The EU is weighing whether to deport migrants to countries they have no obvious connection to
The European Union is considering whether to deport migrants to countries they have no obvious connection to, in a drive to send away more people who are not permitted to stay.
Rights groups say the 'safe third country' plans unveiled Tuesday contravene EU values and will burden poorer nations. Under the bloc's rules, people can be sent to countries deemed safe, but not to those where they face the risk of physical harm or persecution.
'We can expect families being separated and people being deported without appropriate judicial review to places they don't even know,' said Silvia Carta, Advocacy Officer at PICUM, a collective of organizations that defends migrants' rights.
The EU's executive branch, the European Commission, proposed that the 27 member countries should no longer feel bound to ensure that migrants have a link to a place they might be sent to.
The commission, which proposes EU laws and ensures they are respected, said that unauthorized migrants could also be deemed to have a connection to a country if they crossed it safely on their way to Europe. This wouldn't apply to children traveling alone.
Under the plans, people could be forcibly taken to one of these countries before their cases are heard, even if they appeal.
The new draft rules, which must be endorsed by EU nations and the European Parliament to enter force, were unveiled as a number of countries including Britain and Italy seek to set up 'return hubs' in third countries where rejected asylum seekers can be held until they can be deported.
The commission said its plans will speed up asylum procedures and ease pressure on European administrations and facilities. EU law currently requires authorities to prove a link between applicants and the safe third country they might be sent to.
'Instead of spending endless time and resources offloading its responsibilities to other countries, the EU should invest in its own asylum systems,' said Amnesty International's EU Advocate on Migration and Asylum, Olivia Sundberg Diez.
'Sending people to countries to which they have no connection, no support and no prospects, or may have only briefly transited through, is not only chaotic and arbitrary, but also devastating on a human level,' Diez said.
More than 1 million people entered Europe a decade ago, sparking a political crisis over who should take responsibility for them. Tensions between European neighbors remain palpable. Migration laws have been constantly tightened ever since.
Last month, the commission said that seven countries – Bangladesh, Colombia, Egypt, India, Kosovo, Morocco and Tunisia – should be designated 'safe third countries.'
It said that migrants from those countries are unlikely to be granted asylum in Europe and should have their applications processed in 3 months rather than the usual 6 months so they can be sent home more quickly.
Asylum applications by people coming from countries that are candidates to join the EU – Albania, Bosnia, Georgia, Moldova, Montenegro, North Macedonia, Serbia and Turkey – would also be fast-tracked.
___
Follow AP's global migration coverage at https://apnews.com/hub/migration
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
31 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
SUE REID: I uncovered the grooming gangs scandal 15 years ago - and was vilified by the Left. Now I've been entirely vindicated, but I fear this repugnant crime is still going on today...
At last Sir Keir Starmer has announced a national inquiry into the mass-rape gangs prowling the streets of our towns and cities to target young girls for sex. And not before time. His dramatic U-turn follows months of Government reluctance to launch a country-wide probe into the so-called 'grooming' scandal that has shamed Britain for decades. Street rape gangs have operated in the North, the South, the Midlands. There are thousands of girl victims, mostly underage, mostly white. But make no mistake: youngsters of all creeds and colours (including boys) have been damaged by this repugnant, out-of-control crime which I fear is ongoing today.
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Tax and labour increases costing average pub £14,000, says industry body
Tax increases and the rise in the minimum wage have cost each UK pub about £14,000 on average, according to the latest figures. The impact of rises in national insurance contributions, the national minimum wage, business rates for some companies and packaging taxes have wiped out the equivalent of 12 days of pubs' turnover, the British Beer and Pub Association (BBPA) said. Emma McClarkin, boss of the trade body, said the hit was 'indefensible' and called for immediate action to help support the future of the sector. It has urged the Government to overhaul the current business rates system of property tax in order to help offset recent cost increases. The Labour Government has said it plans to reform the current business rates system, and in March said it will publish an interim report on this during the summer. However, in April's budget, the Government cut a relief on the property tax – that came in following the Covid pandemic – from 75% to 40%, resulting in significantly higher bills for hospitality, retail and leisure businesses. The BPPA has called on the Government to speed up reforms of the commercial property tax to alleviate pressure on pubs. The organisation warned earlier this year that the average price of a pint of beer would surge past £5 for the first time because of the cost hikes hitting the sector. It said the average cost of a pint in the UK was expected to rise by about 21p as a result as pubs are forced to pass some cost inflation onto customers. Ms McClarkin, chief executive of the BBPA, said: 'Pubs are effectively having to run on empty for nearly a fortnight which is indefensible considering how vital they are to communities, livelihoods, and the economy. 'We support Labour's ambitions to unlock the UK's potential but, to do that, they must make practical, meaningful changes that support pubs and the jobs that rely on them. 'We are not asking for special treatment — we ask only for fairness. 'We want a modernised, business rates system that supports, not punishes, pubs; Government to mitigate employment cost rises; and a review of the nonsensical and unfair EPR (extended producer responsibility) system.'
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Almost 10,000 gender certificates granted amid rise in Gen Z applications
Almost 10,000 gender recognition certificates (GRCs) have been granted in the UK since their introduction two decades ago, with an increasing proportion going to young adults, analysis shows. Some 1,169 GRCs were issued in the year to March 2025, more than three times the number in 2019/20, when it stood at just 364. It is also the highest annual total since 2005/06, which was the first full year that the scheme – which allows a person's acquired gender to be recognised legally in the country – was in operation. The surge is likely to reflect recent changes in the certification process, including a big cut in fees, combined with more applications from young people. Nearly a quarter (24%) of certificates granted in the latest year were for people born since 2000 – loosely known as Generation Z – and 68% were for those born since 1990, up from 4% and 41% respectively in 2019/20. The analysis has been compiled by the PA news agency using data published by the Ministry of Justice, which shows a total of 9,633 GRCs had been granted in the UK up to March 2025. The findings come after the Supreme Court's ruling in April on the definition of sex, which followed a dispute centred on whether someone with a GRC recognising their gender as female should be treated as a woman under the UK 2010 Equality Act. In a long-awaited judgment, the court confirmed the terms woman and sex in the 2010 Equality Act 'refer to a biological woman and biological sex'. This means transgender women with a GRC can be excluded from single-sex spaces if 'proportionate'. In the wake of the ruling the boss of Britain's equalities regulator suggested that while it does not mean GRCs are 'worthless', their 'efficacy' could be re-examined. Baroness Kishwer Falkner, chairwoman of the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) told BBC Radio 4's Today programme in the days after the ruling: 'I think the next stage of litigation may well be tests as to the efficacy of the GRC, and or other areas.' Asked about whether she thinks GRCs are now 'worthless', she replied: 'We don't believe they are. We think they're quite important.' Government advice on how to apply for a GRC states that the Supreme Court ruling does not affect the application process, but advises people to contact the EHRC if they have questions. The Gender Recognition Act came into effect on April 4 2005, giving adults the right legally to change the gender that was recorded on their birth certificate. This is done by applying for a GRC, a document that shows a person has satisfied the criteria for changing their legal gender. Applications are made to the Gender Recognition Panel, a body of legal and medical experts, who issue a certificate only if the application meets the necessary criteria. GRC applications hit a record 1,517 in 2024/25, up from 1,397 the previous year and 443 in 2019/20. The application fee for a certificate was cut in May 2021 from £140 to £5, while there was a switch to online applications in July 2022. A GRC is granted if the applicant has been diagnosed with gender dysphoria; has lived in the acquired gender for at least two years, and intends to live in that gender for the rest of their life. PA analysis shows the age of those receiving GRCs has changed considerably over the past decade. Some 63% of certificates issued in 2014/15 went to people born before 1980 – but by 2024/25 this had dropped sharply to just 17%. By contrast, people born from 1980 onwards accounted for 83% of certificates in the most recent year, up from 37% a decade earlier. More recently, there has been a steady increase in the proportion of certificates going to people born since 2000, up from 4% in 2019/20 to 24% in 2024/25. The age group currently responsible for the biggest proportion is people born in the 1990s, who accounted for 45% of the total in the year to March 2025. The balance in applications between males and females has also changed over time. In 2005/06, the first full year that certificates were available, more than three-quarters (77%) were granted to people whose sex at birth was male, with just under a quarter (23%) going to those who were female. By 2015/16 the gap between these percentages had narrowed at 67% and 33%, and in 2023/24 the figures were almost equal, at 52% for males and 48% for females. In the most recent year of 2024/25, the gap widened slightly with 55% of certificates granted to people whose sex at birth was male and 45% for those who were female. Nearly one in 10 people receiving certificates in the year to March 2025 were part of a married couple – a proportion that has been relatively stable since the law was changed in 2014 to allow some applicants to remain married while obtaining gender recognition. Of the 1,169 certificates granted in 2024/25, 109 (9%) were for married applicants with the vast majority – 1,033 (88%) – for people who were single, while 27 were recorded as 'other/unknown'.
