logo
‘It put the fear of God in the audience': the incredible story of how Jaws changed Hollywood

‘It put the fear of God in the audience': the incredible story of how Jaws changed Hollywood

The Guardian7 hours ago

Half a century later, Richard Dreyfuss still won't go in the water. 'I have never done it, not since the film,' the Oscar-winning actor says, 'because you're totally aware of what you're not aware of and you're not aware of anything underneath.'
The film is Jaws, whose release 50 years ago on 20 June marked a turning point in both the history of cinema and public perception of sharks. It was the movie that in effect invented the summer blockbuster, paving the way for Star Wars, Jurassic Park and the Marvel Cinematic Universe. It cast sharks in the role of monsters to be feared and killed – but also stimulated interest in marine conservation.
Based on a novel by Peter Benchley and directed by Steven Spielberg, Jaws tells the story of a great white shark terrorising the beach town of Amity Island, prompting police chief Martin Brody, marine biologist Matt Hooper and grizzled fisherman Quint to hunt it down. It earned rave reviews from critics and became the first movie to take more than $100m in theatrical rentals.
The three men on a boat were Dreyfuss (Hooper), Roy Scheider (Brody) and Robert Shaw (Quint) and the dynamic between them is central to the film's appeal. Today only Dreyfuss is left. Now, 77, sitting in a library at his home in San Diego, California, his memories remain lucid. 'First of all, you have to remember this is not 50 years later,' he says via Zoom. 'This is yesterday.'
At first Dreyfuss turned the part down. 'At this lunch meeting he [Spielberg] illustrated the story very well, very vividly, and he said, did you like it? I said, oh, yes. He said, do you want to do it? I said, no, and he said, why? I said, because it's going to be a bitch to shoot. I at that moment was not looking for difficulties. I turned him down in that meeting and then I turned him down again.'
But then Dreyfuss saw a rough cut of a film he had just made and thought his performance looked so bad that it might end his career. So he called Spielberg and begged him for the role. Once shooting got under way, it did not go as Dreyfuss had prophesied at that lunch meeting.
'One of the many things that I learned was that it was not a bitch to shoot at all. I would say that there was one word that characterised the shoot and that was waiting. More waiting than anything.'
Despite the difficulty and cost, Spielberg insisted on shooting in the open ocean off Martha's Vineyard for the sake of authenticity. The budget ballooned from $4m to $9m. Production went 100 days over schedule and was plagued by the malfunctions of the mechanical shark (nicknamed 'Bruce' after Spielberg's lawyer).
At the mention of this, Dreyfuss puts his hands to his mouth to mimic a loudspeaker: ''The shark is not working. The shark is not working. Repeat. The shark is not working.' And then one day you hear this. 'The shark is working! The shark is working!''
He recalls: 'There were three different sharks and three different crews that worked the shark and it was all a disaster. There's a line in the film where Robert says he had these eyes, these doll's eyes, and he did because they were doll's eyes!
'Steven had to conceive of a film which implied the shark rather than show it directly. That was the story of the shoot: the director, Steven, had to rework his conception of the entire movie because he knew he could not show it as brazenly or blatantly as he had assumed. That ultimately made the film a masterpiece.'
Spielberg, who was in his mid-20s at the time, has credited director Alfred Hitchcock with influencing his less-is-more approach to building suspense. He also received a mighty lift from composer John Williams, whose two-note theme music initially seemed so simple that Spielberg thought it a joke until he realised its visceral menace.
Dreyfuss comments: 'John is an extraordinary composer and it took him no time at all to create a sound picture that could carry the film. You don't see the shark first: you hear it. Under the credits you hear bar-dum, bar-dum, bar-dum, bar-dum and you're seeing that shark moving through the underbrush and I'm telling you, it put the fear of God in the audience and me and everybody.'
The British film critic Mark Kermode has argued that Jaws is not about a shark. A case in point is a scene below deck in which Quint recalls how sharks ravaged survivors after the wartime sinking of the USS Indianapolis, providing Quint with a powerful motivation for his hatred of the animals. Enhanced by improvisation captured on tape recorders, it has been described by Spielberg as 'the scene that I'm proudest of in Jaws'.
Shaw – who struggled with alcoholism for most of his life – made himself drunk for the scene but it backfired on the first take, Dreyfuss recalls. 'He lost control of himself and he was terribly embarrassed and that only made him drink more and so that day was a terrible humiliation for him. Because I was sitting next to him and in the shot, it was painful.
'That night he called Steven at two or three in the morning and said, how badly did I humiliate myself? Steven said, not fatally. He came in the next morning and he did the scene in one take and he was brilliant.'
For decades there have been stories that the palpable tension between Hooper and Quint was not based on acting alone but mirrored personal animosity between Dreyfuss and Shaw. The alleged feud was explored in the recent play The Shark is Broken co-written by and starring Shaw's son Ian. Dreyfuss, however, is adamant this is a myth and one that pains him to this day.
'If you are aware of the stories in and around the filming, you know the 'discovery' of the feud between Robert and myself didn't exist for 25 years,' he says firmly. 'It was not the truth. It was not the fact of our relationship at all. Twenty-five years after the film was over, I found that there was this 'feud' between us.
'What there had been was one day where I was angry at him for stuff. It was one day. To a great extent what happened was that in order to jack up the stories about the film, they re-emphasized the story of this feud, which wasn't real and the people who did it knew it. I resented that for a long time but Robert was already dead by 15 years and there was nothing I could do.
'I cherished his memory and what I was learning from him and I'm not kidding about that. Robert was an extraordinary actor and an extraordinary writer and I could tell you a great number of stories about all of that. But I won't allow anyone to walk away from an interview with Richard Dreyfuss and think that there was reality to the feud.'
He and Shaw had even made plans for a future collaboration, Dreyfuss adds. 'We were in the hold of the boat and we were both napping and all of a sudden Robert said, 'I know. I'll play the Ghost to your Hamlet if you play the Fool to my Lear.' I said, 'You've got it. But not for 10 years.' He said, 'Why?' I said, 'Because you'll eat me alive,' and he laughed and said, 'OK.'
'So we had an agreement to make those two pieces and unfortunately he died very quickly. That was a catastrophic feeling, a loss that I knew had changed my future. I could have taken willing advantage of that friendship and I was unable to.'
When Dreyfuss first saw the finished cut of Jaws, it made a huge impression. He recalls: 'I was as terrified as if I had never experienced the making of this film. I was completely swept up in the story. It was so much an achievement of film-making and my friend Steven, who's sitting there – I knew that I was watching the crowning of the uncrowned prince of Hollywood.'
The movie drew long queues at cinemas and quickly became a cultural phenomenon. 'There was, for the first time, an awareness of how a film could affect all of society. There was not one group, one country, one people who were immune to this. He happened upon something that was so ubiquitous and shared by all people. Wow! Although Steven did that a number of times afterwards in other films, it's easy to spot because of Jaws.'
Dreyfuss has never again sat down to watch the whole of Jaws from start to finish, although if he chances on a TV showing that is already under way, he usually sticks with it to the end. And what of the three widely panned sequels? 'They should never have been made and I have absolutely no interest in seeing them. Never have and never will.'
Dreyfuss, Shaw and Spielberg were not involved in Jaws 2, released in 1978, but it did star Scheider and Lorraine Gary, playing his wife Ellen Brody as she had in the first film. Gary is now 88 and living in Los Angeles. Speaking by phone, her memories of working with Scheider on Jaws are less than rosy.
'He was very much an isolated human at that point. He smoked; I hate cigarettes. He also spent a tremendous amount of time with one of those tin foil reflector pans, getting his tan. There was very little in common. Years later I was in New York and we ran into each other on Madison Avenue. We talked like real people at that point instead of actors on the set and it was fun – it was very professional.'
Typically summer months were quiet for cinemas but Jaws was deliberately timed for when people were at beach resorts and accompanied by the tagline: 'See it before you go swimming!' The film opened on 464 screens in North America and was boosted by a major TV advertising campaign, still unusual at the time and marketing stunts such as themed ice-creams. Gottlieb once observed: 'That notion of selling a picture as an event, as a phenomenon, as a destination, was born with that release.'
Did Gary have any sense that Jaws would be such a gamechanger? 'Absolutely not. No clue. It stunned me when it did, what it did and it stuns me now. Every day I get fan mail. I'm an 88-year-old woman. Come on, leave me alone! It's all very strange to me but luckily, it's fun.'
Unlike Dreyfuss, the experience did not put her off swimming. Gary has gone scuba diving and come within five feet of a shark. 'I'm not scared of sharks,' she says. 'The only time I was scared by sharks was when I saw my sons and my grandchildren in the ocean and I thought, sooner or later there'll be payback, but there wasn't. I truly do not have a very strong feeling about hurting the reputation of sharks. They deserve to be known for who they are and what they do.'
The film's impact on these ancient predators, which date back 450m years – longer than the dinosaurs – is complex and frequently debated. Its official trailer speaks of a 'mindless eating machine' that will 'attack and devour anything', adding: 'It is as if God created the devil and gave him jaws.'
Small wonder Jaws instilled widespread fear of sharks, whose population has fallen dramatically since the early 1970s. Spielberg told BBC Radio 4's Desert Island Discs in 2022: 'I truly and to this day regret the decimation of the shark population because of the book and the film. I really, truly regret that.'
But the film also sparked engagement in marine science and conservation, a legacy actively pursued by the author Benchley, who died in 2006, and his wife Wendy, who is executive producer of a Nat Geo documentary, Jaws@50: The Definitive Inside Story.
In a phone interview, Wendy, 84, comments: 'Jaws tapped into an innate fear of being eaten by a monster. It was a scary book and a scary movie but 90% of the people who read the book or saw the movie got over their fear; 10% never went back in the water.'
Benchley had worked as a speechwriter for President Lyndon Johnson over the last two years of his presidency then wanted to get back to freelance writing. The couple were living in Pennington, New Jersey, with two young children and financial pressures but Benchley decided to try writing a book.
He had two ideas, Wendy says. 'One was about current day pirates; one about a great white shark that hangs around a town and causes some mischief. I said, oh, honey, I don't think either of these ideas are going to be that great. Thank heavens he didn't listen to me.'
Benchley had spent childhood summers sailing, fishing or swimming at Nantucket Island, off the coast of Massachusetts, where the black dorsal fins of sharks could be seen above the surface. 'Now, he knew after he wrote the book, and after people started to do more and more research on sharks, that sharks do not hang around. They don't like human flesh: we're too bony, we don't have enough fat on us. Peter always said, 'I would never write Jaws again because I now know how important this animal is and how magnificent it is.''
Benchley was unsure what to call the book. Wendy says: 'Some suggested titles were pretentious, like Leviathan Rising, and others were very scary, like White Death. Peter's father, who was a wonderful guy and a novelist also, said with his good sense of humour: 'How about What's That Noshing on My Leg?'
'It was down to the wire and Peter said, let's settle on the word Jaws because nobody knows what it means and nobody reads a first book anyway. There was absolutely no expectation that this would be rocketing up the New York Times bestseller list.'
Nor did the Benchleys expect it to become a movie. Spielberg had chanced upon galley proofs of the book and been enthralled. The rights were secured by producers Richard Zanuck and David Brown for $150,000, plus $25,000 for a first draft of the script, before the novel had been published (it would sell 5.5m copies before the film opened).
Wendy says: 'I do remember when Peter got the phone call in our little house in Pennington. I cried. I thought, our life is ruined because I had known people who suddenly got some wealth and I thought, oh no, but we were a little bit older and we had good, strong families and we had wonderful friends and so our life stayed very solid.'
Benchley co-wrote the screenplay, and had a bit part on screen as a reporter, but was relieved when Carl Gottlieb took over the day-to-day writing, including a leavening of humour. The film version removed plot lines from the novel such as a mafia connection and an affair between Hooper and Brody's wife. Spielberg also decided: you're gonna need a bigger shark.
Dismayed by the demonisation of sharks, Benchley wrote, narrated and appeared in dozens of TV documentaries about marine life and became
a full-time marine conservationist. He and his wife worked for the Environmental Defense Fund. The Peter Benchley Ocean Awards are held each year to celebrate individual excellence in ocean conservation.
Wendy says: 'We were horrified that people took this novel and this fictional movie as some kind of a licence to go out and kill sharks and to schedule more shark tournaments. We took this very seriously and began to work on conservation issues.'
As awareness has grown, she adds, applications to study marine science have risen at universities around the country. 'That is an outcome of Jaws that people now understand. In fact the ocean community embraces Jaws as a positive for ocean science, ocean research and conservation.
'The other thing that surprised us and relieved us greatly was that Peter began to get thousands of letters from people all over the world who said it was a great book, scary movie, but it intrigued them and they want to know more about sharks. There were so many letters from people wanting to be Hooper, not in a white lab coat sitting doing research but out on the ocean and experiencing not only sharks but other ocean creatures. That was a wonderful feeling.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Meghan launches new jams and £20 orange blossom honey in website restock
Meghan launches new jams and £20 orange blossom honey in website restock

Rhyl Journal

time12 minutes ago

  • Rhyl Journal

Meghan launches new jams and £20 orange blossom honey in website restock

Meghan had promised some 'delicious surprises' as she teased, earlier this week, that she would be offering some new products on her As Ever site. Also available are an apricot spread in 'keepsake packaging' and a crepe mix, both £10 each, flower sprinkles for £11 and a range of herbal teas at £9 each. In an Instagram post at the same time as the new products went live, the California-based duchess wrote: 'Yummies, and honeys, and fruit spreads, oh my!' Meghan previously said the April launch of her As Ever products, including jam and herbal tea, had been 'absolutely extraordinary'. But she also spoke of her fear that she annoyed customers when the first batch of her jam and herbal teas sold out in less than an hour. She said wanted to wait until it is 'completely stable and we have everything we need'. In the run-up to her re-stock, Meghan shared a photo of jam-making preparations including bowls of strawberries, raspberries and blueberries, and freshly squeezed lemons, on her Instagram stories, writing: ''June gloom?' Not over here! Because this month your favourite products are back.' Her official As Ever account also posted: 'To all who've been wondering and waiting, thank you! 'Your favourites are returning, plus a few NEW things we can't wait to show you. Coming this month … get excited!'

The Guide #196: How blockbusters, streaming and risk-averse studios shaped the last 25 years of cinema
The Guide #196: How blockbusters, streaming and risk-averse studios shaped the last 25 years of cinema

The Guardian

time32 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

The Guide #196: How blockbusters, streaming and risk-averse studios shaped the last 25 years of cinema

We've mulled over music, tackled TV and now, to finish our series looking at how pop culture has changed in the first quarter of the 21st century, we're chewing over cinema. And there's quite a bit of chewing to do, equivalent to at least a medium-rare steak or a large toffee. Because, while film might not have been disturbed quite as dramatically by streaming as music or TV has, its still had to contend with some serious changes in audience habits. The more than a century-old practice of spending money to stare at a giant screen in a darkened room now has all manner of competition, including streamers like Netflix beaming films with the same production values and star names straight to your living room at a fraction of the price. These changing headwinds, not to mention a global pandemic that discouraged people from gathering in enclosed spaces together, have only intensified a focus on what studios believe will coax people into cinemas: superhero movies, sequels and stories drawn from familiar IP – wizards, hobbits, Barbies. All of these make an appearance in the list of the biggest films each year at the global box office, which we'll be looking at today. To help make sense of how cinema has shifted over the past 25 years, I spoke to film journalist Ellen E Jones, who as well as being the author of Screen Deep: How Film and TV can Solve Racism and Save the World, co-hosts Radio 4's film discussion series Screenshot with Mark Kermode. Who better then to channel Russell Crowe in A Beautiful Mind, and solve the complicated equations of 21st century cinema. Here's the list of the highest-grossing films from each year in full and what it tells us … The full list 2000 | Mission: Impossible 22001 | Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone2002 | The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers2003 | The Lord of the Rings: Return of the King2004 | Shrek 22005 | Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire2006 | Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest2007 | Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End2008 | The Dark Knight2009 | Avatar2010 | Toy Story 32011 | Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 22012 | The Avengers2013 | Frozen2014 | Transformers: Age of Extinction2015 | Star Wars: The Force Awakens2016 | Captain America: Civil War2017 | Star Wars: The Last Jedi2018 | Avengers: Infinity War2019 | Avengers: Endgame2020 | Demon Slayer: Mugen Train2021 | Spider-Man: No Way Home2022 | Avatar: The Way of Water2023 | Barbie2024 | Inside Out 2 Blockbusters reign supreme Fifty years to the day since the release of Jaws, the first blockbuster, now there is seemingly nothing but. And, while Jaws was based on an original idea, today's equivalents trade on past glories. 'Hollywood,' Ellen says, 'is becoming increasingly risk-averse, leading to an ever-narrowing offering at the multiplex.' As Ellen points out, in the last 25 years of the 20th century only eight of the highest-grossing films from each year were sequels and franchises (though some would go on to spawn their own sequels). 'But in this century, with the exception of Frozen, every single highest-grossing film has been based off of a popular toy, book or film series, and frequently all three.' Amid this sea of regurgitated IP, Ellen sees one small glint of optimism: Barbie, despite the fact Greta Gerwig's film was drawn from the most commercial of sources. 'The film is unassailable proof that, even within the strict IP-only, risk-averse confines of the current system, a film-maker and star, working in perfect partnership and at the height of their powers, can make great cinema art,' Ellen says. Stars are less important than ever In the 21st century it is the franchise, not the human fronting it, that determines box office success. 'Gone are the days when all your movie needed was Julia Roberts's smile or Bruce Willis in a tank top and you were guaranteed return on investment,' says Ellen. 'These days, every actor needs a franchise under their belt in order to crack the highest-earning list, and preferably that franchise is the Marvel Cinematic Universe.' Still, wonders Ellen, is the dwindling importance of A-listers at the box office necessarily a bad thing? 'From the star's ashes has risen a new category of Interesting Internet-Beloved Actors: people like Josh O'Connor, Paul Mescal, Anya Taylor-Joy and Zendaya, who now have space to carve artistically fulfilling careers on their own terms … just as long as they don't expect to out-earn Robert Downey Jr in 2013.' … and so are the Oscars Sign up to The Guide Get our weekly pop culture email, free in your inbox every Friday after newsletter promotion Oscar acclaim and commercial success have rarely been bedfellows, but in the 20th century you would find occasional meeting of the two (The Godfather, Rocky or Titanic, for example). In the last 25 years though the prospect of an Oscar-winning chart topper seems fanciful: only one film on our list – The Lord of the Rings: Return of the King – has won best picture and few others have even been nominated. Still, says Ellen, the Oscars still have a role to play here. 'If the Academy awards is good for anything — and I have my doubts — it's giving a box office bump to quality films for grownups that might otherwise get overlooked, in this time of superhero shenanigans aimed at 15-year-old boys. There are many people who will go and see great films like The Zone of Interest, Past Lives or Nickel Boys simply because they are Oscar nominated. That said, there is only ever a fairly loose correlation between awards season success and artistic value, so I don't find this divergence unduly concerning.' Cinema is thriving away from the top of the box office Rather than uninspired blockbusters, Ellen is interested in what isn't on this list. The fact that our 25 films are only representative of what people went to the cinema to see, misses an entire revolution in film-making that streaming has only accelerated. 'Streaming and its preference for the subscriber revenue model has, in combination with campaigning pressure from social media, led to a positive development on screen, which would be missed if the highest-grossing list is your only barometer,' she says. The result has been a rapidly increasing diversity – in terms, says Ellen of 'race, gender identity and, to a lesser extent, class' – in the sort of stories being told on screen. 'More different kinds of films are being made with smaller budgets, aimed at representing smaller — but possibly more enthusiastically engaged — audience groups,' says Ellen. 'And some of these have also been huge commercial successes, exploding the pervasive and pernicious industry myth that only white-fronted films can 'open' at the box office.' She points to the enormous success of Ryan Coogler's Black Panther, or Crazy Rich Asians, the highest-grossing romcom of the entire 2010s. And then there are the many, many people going to see films each week that don't ever threaten the top of the box office: indie movies, foreign language films or, increasingly, old films given a second chance on the big screen. 'Thanks in part to platforms like Letterboxd, Mubi and even Instagram, a whole new generation of people now thinks going to the cinema to watch arthouse, left-field or foreign-language films is cool,' says Ellen. 'If you don't believe me, just head to the Prince Charles cinema in Leicester Square — or your local repertory or arthouse cinema — on a Friday or Saturday night. 75% of the audience are under 30.' What sums up 21st-century cinema? So which film on our list best encapsulates film in the past quarter century? Given their dominance over our list, it would be difficult to look past one of the caped crusaders here, and Ellen opts for Christopher Nolan's The Dark Knight, which she describes as, 'a superhero movie, but a superior one. It's representative of our era's tedious obsession with IP and that conservative affirmation of white, male, moral power represented by the (white, male) superhero, but it also demonstrates that there is some room for originality and artistry within that.' Superhero movies: not entirely terrible, then. If you want to read the complete version of this newsletter please subscribe to receive The Guide in your inbox every Friday

Chrishell Stause reveals her 'last attempt' to start family with G Flip as she reflects on IVF 'hell'
Chrishell Stause reveals her 'last attempt' to start family with G Flip as she reflects on IVF 'hell'

Daily Mail​

time40 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Chrishell Stause reveals her 'last attempt' to start family with G Flip as she reflects on IVF 'hell'

Chrishell Stause has revealed she is making one 'last attempt' at getting pregnant with partner G Flip. The couple, who tied the knot in Las Vegas in 2023, have been very open about their desire to have children and the painful side-effects of the IVF process. Now, the Selling Sunset star, 43, has revealed post she doesn't wish to go through the 'hell' of IVF injections again, adding: 'Back on the IVF hell train. I think this may be my last attempt. There are other alternatives, but this route needed to be tried first bc of timing. So if it's meant to be, it will be. If not, pivot.' Alongside the caption, Chrishell included a photo of her follicle-stimulating hormone and the pen used to inject it into her body. Chrishell disclosed in April she and G Flip, 31, are 'actively trying' to expand their family and have taken medical steps towards their goal. 'I'm literally still bleeding from a shot I had to just give myself,' Chrishell shared while speaking to Us Weekly at the Tryst hotel opening in Puerto Vallarta, Mexico. G Flip previously opened up about the desire to have children with Chrishell. The singer said on the People Every Day podcast in May 2022: 'I definitely see children in my future. Right now, me and Chrishell know where we are in the stages of our lives. And we're very transparent about that. 'I love children. I was a music teacher for years before I became a session drummer and then a solo artist. So I was like, I've always loved kids and yeah, definitely one day that'll be in the future.' Chrishell and G Flip first met at a Halloween party in 2021, approximately two years after the collapse of Chrishell's marriage to Justin Hartley. They started dating in March 2022 and went public with their relationship that May before getting married in secret the following year.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store