Police investigate Enoch Powell portrait hung in village shop as ‘hate incident'
A village shop is being investigated by police over the display of a portrait of Enoch Powell alongside his most controversial anti-immigration speech.
Mumfords, an ironmonger in Cleobury Mortimer, Shropshire, has a framed picture of the divisive former Tory MP in its window along with an excerpt of his 1968 'Rivers of Blood' speech.
Shopkeeper Elizabeth Griffiths said she put the photograph in her window in February to highlight the 'need for strong assertive leadership during tough political times'.
But West Mercia Police said it was treating the display as a 'hate incident' after receiving a report on 16 May of 'offensive content'.
Mr Powell caused a national political firestorm when he used inflammatory language to criticise immigration to the UK in a 45-minute speech to local Conservative members at a Birmingham hotel.
The former Conservative MP for Wolverhampton South West said white British people would find themselves 'strangers in their own country' as a result of migration.
He was sacked from the Conservative front bench for making the speech and it outraged his senior colleagues at the time.
A hate incident is any non-criminal offence that a victim thinks is motivated by hostility or prejudice towards a person's race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, or disability.
Last week, Sir Keir Starmer was accused of copying Mr Powell's words when he warned that the UK was becoming an 'island of strangers' while vowing to crack down on immigration.
Sir Keir said he would 'take back control' to slash the number of people coming to the UK as the country 'risks becoming an island of strangers, not a nation that walks forward together'.
Norwich South MP Clive Lewis said: 'It's simply not sustainable for the prime minister to echo the language of Enoch Powell's 'rivers of blood' speech. This kind of language doesn't just alienate communities, it drives people away from our country altogether.'
Downing Street rejected comparisons made with Mr Powell, who is a political hero of Reform leader Nigel Farage, and said Sir Keir 'absolutely stands by' his language.
Ms Griffiths told The Independent the picture had been in her shop window since the first week of February and she had received 'nothing but praise for all the time it has been there'.
She said it was put there alongside Sir Winston Churchill, St Francis of Assisi, 'our Lord Jesus Christ', Churchill mugs and books on Churchill and Donald Trump.
A West Mercia Police spokesperson told The Independent: 'On 16 May we received a report of offensive content displayed in a shop window on Church Street in Cleobury Mortimer.
'This is being treated as a hate incident and enquiries are ongoing.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Israel launches strikes on weapons in Syria
Israel said it had launched strikes on weapons belonging to Syria, hours after reports that two projectiles had been fired from Syria into Israel on Tuesday. The Israeli strikes on southern Syria caused "significant human and material losses", Syria's foreign ministry said, adding that Israel was "trying to destabilise the region". Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz said he held Syrian interim President Ahmed al-Sharaa responsible for the projectiles launched into Israel. Despite recent indirect talks to ease tensions between the two countries, Israel has stepped up attacks on targets in Syria since Sharaa led a rebel offensive that overthrew Bashar al-Assad's regime in December 2024. "Violent explosions shook southern Syria, notably the town of Quneitra and the Daraa region, following Israeli aerial strikes," said the Syrian Observatory of Human Rights, a UK-based monitoring group. In a statement, Syria's foreign ministry said: "This escalation constitutes a blatant violation of Syrian sovereignty and aggravates tensions in the region. "Syria has never been and will never be a threat to anyone in the region." It was unclear how many people were killed or injured in Israel's strikes. Israel said the strikes came after two projectiles launched from Syria landed in open areas of the country, causing no injuries. Israeli media reported that the strikes were the first launched from Syria since the fall of the Bashar al-Assad regime. It was not immediately clear who fired the projectiles. "We consider the president of Syria directly responsible for any threat and fire toward the State of Israel," Katz said. Syria's foreign ministry said reports of the launches from inside Syria "have not been verified yet". When the Assad regime was deposed, Israel launched a wave of attacks to degrade Syrian military infrastructure. It has also encouraged the expansion of settlements in the occupied Golan Heights, territory which Israel seized from Syria in 1976 and is considered illegally occupied under international law. Last month, US President Donald Trump announced plans to lift decade-old sanctions on Syria, imposed in response to atrocities committed by forces loyal to Assad during a 13-year civil war. During that conflict, more than 600,000 people were killed and 12 million others were forced from their homes. Last month, Israel bombed an area near Syria's presidential palace in Damascus, a strike which Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said was a "clear message" that it would "not allow the deployment of forces south of Damascus". UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres said the bombing was a "violation of Syria's sovereignty".
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Labour is cosying up to China after years of rollercoaster relations
The sprawling city of Chongqing in southwestern China is an incredible sight. Built on mountainous terrain and crisscrossed by rivers, it is connected by vast elevated roads. Trains even run through some buildings. TikTokers have begun documenting their commutes in the striking urban architecture, generating millions of likes and much hype. But it is also where, on a somewhat quieter trip, mayors and their deputies from the UK recently visited - the largest British civic delegation to visit the country in modern history. The whole trip, which took place in March, received substantial Chinese media coverage, despite flying more under the radar in the UK. The impression it left on some of the politicians who travelled there was vast. "[The city is] what happens if you take the planning department and just say 'yes' to everything," reflects Howard Dawber, deputy London mayor for business. "It's just amazing." The group travelled to southern Chinese cities, spoke to Chinese mayors and met Chinese tech giants. So impressed was one deputy mayor that, on returning home, they bought a mobile phone from Chinese brand Honor (a stark contrast from the days the UK banned Huawei technology from its 5G networks, just a few years ago). Roughly half-a-dozen deals were signed on the back of the trip. The West Midlands, for example, agreed to establish a new UK headquarters in Birmingham for Chinese energy company EcoFlow. But the visit was as much about diplomacy as it was trade, says East Midlands deputy mayor Nadine Peatfield, who attended. "There was a real hunger and appetite to rekindle those relationships." To some, it was reminiscent of the "golden era" of UK-China relations, a time when then-Prime Minister David Cameron and Chinese President Xi Jinping shared a basket of fish and chips and a pint. Those days have long felt far away. Political ties with China deteriorated under former UK Conservative Prime Ministers Boris Johnson, Rishi Sunak and Liz Truss. The last UK prime minister to visit China was Theresa May, in 2018. But the recent delegation - and the talk of Sir Keir Starmer possibly visiting China later this year - suggests a turning point in relations. But to what greater intent? The course correction seemed to begin with the closed-door meeting between Sir Keir and Chinese President Xi in Brazil last November. The prime minister signalled that Britain would look to cooperate with China on climate change and business. Since then, Labour's cautious pursuit of China has primarily focused on the potential financial upsides. In January, Chancellor Rachel Reeves co-chaired the first UK-China economic summit since 2019, in Beijing. Defending her trip, she said: "Choosing not to engage with China is no choice at all." Reeves claimed re-engagement with China could boost the UK economy by £1bn, with agreements worth £600m to the UK over the next five years — partially achieved through lifting barriers that restrict exports to China. Soon after, Energy Secretary Ed Miliband resumed formal climate talks with China. Miliband said it would be "negligence" to future generations not to have dialogue with the country, given it is the world's biggest carbon emitter. Labour simply describes its approach as "grown-up". But it all appears to be a marked shift from the last decade of UK-China relations. During the so-called "golden era", from 2010, the UK's policy towards China was dominated by the Treasury, focusing on economic opportunities and appearing to cast almost all other issues, including human rights or security, aside. By September 2023, however, Rishi Sunak said he was "acutely aware of the particular threat to our open and democratic way of life" posed by China. Labour claimed in its manifesto that it would bring a "long-term and strategic approach". China has a near monopoly on extracting and refining rare earth minerals, which are critical to manufacturing many high-tech and green products. For example, car batteries are often reliant on lithium, while indium is a rare metal used for touch screens. This makes China a vital link in global supply chains. "China's influence is likely to continue to grow substantially globally, especially with the US starting to turn inwards," says Dr William Matthews, a China specialist at Chatham House think tank. "The world will become more Chinese, and whilst that is difficult for any Western government, there needs to be sensible engagement from the get-go." Andrew Cainey, a director of the UK National Committee on China, an educational non-profit organisation, says: "China has changed a lot since the Covid-19 pandemic. To have elected officials not having seen it, it's a no brainer for them to get back on the ground". Certainly many in the UK's China-watching community believe that contact is an essential condition to gain a clearer-eyed view of the opportunities posed by China, but also the challenges. The opportunities, some experts say, are largely economic, climate and education-related. Or as Kerry Brown, Professor of Chinese Studies at King's College London, puts it: "China is producing information, analysis and ways of doing things that we can learn from". He points to the intellectual, technological, AI, and life sciences opportunities. Not engaging with China would be to ignore the realities of geopolitics in the 21st century, in Dr Matthew's view, given that it is the world's second largest economy. However he also believes that engagement comes with certain risks. But Charles Parton, who spent 22 years of his diplomatic career working in or on China, raises questions about the UK's economic and national security. For example, the government is reportedly weighing up proposals for a Chinese company to supply wind turbines for an offshore windfarm in the North Sea. Mr Parton warns against allowing China access to the national grid: "It wouldn't be difficult in a time of high tension to say, 'by the way, we can turn off all your wind farms'". But earlier this year, the China Chamber of Commerce to the EU issued a statement expressing concern over the "politicisation" of deals between wind developers in Europe and Chinese turbine suppliers. Xi's real test is not Trump's trade war North and South Korea are in an underground war - Kim Jong Un might now be winning The Conservative Party faces problems - is its leader one of them? James Sullivan, director of Cyber and Tech at defence think tank Rusi, notes there are also some questions around cyberspace. "China's activities in cyberspace appear to be more strategically and politically focused compared to previous opportunistic activities," he says. As for defence, the UK's recently published defence review describes China as a "sophisticated and persistent challenge", with Chinese technology and its proliferation to other countries "already a leading challenge for the UK". Ken McCallum, MI5 director general, meanwhile, has previously warned of a sustained campaign on an "epic scale" of Chinese espionage abroad. But Prof Brown pushes back on some concerns about espionage, saying some media narratives about this are a "fairytale". Beijing has always dismissed accusations of espionage as attempts to "smear" China. Sir Keir and his team will no doubt be closely monitoring how this is all viewed by Washington DC. Last month, President Donald Trump's trade advisor Peter Navarro described Britain as "an all too compliant servant of Communist China", urging the UK against deepening economic ties. "When it comes to foreign policy towards China, America's influence on policy will be quite substantive compared with say continental Europe," says Dr Yu Jie of China Foresight at LSE IDEAS think tank. Most analysts I speak to in both the UK and China are still clear on the need for the two countries to get back in the same room, even if they differ on where to draw the line: in which areas should Westminster cooperate and where should it stay clear. These red lines have not yet been drawn, and experts say that without some kind of playbook, it is difficult for businesses and elected officials to know how to engage. "You can only keep firefighting specific issues for so long without developing a systematic plan," warns Mr Cainey. Certain thorny issues have arisen, including Chinese investments in the UK. For example in April when the government seized control of British Steel from its former Chinese owner Jingye, to prevent it from being closed down, Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds admitted that he would "look at a Chinese firm in a different way" when considering investment in the UK steel industry. China's foreign ministry spokesperson, Lin Jian, warned that Labour should avoid "linking it to security issues, so as not to impact the confidence of Chinese enterprises in going to the UK". After Starmer met Xi last year, he said the government's approach would be "rooted in the national interests of the UK", but acknowledged areas of disagreement with China, including on human rights, Taiwan and Russia's war in Ukraine. Securing the release of pro-democracy activist and British citizen Jimmy Lai from a Hong Kong prison is, he has said, a "priority" for the government. Labour's manifesto broadly pledged: "We will cooperate where we can, compete where we need to, and challenge where we must." What is still lacking, however, is the fine print. Asked about the British government's longer-term strategy, Mr Parton replied: "No.10 doesn't have a strategy." He tells me he has some specific advice: "Go with your eyes open," he says. "But have a clear idea of what needs protecting, and a willingness to take some short-term financial hits to protect long-term national security." Labour has suggested that some clarity on their approach will be provided through the delayed China "audit", a cross-government exercise launched last year, which will review the UK's relations with China. The audit is due to be published this month, but many doubt that it will resolve matters. "If we see a visit from Starmer to Beijing, that will be an indication that the two sides have actually agreed with something, and that they would like to change and improve their bilateral relationship," says Dr Yu. But many people in Westminster remain China-sceptic. And even if the audit helps Britain better define what it wants out of its relationship with China, the question remains, do MPs and businesses have the China-related expertise to get the best out of it? According to Ruby Osman, China analyst at the Tony Blair Institute, there is an urgent need to build the UK's China capabilities in a more holistic way, focusing on diversifying the UK's points of contact with China. "If we want to be in a position where we are not just listening to what Beijing and Washington want, there needs to be investment in the talent pipeline coming into government, but also think tanks and businesses who work with China," she argues. And if that's the case, then irrespective of whether closer ties with China is viewed as a security threat, an economic opportunity, or something in between, the UK might be in a better position to engage with the country. Top image credit: PA BBC InDepth is the home on the website and app for the best analysis, with fresh perspectives that challenge assumptions and deep reporting on the biggest issues of the day. And we showcase thought-provoking content from across BBC Sounds and iPlayer too. You can send us your feedback on the InDepth section by clicking on the button below.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Medicaid cuts in ‘big beautiful bill' become flashpoint for GOP
Republicans are increasingly on the defensive over the party's handling of Medicaid cuts in the party's 'big, beautiful bill,' underscoring how the issue has become an early flashpoint ahead of next year's midterms. A number of Republicans have been pressed about cuts to Medicaid in heated town halls and conferences, most recently Sen. Joni Ernst (R-Iowa), whose sarcastic response went viral and has been mocked among Democrats. The moment underscored the challenge the party faces as it seeks to message on President Trump's agenda while also responding to growing criticism from Democrats over changes to the health care program, which could lead to millions of people losing coverage. 'As Republicans are bringing this bill home, they've got to focus their message around that waste, fraud and abuse, and they need to make sure that the policy is focused around that waste, fraud and abuse as well,' said Brian Reisinger, a former Wisconsin Republican strategist and rural policy expert who's authored 'Land Rich, Cash Poor.' House Republicans last month passed their sprawling package filled with several of Trump's top priorities, including extending the 2017 tax cuts and an immigration crackdown — overcoming their first major hurdle as they look to clear a Fourth of July holiday deadline to pass the bill in the Senate and get it signed into law. One of Democrats' clearest criticisms over the bill is the impact Medicaid changes could have on Americans. Millions are estimated to be uninsured and vulnerable to losing Medicaid coverage under the bill, though it remains unclear exactly how many will be impacted. Democrats and aligned groups like the Senate Democrats' campaign arm and Protect Our Care have attacked Republicans in ads over the issue. And the issue has come up in some public events that Republicans have participated in, most recently Ernst's town hall. The Iowa Republican drew the ire of Democrats when she quipped that 'we all are going to die' after an audience member shouted that people will die amid a discussion over the proposed Medicaid changes. In that same town hall, Ernst noted that 'Medicaid is extremely important here in the state of Iowa' and that 'those that meet the eligibility requirements for Medicaid, we will protect.' Speaking to reporters on Monday, Ernst defended her remarks, saying she was 'very passionate' and that 'you need to listen to the entire conversation.' But the fallout from the incident has been swift: a well-known Iowa Democrat, J.D. Scholten, jumped into the race following the controversy, and election handicapper Sabato's Crystal Ball shifted the race slightly toward Democrats as a result. Republicans have sought to counter the Democratic attacks, stressing the need for members of their party to frame the changes as part of an effort to make sure only those who really need Medicaid will have access to it. 'Narrative: Republicans are defending Medicaid for EVERY American who NEEDS and DESERVES it the most. That means seniors, low-income families, pregnant women, and disabled Americans, not fraudsters, able-bodied adults who refuse to work, or illegal immigrants,' reads messaging guidance from the House Republicans' campaign arm. 'FACT: Medicaid spending is going up year over year to support those in need.' Most immigrants without legal status can't qualify for Medicaid at the federal level, but some blue states have extended health care coverage to them. Republicans' legislation would lower the federal matching rate for states that make health care coverage available to immigrants without legal status. Other Republicans simply argue the party is tackling waste, fraud and abuse. 'The Democrats are just flat out lying about it. We're not doing Medicaid reform,' Sen. Markwayne Mullin (R-Okla.), an ally of President Trump, told reporters on Monday. 'We're kicking off the waste and the fraud off of it, people that should never be on it.' The Senate Republicans' campaign arm has also played up other aspects of the bill — such as tax cuts and border security — suggesting Democrats running for Senate who voted against it are also voting against the interests of their constituents. One Republican operative who requested anonymity to speak candidly acknowledged while the GOP was not 'entirely on offense on the Medicaid issue,' they noted that the party was at least 'muddying the waters and neutralizing it' by leaning into work requirements and illegal immigration. Yet not all Republicans are on the same page. Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) has opposed some of the Medicaid changes included in the bill, expressing concern over how parts of the legislation could impact rural hospitals. 'I'm concerned about the provider [tax]. I mean, that's not a direct benefit cut, but if it closes rural hospitals, I mean that's … people can't get coverage,' Hawley told reporters, referring to a provision of the bill that would help states fund Medicaid. Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine), who's up for reelection next year, also said last month she was not going to support the bill 'if there are deep cuts in Medicaid that would endanger health care for low-income families, for disabled children, for other vulnerable populations, and for our rural hospitals,' according to Maine Public. Reisinger, the former Wisconsin Republican strategist, said the GOP's messaging needs to focus on the waste, fraud and abuse that resonates with rural communities. 'Right now, voters are hearing … deeply conflicting information from Republicans [and] Democrats, and here's the thing: Republicans need to remember that in rural areas, there are a lot of their voters who at one time voted for a blue-collar Democrat and could do so again,' he said. 'We don't know if that'll be in the near term, in the midterms,' he added. 'We don't know if that'll be long term, but if they're passing legislation that is not living up to the declarations around waste, fraud and abuse, and they're actually passing legislation that has a deeply negative economic impact on rural America, that's going to have an impact.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
