defended freedom of expression. Born Violeta Barrios Torres on Oct. 18, 1929, in the southwestern city of Rivas, Chamorro had little by way of preparation for the public eye. The eldest daughter of a landowning family, she was sent to U.S. finishing schools. After her father's death in 1948, she returned to the family home and married Pedro Joaquin Chamorro, who soon became editor and publisher of the family newspaper, La Prensa, following his own father's death. He penned editorials denouncing the abuses of the regime of Gen. Anastasio Somoza, whose family had ruled Nicaragua for four decades, and was gunned down on a Managua street in January 1978. The killing, widely believed to have been ordered by Somoza, galvanized the opposition and fueled the popular revolt led by Ortega's Sandinista National Liberation Front that toppled the dictator in July 1979. Chamorro herself acknowledged that she had little ambition beyond raising her four children before her husband's assassination. She said she was in Miami shopping for a wedding dress for one of her daughters when she heard the news. Still, Chamorro took over publishing La Prensa and also became a member of the junta that replaced Somoza. She quit just nine months later as the Sandinistas exerted their dominance and built a socialist government aligned with Cuba and the Soviet Union and at odds with the United States amid the Cold War. La Prensa became a leading voice of opposition to the Sandinistas and the focus of regular harassment by government supporters who accused the paper of being part of Washington's efforts — along with U.S.-financed rebels, dubbed 'Contras' by the Sandinistas for their counterrevolutionary fight — to undermine the leftist regime. Chamorro later recounted bitter memories of what she considered the Sandinistas' betrayal of her husband's democratic goals and her own faith in the anti-Somoza revolution. 'I'm not praising Somoza's government. It was horrible. But the threats that I've had from the Sandinistas — I never thought they would repay me in that way,' she said. Chamorro saw her own family divided by the country's politics. Son Pedro Joaquin became a leader of the Contras, and daughter Cristiana worked as an editor at La Prensa. But another son, Carlos Fernando, and Chamorro's eldest daughter, Claudia, were militant Sandinistas. By 1990 Nicaragua was in tatters. The economy was in shambles thanks to a U.S. trade embargo, Sandinista mismanagement and war. Some 30,000 people had died in the fighting between the Contras and Sandinistas. When a coalition of 14 opposition parties nominated an initially reluctant Chamorro as their candidate in the presidential election called for February that year, few gave her much chance against the Sandinista incumbent, Ortega. Even after months of campaigning, she stumbled over speeches and made baffling blunders. Suffering from osteoporosis, a disease that weakens the bones, she broke her knee in a household fall and spent much of the campaign in a wheelchair. But elegant, silver-haired and dressed almost exclusively in white, she connected with many Nicaraguans tired of war and hardship. Her maternal image, coupled with promises of reconciliation and an end to the military draft, contrasted with Ortega's swagger and revolutionary rhetoric. 'I bring the flag of love,' she told a rally shortly before the vote. 'Hatred has only brought us war and hunger. With love will come peace and progress.' She shocked the Sandinistas and the world by handily winning the election, hailing her victory as the fulfillment of her late husband's vision. 'We knew that in a free election we would achieve a democratic republic of the kind Pedro Joaquin always dreamed,' Chamorro said. Washington lifted trade sanctions and promised aid to rebuild the nation's ravaged economy, and by June the 19,000-strong Contra army had been disbanded, formally ending an eight-year war. Chamorro had little else to celebrate during her first months in office. In the two months between the election and her inauguration, the Sandinistas looted the government, signing over government vehicles and houses to militants in a giveaway that became popularly known as 'the pinata.' Her plans to stabilize the hyperinflation-wracked economy with free-market reforms were met with stiff opposition from the Sandinistas, who had the loyalty of most of the country's organized labor. Chamorro's first 100 days in power were marred by two general strikes, the second of which led to street battles between protesters and government supporters. To restore order Chamorro called on the Sandinista-dominated army, testing the loyalty of the force led by Gen. Humberto Ortega, Daniel Ortega's older brother. The army took to the streets but did not act against the strikers. Chamorro was forced into negotiations, broadening the growing rift between moderates and hardliners in her government. Eventually her vice president, Virgilio Godoy, became one over her most vocal critics. Nicaraguans hoping that Chamorro's election would quickly bring stability and economic progress were disappointed. Within a year some former Contras had taken up arms again, saying they were being persecuted by security forces still largely controlled by the Sandinistas. Few investors were willing to gamble on a destitute country with a volatile workforce, while foreign volunteers who had been willing to pick coffee and cotton in support of the Sandinistas had long departed. 'What more do you want than to have the war ended?' Chamorro said after a year in office. Chamorro was unable to undo Nicaragua's dire poverty. By the end of her administration in early 1997, unemployment was measured at over 50 percent, while crime, drug abuse and prostitution — practically unheard of during the Sandinista years — soared. That year she handed the presidential sash to another elected civilian: conservative Arnoldo Aleman, who also defeated Ortega at the ballot. In her final months in office, Chamorro published an autobiography, 'Dreams of the Heart,' in which she emphasized her vision of forgiveness and reconciliation. 'After six years as president, she has broadened her definition of 'my children' to include all Nicaraguans,' wrote a reviewer for the Los Angeles Times. 'So even political opponents like Ortega are briefly criticized in one sentence, only to be generously forgiven in the next.' After leaving office, Chamorro retired to her Managua home and her grandchildren. She generally steered clear of politics and created the Violeta Barrios de Chamorro Foundation. In 2011 it was revealed that she suffered from a brain tumor. In October 2018, she was hospitalized and said by family members to be in 'delicate condition' after suffering a cerebral embolism, a kind of stroke.


Forbes
10 hours ago
- Forbes
Israel-Iran Strikes: What Are The Worst Case Scenarios For Oil Markets
An oil tanker negotiating shallow waters of northern Persian Gulf. (Photo: by Barry Iverson) Israel-Iran strikes have taken a dangerous turn in recent days. They follow an attack by Israel on the Iran's military and nuclear sites. Ever since tensions escalated on Friday, there have been calls for restraint from the United Nations, U.S., U.K., and European Union but to no avail. Fighting has so far been restricted to the two warring countries. However, the level of the ferocity of the strikes has raised the alarming prospect of a wider conflict in a region that is a key exporter of crude oil. On Friday, Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said his country's forces had struck nuclear and military targets deep inside Iran and that action will continue until his country has met all its targets. Israeli strikes targeted sites in Arak and Isfahan, as well as Iran's main uranium enrichment site Natanz and its capital Tehran. In retaliation, Iran has launched over a 200 ballistic missile attacks against Israel so far, and counting. It has also called off the ongoing U.S.-Iran nuclear talks and threatened to attack U.S., U.K. and French military bases and ships in the region if they help with stopping its military strikes on Israel. Critically, Iran's oil and gas infrastructure has been left somewhat untouched by Israel. But given the unpredictability of the situation, this can no longer be ruled out. Late on Saturday, the Shahran oil depot in Tehran was hit by Israel, following on from earlier attacks on Iranian natural gas fields. Should Iran's energy infrastructure be hit more widely and the Islamic Republic retaliates to disrupt regional energy supplies or to draw the U.S. into the conflict, there could be consequences of varying degrees of severity for the oil market. Here are a five worst case scenarios, split between what Israel and Iran may do next in an unpredictable and rapidly escalating conflict. Israel may launch an attack on Kharg Oil Terminal, situated on Kharg Island, 15 miles off Iran's northwestern coast. The terminal handles over 90% of the country's global crude oil exports. If such an attack cripples the facility, the domino effect could be instant. It carries the potential for huge disruption, primarily to Iran's exports to China — the world's largest importer of oil. Not only would it contribute to a further short-term spike in prices, but forward oil futures contracts four to six months out may also see upswings. That's because bringing it back onstream would neither be easy nor quick. Instead of a high profile oil export target like the Kharg Terminal, Israel could hammer Iran's domestic energy chain. The Shahran oil depot in Tehran on Saturday by Israel lends weight to this theory. Upscaling the tactic may involve targeting a bigger cluster of oil terminals and hubs in the Southern province of Hormozgan. The region is also home to two free trade zones on Kish and Qeshm Islands. Kish also hosts the Iranian oil bourse — the only exchange of its kind that does not trade oil and derivatives in U.S. dollars. The domestically focused Abadan Refinery - located across Shatt Al-Arab River on the border between Iraq and Iran - could also be an Israeli target. Reliable up-to-date data on the refinery's production capacity is hard to find. But estimates and regional media sources (e.g. Financial Tribune) suggest it could be producing around 400,000 barrels per day. Abadan has symbolic status too as Iran's oldest oil processing facility. Originally built in 1909 by Anglo-Persian oil (which later became BP), it services around 25% of Iran's domestic fuel demand. Any outages there could be crippling for both Iranian consumers as well as the country's military. Mahshahr Oil Terminal, an oil port located on the Khor Musa Channel, is a related target. It stores and shifts products from the Abadan Refinery, and serves as an engineering and jetty construction hub for Iran. If any of these are hit, Iran's domestic supply chain will likely be severely crippled and may require Tehran to redirect resources. Instead of targeting oil production and export facilities, Israel may execute a plan to cripple Iran's natural gas industry. Iran produces just over 270 billion cubic meters of natural gas per year, almost entirely for domestic use. Israel has already attacked two of Israel's gas fields, including Phase 14 of South Pars so far. The attacks could be a harbinger of what may follow. Such targets would have little ramifications for the global natural gas industry, although Iran does share the natural gas basin with Qatar. However, Iran's natural gas production volume equates to around 6% of the world's output. Domestic outages may see Tehran turning to international liquefied natural gas supplies to meet its needs. For its retaliatory measures, many ponder if Iran could shut down the Strait of Hormuz, a key maritime artery for oil and liquefied natural gas shipments from the Persian Gulf out to the Gulf of Oman and beyond (see map below). Cargo volumes lend relevance to such discussions. Iran's own shipments, plus that of Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Iraq, and to an extent United Arab Emirates' crude - roughly equating to 30% of the world's traded oil - as well as Qatar's LNG cargoes pass through the Strait daily. Strait of Hormuz, a waterway between Persian Gulf and Gulf of Oman, a strategically extremely ... More important choke point, with Iran to the north and UAE and Oman's exclave Musandam to the south. While Iranians could certainly can attempt to close the Strait, they most probably won't, despite junior Iranian political voices currently calling for it. For starters, it would disrupt Iran's own oil shipments. Furthermore, a U.S.-led global retaliation may likely follow that would leave Iran's own coastline and all its ports vulnerable to a vastly superior American air and naval strike arsenal. Nearby Bahrain is home to the U.S. Navy's Fifth Fleet. Any disruption would also irk Iran's number crude oil customer - China. Iran exported on average 1.65 million bpd of oil to China last year. Furthermore, nearly half of crude oil passing through the Strait - whether Iranian or not - in the region of 20.5 million bpd also heads to China. A potential blockade would be very difficult to maintain under pressure from Beijing, the world's main taker of Middle Eastern oil. In an attempt to drag the U.S. into the conflict, Iran may either directly or via its regional proxies in Iraq, Yemen, Lebanon, West Bank and Gaza, attack the energy infrastructure of neighboring Gulf states. This has alleged precedent, for in the past Iran has been accused of targeting Saudi Arabia's oil fields (2019) and an attack in the UAE (2022). While the route of direct attacks remains open to Iran, its regional proxies Hamas and Hezbollah are severely diminished at the moment courtesy of Israel's sustained campaign against them. However, the Houthi Rebels in Yemen - the last standing Iranian proxy ally - remain in a position to ramp up their attacks on commercial shipping, and oil and gas cargoes in the Red Sea - a campaign that began in 2023. Sidestepping energy infrastructure, on Saturday, Iranian officials also warned that the country would attack the military bases of the U.S., U.K. and France in the region, if they are seen to be coming to Israel's defense. All three nations have also have special forces camps and large diplomatic missions in the Gulf. Such a scenario is being widely contemplated in intelligence circles, with U.S. regional forces closely monitoring the situation and the U.K. opting to send more military aircraft to its bases 'for contingency support across the region.' Any such escalation will likely trigger a wider regional war, and prolonged disruption to oil cargoes will likely draw China into a diplomatic row too. As things stand, should one or more of the above scenarios, especially an attack on Iran's Kharg Terminal, materialize during the Israel-Iran strikes, there could be serious near-term ramifications for the global oil and gas markets.