‘No chance of sanctions': We asked all 14 Irish MEPs for their view on the EU's response to Israel
IRISH MEPS HAVE shared their frustration at the European Union's response to Israel's actions in Gaza, with many of them calling it a moral failure that will damage the EU.
The Journal
contacted all of Ireland's current MEPs, asking for their views on the bloc's response to the humanitarian crisis in Gaza and to get a sense of the mood in the parliament currently.
It is now over nine weeks since Israel imposed a complete blockade on Gaza, cutting off supply to food, aid and medicine by refusing to allow in a single truck of humanitarian aid or commercial goods.
Of Ireland's 14 MEPs, two did not respond to our request — Fine Gael's Nina Carberry and Independent Luke Ming Flanagan.
All 12 of the MEPs who replied told us that the EU is not currently doing enough.
Three MEPs (Sinn Féin's Lynn Boylan and Kathleen Funchion, and Labour's Aodhán Ó Ríordáin) said Israel's actions in Gaza amount to genocide.
Frustration at the EPP
Most of Ireland's MEPs told us that views in Europe have not shifted in relation to the humanitarian crisis in Gaza.
Fine Gael's Maria Walsh, who sits in the EPP grouping in the parliament, was the only one who said she believes 'many' MEPs have shifted their mindset since the October 7 Hamas-led attack on Israel. She said this is due to 'the humanitarian abuse that Israel has inflicted since'.
'I firmly believe that the international community cannot accept this step backwards, and this sentiment is shared by many of my colleagues in the European Parliament, and my own Fine Gael party,' Walsh said.
This has been contested by Fianna Fáil MEP Barry Andrews and Labour MEP Aodhán Ó Ríordáin, however, who told
The Journal
that the EPP grouping in the parliament has been one of the main blocks on, as Ó Ríordáin put it, 'any position that could be perceived as critical of Israel'.
'It is absolutely clear to me that the EU is not doing enough,' Andrews said.
'I regret to say that despite many debates and heated discussions, the majority of the Parliament, including Fine Gael's European People's Party (EPP), remain staunchly supportive of Israel and the Netanyahu government.'
Andrews believes a ceasefire and a lasting peace solution will remain out of reach while the EU is divided on this issue and that the EPP needs to be brought 'back towards the centre-ground on this.'
Fianna Fáil MEP Billy Kelleher takes the view that the EU's failure to act is due to 'historical reasons'.
'Many Member States have legacy issues with regards to the horrific atrocities inflicted on the Jewish people during World War II, and are incapable of criticising the actions of the modern State of Israel,' Kelleher said, adding that the EU is 'not doing nearly enough'.
Walsh's EPP colleague, Fine Gael MEP Regina Doherty told
The Journal
that she believes the EU is approaching a turning point, however.
'I'm appalled that in 2025, we are watching starvation used as a weapon of war.
'If Europe won't speak out clearly and decisively now, when will it?,' she said.
'Gaza is a home to children, families, and communities who are being bombed, starved, and silenced. The EU needs to stop using it as a political chessboard and speak up for them,' Doherty added.
Advertisement
Her Fine Gael colleague Sean Kelly said the immediate and unconditional release of all hostages must remain a top priority for the EU, but 'equally, the humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza demands urgent EU action'.
Sinn Féin's two MEPs, Lynn Boylan and Kathleen Funchion, both described the EU's response to Israel's actions in Palestine as a 'moral failure', while Independent Ireland MEP Ciaran Mullooly described it as 'not just a policy failure, but a profound moral collapse'.
Mullooly also highlighted what he sees as the EU's hypocrisy.
'The EU's response to Russia's war on Ukraine has been swift and robust, but its approach to Gaza is marked by hesitation and moral evasion. Civilian deaths must be treated equally, yet the EU's failure in Gaza exposes deep hypocrisy and a betrayal of our founding values,' he said.
This was a sentiment shared by Fianna Fáil MEP Barry Cowen who said 'Europe must find the courage to be consistent'.
Meanwhile, Funchion argued the EU's response is 'rapidly undermining its credibility on the global stage'.
Deadlock on sanctions
Lynn Boylan took the same stance, arguing that it is also a diplomatic failure 'that will have consequences for decades'.
Boylan, who is chair of the European Parliament Delegation for Relations with Palestine, noted that deadlock remains at EU level in relation to sanctions.
'While attitudes in the European Parliament towards Israel are slower to change, there has been a softening of some of the very extreme rhetoric we heard from some quarters. Furthermore, it is incredibly clear that the European public sees the genocidal actions of Israel in Gaza for what they are and are demanding real sanctions from the politicians,' she said.
Despite this, most of Ireland's MEPs do not believe agreement on further sanctions can be achieved.
Billy Kelleher told
The Journal
there is 'no chance' that the necessary consensus can be achieved to review the EU-Israel Association Agreement.
'Nothing to date suggests that any of the Member States have changed their mind one way or another,' he said.
This was also the view of Independent MEP Michael McNamara, who said attitudes towards Israel are 'entrenched in the European Parliament'.
McNamara said he believes there is more scope for the Irish government to act unilaterally in response to Israel's actions.
'While trade is generally an EU competence, there is a good legal argument that member states can act unilaterally where serious human rights issues are engaged, as they are in the IDF's response in Gaza,' he said.
Meanwhile, Fianna Fáil MEP Cynthia Ní Mhurchú said Ireland has 'paid a price' for its stance on Israel's actions in Gaza.
'Trade is the only real weapon that the EU has to influence Israel to do the right thing and meet their humanitarian obligations,' Ní Mhurchú argued.
'We have to be prepared to stop trading with Israel and let them know that we are serious about that.
'I think momentum is building to at least have a conversation in Brussels about threatening to review trade arrangements unless Israel starts to meet their international and humanitarian obligations.'
Her Fianna Fáil colleague Barry Andrews added: 'The Palestinian people aren't asking for special treatment—they're asking for the enforcement of the law. And as long as we fail to do so, we contribute to the prolongation of this conflict.'
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
Learn More
Support The Journal

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Dublin Live
41 minutes ago
- Dublin Live
Irish resident released in Iraq after more than four years in custody
Our community members are treated to special offers, promotions and adverts from us and our partners. You can check out at any time. More info A Roscommon resident has been released by authorities in Iraq – after being locked up for more than four years, it has emerged. Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs Simon Harris tonight revealed that Robert Pether – who is an Australian citizen but had been living in Elphin with his Irish family – was released on bail earlier today. Mr Harris, who has been working to secure the engineer's release for several months, said his Iraqi counterpart Fuad Hussein contacted him to tell him of the development. Construction engineer Mr Pether, 49, who is married to Desree Pether, 53, from Roscommon, has been locked up since April 2021. The father-of-three was jailed over four years ago in a €20 million contract row between his Dubai-based employer and the Central Bank of Iraq. His distraught family in Ireland revealed Mr Pether, who previously had melanoma skin cancer, has a prostate that is "three times (the) normal size" and that he also has gallstones. Mr Pether and an Egyptian colleague had been employed by a Dubai-based construction company, CME Consulting, to build a new Central Bank in Baghdad, when the contract row erupted. They are accused of stealing money from the project, which they both deny. The United Nations has slammed his jailing as "arbitrary detention." He was due to be released last January but Iraq issued new charges against them and he was facing a further 15 years in custody – until Mr Harris intervened earlier this year. He was a free man tonight - although he must remain in Iraq for the meantime. But the Tánaiste welcomed the decision to free him. He said: "This evening, I have been informed of the release on bail of Robert Pether, whose imprisonment in Iraq has been a case of great concern. "This is very welcome news in what has been a long and distressing saga for Robert's wife, three children and his wider family and friends. "Foreign Minister Hussein of Iraq, whom I spoke to last month to urge Robert's release, called me this evening with the news. I was informed that Robert has been released on bail and for the moment he remains in Iraq, but I welcomed this as a first step to his being allowed to return to his family in Roscommon." The Tánaiste also said he had been in contact with Mrs Pether over the release – and said he was grateful to Irish diplomats who had worked on the case. He said: "I also spoke this evening with Robert's wife, Desree Pether, about this positive development. "I want to thank Irish diplomatic officials based in the region for their continued work on this case. "We remain concerned about Robert's health and outstanding charges, but I am hopeful now of a positive resolution in this case." Join our Dublin Live breaking news service on WhatsApp. Click this link to receive your daily dose of Dublin Live content. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice . For all the latest news from Dublin and surrounding areas visit our homepage .

The Journal
44 minutes ago
- The Journal
Children deported this week are 'victims for a state wanting to look tough', Dublin TD says
A DUBLIN TD has said that children should not face deportations from the state as outcry continues over the removal of a number of kids on a chartered flight to Nigeria by the Irish government this week. Social Democrats deputy Gary Gannon said that children were being made 'victims for a state wanting to look tough', adding that Justice Minister Jim O'Callaghan has 'serious questions to answer' over this week's deportations. It comes after the principal of St James school in Dublin 8 that saw two of its pupils deported to Nigeria on Wednesday night criticised the decision to deport , saying that staff and pupils have been left 'devastated'. Five children and thirty adults were removed from Ireland on the chartered flight as part of the Department of Justice's new crackdown on immigration. School principal Ciarán Cronin had told The Journal that two of the children who were removed from the state had been pupils at his school for three years, and have in that time become an integral part of the community there. 'They've been part of our football team, part of our school fabric, part of our school lives,' he said yesterday. Defending the use of the flights yesterday, O'Callaghan said that deportations 'aren't a very pleasant part of the job,' but said the system becomes 'meaningless' if it won't make a difference whether people are granted asylum or not. Gannon told RTÉ Radio One's Today with Claire Byrne that there should be a regularisation scheme for children who have been in Ireland for a year, allowing them to stay here. 'If the system doesn't working at the moment we cannot punish the children that are over here,' he said, adding that a 'compassionate' approach was needed. Gannon also sought information on how many children are currently on deportation lists in Ireland. Advertisement He said the deportation of the children this week was 'devastating', especially for kids who were in Ireland for the past three and four years who have little 'The children on that flight, in the St James school in the Red Cow, they shouldn't be the victims for a state looking to look tough.' 'The consequences are not only for those on the deportation flight, it's for the other 20 odd children,' Gannon said, referring to St James School, describing it 'momentously painful' for the children involved. 'They have the right to come here, if the system is taking too long that is a failure of the state, not a failure of those parents,' Gannon said. Sinn Féin frontbench TD Eoin Ó Broin told reporters this morning that Ireland needs an international protection system that is compassionate, that is human rights based, that takes decisions in a timely manner. Asked whether he believes it's right to deport children who have residing in Ireland over recent years, he said that 'the real problem here is nobody should be waiting for three, four or five years for those decisions to be made'. 'I think if the government took the advice that ourselves and many others, including advocacy groups for people seeking international protection, to ensure decisions were made in a timely manner, then we wouldn't have the kind of challenges that we've seen this week,' the Dublin Mid-West TD said. 'But ultimately international protection has to do what it says. You're either granted international protection, you get your right to remain in the state, or if you're not granted international protection, you lose an appeal, and you lose the application to remain.' Asked about criticism that the government may be trying to appear more aggressive towards migration, he said the issue was that the government had 'made a complete mess' of the international protection system. 'Just like they've made a mess of housing, whether it's housing vacancy or housing more generally, they've made a mess of international protection, and therefore we will continue to raise the concerns that we have always raised with government until they get the system right.' With reporting from Mairead Maguire Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal


Agriland
an hour ago
- Agriland
French and Brazilian leaders disagree on Mercosur after meeting
The presidents of Brazil and France spoke of their differences on the EU-Mercosur Trade Agreement yesterday, during a visit of the Brazilian leader to the European Country. According to reporting by Reuters, French president Emmanuel Macron and Brazilian president Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva differed with each other on the issue, with Lula calling for Macron to 'open his heart' to the deal, and Macron pushing back, highlighting the negative impact to French and European farmers. Lula is set to shortly take up the rotating presidency of the Mercosur bloc – which also includes Argentina, Paraguay and Uruguay – and indicated that he intends to use his six-month tenure to push the agreement over the final hurdles. 'I will not leave the Mercosur presidency without having concluded the trade deal,' he said. He also called on Macron to tell his fellow European leaders that Brazil was committed to fighting deforestation. According to the Reuters report, Macron said he was in favour of free and equitable trade, but that the deal, in its current form, would harm farmers as they would have to compete against South American farmers who are not subject to the same environmental regulations as European farmers. The French president said that the inclusion of so-called 'mirror clauses' may improve the deal. Reuters also reported that French farming organisations met with politicians this week and urged Macron to work with other EU countries to form a 'blocking minority' in the Council of the EU against the deal, (a blocking minority is four EU member states). Mercosur France and Ireland have been the two EU countries most steadfast against the EU-Mercosur Trade Agreement, with Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade Simon Harris recently telling the Dáil that he is unconvinced that Ireland's concerns about the trade agreement have been 'adequately addressed'. According to Minister Harris, both he and his officials continue to engage at EU level at every opportunity, with both the European Commission directly and with counterparts in EU member states, including France, to 'voice our concerns with the agreement'. Harris said both he and his officials have sought to 'interrogate the outcome of negotiations to assess if our concerns have been adequately addressed'. However, he said: 'I am not convinced they have been.'