logo
Trump Accidentally Reveals a Dark MAGA Truth—and Hands Dems an Opening

Trump Accidentally Reveals a Dark MAGA Truth—and Hands Dems an Opening

Yahoo17 hours ago

This week, President Donald Trump admitted on Truth Social that his mass deportations are hurting farmers and the economy. Those removals are 'taking very good, longtime workers away' from farms and hotels, Trump declared, adding that those workers are proving 'impossible to replace.' To be clear, Trump was talking about his own immigration policies.
That's a stunning acknowledgment that Trump's forced mass removals are targeting hard-working folks and that those undocumented immigrants aren't taking Americans' jobs.
But it's also functionally an admission of political vulnerability. Trump plainly grasps that his deportations are now perceived—accurately—as needlessly targeting good people who are contributing vitally to our economy and society, and not primarily the violent 'criminal migrant' class that Trump and Stephen Miller keep insisting they're removing.
If you doubt this, then go listen to vulnerable House Republicans on the matter. In a new letter that's gotten almost zero media attention, six of them effectively reveal that they now see Trump's deportations as a political problem along exactly those lines. Democrats who worry about taking on this issue should ask themselves: If even Republicans are showing fear on it, isn't it time to drop the skittishness and engage already?
The letter—which six House Republicans sent to acting Immigrations and Customs Enforcement Director Todd Lyons—openly calls on ICE to redirect its deportation resources toward 'convicted criminal aliens' and away from undocumented immigrants who are not convicted criminals.
Naturally, the letter goes through the motions of hailing Trump's glorious toughness and infallibility on immigration. But these Republicans also state that they are 'concerned' that Trump's 'limited resources may be stretched to pursue individuals that do not constitute an immediate threat to public safety':
Every minute that we spend pursuing an individual with a clean record is a minute less that we dedicate to apprehending terrorists or cartel operatives.… We need to give absolute priority to every violent offender and convicted criminal illegal alien present in our nation. Diverting limited resources to other objectives puts our national security at risk.
Consider what this really means. These Republicans are admitting forthrightly that deportations that sweep widely—beyond convicted criminals—take resources away from pursuing the dangerous and violent, and that this makes us less safe, and that this is precisely Trump's policy.
The letter is signed by representatives like David Valadao of California, Gabe Evans of Colorado, Maria Elvira Salazar of Florida, and several others. Those are among the most vulnerable Republicans in next year's midterm elections.
Now, anyone who understands politics will get that these members are putting out this letter so their local papers will report on how 'concerned' they are about removals hitting their districts' local businesses. In the end, they'll enthusiastically back whatever Trump does.
But this is nonetheless a revealing moment. To see why, note that Miller, who is reportedly raging about lagging arrests and deportations, is shrieking wildly at ICE officials, commanding them to round up as many migrants as possible by searching for day laborers in Home Depot parking lots.
The key point here is that to boost those numbers, Trump and Miller have to go after noncriminal migrants. There aren't enough criminals around to pad the numbers, and targeting noncriminals is less resource-intensive. In other words, Miller is deliberately choosing to focus more resources on noncriminals—and thus away from dangerous criminals. Law enforcement insiders have leaked word of their anger over exactly this.
Which is what these Republicans are obliquely criticizing. In so doing, what they're really demonstrating is that Trump-Miller-MAGA propaganda is failing. To get voters to support mass removals, Trump and Miller have relentlessly smeared targeted migrants as uniformly dangerous criminals. But polls show that majorities oppose removing undocumented longtime residents, people with jobs, and those who don't have a criminal record.
The public is even souring on deportations more broadly. And as NBC's Natasha Korecki reports, headlines about deported families and other deeply sympathetic cases are growing more common. If this weren't becoming a major political problem, vulnerable Republicans would not have to distance themselves from all of it.
Which raises a question: If those Republicans fear the politics of mass deportations, then why can't Democrats engage on them more vocally?
Trump has himself now admitted to precisely the same thing as those Republicans did: His mass deportations are sweeping up countless people who make essential contributions to economies and communities, to the detriment of our country. Yet after that admission, we saw only a handful of perfunctory statements from Democrats about it.
This is puzzling because Trump's admission repudiates MAGA ideology and politics at a very profound level. A core MAGA tenet is the idea that undocumented immigrants must be forcibly removed because their presence is taking jobs from Americans who are now forced to molder away in idleness and social stagnation. In some iterations of this—see JD Vance's lament to Ross Douthat in 2024—elites are treacherously in on this scheme. In this mythology, those elites deliberately avoid employing American workers—while sneering at them as lazy and entitled, to boot—precisely because they have the option of hiring undocumented immigrants.
But Trump's own admission—and to some degree that of these vulnerable House Republicans—undercuts that story. As Trump himself concedes, there is not a rush of Americans looking to fill vacancies left by deported immigrants.
Some MAGA proponents might argue that many undocumented immigrants still take Americans' jobs, even if farmworkers do not. But this has largely been debunked. And as Andrew Egger notes, Miller appears to have quickly persuaded Trump to clarify that he isn't backing off mass deportations; Miller clearly understood how damaging Trump's admission truly was.
Indeed, Trump's confession arguably undermines the broader zero-sum foundation of the MAGA worldview, which holds that any undocumented immigrant's gain is an American worker's loss. The reality is that undocumented immigrants often complement the American workforce. Without realizing it, Trump admitted this himself.
Why can't Democrats point this out? House Republicans in swing territory have openly demonstrated their vulnerability to these arguments. As they've revealed, in places like Miami and the suburbs of Los Angeles and Denver—home to those GOP districts, where control of the House will be decided—opposition to cruel and indiscriminate mass deportations is growing. Trump has unwittingly produced the perfect weapon to make the case. So what's the holdup here, Democrats?

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump and Newsom on collision course as fight over National Guard intensifies in court
Trump and Newsom on collision course as fight over National Guard intensifies in court

Fox News

time11 minutes ago

  • Fox News

Trump and Newsom on collision course as fight over National Guard intensifies in court

President Donald Trump and California Gov. Gavin Newsom are headed for another legal clash next week after the president activated the National Guard to respond to anti-immigration enforcement protests and riots in Los Angeles. The anticipated showdown will take place on Tuesday and comes after Judge Charles Breyer, a Clinton appointee, ruled Thursday night that Trump's use of the National Guard was illegal and ordered the president to temporarily relinquish control of the soldiers. Newsom, a Democrat, celebrated the ruling, saying Trump had deployed the National Guard to his state out of "vanity" and to "instill fear" and to "incite a response." But Newsom's win was short-lived as the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit quickly put Breyer's decision on hold in a matter of hours. The appellate court's stay will remain in place at least through Tuesday, when attorneys for the California Attorney General's Office and the Trump administration argue before a three-judge panel about whether the court should grant a longer-term stay. Judges Mark Bennett and Eric Miller, both Trump appointees, and Judge Jennifer Sung, a Biden appointee, will hear the arguments. For now, Trump and Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth can continue to deploy thousands of National Guard soldiers in California, as well as hundreds of Marines. Trump and Hegseth indicated in court papers that military forces would be used strictly to protect federal personnel and federal buildings as they faced attacks by anti-Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) rioters in recent days. Department of Justice (DOJ) attorneys argued that a judge's decision to block the Trump administration from carrying out these military activities "would judicially countermand the Commander in Chief's military directives," especially if the decision were issued through a temporary restraining order, like what Breyer issued Thursday night. "That would be unprecedented. It would be constitutionally anathema. And it would be dangerous," the DOJ attorneys said. The decision by Breyer, the 83-year-old brother of retired liberal Justice Stephen Breyer, was met with skepticism by some. Attorney Ed Whelan, a right-of-center former DOJ official, said in remarks online that it was "far more sweeping" than he had expected. Whelan said a significant legal fight could be brewing over the provision of Title 10 that Trump used to federalize the National Guard. Typically, presidents deploy National Guard members with a governor's consent, but the law leaves room for debate on whether the governor's permission is required. Whelan speculated that Trump could attempt to use another provision of Title 10, the Insurrection Act, to bypass the court proceedings. "10 USC 252 seems to give him much freer authority," Whelan said, citing the insurrection law. The National Guard fight comes against the backdrop of Trump hosting a major military parade in Washington, D.C. on Saturday. The event, slated to cost tens of millions of dollars, will showcase U.S. military power and commemorate the Army's 250th birthday. Trump's birthday is also that day. Trump's critics have coined the day "No Kings Day" and are planning to voice their objections to the president's show of force at protests around the country on Saturday. California alone is expected to see dozens of protests. While Trump is in the nation's capital, the protesters will be "literally everywhere else," Ezra Levin, one of the organizers, told the left-leaning Contrarian on Substack. "It's the 250th anniversary of the Continental Army, which was formed to push back against a mad king," Levin said, noting the protests would be peaceful and serve as a recruitment tool in the "pro-Democracy fight" against Trump.

Zelenskiy Says ‘American Decisiveness' Key to Pressuring Putin
Zelenskiy Says ‘American Decisiveness' Key to Pressuring Putin

Bloomberg

time14 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

Zelenskiy Says ‘American Decisiveness' Key to Pressuring Putin

Ukraine needs clarity from the US about steps to put pressure on Russia toward a ceasefire, since European support will also depend on it, President Volodymyr Zelenskiy said ahead of the G7 meeting in Canada, where he hopes to meet President Donald Trump. 'I very much want Trump to take strong steps,' Zelenskiy told reporters in Kyiv late Friday. 'It's important for us that Trump stops Putin with sanctions and other steps. This will give a signal to all of Europe, everyone will unite, and we will have this chance.'

Dollar Ructions Lay Groundwork for a ‘Global Euro Moment'
Dollar Ructions Lay Groundwork for a ‘Global Euro Moment'

Bloomberg

time15 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

Dollar Ructions Lay Groundwork for a ‘Global Euro Moment'

When the euro was born more than a quarter century ago, it arrived with much fanfare. Even the US Federal Reserve chair of the time, Alan Greenspan, was excited. 'To the extent the euro becomes a far more formidable force in the world economy, it's a benefit to everybody, especially the US,' he said in January 2000. Today, while undoubtedly the second-most important reserve currency in the world, the euro holds a shadow of the dollar's influence. European economic policymakers, with plenty of intra-region challenges and crises to keep them busy, had little reason to imagine the euro's global role might do anything other than fade. Until Donald Trump's White House return, that is.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store