Temple Demolished In Dhaka, India Urges Bangladesh To Protect Hindus
The demolition of a Durga Temple in Dhaka had led to a sharp response from India over the treatment of minorities in Bangladesh. Authorities in Bangladesh have justified the move, calling it a 'makeshift structure', built illegally.
Ministry of External Affairs Spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said, "We understand that extremists were clamouring for the demolition of the Durga temple in Khilkhet, Dhaka. The interim government, instead of providing security to the temple, projected the episode as a case of illegal land use and allowed the destruction of the temple today."
"This has resulted in damage to the deity before it was relocated. We are dismayed that such incidents continue to recur in Bangladesh. Let me underline that it is the responsibility of the interim government of Bangladesh to protect Hindus, their properties, and their religious institutions," Mr Jaiswal said.
India has repeatedly voiced concern about the targeting of minorities in Bangladesh under the interim government led by Muhammad Yunus. Prime Minister Narendra Modi raised the issue with Mr Yunus during the meeting between the two leaders on the sidelines of the BIMSTEC summit in Bangkok.
Prime Minister Modi had also underlined India's concerns related to the safety and security of minorities in Bangladesh, including Hindus, and expressed his expectation that the Government of Bangladesh would ensure their security, including by thoroughly investigating the cases of atrocities committed against them, during the meeting with Muhammad Yunus.
The temple, which seems to be a makeshift structure, was demolished within days of demands from extremists to tear it down. The demolition occurred within three days of a mob demanding the temple's removal.
The demolition was carried out by authorities from Bangladesh Railway, assisted by police and military personnel, and visuals from the demolition site showed bulldozers bringing the structure down with the Durga idol still inside the structure. The officials are seen ignoring appeals from devotees to spare the temple.
The Bangladesh Railway authorities say the Khilkhet Sarbojanin Shri Shri Durga Mandir was demolished as it had been built illegally on railway land.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NDTV
38 minutes ago
- NDTV
"So-Called Court Of Arbitration On Indus Waters Treaty Illegal, Void": India
New Delhi: India has, in a strongly-worded statement, rejected a "supplemental award" by an "illegal" Court of Arbitration set up supposedly over the 1960 Indus Waters Treaty. Calling the self-appointed panel unlawful and in "brazen violation" of the treaty itself, India's foreign ministry unequivocally trashed its claims and "concerns". In a five-point statement, India's Ministry of External Affairs said, "Today, the illegal Court of Arbitration, purportedly constituted under the Indus Waters Treaty 1960, albeit in brazen violation of it, has issued what it characterizes as a "supplemental award" on its competence concerning the Kishenganga and Ratle hydroelectric projects in the Indian Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir." Making it clear that New Delhi never considered this self-appointed, so-called 'arbiter' to have any locus standi in any of India's matters, the foreign ministry stated that "India has never recognised the existence in law of this so-called Court of Arbitration, and India's position has all along been that the constitution of this so-called arbitral body is in itself a serious breach of the Indus Waters Treaty." "Consequently, any proceedings before this forum and any award or decision taken by it are also for that reason illegal and per se void," it added. Blaming Pakistan sqarely for the Indus Waters Treaty being put in "abeyance" after terrorist attacks in India, the foreign ministry reiterated that "Following the Pahalgam terrorist attack, India has in exercise of its rights as a sovereign nation under international law, placed the Indus Waters Treaty in abeyance, until Pakistan credibly and irrevocably abjures its support for cross-border terrorism. Until such time that the Treaty is in abeyance, India is no longer bound to perform any of its obligations under the Treaty." Calling out the "so-called Court of Arbitration" for acting at the behest of Pakistan and highlighting that the self-appointed panel has "no existence in the eyes of the law", India said, "No Court of Arbitration, much less this illegally constituted arbitral body which has no existence in the eye of law, has the jurisdiction to examine the legality of India's actions in exercise of its rights as a sovereign," adding that "India, therefore, categorically rejects this so-called supplemental award as it has rejected all prior pronouncements of this body." Labeling Pakistan as the global epicenter for terrorism, India underscored that "This latest charade at Pakistan's behest is yet another desperate attempt by it to escape accountability for its role as the global epicenter of terrorism. Pakistan's resort to this fabricated arbitration mechanism is consistent with its decades-long pattern of deception and manipulation of international forums." India has made it amply clear that the Indus Waters Treaty shall continue to remain in abeyance till Pakistan does not eradicate every shred of terror infrastructure and financing as well as eliminate every single terrorist on its soil. New Delhi has also sent a clear message to Pakistan and the global community that any terror activity or terrorist attack in India with links found to Pakistan will be considered an escalation which merits a military response "anywhere in Pakistan". The Indus Waters Treaty being kept in abeyance was one of the first diplomatically punitive measures taken by India against Pakistan after the Pahalgam terror attack was traced to have Pakistani-links. Prime Minister Narendra Modi has said that "blood and water cannot flow at the same time." India has also told Pakistan that "terror and talks cannot happen at the same time either", leaving Islamabad and Rawalpindi (Pak Army headquarters) with no option but to put an end to its policy of "cross-border terror". Under the 1960 Indus Waters Treaty, India had, as a gesture of goodwill, graciously agreed to share the waters from the Indus river and its five tributaries - Baes, Sutlej, Ravi, Chenab, and Jhelum - in a mutually agreeable basis. According to the pact, the waters of the three 'western rivers' - Indus, Jhelum, and Chenab are to be released for Pakistan as per agreeable terms, while the entire volume of water from the three 'eastern rivers' - Baes, Sutlej, and Ravi - are for India. There are detailed terms and conditions which allows for building of dams, sharing of data annually, and multiple other factors.
News18
an hour ago
- News18
‘Charade At Pakistan's Behest': India Rejects Court Of Arbitration's 'Ruling' On J&K Dam Projects
Last Updated: MEA reiterated that India 'categorically rejects this so-called supplemental award as it has rejected all prior pronouncements of this body.' India firmly rejected a ruling by a 'so-called" Court of Arbitration that issued a 'supplemental award" regarding the Kishenganga and Ratle hydroelectric projects in Jammu and Kashmir. The projects, situated on tributaries of the Indus river system, have been a longstanding point of contention between India and Pakistan. The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) said in a statement that the Court of Arbitration has no legal standing and that its very formation breaches the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT). India, the statement added, does not recognise the court or any decision emerging from it. 'The illegal Court of Arbitration, purportedly constituted under the Indus Waters Treaty 1960, albeit in brazen violation of it, has issued what it characterises as a 'supplemental award' on its competence concerning the Kishenganga and Ratle hydroelectric projects in the Indian Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir," the MEA said. India reiterated that any proceedings before this tribunal, as well as its rulings, are 'illegal and per se void." The statement comes in the wake of India's recent decision to place the Indus Waters Treaty in abeyance following the Pahalgam terrorist attack in April, which claimed 26 lives. In light of the security situation, India said it has exercised its sovereign rights under international law to suspend its obligations under the treaty until Pakistan 'credibly and irreversibly" renounces support for cross-border terrorism. During this suspension, India asserts it is no longer bound by the treaty's terms. 'No Court of Arbitration, much less this illegally constituted arbitral body which has no existence in the eye of law, has the jurisdiction to examine the legality of India's actions in exercise of its rights as a sovereign," the MEA stated. India also criticised Pakistan's role in the arbitration proceedings, calling it a 'latest charade" and a 'desperate attempt" to deflect attention from its alleged role in supporting terrorism. 'This latest charade at Pakistan's behest is yet another desperate attempt by it to escape accountability for its role as the global epicenter of terrorism," the MEA said, adding, 'Pakistan's resort to this fabricated arbitration mechanism is consistent with its decades-long pattern of deception and manipulation of international forums." Islamabad has long raised objections to India's hydropower developments on the western rivers of the Indus system. It first opposed the 330 MW Kishenganga project on the Jhelum River in 2006 and later, the 850 MW Ratle project on the Chenab River. Pakistan argues that the projects violate the treaty and could impact water flow into its territory. India, however, maintains that it is well within its rights under the Indus Waters Treaty to construct run-of-the-river hydroelectric projects on the Jhelum and Chenab rivers and that adequate safeguards have been incorporated to comply with the treaty's provisions.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
India slams Pakistan's 'charade' on Kishenganga, Ratle dams; trashes 'illegal' Court of Arbitration's new ruling
India has dismissed a ruling by a Court of Arbitration regarding the Kishenganga and Ratle hydroelectric projects. The projects are located in Jammu and Kashmir. The Ministry of External Affairs has stated that the court's formation violates the Indus Waters Treaty of 1960. India does not recognize the court's legitimacy. It considers any decisions made by it as void. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads India on Friday rejected a fresh ruling by a Court of Arbitration over two hydroelectric projects in Jammu and Kashmir . The Pakistan-backed court issued a 'supplemental award' claiming it has the right to decide on the Kishenganga and Ratle dams under the Indus Waters Treaty of 1960."India categorically rejects this so-called supplemental award as it has rejected all prior pronouncements of this body," ministry said in an official statement on the Ministry of External Affairs said this so-called court is "illegal" because it was set up in clear violation of the treaty. India has never accepted its existence or any of its past decisions, calling them unlawful and automatically invalid."Today, the illegal Court of Arbitration, purportedly constituted under the Indus Waters Treaty 1960, albeit in brazen violation of it, has issued what it characterizes as a "supplemental award' on its competence concerning the Kishenganga and Ratle hydroelectric projects in the Indian Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir," the ministry statement echoed."India has never recognised the existence in law of this so-called Court of Arbitration, and India's position has all along been that the constitution of this so-called arbitral body is in itself a serious breach of the Indus Waters Treaty and consequently any proceedings before this forum and any award or decision taken by it are also for that reason illegal and per se void," it PM Narendra Modi-led Centre also reiterated that until Pakistan stops supporting cross-border terrorism, India will not follow the treaty's rules."Until such time that the Treaty is in abeyance, India is no longer bound to perform any of its obligations under the Treaty. No Court of Arbitration, much less this illegally constituted arbitral body which has no existence in the eye of law, has the jurisdiction to examine the legality of India's actions in exercise of its rights as a sovereign," the statement further Central government called the ruling a 'charade' pushed by Pakistan to avoid facing the truth about its role in terrorism. India said Pakistan has a long history of using false claims and manipulating international forums to cover up its actions."This latest charade at Pakistan's behest is yet another desperate attempt by it to escape accountability for its role as the global epicenter of terrorism. Pakistan's resort to this fabricated arbitration mechanism is consistent with its decades-long pattern of deception and manipulation of international forums."
