logo
People can still flourish in hard economic times, report says. Here is what it takes

People can still flourish in hard economic times, report says. Here is what it takes

CNN30-04-2025

There is happiness, and then there is flourishing. And as new research has found, having one doesn't always mean having the other, too.
Flourishing indicates you're living a good life, and it is more than individual happiness — it is evaluated from multiple dimensions, including health, financial security, meaning and relationships, according to the new report.
Indonesia topped the rankings of countries where people flourish the most, followed by Mexico and the Philippines, according to the Global Flourishing Study, which published Wednesday.
Many of the places that scored highest in terms of flourishing did not rank highly in assessments of the world's happiest countries, according to the new report that Baylor University's Institute for Studies of Religion and Harvard University's Human Flourishing Program developed in partnership with Gallup and the Center for Open Science. The study includes 22 countries and Hong Kong, a special administrative region of China.
The research was designed to capture a look at much of the world, said study lead and report contributor Dr. Byron Johnson, distinguished professor of the social sciences at Baylor in Waco, Texas.
'The uniqueness of the Global Flourishing Study is the size: We are following 207,000 participants around the world in over 40 different languages on the six inhabited continents,' Johnson said. 'This gives a voice to approximately 64% of the world's population.'
Although it has some limitations, the study is an ambitious and welcome asset when looking at global well-being, said Dr. Felix Cheung, assistant professor of psychology at the University of Toronto and Canada Research Chair in Population Well-Being. Cheung is a coauthor of a chapter in the recent World Happiness Report, which was not a part of the Global Flourishing Study.
Wednesday's report is just the start, said researchers, who will follow up with the people surveyed every year for five years to see how levels of flourishing change and to investigate further the factors that make for a good life.
One result that stands out in this new research and other reports on well-being is that young people tend not to be doing well in comparison with other age groups.
'Perhaps one of the more troubling features of this data is that we find when we aggregate across the 22 countries, flourishing tends to increase with age, so that the youngest individuals are reporting the lowest levels of flourishing,' said Dr. Tyler VanderWeele, study lead and contributor to the report.
That isn't the case everywhere –– in Poland and Tanzania, for example, flourishing tends to be higher for younger people. But for much of the world, patterns of flourishing over a lifetime seem to be changing, said VanderWeele, the John L. Loeb and Frances Lehman Loeb Professor of Epidemiology at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health.
'Young people are telling us something is wrong,' Cheung said.
There are some theories about why youths are struggling. One study speculated that developed countries tend to have more competitive environments in education systems to get better jobs, which can lead to more stress for young people, he said.
One of Cheung's previous studies found that Americans don't see a lot of opportunity for social mobility, meaning people feel their hard work doesn't necessarily pay off.
'It's possible that this perception of lack of social mobility particularly hurts younger folks because they're just trying to transition from either university or from school into their career,' Cheung said.
Flourishing was assessed using two questions for each of six domains: happiness, health, meaning, character, relationships and financial security.
While people in richer, developed countries reported feeling more financially secure and better about how their life was going, these developed countries didn't tend to rank as highly in other categories such as meaning, relationships or prosocial character, which is behavior that promotes kindness and social cohesion.
'This raises important questions with regard to how can we carry out economic development without compromising meaning and purpose and relationships and character,' VanderWeele said.
Some countries reporting the highest levels of flourishing were unexpected, he said.
Indonesia had the highest level of flourishing, with the Philippines ranked third and Nigeria fifth –– all countries that were not in the top 20 of the World Happiness Report.
On the other hand, Sweden was fourth on the list of happiest countries but placed in the middle in the report on flourishing. The United States also ranked toward the middle of countries in the flourishing report.
'Why might this be so? Well, this is some of what we have to do in the years ahead to try to understand and unpack these results,' VanderWeele said.
While further studies will continue to investigate the factors that most affect flourishing, there are ways in which people can start to evaluate their lives from this research.
'One approach to reflecting on one's own flourishing is simply to go through our 12 core flourishing questions,' VanderWeele said. 'One respondent said that she had been thinking about committing to a volunteering activity for some months, and after going through and realizing she was missing a deeper sense of purpose, she decided to make a commitment to this volunteering activity.'
You can find the 12 core flourishing questions here.
The data also shows that there are ways to find well-being under multiple circumstances –– not just in developed countries with a high gross domestic product, Cheung said.
Related video
Why is America less happy?
A consistent takeaway from the study and from other research into well-being is that human connection is crucial for a good life, he added.
People who participate in religious or civic life tend to report higher well-being as well as those who live with others or regularly share meals, Cheung said.
There are aspects of flourishing that are under a person's control, but some are not, he added. Conflict, natural disasters and economic hardship may take a toll on people's well-being, and that is natural, Cheung said.
'When one person is unhappy, that's an individual issue,' he said. 'But when the population isn't happy, that's a structural problem, and a structural problem requires structural solutions.'
If you'd like to reflect on the questions to assess flourishing, they include the following. (Check the link to assess the flourishing measures on a scale of 0 to 10):
Overall, how satisfied are you with life as a whole these days?
In general, how happy or unhappy do you usually feel?
In general, how would you rate your physical health?
How would you rate your overall mental health?
Overall, to what extent do you feel the things you do in your life are worthwhile?
I understand my purpose in life.
I always act to promote good in all circumstances, even in difficult and challenging situations.
I am always able to give up some happiness now for greater happiness later.
I am content with my friendships and relationships.
My relationships are as satisfying as I would want them to be.
How often do you worry about being able to meet normal monthly living expenses?
How often do you worry about safety, food, or housing?

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Christiane Amanpour Now Treats Travel To U.S. 'As If I Was Going To North Korea'
Christiane Amanpour Now Treats Travel To U.S. 'As If I Was Going To North Korea'

Yahoo

time19 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Christiane Amanpour Now Treats Travel To U.S. 'As If I Was Going To North Korea'

British journalist Christiane Amanpour said she treats travel to the U.S. under President Donald Trump 'as if I was going to North Korea.' The longtime CNN correspondent talked about her experience flying to the U.S. on her podcast, 'The Ex Files.' 'I must say I was afraid,' Amanpour told her co-host and ex-husband, Jamie Rubin, on Wednesday's episode. Amanpour was traveling to the U.S. last week to give a speech at Harvard University, which has come under increased attacks by Trump, including revoking the university's ability to enroll international students. Trump has also ramped up his attacks on immigrants, using agents with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement to snatch people off the streets and imprison them without due process. And on Thursday, Trump announced that citizens of 12 countries would be banned from visiting the U.S. and seven others that would face restrictions. 'I'm a foreigner,' Amanpour said. 'I don't have a green card. I'm not an American citizen. I'm fairly prominent, and I literally prepared to go to America as if I was going to North Korea. I took a burner phone, Jamie. Imagine that. I didn't take a single … not my mobile phone, not my iPad, nothing, and I had nothing on the burner phone except a few numbers.' Amanpour said she also spoke to CNN security about what precautions to take. 'I've heard that many, including British citizens, have been stopped at the border and been questioned for hours and hours and hours,' she said. Thankfully, Amanpour said she went through airport security without any issues. 'I was welcomed,' she said. 'The immigration officer at Boston, where I came in, could not have been nicer. Huge sigh of relief I breathed.'

What Trump's Harvard Visa Restriction Means for International Students
What Trump's Harvard Visa Restriction Means for International Students

Time​ Magazine

timea day ago

  • Time​ Magazine

What Trump's Harvard Visa Restriction Means for International Students

President Donald Trump has escalated his standoff with Harvard University, seeking another path to prevent international students from attending the school after a judge blocked an attempt to revoke Harvard's ability to enroll international students. 'I have determined that the entry of the class of foreign nationals described above is detrimental to the interests of the United States because, in my judgment, Harvard's conduct has rendered it an unsuitable destination for foreign students and researchers,' Trump said Wednesday, the same day he issued a ' travel ban ' restricting nationals from 19 countries on entering the U.S., in a proclamation that seeks to limit foreigners' ability to travel to the U.S. to study at Harvard. 'This is yet another illegal retaliatory step taken by the Administration in violation of Harvard's First Amendment rights,' the university said in a statement. 'Harvard will continue to take steps to protect the rights of our international students and scholars, members of our community who are vital to the University's academic mission and community—and whose presence here benefits our country immeasurably,' it said in a previous statement. The university has not responded to queries from TIME about how exactly it plans to respond to the proclamation. The proclamation comes days after the State Department reportedly instructed embassies and consulates to increase vetting of visa applicants looking to travel to Harvard for any purpose—with the word 'any' underlined and bolded. Last week, the State Department paused the scheduling of new student visa interviews at embassies across the world to look into intensifying the scrutiny of applicants' social media accounts, citing concerns about antisemitism and terrorism. Harvard has also faced the threat of federal funding cuts and the rescinding of its tax-exempt status. The Cambridge, Mass.-based university is one of several elite higher education institutions in the U.S. that have come under attack by the Trump Administration. Here's what to know. What does the latest proclamation do? The proclamation suspends the entry of foreign nationals seeking to study or participate in exchange programs at Harvard, effective immediately. After 90 days, it will be reassessed for extension; otherwise, it will expire in six months. The proclamation applies to those who attempt to enter the country to attend Harvard through the Student Exchange Visa Program. It does not apply to those attending other universities through SEVP. It also directs Secretary of State Marco Rubio to 'consider' on a case-by-case basis whether foreign nationals who attend Harvard and are already in the U.S. under F, M, or J visas should have their visas revoked. The order allows for exceptions to be made for those 'whose entry would be in the national interest,' as determined by Rubio, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, or their respective designees. Harvard currently has nearly 7,000 international students, representing more than a quarter of its enrollees. Several universities across the globe have already offered to accept impacted students. If international students are forced to transfer, Harvard would suffer financially, as many international students pay full tuition and other associated costs of attendance, which can be as high as about $87,000 per year for undergraduates to $102,000 per year for some graduate students. The latest proclamation comes as Trump's second-term Administration has already sought to cancel thousands of international students' visas across the country, before abruptly reversing course. Recently, the Administration has also targeted students from China, who account for nearly a quarter of all international students in the U.S., citing national security concerns. Why is Trump targeting Harvard? According to the latest proclamation, the government has concluded 'Harvard University is no longer a trustworthy steward of international student and exchange visitor programs.' The proclamation points to concerns about crime; insufficient cooperation with the Department of Homeland Security; foreign entanglements, including with China; and alleged civil rights violations. 'Crime rates at Harvard University—including violent crime rates—have drastically risen in recent years,' the proclamation asserts, adding that the university 'has failed to discipline at least some categories of conduct violations on campus.' It also alleges that Harvard 'has refused the recent requests of the DHS for information about foreign students' 'known illegal activity,' 'known dangerous and violent activity,' 'known threats to other students or university personnel,' 'known deprivation of rights of other classmates or university personnel,' and whether those activities 'occurred on campus,' and other related data.' It concluded: 'Harvard's actions show that it either is not fully reporting its disciplinary records for foreign students or is not seriously policing its foreign students.' The proclamation also cites student newspaper the Harvard Crimson, which reported earlier this year that the university has received over $150 million in funding from foreign governments, more than any of its Ivy League peers. A university spokesperson told the Crimson that donations are used to fund financial aid as well as educational and operational expenses. Trump's latest proclamation also cited a May letter by the Republican-led House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party that alleged 'Harvard repeatedly hosted and trained members of a CCP paramilitary organization.' Lastly, the proclamation claimed that Harvard 'continues to flout the civil rights of its students and faculty.' It referred to the 2023 Supreme Court case Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President and Fellows of Harvard College, in which admissions policies that consider race as a factor were ruled unconstitutional, to suggest that the university engages in 'blatant' 'discrimination against disfavored races.' Harvard, the proclamation alleged, continues to 'deny hardworking Americans equal opportunities,' while it 'admits students from non-egalitarian nations, including nations that seek the destruction of the United States and its allies, or the extermination of entire peoples.'

Trump suspends foreign student visas at Harvard
Trump suspends foreign student visas at Harvard

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

Trump suspends foreign student visas at Harvard

Donald Trump has suspended for an initial six months the entry of foreign students seeking to study or participate in exchange programmes at Harvard University. The US president issued the proclamation on Wednesday, citing "national security" concerns and declaring it "detrimental" to US interests to continue allowing foreign students at the institution. Harvard has responded by calling the order "retaliatory" and emphasised it would continue to protect its international students, according to Reuters news agency. Trump's announcement is a further escalation of an ongoing legal row with one of the US's most prestigious universities after Harvard refused to yield to a series of White House demands in April. Wednesday's order comes after a judge blocked the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) from banning international students at Harvard in a ruling last week. Trump's proclamation accused Harvard of developing "extensive entanglements" with foreign countries and continuing to "flout the civil rights of its students and faculty". Follow live updates: Trump signs ban on travel to US by citizens of 12 countries "Considering these facts, I have determined that it is necessary to restrict the entry of foreign nationals who seek to enter the United States solely or principally to participate in a course of study at Harvard University," he said. The order also suspends visas for international students seeking exchange programmes and directs the secretary of state to consider revoking existing visas of students currently studying at the university. The suspension can be extended beyond six months. The White House said Harvard had failed to provide sufficient information to the DHS about "foreign students' known illegal or dangerous activities" and reported "deficient data on only three students". Harvard issued a statement calling the order "yet another illegal retaliatory step taken by the administration in violation of Harvard's First Amendment rights", Reuters reported. The world's wealthiest university has been embroiled in a legal battle with the Trump administration after it froze billions of dollars of federal funding and accused the institution of failing to root out antisemitism on campus. Last month, DHS Secretary Kristi Noem revoked certification Harvard needed to enrol foreign students on campus, a move that was swiftly blocked by a judge. Another federal judge upheld that decision last Thursday, saying she would issue a longer-term hold that would allow international students to continue their studies at Harvard while the legal battle plays out. However, Wednesday's proclamation once again throws the futures of thousands of international students into limbo. For the 2024-2025 school year, Harvard enrolled nearly 7,000 foreign students, who made up 27% of its population. Last week, a Chinese Harvard student called for unity during the university's graduation ceremony, just days after Trump vowed to "aggressively" revoke visas for Chinese students. In the past few months, the Trump administration has ramped up its crackdown on higher education in the US, accusing universities of failing to tackle antisemitism amid protests against the war in Gaza across campuses. Earlier on Wednesday, the White House threatened to strip Columbia University of its accreditation over claims it violated the civil rights of its Jewish students. The fallout from Trump's war on Harvard will long outlast his presidency Harvard Chinese grad speech draws praise and ire

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store