
Edinburgh University denies purchasing iconic building
An internal communication from the university to staff in late March – shared with The Ferret – said it had bought the former Scottish Widows building opposite Edinburgh's Commonwealth swimming pool the previous month.
However, in response to queries from The Ferret, a spokesperson for the university denied it had bought the building. They did not explain how the miscommunication had occurred.
Pressed further, a spokesperson said: 'At this stage, all we can say is that any information suggesting the university has bought the building is incorrect.'
READ MORE: Scottish university axes 350 members of staff as further cuts loom
The property on Dalkeith Road in the Newington area of the city is known for its distinctive brown hexagonal buildings.
Staff reacted with anger and disappointment to the confusion around the purchase, while the union said it had now lost any remaining trust it had in management.
The information was shared in an online post just weeks after the university announced £140 million of cuts over the next 18 months. The Ferret understands the post was taken down a few days later.
(Image: Wikipedia Creative Commons) Last week, the university said 350 staff had left through a voluntary severance scheme launched in January and that academic promotions would be frozen for the 2025-26 year. The university has not ruled out further compulsory redundancies.
On Friday, the University and College Union (UCU) branch released an analysis claiming that up to 2000 jobs might be at risk and more money than ever is being spent on buildings.
The Scottish Widows building, said the memo, was bought as part of the university's 'capital plan' to continue its commitment to 'world-class facilities' for students and staff.
The Edinburgh branch of the University and College Union (UCU) called for urgent answers over the confusion and for clarity about whether buying the property was, or is, under consideration.
The university told staff it had purchased the building in answer to a question posted on an internal online hub. The Ferret understands the question reflected longstanding rumours circulating among Edinburgh staff.
The union said the rumours were fuelled by the lack of 'transparency and accountability' surrounding capital expenditure at the university. It claimed 'finance and capital' were 'driving the direction of the university rather than teaching and research'.
Scottish Labour said 'overstretched' university finances meant it was 'more important than ever' that 'all financial decisions are sound and high standards of transparency are being held'.
The Dalkeith Road site has been vacant since 2020.
But plans to redevelop it into a 'business hub' and nearly 200 apartments – of which 35% were expected to be 'affordable' – were approved by the council in 2023.
READ MORE: Scottish university staff to vote on strike action in dispute over £140m in cuts
The cost of that refurbishment – which would include replacement of the building's glass facade because it contained 'significant amounts of asbestos' – was previously estimated to be £100m.
University of Edinburgh management has blamed factors including a fall in the recruitment of international students, 'longstanding' underfunding of Scottish undergraduates and rising staff costs for its financial troubles.
But the UCU – which is balloting members on strike action – has accused senior staff of 'manufacturing a crisis' to justify cuts and claim the biggest threat to its finances is 'unrestrained' capital spending on things like buildings.
A number of universities across Scotland – including Dundee, Robert Gordon and Aberdeen – are facing financial problems.
The body that represents Scotland's higher education institutions, Universities Scotland, argues the root cause of the crisis is underfunding. The amount the Scottish Government gives universities for each Scottish student has declined in real terms for more than a decade.
Universities have become increasingly dependent on income from international students – who often pay tens of thousands in fees – to plug the gap. Analysis by The Ferret last year showed seven of Scotland's universities relied on international fees for more than a quarter of their total income in the 2022-23 academic year.
There has been a fall in recruitment of non-EU students this year, partly because of a change to UK Government visa rules which made studying in Britain less attractive.
Funding pressures have meant some universities have recorded operational deficits in recent years. Edinburgh, however, has continued to record surpluses – although it says these are now not sustainable – and has significant assets which the UCU claims could be used to stave off job cuts.
The union claims management has not been transparent in sharing details of modelling to forecast future deficits, and that the target of £140m in cuts had been set 'arbitrarily'. It also claims senior staff are incentivised to view buildings as 'assets' and staff as 'costs'.
Announcing the scale of cuts in February, principal Sir Peter Mathieson claimed in an email that 'steadily rising' staff numbers and pay rises in recent years had meant the amount spent on staff was 'no longer sustainable' and had to be reduced.
He wrote that capital spending was also being reviewed but reducing this would 'only be a short-term measure' and would 'do nothing to address the underlying issues'. The university's provost, Kim Graham, said at the start of April that it was 'exploring opportunities to dispose of buildings which are no longer strategically critical to the university'.
Mathieson himself has faced scrutiny for his pay packet and expenses.
He is one of the highest earners in Scottish academia and staff said they had been left 'speechless' to learn Mathieson had received a 2.5% pay rise in January, the month before he announced the scale of cuts the university is planning to make.
The Ferret also revealed in March that Mathieson had taken a second job at a company linked to the university last year, which critics said could distract him from the problems facing the institution.
READ MORE: Scottish university boss raises prospect of tuition fees amid financial crisis
According to Sophia Woodman, president of the Edinburgh branch of the UCU, the confusion around the mix-up over the purchase 'makes it extremely difficult' to 'trust anything' university management says.
'Yet I'm not even that surprised,' she told The Ferret. She claimed that graphs shared showing cashflow 'have subsequently been changed'.
Woodman continued: 'Peter Mathieson has said in public that he has shared detailed financial modelling when all we've had is eight slides, two of which were title slides.
'It means we all wonder if the underlying assumptions could also be wrong.'
She called for 'urgent clarity' and for the university to confirm whether buying the Scottish Widows building 'had been under consideration'.
A university spokesperson told The Ferret: 'The university has not acquired 15 Dalkeith Road. We are reviewing all capital expenditure as we assess affordability across all university activities.'
'Marie Antoinette moment'?
MEANWHILE, a new freedom of information (FoI) request shared with The Ferret has revealed guests were wined and dined at the private home Mathieson lives in free-of-charge in the affluent new town area of the city.
The university said 10 events had been hosted at the property since November 2023. Guests enjoyed delicacies including champagne, caviar crème fraiche, and wild mushroom and truffle arancini.
At one end-of-year reception for 40 staff, seven bottles of wine and 10 bottles of prosecco were downed. Guests also enjoyed canapes such as avocado on savoury biscuit and haggis bon bons, whisky and mustard. The cost of that event was £906.
At a working dinner last June, 14 people had gin-cured salmon, potato veloute and turnip chou croute, alongside a prime Scotch fillet of beef. Three bottles of £65 champagne were also drunk at the event which cost £1300.
Edinburgh University said in the FoI response that the principal's residence was 'not solely used as a family home, but is also as a venue for hosting formal university events.
'This includes events to welcome international guests, which strengthens the university's global reputation and increases our partnerships and potential funding streams,' it argued.
Referring to the events at Mathieson's house, Scottish LibDem leader Alex Cole-Hamilton claimed it could be Edinburgh University's 'Marie Antoinette moment'.
He added: 'Constituents are contacting my office concerned about their jobs. They will have absolutely no truck with lavish spending from university bosses when they and their colleagues are staring down the barrel of compulsory job cuts.
'Since the news of prospective cuts emerged, I have been in contact with the principal about the situation at the university and I will keep up the pressure on behalf of all the staff and students who this will affect.'
READ MORE: Scottish university chief spends more than £40k on travel amid funding crisis
Scottish Labour's education spokesperson Pam Duncan-Glancy said: 'At a time when university finances are so overstretched, it is more important than ever that all financial decisions are sound and high standards of transparency are being upheld.
'However, university funding in Scotland is fundamentally no longer fit for purpose and Scotland's world-class universities are being put at risk and young Scots are being failed as a result.'
A spokesperson for Edinburgh University said: 'The university has not acquired 15 Dalkeith Road. We are reviewing all capital expenditure as we assess affordability across all university activities.
'The principal's residence is often used as a venue for hosting formal university events to welcome an array of guests, such as dignitaries, international partners and other supporters. All hospitality was provided using standard menus from our internal university catering service.
'These events help to enhance the university's reputation, strengthen our partnerships and potential funding streams.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


STV News
an hour ago
- STV News
SNP calls on Labour to match Scottish Government action on poverty
Almost two million families would be lifted out of poverty if Labour matched Scottish Government action on the issue, the SNP has claimed. Ahead of the UK spending review, the SNP asked the House of Commons Library to produce an independent analysis on the number of British children in poverty and the impact that replicating Scottish Government policies across the UK would have. The research showed 1.83 million families would be lifted out of poverty if policies were matched, including abolishing the two-child benefit cap, scrapping the bedroom tax and raising the child element of Universal Credit to match the Scottish child payment, according to the SNP. Statistics showed a third of British children were anticipated to be living in poverty by 2029-30 unless action was taken. Sir Keir Starmer was urged to act on the figures ahead of the UK spending review on Wednesday amid warnings the number of British children living in poverty is expected to rise to a record 4.6 million by 2029-30. Over the past decade, the number of children living in poverty has risen from 3.7 million (27%) in 2013/14 to 4.5 million (31%) in 2023/24, the SNP said. The SNP said Scotland is the only part of the UK where child poverty is falling, due to 'bold' policies such as the Scottish child payment of £27.15 per child, per week, paid in addition to other benefits. Replicating it UK-wide, by raising the child element of Universal Credit by the same amount, would lift 732,000 families out of poverty, including a further 38,000 families in Scotland, analysis showed. The SNP said it has also mitigated the bedroom tax and is in the process of ending the two-child benefit cap in Scotland. It said replicating the policies would lift a further 609,000 British families out of poverty, with the combined impact of introducing all three policies lifting 1.83 million families out of poverty, including a further 75,000 in Scotland. The UK Government delayed its child poverty taskforce review to the autumn and last year Labour MPs voted against abolishing the two-child benefit cap, in a motion tabled by the SNP. The Chancellor has previously rejected proposals to abolish the bedroom tax. The SNP said the UK Government's own impact analysis showed planned cuts to disability benefits will push 250,000 more people into poverty, including 50,000 children, with families losing out on £4,500 a year on average as a result of the cuts, branding it 'shameful'. SNP work and pensions spokeswoman Kirsty Blackman MP said: 'The evidence shows Keir Starmer's Labour Government is keeping almost two million families in poverty by failing to match SNP action across the UK. 'It's shameful that UK child poverty is rising to record levels under the Labour Government, which has pushed thousands more children into deprivation by imposing punitive welfare cuts. 'It's vital that the Prime Minister finally listens to families struggling with the soaring cost of living – and takes the long-overdue action needed to end child poverty at the UK spending review this week. 'That means abandoning the devastating austerity cuts to disabled families, matching the Scottish child payment UK-wide, abolishing the bedroom tax and scrapping the two-child limit and benefit cap. 'With 4.5 million children living in poverty in the UK, only bold and immediate action will do. 'The two-child benefit cap and bedroom tax must be abolished immediately, but that alone isn't enough to end child poverty. It's vital the Labour Government matches the Scottish child payment by raising the child element of Universal Credit across the UK. 'Scotland is the only part of the UK where child poverty is falling – and families receive the best cost-of-living help of anywhere in the UK. 'Westminster must match this action – or it will leave millions more children languishing in poverty.' A UK Government spokesperson said: 'We are determined to bring down child poverty and we have already expanded free breakfast clubs, increased the national minimum wage for those on the lowest incomes, uprated benefits in April and supported 700,000 of the poorest families by introducing a fair repayment rate on universal credit deductions. 'We will also publish an ambitious child poverty strategy later this year to ensure we deliver fully funded measures that tackle the structural and root causes of child poverty across the country.' Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country


Press and Journal
2 hours ago
- Press and Journal
'Stop passing the buck and help Aberdeen Raac families'
A campaigner fighting for Aberdonians caught up in the Raac housing crisis is pleading with politicians to stop passing the buck over responsibility days before another UK spending review. Torry Raac campaign supporter Raymond Davidson reacted to the blame-game between political leaders in the week the UK Chancellor is under more pressure from the Scottish Government to find funds at Westminster. In the run up to the spending review on Wednesday, SNP and Labour leaders again kept the row going in a series of letters and statements shared with the P&J. Meanwhile in Aberdeen, Balnagask homeowners are trying to convince the city council it already has the money to meet everyone's needs. Mr Davidson said the constant back-and-forth between London and Edinburgh is a distraction. 'It's like a game of pass the parcel to them,' he said. 'No one wants the music to stop and take responsibility, it just keeps going round and round. 'It's as though people don't matter in this. Politicians are playing party-political games.' One of the big problems is what happens to homeowners who bought properties with Raac which is now posing a risk. The council has a 'voluntary acquisition proposal' which would cost more than £12 million to take the homes and demolish them. For those who want to stay, a massive repair bill would fall to them personally. The share could be between £20,000 and £44,000 depending on the size of property. 'Why can't the council provide the lot?' asked Mr Davidson. 'They can spend now whatever Holyrood and Westminster are saying. 'If there's extra money down the line, fine. But that shouldn't stop them now.' A proposal from residents would see people relocated to a cluster of homes which would then be repaired at what campaigners say is a reduced cost to the taxpayer. Councillor Allard, the SNP co-leader in Aberdeen, said the local authority is already getting on with helping Raac residents – but is under no obligation to fully fund private owners. 'By law we don't need to give them anything,' he said. 'Morally, we are helping.' The full cost, regardless of what happens, should involve government help, he added. 'I don't understand why the UK Government will not pay more. It should be like the Grenfell cladding crisis and a UK-wide issue.' In the UK's Scotland Office, Labour MP Ian Murray agreed the council's voluntary purchase scheme must give homeowners 'fair compensation.' But in a letter copied to residents and the P&J, he wrote: 'While I have the utmost sympathy with what you and your neighbours are going through, our powers are limited, given this is an issue devolved to the Scottish Government, which received a record £50bn funding settlement at the Autumn Budget. 'Some of that could – and I believe should – be used to tackle this problem.' Meanwhile, the housing minister in the UK Government said Raac is 'low' in English housing so there will be no additional extra government scheme. This is crucial because if Westminster does spend extra on English housing on Wednesday, it would generate a compensating figure for use in Scotland. In a letter to his Scottish counterpart, Mr Norris said building safety and local government finance are Holyrood's responsibility. 'Any decisions on funding to support building owners to manage Raac are for the Scottish Government and impacted local authorities,' he wrote. The P&J put the UK Government position to the SNP Government. Scottish housing minister Paul McLennan said: 'Raac is a cross-UK problem, and we have been clear from the beginning that it requires a cross-UK solution. 'We have repeatedly called on the UK Government to make available a dedicated Raac remediation fund, which they have unfortunately failed to do. 'We are continuing to call on them to take action – and at next week's spending review the Chancellor has the opportunity to take action to support people affected by Raac, including those in Aberdeen. We will keep up the pressure on the UK Government on behalf of homeowners in Aberdeen and across Scotland.' The P&J asked a spokesman for the prime minister in the Commons last week if any money can be expected on Wednesday. But the spokesman would not disclose any details ahead of the statement.


Scotsman
3 hours ago
- Scotsman
Immigration is an economic imperative for Scotland
Liz McAreavey, CEO, Edinburgh Chamber of Commerce There is a growing recognition across Scotland's business community that immigration is not just a social or political issue – it is an economic imperative. Sign up to our daily newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to Edinburgh News, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... For Edinburgh and the wider Scottish economy to thrive, we must embrace the reality that attracting and retaining international talent is essential to our future prosperity. There has been much debate in recent weeks about the merits of giving the Scottish Parliament devolved powers when it comes to setting immigration policy. Inevitably, that has become caught up in the ever-present constitutional argument. Scotland's demographic trends are clear: we have an ageing population and a declining birth rate. Edinburgh, while a vibrant and successful city, is not immune to these challenges. Over the next decade most of the population growth in Edinburgh and the Lothians is expected to come from people aged 65 and over – and by quite a large margin. At the same time, Edinburgh's birth rate is one of the lowest in the UK, which itself has a lower birth rate than many other countries. This creates a real challenge for our future workforce and economy. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The facts speak for themselves: to keep our economy growing, we need more people of working age. We need individuals who can support our essential public services, start new businesses and bring valuable skills into our workforce. The 2024 Edinburgh by Numbers report highlights this clearly. Between 2012 and 2022 the natural population change – births minus deaths – added just over 5700 people to Edinburgh's population. In contrast, net migration added more than 53,000. Migration isn't just helping to grow our population – it is the main driver behind it. Edinburgh is a city of opportunity. As outlined in our Call to Action, we have world-class strengths across a range of sectors including tech, health, the green economy, financial services and the creative industries. These are underpinned by strong enablers such as our vibrant visitor economy, excellent domestic and international connectivity, and a highly skilled workforce. But to maintain this momentum – and to drive good economic growth – we must ensure our population can support our economic ambitions. Other countries have successfully aligned immigration policy with regional economic needs offering useful models for Scotland. Canada is a strong example. While the federal government sets overall immigration targets, provinces have the flexibility to tailor programmes that address their specific labour market demands. Through the Provincial Nominee Programs (PNP), provincial governments can attract economic migrants with the skills and experience needed in their regions. For instance, Alberta has a scheme that encourages immigration to smaller rural communities facing labour shortages. In British Columbia, the Tech Pilot programme fast-tracks immigration for technology professionals to meet the needs of its growing digital sector. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad These models show the value of a collaborative approach between national and regional governments – one that enables targeted, responsive immigration strategies. Crucially, they are supported by integrated data systems that track and monitor migration flows. The UK already has tools, such as the digitised National Insurance system, that could support a similar approach here. With the right infrastructure and political will, we could adopt a more flexible, regionally responsive immigration system – one that supports Scotland's specific economic needs and helps unlock our full potential. The time has come for a mature, constructive conversation about how we manage immigration in a way that supports our economic ambitions. We need our governments – at all levels – to work together to find practical, forward-looking solutions. Liz McAreavey is Chief Executive, Edinburgh Chamber of Commerce