Albudaiwi Stresses GCC Commitment to Combating All Forms of Human Trafficking
Secretary-General of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) Jassim Albudaiwi stressed that the Governmental Forum to Combat Human Trafficking in the Middle East has received regional and international acclaim for the efforts of GCC countries.
He noted that since its inception, the forum has contributed to shaping a unified GCC vision to address human trafficking, tailored to the region's unique economic and geographic characteristics, as well as the evolving challenges of this crime, particularly with the use of modern technologies and transnational organized crime networks, the Saudi Press Agency reported on Thursday.
Albudaiwi made his remarks during his speech at the opening of the sixth Governmental Forum to Combat Human Trafficking in the Middle East for 2025, held in Kuwait. The forum was attended by Minister of Justice of Kuwait Counselor Nasser Al-Sumait, along with several ministers and senior representatives from member states, as well as delegates from the GCC Secretariat, the Arab League, the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC), and the US Department of State.
Albudaiwi highlighted the adoption of national laws that criminalize human trafficking and establish clear mechanisms for victim protection and offender prosecution. These efforts include the formation of national committees and agencies, establishment of shelters, hotlines, and national referral systems for potential victims, as well as specialized training for security and judicial personnel.
He also cited regulatory reforms in labor markets through updated labor legislation and expanded regional and international cooperation with organizations such as UNODC, the International Organization for Migration, and the International Labor Organization to implement joint preventive and awareness programs.
Albudaiwi concluded and called for united efforts among countries to address shared challenges, enhance coordination, and sustain collective action, mainly in combating transnational crimes and protecting vulnerable groups such as women, children, and migrants.
He reaffirmed the GCC's steadfast and ongoing commitment to combating human trafficking in all its forms, advancing legislative and regulatory frameworks, and enhancing regional and international cooperation to ensure victim protection, offender accountability, and the promotion of justice and human rights.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arab News
3 hours ago
- Arab News
GCC takes a stand on the Iran-Israel war
As the Israel-Iran war entered its fourth day on Monday, with the fighting intensifying and reaching dangerous levels that could disrupt life beyond the two warring parties, the Gulf Cooperation Council foreign ministers met to coordinate their policy. The six GCC member states, plus the bloc as a whole, had already put out similar statements calling for a ceasefire and condemning Israel for starting the war on Friday. At Monday's meeting, the six GCC ministers went beyond those initial statements to address some of the risks involved and suggested ways to handle them other than war. While the GCC and Iran have at times strongly disagreed on important issues, the organization and its member states have opted for diplomacy to settle those disputes. Oman, one of the GCC member states, has actively mediated between Iran and the US on the nuclear issue. Saudi Arabia and Iran reached an agreement two years ago, with the help of China, to resume diplomatic relations after many years of disruption. Other member states have been in regular touch with Iran on its regional policies, over which the two sides have diverged greatly. All six foreign ministers met with their Iranian counterpart last October to work on this diplomatic approach. It is still a work in progress. A paramount concern for the ministers was how Israel's unilateral action has undermined respect for international law, including the UN Charter, in the region, which was already at a low point after 20 months of Israel's unlawful war of extermination against Palestinians in Gaza. The ministers therefore condemned attacks on Iran as a 'clear violation of international law and the United Nations Charter.' They called for an 'immediate ceasefire' and a quick return to the diplomatic track, to 'spare the region and its people the dangers of war' and to 'safeguard regional security and stability.' The approach was balanced, calling on 'all parties to exert joint efforts' to de-escalate, 'exercise maximum restraint' and choose diplomacy to resolve their conflict. A paramount concern was how Israel's unilateral action has undermined respect for international law Dr. Abdel Aziz Aluwaisheg Nuclear proliferation has been a major concern for the GCC, especially as the International Atomic Energy Agency has voiced criticisms of Iran's nuclear program, most recently in last week's Board of Governors decision, which found Tehran to be in breach of its nonproliferation obligations. That decision, which was the first of its kind in 20 years, raised the prospect of reporting the breach to the UN Security Council, especially following Iran's defiant reaction at the time. Israel's unilateral attack undermined that lawful process and raised the risk of a dangerous environmental fallout as it attacked nuclear targets with abandon, in violation of international law and international humanitarian law, which prohibit the targeting of nuclear facilities and installations, as clearly stipulated in Article 56 of the First Protocol of the Geneva Conventions. The IAEA has raised the alarm about likely radioactive contamination as a result of these attacks, as did the GCC ministers in their statement issued following Monday's meeting. They stressed the IAEA's important role in preventive nuclear security and safety and warned of the 'serious humanitarian and environmental consequences' of attacks on nuclear facilities, which clearly constitute a threat to safety and the international IAEA-run comprehensive safeguards system. By attacking nuclear facilities, Israel has triggered a race to the bottom, if Iran retaliates in kind, for example. While the resulting contamination so far appears to be contained, according to IAEA statements, the potential for widespread radioactive contamination is real. To prepare for nuclear and other environmental disasters, the GCC in 2012 established an emergency response center in Kuwait and put together various risk assessments and plans to meet any contingencies. On Monday, the ministers reviewed ongoing security coordination between member states under the GCC Joint Military Command and the ministries of defense, interior and other agencies dealing with these matters. Norms that many thought were well established in the relations between nations have been torn asunder Dr. Abdel Aziz Aluwaisheg The GCC Ministerial Council also stressed the need to safeguard maritime security, including the security and safety of waterways in the region. They called for 'confronting activities that threaten the security and stability of the region and the world, including targeting commercial vessels, threatening shipping lanes, international trade, and oil facilities.' It is clear that, unless the war is stopped, it will soon pose a serious threat not only to the region but it could spread way beyond. This week's news indicates that the US, for example, could get more deeply involved. Other powers also appear to be moving in that direction. The GCC ministers therefore called on the UN Security Council and world powers to 'assume their responsibilities toward bringing an immediate end to this war and preventing escalation.' In particular, it called for the resumption of nuclear talks between the US and Iran. What is quite clear is that there is a serious deficit in the region in upholding international law and deferring to the UN Charter, which clearly calls for settling disputes through political means and refraining from the use of force. Norms that many thought were well established in the relations between nations have been torn asunder, including the principles of good neighborliness, respect for the sovereignty and equality of states, their territorial integrity and noninterference in their internal affairs. This lawlessness has been a mark of this region in recent years. If the regional order breaks down completely here, other parts of the world could follow. No matter how worthy the cause, disregard for international law and the rules-based order, centered on the UN and anchored in international law, can only lead to chaos and disasters like those we are witnessing in the Middle East today.
Arab News
5 hours ago
- Arab News
Europe and GCC must lead a Middle East reset
The recent and ongoing Israeli attacks on Iran and Iranian counterattacks are bringing the Middle East once again to the brink of a wider war. While headlines rightly focus on the immediate fallout, including the damage, retaliation and fear of further escalation, including a nuclear dimension, there is a deeper and more urgent truth that policymakers must confront: the cycle of conflict in the Middle East will not end unless serious diplomatic leadership steps in. The crisis, therefore, also offers an opportunity — one where Europe and the Gulf Cooperation Council states, in particular, must step into the current vacuum to take ownership with a new diplomatic initiative that addresses what the region's security environment will look like post-Israel-Iran crisis. The attack by Israel on Iran and the subsequent regional shock waves mark a dangerous turning point in an already fragile region. Iran's long-standing involvement in proxy conflicts across the Arab world — from Lebanon to Syria, Iraq and Yemen — has made it a persistent source of tension with its neighbors. At the same time, the Netanyahu government's uncompromising stance on national security, often at the cost of diplomatic restraint, is feeding into a cycle of tit-for-tat violence. The result is a continuous downward spiral where everyone loses — civilians suffer, extremism festers and trust across borders erodes. That cycle must be broken. Amid this chaos, the usual arbiters of peace — chiefly the US — are no longer seen as reliable brokers by many in the region. Washington's political polarization and its increasingly transactional approach to foreign policy have left question marks on its credibility. Russia, distracted and weakened by its war in Ukraine, is no longer a stabilizing counterbalance. China, for all its growing diplomatic ambitions, still lacks the deep historical ties and cultural literacy required for lasting influence in the Middle East. And both Russia and China lack the institutional depth to mediate in the Middle East effectively. Together, they possess the diplomatic relationships, economic leverage and regional legitimacy to chart a new course Christian Koch This vacuum presents a unique and urgent opportunity for Europe and the GCC. Together, they possess the diplomatic relationships, economic leverage and regional legitimacy to chart a new course. To seize this moment, the two sides should now jointly lay out a serious, coordinated plan for a postconflict Middle East — one grounded in realism, mutual respect and long-term strategic thinking. Europe has both a moral obligation toward and a strategic interest in Middle East stability. Waves of migration triggered by Middle Eastern wars have had profound political consequences across the continent, fueling the rise of populist movements and undermining social cohesion. Terror attacks on European soil — many inspired by chaos sown in Syria, Iraq and beyond — have shown that Middle Eastern instability does not stay confined within its regional borders. A prolonged Israel-Iran war would ensure that such instability will not only continue but increase. Europe still enjoys strong diplomatic relations with key players on both sides of the current divide. In the framework of a strategic partnership with the GCC states, an increased convergence of views on the causes and paths forward on regional security is being formed. Europe has long maintained dialogue with Iran under the framework of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action and European capitals continue to underline their unwavering support for Israel's security. It is also true that much of the Middle East leadership looks to Europe to play a diplomatic role that the US is either unable or unwilling to play, or one that regional players cannot fully claim. Yet, Europe is almost completely absent when it comes to peacebuilding in the Middle East. European diplomacy is reactive, cautious and inconsistent. Europe's failure to hold the Netanyahu government to account for its violations of international law when it comes to the crisis in Gaza has seriously undermined European credibility. To be clear, Europe's inattentiveness in its direct neighborhood has contributed to the region's insecurity. Unless reversed, the direct consequences for European security will mount. Meanwhile, the GCC has emerged as a diplomatic force in recent years. Saudi Arabia's outreach to Iran, the UAE's normalization with Israel via the Abraham Accords and Qatar's ability to mediate hostage negotiations in Gaza all illustrate a newfound maturity and pragmatism in Gulf diplomacy. This is coupled with a commitment to finding solutions to the region's perennial problem, exemplified in Saudi Arabia's leadership in the Global Alliance for the Implementation of the Two-State Solution and the GCC's push, through the Arab League, for the Gaza reconstruction plan. The GCC also brings economic and soft power to the table. The bloc's financial clout will be essential to underwrite reconstruction efforts in conflict-ravaged areas. Its sovereign wealth funds will be critical for driving regional infrastructure projects that bind nations together through shared interests, while its religious and cultural influence will help foster narratives of coexistence rather than confrontation. In this equation, it must be underscored that military victories will be fleeting and only political solutions will endure Christian Koch Moreover, the GCC has a vested interest in regional stability. The fallout from a full-scale Iran-Israel war would be catastrophic for Gulf economies, particularly given the vulnerability of maritime trade routes and oil infrastructure. Thus, preventing further escalation is not merely an act of altruism — it is an existential necessity. Now is not the time for shoulder shrugging or continued complacency. Instead, it is time for leadership and foresight. Critics will argue that the region is too fractured, the enmities too entrenched. But history shows that the most fruitful diplomacy often arises from the moments of greatest danger. The EU itself was born out of the ashes of two world wars. The Helsinki Accords emerged during the Cold War's tensest period. Furthermore, the current waves of attacks between Israel and Iran have shaken the status quo. They have reminded all regional actors of the fragility of peace and the urgency of restraint. In this equation, it must be underscored that military victories will be fleeting and only political solutions will endure. Based on their shared vision for a better and more stable future, Europe and the GCC must now act together, not as distant benefactors or cautious observers, but as co-architects of a new Middle East, outlining a path for a regional system of cooperation and security. Both have ties across the regional divide and can serve as stabilizing forces by offering a roadmap toward de-escalation and longer-term security arrangements. Waiting for the perfect moment is futile, as the only current certainty is that inaction will result in more lives lost, more cities destroyed and more generations condemned to cynicism and despair. The window for diplomacy remains open, but that opportunity must be urgently seized, as the cost of failure will disperse far beyond the borders of the Middle East and be felt around the globe.
Saudi Gazette
a day ago
- Saudi Gazette
GCC slams Israeli attack on Iran and calls on all parties to exercise restraint
Saudi Gazette report RIYADH — The Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) condemned the Israeli aggression on Iran and urged all parties to exercise restraint and halt the war to avoid a dangerous slide into a wider conflict. Jassim Albudaiwi, secretary general of GCC, said this in a statement following the 48th extraordinary meeting of the GCC Ministerial Council held via video conference on Monday. Abdullah Al-Yahya, Kuwait's minister of foreign affairs and chairman of the current session of the Ministerial Council, chaired the meeting, which was attended by the GCC foreign ministers. The meeting decided to activate the Emergency Management Center to prevent environmental and radiological hazards. Albudaiwi said that the meeting reviewed that the region has been witnessing an extremely dangerous and unprecedented escalation in recent days due to the attacks by the Israeli occupation forces on Iran and the response by Iran. "This has heightened tensions in the region and opened the door to disturbing scenarios, undermining the prospects for political processes and leading to the collapse of dialogue and diplomatic efforts," he said. The GCC chief emphasized that the Gulf countries remain committed to calming tensions, enabling to start dialogue, and preventing a slide into any conflict that threatens the stability of the Gulf and the world. The meeting underlined the need to avoid a dangerous slide into a wider conflict of which the outcomes will be unpredictable and uncontrollable. The meeting discussed the repercussions and challenges that may face GCC countries as a result of these rapid developments. These include the implications of any escalation that may affect nuclear facilities, given its potential impact on the regional environment and vital infrastructure. These repercussions could also extend to the economy, disrupt supply chains, trade and energy flows, and threaten the safety of vital waterways. Albudaiwi said that the GCC meeting has decided to activate the GCC Emergency Management Center to take all necessary preventive measures at all environmental and radiological levels, and to closely monitor technical indicators in these critical circumstances. This is in line with the implementation of the Supreme Council's directives to strengthen emergency response systems in the context of the potentially serious technical and environmental repercussions of any targeting of nuclear facilities. This is done in full coordination with the competent authorities in member states and through early warning systems. Albudaiwi noted that technical indicators so far remain within the safe range, and there is no cause for concern. He emphasized that the state of full alert remains in place to ensure the highest levels of preparedness and to reinforce the ongoing vigilance as required by the situation.
