logo
Facts About International Negotiations

Facts About International Negotiations

By Prof. Abdelhaq Azzouzi
I recommend that anyone interested in understanding the concepts of negotiations and international relations—particularly as taught in the literature of universities and decision-making centers in the United States—should read Donald Nuechterlein's book 'America Overcommitted: United States National Interests in the 1980s.'
In this book, Nuechterlein defines national interests as: 'The perceived needs and desires of a sovereign state in relation to other sovereign states that constitute its external environment.' The nature of the strategic environment, as described in the same book regarding the development of policy and strategy, implies a more comprehensive mode of thinking. It refers to: 'The needs and desires of a sovereign state in relation not only to other sovereign states but also to non-governmental actors, coincidences, and circumstances in an emerging strategic environment described as the desired end state.'
This inclusive definition reveals the dynamic nature of the strategic environment, which is subject to a number of actors, coincidences, and interactions. It also involves both external and internal components.
Nuechterlein identified four core American interests:
1. Homeland defense
2. Economic prosperity
3. A preferred world order
4. The spread of values
The value of clearly and precisely defining these interests lies in their utility for formulating sound policy and strategy. Precision is a crucial feature in creating good policy and strategy. It clears up confusion, sharpens vision, and provides clarity, enabling the elimination of intellectual obscurity that is unacceptable in international relations and comparative political science.
Rethinking the "Preferred World Order"
Focusing on the notion of a preferred world order brings up the need for a precise understanding of its mechanisms and outcomes, as well as how to integrate successfully within its frameworks and master its algorithms. This brings into question the concept of value-spreading mentioned by Nuechterlein, which appears less accurate in describing American foreign policy—particularly under President Donald Trump, who effectively buried that idea in favor of other priorities.
Trump grasped the secret behind China's Belt and Road success: that China is not an ideological or evangelizing state. Unlike Western nations such as the U.S. and France, which attempt to export their models and believe that no political openness or societal progress can be achieved without adopting not only their intellectual, cultural, and social models, but also their economic and political systems.
Thus, Western nations created development agencies, human rights organizations, and conditioned loans to developing nations on adherence to global human rights principles and political openness. They also established think tanks—often state-funded—that rank countries based on their respect (or lack thereof) for global human rights frameworks and categorize them as democratic, semi-democratic, or authoritarian.
The End of the Evangelical Model
Such rhetoric no longer holds sway in Trump's doctrine. China, for example, so long as its territory and sovereign interests remain unharmed, pursues a non-interventionist foreign policy that operates quietly and pragmatically without interfering in the sovereign affairs of other states. It pays no attention to Western 'evangelism,' rankings, or the classifications made by research institutions. It promotes a principle that any country's economic success does not necessitate another's failure, refuting the friend-enemy binary and instead embracing a win-win logic.
This understanding clarifies why Trump decided to shut down the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) and withdraw from certain international organizations.
A New Doctrine of International Negotiation
Returning to the notion of a preferred world order, there's the issue of multidimensional international negotiations: strategic, security, economic, financial, and industrial. These are areas where the U.S. president excels, managing to disorient adversaries or force them into full compliance with his terms.
Negotiations, as we teach our university students, are not a science governed by fixed mathematical rules that help the negotiator or diplomat reach desired outcomes. Rather, they are an art form that relies on experience, foresight, and the ability to influence the future.
They require:
- Deep knowledge of the issue at hand
- A well-informed assessment of options and alternatives
- A level of mastery similar to internal medicine, which diagnoses and treats complex inter-organ diseases
Today's international negotiations—whether concerning the Russia-Ukraine crisis, territorial disputes, or tariff issues—are all driven by a new Trumpian doctrine. This doctrine may reveal the starting point, but it hides the end goal, making it impossible to predict outcomes. Negotiators thus find themselves in a highly uncertain environment, where conventional expectations collapse.
In this context, the negotiator must possess a keen strategic mindset, along with enough knowledge and expertise to extract the key components of this uncertain phase of negotiations, in order to reach targeted objectives and fulfill intended goals.
This becomes especially difficult when one of the parties is today's United States of America.
read more
Gold prices rise, 21 Karat at EGP 3685
NATO's Role in Israeli-Palestinian Conflict
US Expresses 'Strong Opposition' to New Turkish Military Operation in Syria
Shoukry Meets Director-General of FAO
Lavrov: confrontation bet. nuclear powers must be avoided
News
Iran Summons French Ambassador over Foreign Minister Remarks
News
Aboul Gheit Condemns Israeli Escalation in West Bank
News
Greek PM: Athens Plays Key Role in Improving Energy Security in Region
News
One Person Injured in Explosion at Ukrainian Embassy in Madrid
News
Egypt confirms denial of airspace access to US B-52 bombers
News
Ayat Khaddoura's Final Video Captures Bombardment of Beit Lahia
News
Australia Fines Telegram $600,000 Over Terrorism, Child Abuse Content
Lifestyle
Pistachio and Raspberry Cheesecake Domes Recipe
Arts & Culture
Nicole Kidman and Keith Urban's $4.7M LA Home Burglarized
Videos & Features
Bouchra Dahlab Crowned Miss Arab World 2025 .. Reem Ganzoury Wins Miss Arab Africa Title (VIDEO)
News
Israeli PM Diagnosed with Stage 3 Prostate Cancer
Sports
Neymar Announced for Brazil's Preliminary List for 2026 FIFA World Cup Qualifiers
News
Prime Minister Moustafa Madbouly Inaugurates Two Indian Companies
Arts & Culture
New Archaeological Discovery from 26th Dynasty Uncovered in Karnak Temple

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Tump's Threat to Cancel SpaceX Contracts Could Force U.S. Back Into Russian Dependence, Experts Warn
Tump's Threat to Cancel SpaceX Contracts Could Force U.S. Back Into Russian Dependence, Experts Warn

See - Sada Elbalad

time19 hours ago

  • See - Sada Elbalad

Tump's Threat to Cancel SpaceX Contracts Could Force U.S. Back Into Russian Dependence, Experts Warn

Ahmed Emam US President Donald Trump's threat to revoke the government contracts with Elon Musk's SpaceX has sparked serious concern among space policy experts, who warn that such a move could undermine American space dominance and potentially force NASA to resume its reliance on Russia for access to the International Space Station. In a report published by "News week" , multiple analysts cautioned that cutting ties with SpaceX—the company behind many of NASA's most critical crewed missions—would leave the U.S. space program with limited alternatives. 'SpaceX is essential to both U.S. national security and NASA's operations. It's a core player in everything the United States is doing in space,' said Clayton Sopp, Deputy Director of the Space Security Project at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, an institution labeled 'undesirable' by Russian authorities. Sopp warned that canceling SpaceX contracts would create 'a massive gap' in American space capabilities, particularly in launching astronauts and maintaining operations aboard the ISS. 'There is no current service that can immediately fill that void,' he added. The *Newsweek* report follows Trump's escalating feud with Musk, whose companies have received an estimated \$38 billion in government contracts, loans, subsidies, and tax breaks over the past decade—support that has significantly contributed to Musk becoming the world's richest man, according to *The Washington Post*. Trump, reacting to Musk's recent public criticisms and calls for his disqualification from office, has threatened to conduct a sweeping review of government contracts with Musk's companies. That review, he hinted, could lead to their cancellation. In response, Musk announced that SpaceX would 'immediately' begin pulling its Dragon spacecraft from service—an announcement that raised eyebrows and questions about the potential impact on NASA's crewed space missions. Scott Hubbard, former director of NASA's Ames Research Center and founding director of its Astrobiology Institute, expressed skepticism that Trump's threats would materialize but warned of the consequences if they did. 'There is currently no alternative to the Falcon 9–Dragon system,' Hubbard told Newsweek. 'Without it, astronauts could be left stranded on the ISS—unless we're prepared to go back to the Russians, asking for mercy and seats on Soyuz.' That sentiment was echoed by Benjamin L. Schmitt, a physicist and space policy expert at the University of Pennsylvania. He called SpaceX's 2020 crewed flights 'a breakthrough in ending U.S. dependence on Russian launch systems,' noting that for years NASA had paid Russia for Soyuz seats following the retirement of the Space Shuttle. 'Canceling these contracts now would be a major setback—not just technologically, but strategically,' Schmitt said. 'It would hand leverage back to the Kremlin and strike at the heart of U.S. space independence.' SpaceX currently holds more than \$22 billion in active U.S. government contracts, including a \$2.89 billion deal with NASA to develop the Human Landing System for the Artemis Moon mission and a \$1.15 billion contract for a second lunar lander. Other major deals include a \$1.8 billion agreement with the National Reconnaissance Office for a classified satellite network and \$102 million from the U.S. Air Force for the Rocket Cargo program. As tensions between Trump and Musk intensify, the political drama threatens to spill into national security and aerospace policy—areas where SpaceX has become deeply embedded. 'SpaceX has moved from being a disruptor to a pillar of U.S. space infrastructure,' said Sopp. 'Removing that pillar could cause the entire structure to wobble.' read more Gold prices rise, 21 Karat at EGP 3685 NATO's Role in Israeli-Palestinian Conflict US Expresses 'Strong Opposition' to New Turkish Military Operation in Syria Shoukry Meets Director-General of FAO Lavrov: confrontation bet. nuclear powers must be avoided News Iran Summons French Ambassador over Foreign Minister Remarks News Aboul Gheit Condemns Israeli Escalation in West Bank News Greek PM: Athens Plays Key Role in Improving Energy Security in Region News One Person Injured in Explosion at Ukrainian Embassy in Madrid News China Launches Largest Ever Aircraft Carrier Sports Former Al Zamalek Player Ibrahim Shika Passes away after Long Battle with Cancer Lifestyle Get to Know 2025 Eid Al Adha Prayer Times in Egypt Sports Neymar Announced for Brazil's Preliminary List for 2026 FIFA World Cup Qualifiers News Prime Minister Moustafa Madbouly Inaugurates Two Indian Companies Arts & Culture New Archaeological Discovery from 26th Dynasty Uncovered in Karnak Temple Business Fear & Greed Index Plummets to Lowest Level Ever Recorded amid Global Trade War Arts & Culture Zahi Hawass: Claims of Columns Beneath the Pyramid of Khafre Are Lies News Flights suspended at Port Sudan Airport after Drone Attacks News Shell Unveils Cost-Cutting, LNG Growth Plan

Trump Says China Agrees to Resume Rare Earth Flow
Trump Says China Agrees to Resume Rare Earth Flow

See - Sada Elbalad

time2 days ago

  • See - Sada Elbalad

Trump Says China Agrees to Resume Rare Earth Flow

Taarek Refaat US President Donald Trump revealed on Friday evening that Chinese President Xi Jinping had agreed to resume the flow of rare earth minerals to the United States. "We've come a long way with the agreement with China," Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One. Beijing has stepped up its use of rare earth minerals as a strategic lever through a stringent export licensing regime modeled after US sanctions, a move that is reshaping the trade war between China and the United States. These measures give China unprecedented control over a vital joint in global supply chains, amid growing concern in Western capitals. During his remarks aboard Air Force One, he stated that he believes the US is "doing very well" despite ongoing trade tensions and economic uncertainty. He noted that there has been "a lot of progress" on the agreement with China ahead of Monday's discussions. Recent weeks have seen intense activity by international companies seeking to secure mineral export licenses from China, following the inclusion of advanced types of rare earth minerals on a regulatory list last April. In the latest development, US President Donald Trump spoke by phone with his Chinese counterpart, Xi Jinping, on Thursday evening to discuss this vital issue, amid the shutdown of some European production lines due to supply shortages. Meanwhile, White House trade advisor Peter Navarro said on Friday that a meeting between US and Chinese officials on trade is scheduled to take place within seven days. China produces approximately 70% of the world's rare earth minerals and has a monopoly on processing technologies, giving it an unparalleled industrial advantage. With the implementation of the new licensing system, the Chinese Ministry of Commerce effectively controls the flow of vital raw materials for auto, technology, and defense industries around the world. This week, some European companies were forced to suspend production after their stocks ran out, threatening a wider wave of industrial disruptions if Chinese approvals continue to be delayed. read more CBE: Deposits in Local Currency Hit EGP 5.25 Trillion Morocco Plans to Spend $1 Billion to Mitigate Drought Effect Gov't Approves Final Version of State Ownership Policy Document Egypt's Economy Expected to Grow 5% by the end of 2022/23- Minister Qatar Agrees to Supply Germany with LNG for 15 Years Business Oil Prices Descend amid Anticipation of Additional US Strategic Petroleum Reserves Business Suez Canal Records $704 Million, Historically Highest Monthly Revenue Business Egypt's Stock Exchange Earns EGP 4.9 Billion on Tuesday Business Wheat delivery season commences on April 15 News China Launches Largest Ever Aircraft Carrier Sports Former Al Zamalek Player Ibrahim Shika Passes away after Long Battle with Cancer Lifestyle Get to Know 2025 Eid Al Adha Prayer Times in Egypt Sports Neymar Announced for Brazil's Preliminary List for 2026 FIFA World Cup Qualifiers News Prime Minister Moustafa Madbouly Inaugurates Two Indian Companies Arts & Culture New Archaeological Discovery from 26th Dynasty Uncovered in Karnak Temple Business Fear & Greed Index Plummets to Lowest Level Ever Recorded amid Global Trade War Arts & Culture Zahi Hawass: Claims of Columns Beneath the Pyramid of Khafre Are Lies News Flights suspended at Port Sudan Airport after Drone Attacks News Shell Unveils Cost-Cutting, LNG Growth Plan

Has Soft Power Come to an End?
Has Soft Power Come to an End?

See - Sada Elbalad

time2 days ago

  • See - Sada Elbalad

Has Soft Power Come to an End?

By Prof. Abdelhaq Azzouzi Anyone following international events and strategic thinking trends will come to the conclusion that capitals such as Washington, Beijing, and Moscow are now leaning heavily on the theories of Carl von Clausewitz, the 18th-century Prussian general and military historian, as well as those of Sun Tzu, the 6th-century BC Chinese military strategist. This trend stands in contrast to the intellectual frameworks developed by strategic thinkers like Joseph Nye, who passed away just a few weeks ago. Nye lamented in his final writings the rupture caused by President Trump with American soft power. Writing in the Financial Times, he noted: 'His background in New York real estate gave him a distorted view of power, focusing only on coercion and deals. American soft power will therefore have a hard time during the next four years.' Joseph Nye, who was once Dean at Harvard University, authored two essential books I always recommend to my students. The first, Bound to Lead: The Changing Nature of American Power (1990), explores the ability of the United States to exert global influence through non-coercive means — based on attraction and persuasion rather than blatant force or hard power. The second, titled Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics, elaborates on the advantages of diplomacy and cultural appeal, emphasizing how a nation's political values, culture, or other forms of influence can achieve cultural dominance. Nye warns, 'Although hard power can achieve goals, it can also jeopardize the economic, political, and even cultural aspirations of major powers.' He cautions that if America wishes to remain strong, 'Americans must be attentive to their soft power.' Nye bridged the worlds of theory and practice, which gave his writings remarkable resonance. He was a founding figure of the Harvard Kennedy School — often regarded as a factory for strategic minds and public policy leaders in the U.S. — and held several governmental positions under Presidents Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton. At the height of the COVID-19 crisis, Nye penned an article for Project Syndicate titled 'Geopolitics After the Pandemic,' in which he observed that long-term projections about the impact of the pandemic remained uncertain. He proposed that there was no single guaranteed scenario through to 2030. Instead, he outlined five potential geopolitical trajectories: 1. The end of the liberal world order. 2. The rise of authoritarian regimes resembling those of the 1930s. 3. A world order dominated by China. 4. The adoption of a global green agenda. 5. A continuation of the current status quo. Despite the value of these theories and scenarios, they require deeper clarification and adjustments. It is true that the U.S. administration, under President Trump, decided to shut down the U.S. Agency for International Development, withdrew from several international organizations, and largely disregarded values that constitute the core of soft power. But does this mean that American soft power has truly ended? Certainly not. Soft power persists — often alongside hard and smart power — especially through the limitless, diverse, and evolving products of American civil society. This presence ensures America retains global leadership in areas such as technology, scientific research, cinema, music, the English language, media, food culture, and fashion. A prime example is Netflix, which as of 2025 boasts over 301.6 million subscribers worldwide. It captivates individuals and governments alike with its dramatic and documentary productions. This kind of success is only possible for countries or companies with a vast cultural industry capable of attracting global consumers. It is a clear manifestation of soft power — one that places the languages and cultures of other countries under immense pressure. It is true that we are witnessing the continued erosion of the liberal world order and the return of fascism in some parts of the world. But this does not preclude the potential rebirth of liberalism. Major crises sometimes produce unexpected outcomes. The Great Depression, for instance, triggered waves of isolationism, nationalism, and fascism, culminating in World War II. Yet it also led to groundbreaking economic programs in the U.S. known as the New Deal, the rise of America as a global superpower, and ultimately the dismantling of colonial empires. Finally, even if, contrary to Nye's prediction, we do not see the emergence of a pragmatic green global agenda amid American isolationism and its withdrawal from the Paris Agreement on climate change, we will likely witness the rise of nationalist rhetoric in many countries — a trend that could dangerously escalate international tensions. read more Gold prices rise, 21 Karat at EGP 3685 NATO's Role in Israeli-Palestinian Conflict US Expresses 'Strong Opposition' to New Turkish Military Operation in Syria Shoukry Meets Director-General of FAO Lavrov: confrontation bet. nuclear powers must be avoided News Iran Summons French Ambassador over Foreign Minister Remarks News Aboul Gheit Condemns Israeli Escalation in West Bank News Greek PM: Athens Plays Key Role in Improving Energy Security in Region News One Person Injured in Explosion at Ukrainian Embassy in Madrid News China Launches Largest Ever Aircraft Carrier Sports Former Al Zamalek Player Ibrahim Shika Passes away after Long Battle with Cancer Lifestyle Get to Know 2025 Eid Al Adha Prayer Times in Egypt Sports Neymar Announced for Brazil's Preliminary List for 2026 FIFA World Cup Qualifiers News Prime Minister Moustafa Madbouly Inaugurates Two Indian Companies Arts & Culture New Archaeological Discovery from 26th Dynasty Uncovered in Karnak Temple Business Fear & Greed Index Plummets to Lowest Level Ever Recorded amid Global Trade War Arts & Culture Zahi Hawass: Claims of Columns Beneath the Pyramid of Khafre Are Lies News Flights suspended at Port Sudan Airport after Drone Attacks News Shell Unveils Cost-Cutting, LNG Growth Plan

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store
Facts About International Negotiations