Richard Childress seeks answers to Kansas engine failure for AJ Allmendinger
ECR Engines is closing in on a cause for AJ Allmendinger's blown engine last weekend at Kansas Speedway, a failure that led to the driver's radio rant against the engine company that Richard Childress serves as Chairman and CEO.
Allmendinger's engine blew after six laps last weekend. After the engine blew, Allmendinger said on his team's radio: 'Hey ECR, you guys (expletive) suck.'
When a team member asked if he had lost an engine, Allmendinger replied on the radio: 'Yeah, shockingly.'
The engine failure was the second of the season for Allmendinger. Those have been the only two engine failures for ECR in the Cup Series.
ECR provides engines for Kaulig Racing, Richard Childress Racing, Trackhouse Racing and Beard Motorsports.
Nate Ryan,
Childress told NBC Sports on Friday at North Wilikesboro that he had yet to talk to Allmendinger but expressed his displeasure with Allmendinger's comments, noting how other drivers have reacted on a team's radio after an engine failure.
'The 12 (Ryan Blaney) blew up two times,' Childress said. 'The 48 (Alex Bowman) blew up (one time). They never said anything. It's how you want to run your mouth.'
Childress said he wanted to talk to Allmendinger when there was a definitive answer to the engine's failure.
'I want to know what happened to the engine,' Childress said. 'When (Allmendinger) jumps out (of the car at Kansas), he don't even know if the belt come off the oil pump or what.'
Adding to the frustrations for Allmendinger is that the engine failure marked the second consecutive race he failed to finish. A crash ended his day at Texas in the previous race. Those two finishes dropped him from 15th in the points to 25th heading into next weekend's Coca-Cola 600 at Charlotte Motor Speedway.
Dustin Long,
Danny Lawrence, vice president of alliance operations for ECR Engines, told NBC Sports that debris may have caused the issue with Allmendinger's engine last weekend at Kansas.
'It was a bearing issue,' Lawrence said. 'We at RCR and ECR have a quality control department. They're struggling to figure out exactly what happened. They've sent the bearings off to be analyzed, but the initial (cause) looks like lack of lubrication.
'That engine had ran at Darlington. We're not so sure that we didn't have some kind of foreign material, something, an oil line or something happened for (the) lack of lubrication.'
Lawrence said what caused the failure with two of the eight bearings should be known this week.
As to what could have got in the line, Lawrence is unsure.
'We have filters on the oil going in, we have filters on the oil coming out,' Lawrence said. 'So it's baffling, but Richard is holding a strong arm (saying) 'I want answers to be able to show (Kaulig Racing President) Chris Rice and (team owner) Matt Kaulig. We're going to know exactly (what happened) and try to make sure this never happens again.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Appeals court rules in favor of NASCAR and overturns injunction for Michael Jordan's 23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports
A federal appeals court ruled in favor of NASCAR on Thursday in the sanctioning body's ongoing legal battle with Michael Jordan's 23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports. The Fourth Circuit of Appeals in North Carolina overturned an injunction that allowed the teams to race as chartered teams as their lawsuit against NASCAR proceeded. The teams won the injunction in December after they were the only two teams in NASCAR's Cup Series to not sign the current franchising agreement between NASCAR and its teams. 'In short, because we have found no support for the proposition that a business entity or person violates the antitrust laws by requiring a prospective participate to give a release for past conduct as a condition for doing business, we cannot conclude that the plaintiffs made a clear showing that they were likely to succeed on the merits of that theory," the decision stated. "And without satisfaction of the likelihood-of-success element, the plaintiffs were not entitled to a preliminary injunction.' Advertisement Front Row and 23XI had said that NASCAR was monopolistic in its antitrust suit filed in October. Chartered teams receive guaranteed entries into every Cup Series race and, most importantly, get a bigger share of purse money from the season-ending points fund. Per the terms of the decision, the teams have 14 days to ask for another hearing and the revocation of the charters — if it happened — wouldn't go into effect for another week after that 14-day deadline. There's still plenty of time for more legal machinations to happen before the teams' charters would get taken. Where everything stands now There were signs the teams' argument could be in trouble a month ago during a May hearing. The appeals court proceeding happened after NASCAR appealed the injunction in favor of the teams. A judge on the panel openly questioned the teams' argument that they should receive the benefits of the charter contract while not signing the contract. Advertisement From Sportsnaut: 'I had thought coming in and you can correct me, that the district court concluded that the (lawsuit release clause) was anticompetitive and therefore, to protect your antitrust claims, the court wanted you to be able to race but without a contract that included the release,' said [Judge Paul V.] Niemeyer, 'and my concern and I'll just lay it out there, I don't understand the Section 2 analysis, what we need to have is the exercise of monopoly power to exclude competition. 'I can't see why a release addresses competition in any sense. If you don't want the contract, you don't enter into it and you sue. But if you do want the contract, you enter into it, and you've given up past releases. But the Omega (a precedence case) is that you can't have your cake and eat it too.' The teams have been represented by famed antitrust lawyer Jeffrey Kessler. The 71-year-old has been on the winning side in previous high-profile sports cases like the NCAA's lifting of its cap on college athlete compensation, the United States Women's National Team's pay discrimination case and even Tom Brady's appeal of his four-game suspension as part of the "Deflategate" scandal. Neither 23XI or Front Row seem to be at risk of failing to qualify for any races if they lose their charter protections because no race since the Daytona 500 has featured more than 40 teams attempting to qualify for the 40 available starting spots. In fact, all but one race since the 500 has not featured a full field. The money, however, is a much bigger factor. Cup Series teams rely heavily on purse and points fund money from NASCAR. With chartered teams getting a much larger share of that money than open teams, the budgets of both 23XI and Front Row Motorsports could be heavily impacted. Advertisement The decision could also lead to a fascinating dilemma. Both Front Row and 23XI expanded from two cars to three over the offseason by purchasing charters from the now defunct Stewart-Haas Racing team that closed at the end of the season. NASCAR would assumably take over the ownership of the charters since SHR no longer exists and other chartered teams could end up getting larger shares of the money designated for chartered teams. Front Row currently fields cars for Todd Gilliland, Noah Gragson and Zane Smith, while 23XI Racing has cars for Riley Herbst, Tyler Reddick and Bubba Wallace.
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Appeals court rules in favor of NASCAR and overturns injunction for 23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports
A federal appeals court ruled in favor of NASCAR on Thursday in the sanctioning body's ongoing legal battle with Michael Jordan's 23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports. The Fourth Circuit of Appeals in North Carolina overturned an injunction that allowed the teams to race as chartered teams as their lawsuit against NASCAR proceeded. The teams won the injunction in December after they were the only two teams in NASCAR's Cup Series to not sign the current franchising agreement between NASCAR and its teams. 'In short, because we have found no support for the proposition that a business entity or person violates the antitrust laws by requiring a prospective participate to give a release for past conduct as a condition for doing business, we cannot conclude that the plaintiffs made a clear showing that they were likely to succeed on the merits of that theory," the decision stated. "And without satisfaction of the likelihood-of-success element, the plaintiffs were not entitled to a preliminary injunction.' Advertisement Front Row and 23XI had said that NASCAR was monopolistic in its antitrust suit filed in October. Chartered teams receive guaranteed entries into every Cup Series race and, most importantly, get a bigger share of purse money from the season-ending points fund. Per the terms of the decision, the teams have 14 days to ask for another hearing and the revocation of the charters — if it happened — wouldn't go into effect for another week after that 14-day deadline. There's still plenty of time for more legal machinations to happen before the teams' charters would get taken. Where everything stands now There were signs the teams' argument could be in trouble a month ago during a May hearing. The appeals court proceeding happened after NASCAR appealed the injunction in favor of the teams. A judge on the panel openly questioned the teams' argument that they should receive the benefits of the charter contract while not signing the contract. Advertisement From Sportsnaut: 'I had thought coming in and you can correct me, that the district court concluded that the (lawsuit release clause) was anticompetitive and therefore, to protect your antitrust claims, the court wanted you to be able to race but without a contract that included the release,' said Niemeyer, 'and my concern and I'll just lay it out there, I don't understand the Section 2 analysis, what we need to have is the exercise of monopoly power to exclude competition. 'I can't see why a release addresses competition in any sense. If you don't want the contract, you don't enter into it and you sue. But if you do want the contract, you enter into it, and you've given up past releases. But the Omega (a precedence case) is that you can't have you cake and eat it too.' The teams have been represented by famed antitrust lawyer Jeffrey Kessler. The 71-year-old has been on the winning side in previous high-profile sports cases like the NCAA's lifting of its cap on college athlete compensation, the United States Women's National Team's pay discrimination case and even Tom Brady's appeal of his four-game suspension as part of the "Deflategate" scandal. Neither 23XI or Front Row Appseem to be at risk of failing to qualify for any races if they lose their charter protections because no race since the Daytona 500 has featured more than 40 teams attempting to qualify for the 40 available starting spots. In fact, all but one race since the 500 has featured a full field. The money, however, is a much bigger factor. Cup Series teams rely heavily on purse and points fund money from NASCAR. With chartered teams getting a much larger share of that money than open teams, the budgets of both 23XI and Front Row Motorsports could be heavily impacted. Advertisement The decision could also lead to a fascinating dilemma. Both Front Row and 23XI expanded from two cars to three over the offseason by purchasing charters from the now defunct Stewart-Haas Racing team that closed at the end of the season. NASCAR would assumably take over the ownership of the charters since SHR no longer exists and other chartered teams could end up getting larger shares of the money designated for chartered teams. Front Row currently fields cars for Todd Gilliland, Noah Gragson and Zane Smith, while 23XI Racing has cars for Riley Herbst, Tyler Reddick and Bubba Wallace.
Newsweek
4 hours ago
- Newsweek
Dale Jr. Links Carson Hocevar's Bold Move to His Father's NASCAR Legacy
Dale Earnhardt Jr. showered huge praise on young Cup Series driver Carson Hocevar for his aggressive driving style by comparing him to his late father and NASCAR icon, Dale Earnhardt Sr. The comments from Dale Jr. arrive days after Hocevar clashed with Ricky Stenhouse Jr. at Nashville Superspeedway. Hocevar hit the rear of Stenhouse Jr.'s No. 47 car, which pushed him off course and led him straight into the wall. While Hocevar managed to finish second, Stenhouse Jr. finished the race last. The incident prompted several NASCAR insiders to target Hocevar's driving style. Stenhouse Jr. also pointed to a possible payback in the future. However, seeing Hocevar's race, Dale Jr. was reminded of his father, which prompted him to advise Hocevar to continue driving the same way. Speaking on the Dale Jr. Download, he said: Dale Earnhardt Jr. speaks to the media on the red carpet for the NASCAR on Prime Presents The World Premiere of Earnhardt at The Revelry on May 22, 2025 in Charlotte, North Carolina. Dale Earnhardt Jr. speaks to the media on the red carpet for the NASCAR on Prime Presents The World Premiere of Earnhardt at The Revelry on May 22, 2025 in Charlotte, North NASCAR and Prime Video "Carson, I even said in a clip on Dirty Mo Media, I think the guy reminds me of a 1979 Dale Earnhardt. Fast, not scared to use his front bumper, don't care if somebody gets mad about it and on the verge of becoming a star. That's exactly how I saw dad around that timeframe in his career. "Off the track, what they like to do Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, they could be completely different people. But on the racetrack, that's what I see out of Carson. "And I say that to maybe encourage Carson to continue what he's doing because Dale Earnhardt ended up becoming a seven-time champion. That aggressive style was something that endeared him to a lot of people. You can see a lot of people enjoy that as well, out of Carson." Hocevar revealed that he texted Stenhouse Jr. after the race weekend and admitted that his intention was not to crash into him. Speaking on SiriusXM NASCAR Radio, he said: "We texted a little bit back and forth and I think we'll still talk. You see each other 38 weekends a year. Eventually, you're going to run into each other. Not literally, hopefully, but run into each other in person. I think it's better if you're going to have that talk or conversation, to do it before you get to the track and everyone gets into race mode. "Yeah, he wanted to have that conversation, so I just texted him to reach out or whatever. We'll probably have that talk and see where it goes." He added: "I know my intentions and what I thought was gonna happen. Ultimately, you don't want to wreck anybody's race car. You don't want to wreck anybody. [Spire co-owner] Jeff Dickerson tells me all the time that if you're explaining, you're losing. With us talking about this, instead of talking about how we can get ourselves one spot better, we're talking about this. "I didn't want to wreck him. I went in and I thought I could get there and get a little more space. For his arc, I thought he was gonna go run the middle with the 54 [Ty Gibbs] running the bottom and thought I could get in a little deeper and have his spotter call inside and he just came all the way down and I landed into his left rear. Backed him into the fence. I don't wanna do that and I feel bad for it, obviously, for wrecking somebody's race car. "I think the biggest thing is the story we want is the fact we ran second with the 77 car. Don't think anyone remembers Ryan Blaney won the race because all they're talking about is this so far. I think that's the biggest thing is we don't want to slow ourselves down by having these clouds over our heads just as a team or put any more targets on my back. I've created the world I live in of that reputation; I understand that. You don't want to do anything more to put a bigger target on your back."
