North Korea slams 'conniving' U.S. over missile deal with Japan
North Korea criticized a recent agreement by Japan and the United States on co-producing air-to-air missiles as aggravating regional security risks and another example of Washington's push to militarize Japan, state media said on Wednesday.
At a time when the United States is upgrading its military command in Japan, the two countries' cooperation in munitions production clearly has military and aggressive intentions aimed at countries in the region, KCNA state news agency said.
The comments were attributed to an unnamed vice general director of the North's defense ministry and did not name specific countries.
But the official referred to the AIM-120 air-to-air missile system that the United States and Japan have agreed to accelerate co-producing during U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's visit to Tokyo on Sunday.
Advancing the deployment of such a weapon used by aircraft involved in frequent military drills in the region that already pose a grave security threat adds a 'new element of strategic instability to the Asia-Pacific region,' the official said.
'Certainly, the center of gravity of the U.S. hegemony-oriented military security strategy is changing and it is a new warning signal for the Asia-Pacific regional society including the countries in Northeast Asia,' the official said.
The agreement comes as 'the U.S. has connived at and encouraged Japan's moves for a military giant since last century,' the official said.
In Tokyo, Hegseth and his Japanese counterpart agreed to accelerate a plan to jointly produce beyond-visual-range air-to-air missiles and to consider co-producing other surface-to-air missiles.
Hegseth stressed the importance of Japan's role in deterring China including Beijing's threat across the Taiwan Strait, calling it a 'cornerstone' of security in the region.
Such a positive recognition of Japan by Hegseth was in contrast with his criticism against European allies and U.S. President Donald Trump's complaint that Tokyo has not done enough to support the presence of U.S. military in the country.
It is a priority for North Korea to counter growing instability by bolstering its military deterrence, the Defense Ministry official said, without elaborating.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Record
20 minutes ago
- Daily Record
What really happened to Rangers 'football review' as new three pillars at Ibrox make vision clear
Major changes have taken place at Ibrox - and more are to come this summer Rangers' American owners, sporting director Kevin Thelwell and boss Russell Martin have all touched down at Ibrox - but it won't be long before the squad will be up, up and away. With the first of three European qualifiers only six weeks off, the new regime in charge at Ibrox find themselves flying by the seat of their pants. With new signings to be recruited, players to be shipped out and a new radical possession-based style of play to be drilled into the team, there's not a second to be wasted if Martin's new side aren't to crash and burn upon takeoff. It may seem like they are operating on a wing and a prayer with so much work to be done in such a short period of time. But Patrick Stewart is confident Rangers can soar at the same time as they set about constructing the runway it's hoped will at long last point have the Light Blues pointing in the right direction. The Ibrox CEO said: 'I fully appreciate it's very different and the expectation is success now whilst developing. 'So we've got to build the plane while we're flying the plane. 'Everyone recognises that. Russell recognises it, Kevin recognises it. 'It is hard, it is really hard but we're all used to working in hard conditions. 'The people at the club now are used to big challenges but we see that as a positive, we enjoy the challenge. 'You come to a club of the stature of Rangers and if you don't come with your eyes open you probably wouldn't get through the door in the first place. We love the challenge, we want to take on the challenge and we're confident we'll succeed.' Rangers' recent trajectory has been a spiralling decent. One league title in 14 years tells a story of failures stacked on failures. Dragging the club out of that nosedive won't be easy but Stewart is prepared to make the alterations that he believes can soon have things looking up for the Ibrox legions. 'We've been second for a long time, obviously 55 aside, and if we don't change something we're going to continue finishing second,' he said. 'I'm probably stating the obvious that we have to change things, we have to change people, we have to change culture. 'In a sports club, whatever the sport, if you've not got the right culture you're not going to be winning either on or off the pitch, 'So we've got to make sure that everyone's presenting the best version of themselves, everyone's pulling together.' Russell was the last of the three key appointments to touch down in Glasgow last week. His arrival came four months after Philippe Clement was heaved out of the Ibrox exit. Barry Ferguson was installed as a stop-gap gaffer to lead the club through to the end of the season but even the brief return of the former skipper did not satisfy the Ibrox faithful's insatiable hunger for news on Clement's permanent replacement. Stewart certainly didn't go out of his way to feed the frenzied clamour for updates, neither did a media department who could have padded up for the English cricket team with the amount of straight bats they dished out. But for all that the punters were fraying at the edges, Stewart insists it was cool and calm inside Ibrox as they worked their way through the top order of candidates. 'We wanted to take the time and use that time,' he said. 'It's how you use the time. If you're just sitting doing nothing, then yes, we've wasted the time — but we haven't been. 'A lot of work was done in getting the football review completed. 'I know people will ask, what was the outcome of the football review? We know the outcomes and we've been implementing several of the steps and one of those was bringing in Kev. "We've done a lot of work as well around what's our club football style going to be so that we could then hire a head coach that fits that style. 'That requires a lot of analysis, video, data, taking a lot of references. 'There's been a lot of work going on so, we've not wasted the time but equally we've not been providing a running commentary. 'It's not the way a professional club wants to run, playing everything out in public. 'We've used the time well and it was really critical for the club that we got in place a sporting director and that the sporting director was integral in the head coach process and decision. 'I still think we're in a good spot because transfer window is June 16, I think. 'We've got the new head coach in place well in advance of the opening of the transfer window but also critically well in advance of the players coming back. So actually I'd say we're exactly where we want to be and we've used the time well.' Rangers are now under US control, with the Pennsylvania-based Andrew Cavenagh now sitting in the chairman's seat and Leeds chairman Paraag Marathe - who will split his time between Glasgow, Elland Road and San Francisco - next to him as his deputy. But with Stewart, alongside Thelwell and former chairman Fraser Thornton, based in the city permanently, he is confident the of avoiding snags in the chains of command. 'I think in any organisation where you want alignment from ownership throughout the organisation, you're in constant dialogue,' he explained. 'So it's not quite as binary as am I deciding something or are they deciding something or is Kev deciding something. 'Of course we've got different decisions that are better taken by different people but we're in constant dialogue. 'So I speak with Andrew frequently and I can pick up the phone to him and bounce stuff off him. 'Likewise and similarly with Kevin and myself, I think we've seen more of each other than certainly our families have seen of us. So communication is key and just making sure we've got alignment so that we're all pulling in the same direction.'
Daily Record
20 minutes ago
- Daily Record
Patrick Stewart tackles creeping Rangers concern over Leeds involvement as Crystal Palace example rings alarm bells
Patrick Stewart has shot down fears Rangers ' links with Leeds could threaten their European involvement. Ibrox is under new ownership following last week's £75million takeover by US health insurance tycoon Andrew Cavenagh and the San Francisco 49ers. Paraag Marathe, a senior exec with the NFL giants and chairman at Elland Road, has also taken up a seat next to new boardroom chief Cavenagh as Gers' vice-chairman. But Marathe and the 49ers' controlling interest in the Premier League new boy's forced the American consortium to gain SFA approval before they could take hold of the keys to Ibrox. But Light Blues CEO Stewart insists the new arrangement in Govan is nothing like the set up that could see FA Cup winners Crystal Palace blocked from next season's Europa League. Eagle Football - the multi-club group owned by John Textor which includes a minority shareholding in Palace - owns a majority stake in Ligue 1 side Lyon, who have also qualified for the same competition. Palace chiefs have been forced to fly out to UEFA headquarters in Switzerland for talks over a deal to save their Euro ticket - but Selhurst Park chiefs are far from confident they will get the green light. Stewart, though, is certain Rangers will face no such hurdles should Leeds end up booking a continental trip next season. He said: 'I think firstly that this isn't a multi-club ownership model. It just simply isn't. 'There is no common parent club. There is a limited amount of overlap. 'Paraag Marathe is the chairman of Leeds and the vice-chair of Rangers. 'We have a couple of other individuals that have interests or roles in both clubs. 'There's commonality, but there's not any control from one club to the other. "I see it as there could be opportunities, but the directors of Rangers are always going to operate in the best interests of Rangers. 'The Scottish FA is part of that process. They made it very clear, for example - which we are grateful for - that Rangers' participation in UEFA competitions cannot be harmed by any of this overlap. 'I just see opportunity, and now having experienced working with Parag and 49ers, I think that opportunity is real.' Rangers fans have faced taunts from the opposite side of Glasgow since last week's takeover, with mischievous claims their team might end up as a feeder club for Leeds. But Stewart is adamant the loose tie-up with the Peacocks and their Gridiron counterparts in California will only benefit the Light Blues. He said: 'What the 49ers have got is a high degree of expertise in a number of different sports, including football obviously at Leeds and obviously in the NFL. 'What we tap into is a network of expertise where we can grow together. I've had several discussions with counterparts at Leeds, at 49ers Enterprises, just sharing information but also really importantly networks and those networks can be helpful from a technical perspective or from a commercial perspective. 'We very much see 49ers role in the consortium as providing that level of expertise that will help fill in some of the gaps we've got, complement what we've got as well but the strategic significance they can have shouldn't be underestimated.' Stewart has proved to be a divisive figure at Ibrox since taking up his post last December. He's taken a new hard-line stance on the behaviour of fans - including a scathing statement aimed at the Union Bears and their tifo depicting a gun-toting Graeme Souness ahead of last month's Old Firm clash at Inbox. But he is confident he remains on good terms with the club's supporters. 'We had a really good meeting with the Fan Advisory Board after what you're referring to, predominantly the tifo that we made a comment on as a club,' he said. 'There's lots of aspects about Rangers which are a cause for celebration. There's some aspects that we think standards are important all across the club in every aspect. 'I think the Union Bears did a really interesting statement last week where they talked about standards and their tifos being befitting of the standards of Ibrox. 'I think all aspects of the club, supporters, employees, management, ownership, we all want to drive the best standards and that can mean different things to different people. I thought it was a really interesting statement from the UB and actually a really positive statement.'
NBC News
2 hours ago
- NBC News
Transgender troops face a deadline and a difficult decision: Stay or go?
WASHINGTON — As transgender service members face a deadline to leave the U.S. military, hundreds are taking the financial bonus to depart voluntarily. But others say they will stay and fight. For many, it is a wrenching decision to end a career they love, and leave units they have led or worked with for years. And they are angry they are being forced out by the Trump administration's renewed ban on transgender troops. Active duty service members had until Friday to identify themselves and begin to leave the military voluntarily, while the National Guard and Reserve have until July 7. Then the military will begin involuntary separations. Friday's deadline comes during Pride Month and as the Trump administration targets diversity, equity and inclusion efforts, saying it's aiming to scrub the military of "wokeness" and reestablishing a "warrior ethos." "They're tired of the rollercoaster. They just want to go," said one transgender service member, who plans to retire. "It's exhausting." For others, it's a call to arms. "I'm choosing to stay in and fight," a noncommissioned officer in the Air Force said. "My service is based on merit, and I've earned that merit." The troops, who mainly spoke on condition of anonymity because they fear reprisals, said being forced to decide is frustrating. They say it's a personal choice based on individual and family situations, including whether they would get an infusion of cash or possibly wind up owing the government money. "I'm very disappointed," a transgender Marine said. "I've outperformed, I have a spotless record. I'm at the top of every fitness report. I'm being pushed out while I know others are barely scraping by." Some transgender troops decide to leave based on finances Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has said this is President Donald Trump's directive and what America voted for. The Pentagon, he said, is "leaving wokeness & weakness behind" and that includes "no more dudes in dresses." Sen. Tammy Duckworth of Illinois, a veteran, and 22 other Democratic senators have written to Hegseth urging him to allow transgender troops to keep serving honorably. Already, more than 1,000 service members have voluntarily identified themselves as transgender and are slated to begin leaving, according to rough Defense Department estimates. Defense officials say there are about 4,240 active duty transgender troops but acknowledge the numbers are fuzzy. For many, the decision is financial. Those who voluntarily leave will get double the amount of separation pay they would normally receive and won't have to return bonuses or tuition costs. Those who refuse to go could be forced to repay reenlistment or other bonuses as high as $50,000. That was the tipping point for Roni Ferrell, an Army specialist at Joint Base Lewis-McChord near Tacoma, Washington. Ferrell, 28, lives on base with her wife and two children and had planned to stay in the Army for at least another decade. But she said she felt "backed into a corner" to sign the voluntary separation agreement, fearing she would have to repay an $18,500 reenlistment bonus. "My commander basically said it was my only option in order to make sure my kids are taken care of," Ferrell said. The Marine, who has served for more than 25 years, said she had planned to stay and fight, but changed her mind. Lawyers, she said, told her an involuntary separation would put a code in her record saying she was forced to leave "in the interests of national security." That designation, she said, could mean those involuntarily separated could lose their security clearances, hurting future job prospects. In a statement Friday, a defense official said the code "is not intended" to trigger clearance revocations and that gender dysphoria is not a security reporting requirement, according to the director of national intelligence. The official spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss internal deliberations. Cynthia Cheng-Wun Weaver, senior director of litigation for Human Rights Campaign, said it's important for troops to talk with judge advocates general in their services to ensure they understand the different procedures being implemented. Other transgender troops plan to stay despite the ban The Air Force service member and a transgender officer in the Army National Guard both said they plan to stay and fight. Lawsuits over the ban continue and could change or block the policy. For troops involved in the court battles as plaintiffs, leaving voluntarily now would likely hurt their standing in the case. For others, it's simply dedication to their career. "I've really embraced military culture, and it's embraced me," the Air Force member said. "It's not about money. It's the career that I love." The Guard soldier echoed that sentiment, saying he will stay on "because it is important to me to serve. Frankly, I'm good at it, I'm well trained so I want to continue." Others without bonuses to repay or who have been in the military only a short while and won't get much in separation bonus pay may opt to stay and see what happens. National Guard troops face a particular problem National Guard members who are heading to their monthly drill weekend or annual two-week drill in June could be required to go but serve as the gender they were assigned at birth. That means they would have to wear uniforms and haircuts of that gender, use that bathroom and be referred to as "sir" or "ma'am" based on that gender. For many, that could be close to impossible and create uncomfortable situations. "If I were to show up to drill this weekend, I'd be expected to use all female facilities, I would be expected to wear a woman's uniform," said the Army Guard officer, who transitioned to male about five years ago and says others in his unit know him as a man. "I don't look like a woman. I don't feel like a woman. It would be disruptive to good order and discipline for me to show up and to tell my soldiers, you have to call me 'ma'am' now." It's not clear if Guard units are handling it all the same way, and it could be up to individual states or commanders. Some may allow troops to postpone the drill or go on administrative leave. What happens next for transgender troops? The service members interviewed by The Associated Press said they don't know what will happen once the deadline passes to leave voluntarily. Some believe that unit commanders will quickly single people out and start involuntary separations. Others say the process is vague, may involve medical review boards and could take months. The defense official said Friday that as the Pentagon takes these steps, it "will treat our service members with dignity and respect." Under Hegseth's directive, military commanders will be told to identify troops with gender dysphoria — when a person's biological sex does not match their gender identity — and send them to get medical checks to force them out of the service, defense officials have said. The order relies on routine annual health checks — so it could be months before that evaluation is scheduled. "My real big sticking point is that this administration's whole push is to reform this country based around merit, and that gender, race, etc., should have no factor in hiring," the Air Force service member said. "If that's true, I'm solely being removed for my gender, and merit is no longer a factor."
