
CEO behind nuclear-capable fighter jets gives chilling update on pilot plans
The UK is set to purchase 12 new F-35A jets in a move billed by Downing Street as 'the biggest strengthening of the UK's nuclear posture in a generation'
Keir Starmer says he will oversee the "biggest strengthening" of the UK's nuclear deterrence in three decades after confirming RAF pilots will get nuke-capable jets.
The move will see the UK purchase 12 F-35A jets and join NATO's airborne nuclear mission.
The jets, a variant of the F35Bs the UK already uses, can carry conventional weapons, but can also be equipped with nuclear bombs.
The Prime Minister said: "In an era of radical uncertainty we can no longer take peace for granted, which is why my government is investing in our national security, ensuring our armed forces have the equipment they need and communities up and down the country reap the benefits from our defence dividend."
The decision represents a victory for the Royal Air Force, which has long pushed for a return of its nuclear capabilities since the last British air-dropped nuclear weapon was withdrawn from service after the end of the Cold War.
Just last month, the company behind the F-35 fighter jets issued an update on their plans to develop an autonomous aircraft.
At Bernstein's 41st Annual Strategic Decisions Conference, Lockheed Martin CEO Jim Taiclet suggested that a F-35 fighter jet with an "optional" pilot could be possible within a "relatively modest time frame."
Developing autonomous or 'uncrewed' aircraft has been a top priority for the U.S. Air Force. Its Collaborative Combat Aircraft (CCA) initiative focuses on unmanned jets designed to operate alongside manned aircraft or independently across various missions.
Air Force leadership has touted these "loyal wingmen" as not only giving pilots a variety of options for how to employ them — as sensors, weapons carriers, or jamming platforms — but also offering the possibility of having enough with lower costs than crewed aircraft.
This cost-effectiveness could prove crucial in a conflict with peer adversaries like China or Russia, allowing pilots to deploy CCAs on high-risk missions.
Taiclet noted that Lockheed Martin's vision for the F-35 includes making it optionally manned to complement the CCA concept.
"We're thinking of the F-35 not just as a standalone platform, but as one that can integrate with sixth-generation aircraft and unmanned systems, with the ability to be optionally manned,' he said.
Since the 1990s, the UK's nuclear deterrent has been carried exclusively by the Royal Navy's submarines, which the Government has also promised to invest in renewing with four new vessels.
Sir Keir added: "Supporting 100 businesses across the country and more than 20,000 jobs, these F35 dual capable aircraft will herald a new era for our world-leading Royal Air Force and deter hostile threats that threaten the UK and our Allies."
Defence Secretary John Healey said the decision followed a strategic defence review that "confirmed we face new nuclear risks, with other states increasing, modernising and diversifying their nuclear arsenals".
The review, published earlier this month, recommended beginning discussions with the US and NATO on "enhanced UK participation" in the alliance's nuclear mission, and raised the possibility of acquiring F35As.
It comes as the Prime Minister warned today at the NATO summit that it is a "mistake" to think the only threats Britain faces are far off - saying the British homeland faces danger "on a daily basis".
Asked by The Mirror about an alarming dossier that said Brits must "actively prepare" for war, he voiced his alarm over "sophisticated" attacks on the UK mainland. The Prime Minister announced that security spending will be ramped up dramatically in a "decisive message to aggressors".
Speaking today at The Hague in the Netherlands, the PM stated: "It is a mistake to think that the only threat we face is external and far off. We do face threats at home all of the time on a daily basis.
"There are cyber attacks that have to be dealt with and all being dealt with. They are ever more sophisticated. We need to have the capability to deal with them."
The PM stated that Europe has made a "fundamental shift in its posture" by ramping up its focus on security in the face of new threats. He said NATO members have agreed to raise spending to 5% within a decade, and vowed that the UK will reach 4.1% by 2027.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

The National
25 minutes ago
- The National
Anas Sarwar backs UK disability benefit cuts as Labour MPs revolt
By Wednesday evening, 12 Scottish Labour MPs out of 37 had signed their names to a reasoned amendment which would block the UK Government welfare cuts if it passes a vote on July 1. In total, around 130 Labour MPs have put their names to the amendment opposing Keir Starmer's Government's plan to cut some £5 billion from disability benefits annually. This will be done largely by cutting back Personal Independence Payments (Pip) – the main disability benefit which is also paid to people in-work – and the health element of Universal Credit. Speaking to the Holyrood Sources podcast in Edinburgh on Wednesday, Sarwar was asked if he supported the Scottish Labour MPs opposing the welfare cuts. He said: 'Look, my position has been quite consistent on the welfare reforms, which is I support the principle of reform. 'We do have to look at the structural challenges that exist in our welfare system, even with the changes currently being proposed, and I saw the Deputy Prime Minister, just when I came in, saying in an interview that discussions are ongoing around the specifics of the bill. 'Even with the changes that we proposed, welfare spending will be going up over the course of this parliament, not coming down. 'And it's also important to note, and I think this is a fundamental Labour principle, that I believe work is the best route out of poverty, that's a fundamental Labour principle – but not everyone can work and those that can't work should get the support that they deserve. 'There are many positives in this legislation, for example, the end to mandatory reassessments, particularly for those that have lifelong conditions, the billion pounds extra that goes into back to work schemes.' Asked again to state his position on the welfare cuts as proposed, Sarwar suggested that the UK Government's Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill may change before the crunch vote next Tuesday. 'Conversations are underway,' he said. 'As you would expect, people are legitimately raising their concerns, having those conversations … I think it's safe to say that there'll be ongoing conversations with the legislation and legitimate concerns should be addressed, but we should absolutely support the principle of reform.' Sarwar added that although he is 'not party to the direct conversations that individual MPs are having … we have to support the principle of reform'. His comments came after Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner insisted the Government was not expecting backbenchers to go against traditional party values by backing the planned welfare cuts. Asked what concessions could be offered to convince rebels to back the bill, Rayner said 'discussions are ongoing'. 'I'm not going to get into that on your show tonight,' she said in an interview on ITV's Peston programme. 'Those discussions are ongoing around making sure that the welfare reforms that we're bringing in support people into work who need that, and we're putting a huge amount of investment into doing that, but also protecting the most vulnerable.' She acknowledged that 'a lot of people are very scared about these changes' but added: 'I haven't changed my Labour values and we're not expecting our benches to do anything that isn't in check with them. 'What we want to do is support people, and that is the crucial bit around these reforms of what Labour are trying to achieve, and we're discussing that with our MPs.' Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall, who has already taken steps to soften the impact of the welfare Bill, has been locked in talks with backbenchers as she seeks to win over those opposed to the measures. Other senior Labour figures outside Parliament, including Greater Manchester mayor Andy Burnham and London Mayor Sadiq Khan, have also publicly expressed their opposition to the plans. Meanwhile, the Tories seem unlikely to lend the Government their support, with leader Kemi Badenoch setting out conditions for doing so including a commitment to rule out tax rises in the autumn budget and further cut the benefits bill.

Rhyl Journal
an hour ago
- Rhyl Journal
British woman stranded in Israel remains in dark about evacuation flights
The first RAF flight set off from Ben Gurion Airport in Tel Aviv on Monday afternoon carrying 63 British passengers, who landed in Cyprus and were then flown back to Birmingham Airport, where they arrived in the early hours of Tuesday. In the days since, more Britons have made the journey home as part of the Government's evacuation strategy. It comes as Israeli airspace reopened on Monday after being closed for 10 days following the start of the conflict between Israel and Iran on June 13. British-Israeli Mali Smith, 66, said she has not heard from the Foreign Office since registering for the repatriation flights on Wednesday June 18, leading her to book a flight home to London for 600 US dollars (£439) as she 'can't bear the stress anymore'. Mrs Smith, a solicitor born in Tel Aviv but who now lives in Hampstead Garden Suburb, London, with her husband, had arrived in Israel on June 11 to see her mother and friends. The mother-of-two has twice booked flights to Luton Airport, one with Wizz Air and one with Israir, which were both cancelled. She said: 'After my flights were cancelled, the Foreign Office sent many of us an email saying that they were planning on sending an RAF plane to rescue us and take us back to the UK. 'But it's been days now and I'm still waiting for a response – even though we had to pay them £350 for the pleasure. 'They have been in touch with some Brits but many of us are still waiting and I don't understand why they are sending such a small aeroplane with only 63 seats, while there are thousands who have applied for the flights. 'I sent them emails and I called them, but they couldn't give me an answer – I have been in touch with my MP and she has tried hard to help some of us here, but we've had no success. 'It's nerve-wracking and it's really hard to sit around and wait for them to do something. 'Now the war has a ceasefire, so I don't know what's going to happen – they might cancel it all even before they have rescued us.' Mrs Smith says that the lack of information about the flights has left those who remain in the country feeling stranded waiting for more support. She said she had also been told that British nationals have had phone calls from the Foreign Office as late as 3am in the morning, asking them to be at the airfield just six hours later at 9am, only for their flight to be delayed until 1pm. Mrs Smith said: 'The organisation of the evacuation has not been good enough. 'I'm in Tel Aviv, right next to the Iron Dome, and the noise is really loud and scary, and it means you can't sleep properly. 'The community has been great, they've been so supportive and there's a lot of warmth from everyone. 'But the UK Government has been so slow to respond and I'm just disappointed that it's taken them that long and that the communication is that bad. 'I don't know whether to book another flight and forget about the evacuation flight, and whether I can claim the money back. 'The situation has improved here with the ceasefire which seems like it's holding, but the Foreign Office needs to be so much better.' The FCDO has been contacted for comment.

Rhyl Journal
an hour ago
- Rhyl Journal
Harry Dunn review ‘will not scrutinise actions of US government'
The 19-year-old's family met with senior officials at the Foreign Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO) on Wednesday where they were told the probe will be led by former chief inspector of prisons Dame Anne Owers. The PA news agency understands the review is set to examine the support the FCDO offered the Dunn family after Harry was killed by a former US state department employee in a road crash in 2019. The American driver, Anne Sacoolas, had diplomatic immunity asserted on her behalf following the incident outside RAF Croughton in Northamptonshire before a senior Foreign Office official said they should 'feel able' to put her on the next flight home. PA understands the probe, which is scheduled to last for three months, is also set to look at the actions taken by the Foreign Office in the months after Harry's death and the nature of internal decision-making. The review will also look to identify lessons to be learned for the FCDO for comparable future situations. The involvement of the US government, which asserted the diplomatic immunity on behalf of Ms Sacoolas, will not be examined – alongside any issues covered in previous court hearings. Dame Anne could look to request interviews with relevant staff within the Foreign Office at the time of Harry's death, as well as documents from within the FCDO. Following the meeting, family spokesman Radd Seiger told PA: 'I think overall the family are feeling that we are going to leave a legacy for Harry, which is that no family should ever be treated the way this family were by their own government. 'The American government really were stepping on their rights; nobody really from the government stepped forward to help them. 'Dame Anne is going to look into all of this and make a series of recommendations to David Lammy that should this ever happen again, whether here or abroad, that they will get the support and representation of the Government that they need. So we are very, very pleased. 'The reason we got justice for Harry in the end was no thanks to the United Kingdom government; it was thanks to the British public and the media on both sides of the Atlantic, who spoke truth to power and made sure that we held them to account.' Harry's mother Charlotte Charles said the current Government was more 'welcoming' than the previous Conservative one. She said: 'I think this Government is totally different to what we were dealing with before: they were calmer, they seemed to want to engage with us, they are welcoming us to the Foreign Office. 'We aren't being shoved down the road and they seem to have a lot of patience and time for us to get the answers that we need. 'The previous government's meetings were very fraught. I think they had us in their offices under duress almost. 'I think they almost felt like they had to do it and we could feel that in the room. But since the Labour Government got in, they've been more open with us and more welcoming.' She said she hoped the inquiry would 'get to the reason as to why we were treated so poorly'. Ms Charles added: 'Why did they kick us down the road, why did they try to shove Harry's life under the carpet? 'What was more important than our son's life? They were rude, they were brutal with us. They were not engaging with us at all. 'They did everything they possibly could to try to make us go away and give up. The answers we need now are why. What were they so scared of?'