International Atomic Energy Agency report spells out past secret nuclear activities in Iran
International Atomic Energy Agency report spells out past secret nuclear activities in Iran
VIENNA, May 31 (Reuters) - Iran carried out secret nuclear activities with material not declared to the U.N. nuclear watchdog at three locations that have long been under investigation, the watchdog said in a wide-ranging, confidential report to member states seen by Reuters.
The findings in the "comprehensive" International Atomic Energy Agency report requested by the agency's 35-nation Board of Governors in November pave the way for a push by the United States, Britain, France and Germany for the board to declare Iran in violation of its non-proliferation obligations.
A resolution would infuriate Iran and could further complicate nuclear talks between Tehran and Washington.
Using the IAEA report's findings, the four Western powers plan to submit a draft resolution for the board to adopt at its next meeting the week of June 9, diplomats say. It would be the first time in almost 20 years Iran has formally been found in non-compliance.
Iran's foreign ministry and the Iranian nuclear agency rejected the report, calling it "politically motivated" in a joint statement. They said Tehran will take "appropriate measures" in response to any effort to take action against the country at the Board of Governors meeting, state media reported, without elaborating.
Tehran says it wants to master nuclear technology for peaceful purposes and has long denied accusations by Western powers that it is seeking to develop nuclear weapons.
While many of the findings relate to activities dating back decades and have been made before, the IAEA report's conclusions were more definitive. It summarised developments in recent years and pointed more clearly towards coordinated, secret activities, some of which were relevant to producing nuclear weapons.
It also spelled out that Iran's cooperation with IAEA continues to be "less than satisfactory" in "a number of respects". The IAEA is still seeking explanations for uranium traces found years ago at two of four sites it has been investigating. Three hosted secret experiments, it found.
The IAEA has concluded that "these three locations, and other possible related locations, were part of an undeclared structured nuclear programme carried out by Iran until the early 2000s and that some activities used undeclared nuclear material", the report said.
Nuclear material and/or heavily contaminated equipment from that programme was stored at the fourth site, Turquzabad, between 2009 and 2018, it said.
"The Agency concludes that Iran did not declare nuclear material and nuclear-related activities at three undeclared locations in Iran, specifically, Lavisan-Shian, Varamin, and Turquzabad," the report said.
At Lavisan-Shian in Tehran, a disc made of uranium metal was "used in the production of explosively-driven neutron sources" at least twice in 2003, a process designed to initiate the explosion in a nuclear weapon, the report said, adding that it was part of "small-scale" tests.
The report is likely to lead to Iran being referred to the U.N. Security Council, though that would probably happen at a later IAEA board meeting, diplomats said.
More immediately, it is likely to lead to Iran again accelerating or expanding its rapidly advancing nuclear programme, as it has done after previous rebukes at the board. It could also further complicate talks with the United States aimed at reining in that programme.
Uranium enrichment
A separate IAEA report sent to member states on Saturday said Iran's stock of uranium enriched to up to 60% purity, close to the roughly 90% of weapons grade, had grown by roughly half to 408.6 kg. That is enough, if enriched further, for nine nuclear weapons, according to an IAEA yardstick.
Both IAEA reports said enrichment to such a high level was "of serious concern" since it is the only country to do so without producing nuclear weapons.
Israel, which has long urged strong action against Iran's nuclear programme, said the IAEA report showed Tehran was determined to complete its nuclear weapons programme. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's office said the world should act now to stop Iran from doing this.
U.S. intelligence agencies and the IAEA have long believed Iran had a secret, coordinated nuclear weapons programme that it halted in 2003. Iran denies ever having had one.
Separately on Saturday, Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi said his Omani counterpart presented elements of a U.S. proposal for a nuclear deal between Tehran and Washington during a short visit to Tehran.
Araqchi said in a post on X that Iran "will respond to the U.S. proposal in line with the principles, national interests and rights of people of Iran".
His statement came ahead of an anticipated sixth round of talks between Washington and Tehran. The date and venue of talks have not yet been announced.
(Reporting by Francois Murphy, Menna Alaa El-Din and Muhammed Al Gebaly in Cairo and Parisa Hafezi in Dubai.Editing by Toby Chopra and Frances Kerry)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
How Iraqi militias laundered money for Iran through global payment networks
US and Iraqi authorities revealed a complex scheme involving prepaid cards that funneled illicit funds to Iranian-backed terror militias. Iraqi terrorist militia groups figured out how to extract illicit funds for Iran from Visa and Mastercard payment networks, the Wall Street Journal reported on Saturday. According to the report, at the start of 2023, cross-border Visa and Mastercard transactions in Iraq generated about $50 million. By April of the same year, that figure had soared to $1.5 billion. The militias, which include Kataib Hezbollah, the Badr Brigade, and Asaib Ahl al-Haq, have helped the Islamic Republic avoid sanctions in what the US Treasury called a 'clandestine network of financial facilitators.' Iraq has both an official dollar exchange rate and a higher, unofficial rate. This allows individuals to buy prepaid cards in Iraq, withdraw the money elsewhere in the Middle East at Iraq's lower official rate, and then return home to convert it into dinars at the higher rate. The process has generated gains for participants of up to 21%. To generate these massive gains for themselves and Tehran, the militias acquired large amounts of Mastercards and Visa cards loaded with money, transported them back to the United Arab Emirates and other neighboring Gulf states, and withdrew the money, the report said. The Treasury told the Wall Street Journal that the militias likely used the financial graft to buy weapons and finance terror operations. The cash was also likely distributed among the cardholders for their personal use. The cardholders who participated are estimated to have made nearly $450 million in profit in 2023 alone. A source familiar with the matter said that the foreign card networks are estimated to have made about $120 million between them. Mastercard and Visa profited from the transactions by charging at least 1% to 1.4% on cross-border transactions. US Treasury officials reportedly notified the companies of the exchanges in the fall of 2024, but it took them months to take control of the transactions. Although the cash flow eventually decreased after the card companies reined it in, transactions still ranged from about $400 million to $1.1 billion a month until early 2025. US and Iraqi officials said that warnings to the card companies about the suspicious activity went unheeded for months. The Treasury recently asked the Central Bank of Iraq to formally block more than 200,000 cards used by militia members. The Iraqi card issuers that partnered with the card companies were not under any sanctions, so there are no public allegations that Visa or Mastercard violated US sanctions. The companies said they had acted quickly to limit transactions after the Treasury presented the fraud evidence. 'Ongoing government engagement is built into our programs so that we can quickly look into claims, identify the situation, and take action as appropriate,' Mastercard spokesman Seth Eisen said. 'That's exactly what we have done with the US government on this matter from a very early stage,' he added. 'Central to our operations is a commitment to ensuring that transactions on our network do not violate the law… When we identify or are alerted to any suspicious or illegal activity, we take action,' said Visa spokeswoman Fletcher Cook. In early 2023, the Central Bank of Iraq took steps to keep money circulating in the economy after international wire transfers were restricted. The bank allowed payments with cash and debit cards outside Iraq to be made at the official conversion rate, currently 1,320 Iraqi dinars to the dollar, which was cheaper than what was available in Iraq's currency markets. This policy sparked a surge in debit card usage for currency arbitrage. Militia couriers smuggled these cards into the UAE, Turkey, and Jordan. Witnesses described Iraqis lining up day and night at ATMs in Dubai with stacks of prepaid cash cards, withdrawing money nonstop. They then returned the funds to Iraq either through informal hawala networks or by electronic transfer. Once home, they converted the dollars into dinars at the higher unofficial market rate—close to 1,600 dinars to the dollar at its peak in 2023—pocketing the difference. Although that rate has since fallen to about 1,400 dinars, regulators in Iraq and the UAE responded by limiting daily withdrawals and cracking down on card smuggling. Authorities arrested dozens of Iraqis carrying thousands of cards worth millions at airports and border crossings. In one case, a traveler in Najaf was found with 300 cards hidden in cigarette packs; in another, Iranians and Iraqis were caught smuggling Mastercards into Iran. The militias adapted by persuading merchants in the region with Visa and Mastercard access to process fake purchases in exchange for a commission. Bankers described a scenario in which a luxury goods shop in the UAE would charge a Visa or Mastercard $5,000 even though no sale occurred. For a 5% fee, the shop would hand over the cash or the equivalent in UAE dirhams. The card company would debit the transaction at the official Iraqi rate, and the funds would be transferred back to Iraq for currency conversion. The militias often repeated this process endlessly, profiting at every step. Eventually, scammers acquired point-of-sale machines commonly used by restaurants and shops, according to US and Iraqi officials. At so-called POS farms, they processed fake transactions on dozens of devices, often using virtual private networks to hide their locations. Iraqi officials admitted they lacked sufficient controls to prevent what they described as rampant fraud. US authorities said they initially failed to spot the flaws, partly because card settlements are less scrutinized than traditional wire transfers. Iraq's heavy reliance on cash and weak oversight of card issuers made the problem worse. Authorities had some success reining in the scheme. After restrictions on wire transfers, funds flowing through Western Union and MoneyGram soared, surpassing $1 billion in March 2023 and reaching $1.7 billion in June. Western Union acknowledged the surge in Iraqi transactions in its earnings statements and noted ongoing discussions with US and Iraqi regulators. US and Iraqi authorities imposed new limits on monthly remittances, prompting Western Union and MoneyGram to close accounts at multiple Iraqi banks. As a result, cross-border flows dropped to about $110 million a month by October 2024. Western Union declined to comment, and MoneyGram did not respond to requests for comment. Despite enforcement actions, new loopholes emerged. When Baghdad's First Iraqi Bank launched Visa Direct in early 2024, the bank's Visa cardholders sent $1.2 billion overseas in just two months. One account holder alone transferred more than $5 million a day to 11 Indonesian accounts. The Treasury and the Federal Reserve raised concerns, and Visa suspended the service after 10 weeks. Visa and the bank did not respond to questions about Visa Direct. However, stopping individual services did little to curb the fraud, and the card business continued to grow. By 2024, Iraq had 17 licensed card issuers, up from five in 2017. Particularly concerning was the Qi Card, Iraq's most popular debit card, issued to millions of pensioners, government workers, and militias. Usage soared from about $10 million a month in early 2023 to more than $500 million a month by early 2025. Some militia commanders reportedly seized rank and file members' cards or created fake names to secure extra payouts, an Iraqi banker said. Even after the defeat of ISIS in 2019, the Popular Mobilization Forces, an umbrella group of mostly Shi'ite militias, grew more influential in both the government and financial sectors. By early 2025, more than 200,000 militia members were receiving salaries through Qi Cards, giving them significant leverage over the illicit card trade. The Treasury recently asked Iraq's central bank to block Qi Cards issued to militias. Qi Card's parent company, International Smart Card, said it 'no longer provides any services to the Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF).' Bahaa Abdul Hadi, the 55-year-old founder, said the company had taken steps to reassure the Treasury and the Federal Reserve that no cardholders were under US sanctions and that no militia members had Qi Cards usable outside Iraq. 'The only service provided to PMF cardholders was the transfer of outbound salaries from their employer,' the company said. US and Iraqi officials said funds could easily be transferred to other cards that work internationally. Data on card usage confirmed the scale of the fraud. One in five transactions by foreign cardholders in the UAE in 2024 involved an Iraqi debit or cash card, even though only one in 250 travelers was from Iraq. Many payments went to businesses in free trade zones or high-end jewelers rather than the usual tourist spots. Mastercard's Global Compliance Team reviewed Yana Banking Services in August 2023 and found 'no customer risk rating is performed, and no risk ratings were reflected on eight cardholder and three merchant files.' Yana was temporarily banned from issuing new Mastercard-branded cards but was later reinstated after addressing the violations. 'The goal is to ensure they avoid further violations of Mastercard standards or regulatory requirements,' Eisen said. 'We reserve the right to revisit any allegation to ensure this compliance.' Yana did not respond to requests for comment. In March 2025, Mastercard blocked more than 100,000 Iraqi-issued cards and removed 4,000 merchants in the UAE. Half of the cards came from International Smart Card, the US, and Iraqi officials said. 'Information about Qi Card and International Smart Card that Mastercard received from government agencies was compiled with existing information and acted upon accordingly,' Eisen said. In April, Visa flagged 70,000 Iraqi cards for potential fraud and blocked about 5,000 UAE vendors. Some cards were later reinstated after review. The Central Bank of Iraq also capped cross-border transactions at $300 million a month and limited each cardholder to $5,000 monthly. The bank hired K2, a US financial crimes consulting firm, and required issuers to bank with an Iraqi institution that has a US correspondent bank. The US Treasury blacklisted three Iraqi card issuers, all Visa or Mastercard partners, for suspected ties to militias. One issuer, Al Saqi Electronic Payment Company, is affiliated with the Holy Shrine of Al Abbas. Al Saqi did not respond to The Wall Street Journal's requests for comment. Visa stopped processing Al Saqi cards, but Al Saqi's website still features Visa logos, promising 'all the advantages offered by Visa, including ease of use, global acceptance, and high security standards.'
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Tunisian national shot dead by neighbour in the south of France
PARIS (Reuters) -A Tunisian national was shot dead by his neighbour in the south of France, the Draguignan prosecutor said in a statement, adding that the incident was being investigated as a racially-motivated crime. The victim, who was said to be "possibly 35", but has not been officially identified, was killed late on Saturday night in the town of Puget-sur-Argens. A 25-year-old Turkish national was also shot in the hand by the man and taken to hospital. The incident comes one month after the fatal stabbing of Aboubakar Cisse, a 22-year-old man from Mali, in a mosque in the southern town of La Grand-Combe, amid rising racism in France. Last year French police recorded an 11% rise in racist, xenophobic or anti-religious crimes, according to official data published in March. In a statement released late on Sunday, the prosecutor said the suspect in the weekend shooting was a 53-year-old who practises sports shooting. He had published hateful and racist content on his social media account before and after killing his neighbour, the prosecutor added. France has the largest Muslim population in Europe, numbering more than 6 million and making up about 10% of the country's population. Politicians across the political spectrum, including President Emmanuel Macron, have attacked what they describe as Islamist separatism in a way that rights groups have said stigmatises Muslims and amounts to discrimination.
Axios
36 minutes ago
- Axios
Behind the Curtain: Trump's America-First AI risk
The two most durable and decisive geopolitical topics of the 2020s are fully merging into one existential threat: China and AI supremacy. Put simply, America either maintains its economic and early AI advantages, or faces the possibility of a world dominated by communist China. Why it matters: This is the rare belief shared by both President Trump and former President Biden — oh, and virtually every person studying the geopolitical chessboard. David Sacks, Trump's AI czar, said this weekend on his podcast, "All-In": "There's no question that the armies of the future are gonna be drones and robots, and they're gonna be AI-powered. ... I would define winning as the whole world consolidates around the American tech stack." The big picture: That explains why the federal government has scant interest in regulating AI, why both parties are silent on AI's job threat, and why Washington and Silicon Valley are merging into one superstructure. It can all be traced to China. Trump is squarely in this camp. Yet his short-term policies on global trade and treatment of traditional U.S. allies are putting long-term U.S. victory over China — economically and technologically — at high risk. To understand the stakes, wrap your head around the theory of the case for beating China to superhuman intelligence. It goes like this: China is a bad actor, the theory goes, using its authoritarian power to steal U.S. technology secrets — both covertly, and through its mandate that American companies doing business in China form partnerships with government-backed Chinese companies. China has a lethal combination of talent + political will + long-term investments. What they don't have, right now, are the world's best chips. If China gains a decisive advantage in AI, America's economic and military dominance will evaporate. Some think Western liberal democracy could, too. China then uses this technology know-how and manipulates its own markets to supercharge emerging, vital technologies, including driverless cars, drones, solar, batteries, and other AI-adjacent categories. Chinese firms are exporting those products around the world, squashing U.S. and global competitors and gathering valuable data. It then floods markets with cheap Chinese products that help gather additional data — or potentially surveillance of U.S. companies or citizens. The Trump response, similar to Biden's, is to try to punish China with higher targeted tariffs and strict controls on U.S. tech products — such as Nvidia's high-performing computer chips — sold there. The downside risk is slowing U.S. sales for companies like Nvidia, losing any American control over the supply chain that ultimately produces superhuman intelligence in China, and cutting off access to AI components that China produces better or more cheaply than the U.S. Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang recently called the export controls " a failure" that merely gave China more incentive to develop its industry. You mitigate this risk by opening up new markets for American companies to sell into ... fostering alternatives to Chinese goods and raw materials (Middle East) ... and creating an overall market as big or bigger than China's (America + Canada + Europe + Middle East + India). But Trump isn't mitigating the risk elsewhere while confronting China. He's often escalating the risk, without any obvious upside. Consider: Canada, rich in minerals and energy, is looking to Europe, not us, for protection and partnership after Trump insulted America's former closest ally. Trump continues to taunt Canada about becoming an American state. Europe, once solidly pro-American, has been ridiculed by Trump and Vice President Vance as too weak and too cumbersome to warrant special relations with America. Zoom in: Trump's tariffs spooked these two allies and many others who could legitimately form a massive, united counterweight to China. That has slowed discussions of a united front in case America and China fully decouple. In fact, Europe and China are now talking more actively, in a sort of "the trade enemy of my trade enemy is my friend" dialogue. Trump has tightened relationships with rich nations in the Middle East, and sees the Saudis and others as displacing European nations as part of the global American coalition. But those same nations are close to China, too, and have little incentive to pick sides so decisively. The Trump-Biden export controls rely on countries involved in the cutting-edge chip supply chain — Japan, the Netherlands, South Korea and Taiwan — agreeing to harm their own companies' business in China to form a united front with the U.S. Trump has given them reason to reconsider. Zoom out: Trump, in public, has been all over the place on China, much like he has on trade policy. He talked tough early, slapped on 145% tariffs — then sent Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent out to argue the broader trade strategy was a chess move to isolate China. But then Trump reduced the tariffs, suggested peaceful competition was possible, and reignited trade talks. Now, he's back to talking tough and firing off social media warnings about calling them off again. Meanwhile, China keeps racing ahead on drones, cars, quantum computing and batteries. At the same time, Beijing holds all the leverage on the rare earth minerals the U.S. so desperately needs. And JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon, just back from China, warned last week that America's internal issues leave the nation unprepared for war abroad. "If you put a team on the field and the team's torn apart, they're gonna lose," he told the Reagan National Economic Forum. "And that's kind of us right now." The other side: Administration advisers tell us there's more coherence to the Trump strategy than meets the eye. Trump believes he'll ultimately create a coalition of willing trading partners, with more favorable terms for America, to rival China. He also believes his tactics will nudge Canada, Greenland, Ukraine and others to share essential minerals and AI ingredients — and that U.S. workers will benefit from better-paying jobs in this new economy. Understanding that countries need AI and just choose between the U.S. and China, Trump sees the opportunity to leverage the U.S. AI lead to both bring countries onto U.S. systems — and to get investment back into the U.S. to fund critical AI infrastructure, including OpenAI's Stargate. An OpenAI official who has worked closely with Trump officials told us the administration excels at AI diplomacy and is executing a sophisticated strategy. "They get it," the official said, "particularly when it comes to making sure the world is going to build out on U.S.-led AI rails, while also using the interest in U.S. AI to get reciprocal investment into U.S.-based infrastructure."
