CT Man pleads guilty to cruelty after strangling, dismembering dog in New Rochelle
A Connecticut man has pleaded guilty to aggravated cruelty to animals after killing and dismembering an English bulldog in New Rochelle, the Westchester County District Attorney's office said.
Benjamin Tyler, 40, of New Milford, pleaded guilty to the unclassified felony, District Attorney Susan Cacace's office said in a news release.
Tyler is expected to be sentenced on Sept. 8 in Westchester County Court to one year in jail, the release said.
From 2024: Arrest made in strangling, dismembering of English bulldog in New Rochelle
On Dec. 6, 2024, Tyler strangled Bruno, a pure-bred English bulldog, to death at the New Rochelle home of Bruno's guardian, a longtime acquaintance of the defendant with whom he had been staying, according to the District Attorney's office. Tyler dismembered Bruno and strewed various pieces of his carcass around New Rochelle.
The criminal complaint from 2024 said Tyler strangled and dismembered the dog, then put the torso in an orange bucket and the head and two legs in a cardboard box.
Later in December, Tyler turned himself in at police headquarters after learning there was an arrest warrant for him after an investigation by New Rochelle detectives and SPCA Westchester investigators.
"The defendant's conduct in this case is sickening beyond comprehension," Cacace said. "He will soon have time to reflect on the depravity of his actions from the Westchester County Jail. Cruelty to animals will never be tolerated under my administration.'
This article originally appeared on Rockland/Westchester Journal News: Connecticut man pleads guilty to dismembering dog in New Rochelle, NY
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Colorado attack suspect to appear in federal court Friday as he faces nearly 120 state charges
The Egyptian man accused of carrying out an antisemitic attack in Boulder, Colorado, is set to appear in federal court on Friday – a day after he was charged with 28 counts of attempted murder in connection to a firebombing that has sparked widespread fear across the Jewish community. Mohamed Soliman, 45, allegedly used a makeshift flamethrower and Molotov cocktails to set people on fire during a downtown event held in support of Israeli hostages in Gaza. The attack occurred on the eve of Shavuot, a Jewish holiday, and less than two weeks after a separate antisemitic attack in Washington, DC, where two Israeli Embassy staff members were shot dead. In a Public Service Announcement Thursday, the FBI and Department of Homeland Security highlighted 'potential public safety concerns related to ongoing threats to Jewish and Israeli communities.' Soliman faces a federal hate crime charge in connection with the Boulder attack, an affidavit shows. He faces life in prison if convicted of the federal charge, acting United States Attorney for the District of Colorado J. Bishop Grewell said Monday. On Thursday, Soliman appeared in court from a room in the Boulder County Jail before Colorado District Judge Nancy Salomone to face state charges. Wearing an orange zip-up jacket, Soliman nodded in response to the judge's questions. He faces 118 counts, including 28 counts of first-degree attempted murder, according to court documents filed in the Boulder District Court. Soliman also faces counts of felony assault, incendiary device charges, along with one count of animal cruelty, the document shows. CNN has reached out to his attorney for comment. A total of 62 of those counts relate to the victims. If convicted, Soliman could face up to 48 years in prison for each victim, said Michael Dougherty, the district attorney for Colorado's 20th Judicial District. The attack injured at least 15 people – including a Holocaust survivor – as well as a dog. The victims included eight women and seven men between the ages of 25 and 88, according to the FBI, with several suffering severe burns. Three victims remained hospitalized as of Thursday, Dougherty said. He is due in court for a preliminary hearing on his state charges on July 15. During the attack, Soliman reportedly yelled 'Free Palestine,' according to the FBI and later told authorities that 'he wanted to kill all Zionist people and wished they were all dead,' an affidavit said. Authorities are investigating whether Soliman has any underlying mental health issues, a source familiar with the investigation previously told CNN. Investigators are also examining a notebook left behind by Soliman, which includes a manifesto written in English with some lines in Arabic, according to a law enforcement source. Police recovered the notebook after Soliman directed them to its location. Investigators are also reviewing videos Soliman recorded on his phone, featuring him speaking in both English and Arabic, the source said. One such video, which has surfaced on social media, appears to show Soliman speaking in Arabic while driving. CNN has not independently confirmed the video's authenticity. The attack is one of multiple recent incidents that has increased fear among the Jewish community in the US. 'The ongoing Israel-HAMAS conflict may motivate other violent extremists and hate crime perpetrators with similar grievances to conduct violence against Jewish and Israeli communities and their supporters,' the FBI and DHS warned in their public service announcement. 'Foreign terrorist organizations also may try to exploit narratives related to the conflict to inspire attacks in the United States,' the announcement said. The agencies urged the public to remain vigilant and report any threats of violence or suspicious activity to law enforcement. Colorado Gov. Jared Polis, Boulder Mayor Aaron Brockett and interfaith leaders gathered Wednesday to denounce the attack and call for unity, according to a news release. 'Violence in any form has no place in Colorado, and we know that to move forward we must join together in our common humanity to ensure peace in our communities, take care of one another, and emerge stronger,' Polis said in a statement. CNN's Danya Gainor, Cindy Von Quednow, Evan Perez, Alisha Ebrahimji and Jeremy Harlan contributed to this report.
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
Las Vegas woman indicted in ‘Reba' dog death takes plea deal
LAS VEGAS (KLAS) — A Las Vegas woman indicted in the death of an English bulldog named 'Reba' took a plea deal Thursday afternoon, bringing her down to a lesser charge. On Thursday, June 5, Markeisha Foster, 30, took a plea deal, agreeing to one count of attempt to kill, maim, or disfigure an animal of another. She originally faced a charge of willful/malicious torture/maiming/killing of a dog, cat, or animal. On July 26, 2024, Las Vegas Metro police officers found the English bulldog, later named 'Reba,' in the 1100 block of East Twain Avenue, near Maryland Parkway, next to a dumpster inside a tote that was taped shut. The temperature that night hovered around 110 degrees. The National Weather Service reported a high of 111 for the evening. Reba died the next day. Her death made national headlines as people called for 'Justice for Reba.' Last December, police arrested Issac Laushaul Jr., 32, and Foster on animal abuse charges. A grand jury later voted to indict them on similar charges. On May 16, documents were filed by Laushaul's attorney asking a judge to move his case from Clark County because of intense media coverage, instead wanting to the trail to happen outside of Las Vegas. While not asking for a venue change, Foster's attorney asked the judge to sever her case from Laushaul's. The filing indicated Laushaul and his attorney believe they will be unable to find an impartial jury. RELATED: Nevada lawmakers approve Reba's Law; it's now on the governor's desk 'The media has followed this case/story extensively,' Laushaul's attorney wrote in court documents filed May 16, citing 8 News Now's reporting. 'Media coverage has included photographs, articles all about 'Reba,' interviews with individuals who know the defendant, coverage of in-court proceedings, pending motions, comments by prosecutors, police, and defense attorneys, and interviews and analyses of veterinarians as to 'how this could have all happened.'' News coverage of Reba's death began in the months after Laushaul and Foster allegedly left her in the heat, as police released video footage of their suspects. Prosecutors oppose the venue change, writing, 'The mere existence of publicity does not require a trial to be moved.' Additional details about Foster's plea deal were not immediately known. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
Medieval cold case is a salacious tale of sex, power, and mayhem
Researchers have uncovered handwritten letters, court documents, and a coroner's report related to the nearly 700-year-old cold case murder of a medieval priest. Published on June 5 in the journal Criminal Law Forum, the investigation draws on direct archival evidence from Cambridge University that is helping fill in the gaps to a high-profile true crime scandal that would make headlines even today. But despite a mountain of firsthand accounts, the murder's masterminds never saw justice. On Friday, May 3, 1337, Anglican priest John Forde began a walk along downtown London's Cheapside street after vespers (evening prayers) shortly before sunset. At one point, a clergyman familiar to Forde by the name of Hasculph Neville approached him to begin a 'pleasant conversation.' As the pair neared St. Paul's Cathedral, four men ambushed the priest. One of the attackers then proceeded to slit Forde's throat using a 12-inch dagger as two other assailants stabbed him in the stomach in front of onlookers. The vicious crime wasn't a brazen robbery or politically motivated attack. It was likely a premeditated murder orchestrated by Ela Fitzpayne, a noblewoman, London crime syndicate leader—and potentially Forde's lover. 'We are looking at a murder commissioned by a leading figure of the English aristocracy. It is planned and cold-blooded, with a family member and close associates carrying it out, all of which suggests a revenge motive,' Cambridge University criminology professor Manuel Eisner explained in a statement. To understand how such a brutal killing could take place in daylight on a busy London street, it's necessary to backtrack at least five years. In January 1332, the Archbishop of Canterbury sent a letter to the Bishop of Winchester that included a number of reputation-ruining claims surrounding Fitzpayne. In particular, Archbishop Simon Mepham described sexual relationships involving 'knights and others, single and married, and even with clerics in holy orders.' The wide-ranging punishments for such sinful behavior could include a prohibition on wearing gold and other precious jewelry, as well as large tithes to monastic orders and the poor. But the most humiliating atonement often came in the form of a public walk of shame. The act of contrition involved walking barefoot across Salisbury Cathedral—England's longest nave—in order to deliver a handcarried, four-pound wax candle to the church altar. What's more, Archbishop Mepham commanded that Fitzpayne must repeat this penance every autumn for seven years. Fitzpayne was having none of it. According to Mepham's message, the noblewoman chose to continue listening to a 'spirit of pride' (and the devil), and refused to abide by the judgment. A second letter sent by the Archbishop that April also alleged that she had since absconded from her husband, Sir Robert Fitzpayne, and was hiding in London's Rotherhithe district along the Thames River. Due to this, Archbishop Mepham reported that Ela Fitzpayne had been excommunicated from the church. But who tipped the clergy off to her indiscretions? According to Eisner's review of original documents as part of the Cambridge University Institute of Criminology's Medieval Murder Maps project, it was almost certainly her ex-lover, the soon-to-be-murdered John Forde. He was the only alleged lover named in Archbishop Mepham's letters, and served as a church rector in a village located on the Fitzpayne family's estate at the time of the suspected affair. 'The archbishop imposed heavy, shameful public penance on Ela, which she seems not to have complied with, but may have sparked a thirst for vengeance,' Eisner said. 'Not least as John Forde appears to have escaped punishment by the church.' But Forde's relationship with the Fitzpaynes seems to have extended even more illicit activities. In another record reviewed by Eisner, both Ela Fitzpayne and John Forde had been indicted by a Royal Commission in 1322. The crime–assisting in the raid of a Benedictine priory alongside Sir Fitzpayne. They and others reportedly assaulted the priory a year earlier, making off with around 18 oxen, 30 pigs, and 200 sheep. The monastery coincidentally served as a French abbey's outpost amid increasing tensions between France and England in the years leading up to the Hundred Years' War. Archbishop Mepham was almost certainly displeased after hearing about the indictment of one of his own clergy. A strict administrator himself, Mepham 'was keen to enforce moral discipline among the gentry and nobility,' added Eisner. He theorizes that Forde copped to the affair after getting leaned on by superiors, which subsequently led to the campaign to shame Ela Fitzpayne as a means to reassert the Church's authority over English nobility. Forde, unfortunately, was caught between the two sides. 'John Forde may have had split loyalties,' argued Eisner. 'One to the Fitzpayne family, who were likely patrons of his church and granted him the position. And the other to the bishops who had authority over him as a clergy member.' Archbishop Mepham ultimately wouldn't live to see the scandal's full consequences. Fitzpayne never accepted her walk of shame, and the church elder died a year after sending the incriminating letters. Eisner believes the Fitzpaynes greenlit their hit job on Forde only after the dust had seemingly settled. It doesn't help their case three bystanders said the man who slit the rector's throat was none other than Ela Fitzpayne's own brother, Hugh Lovell. They also named two family servants as Forde's other assailants. Anyone waiting for justice in this medieval saga will likely be disappointed. 'Despite naming the killers and clear knowledge of the instigator, when it comes to pursuing the perpetrators, the jury turn[ed] a blind eye,' Eisner said. Eisner explained the circumstances surrounding an initial lack of convictions were simply 'implausible.' No one supposedly could locate the accused to bring to trial, despite the men belonging to one of England's highest nobility houses. Meanwhile, the court claimed Hugh Lovell had no belongings available to confiscate. 'This was typical of the class-based justice of the day,' said Eisner. In the end, the only charge that ever stuck in the murder case was an indictment against one of the family's former servants. Five years after the first trial in 1342, Hugh Colne was convicted of being one of the men to stab Forde in the stomach and sentenced to the notorious Newgate Prison. As dark and sordid as the multiyear medieval drama was, it apparently didn't change much between Ela Fitzpayne and her husband, Sir Robert. She and the baron remained married until his death in 1354—when she subsequently inherited all his property. 'Where rule of law is weak, we see killings committed by the highest ranks in society, who will take power into their own hands, whether it's today or seven centuries ago,' said Eisner. That said, the criminology professor couldn't help but concede that Ela Fitzpayne was an 'extraordinary' individual, regardless of the era. 'A woman in 14th century England who raided priories, openly defied the Archbishop of Canterbury, and planned the assassination of a priest,' he said. 'Ela Fitzpayne appears to have been many things.'
