Midland ISD, Baylor College of Medicine launch STEM+M program for students planning to enter medical field
MIDLAND, Texas (KMID/KPEJ)- A new educational partnership between Midland ISD and Baylor College of Medicine (BCM) is set to provide students with advanced opportunities in the medical field. Supported by the Scharbauer Foundation, the STEM+M program (Science, Technology, Engineering, Math, and Medicine) aims to ignite students' interest in healthcare careers while preparing them for future success.
Part of MISD's 'Engage and Act' initiative, the program builds on the district's existing Career and Technical Education (CTE) Health Science offerings. Beginning this fall, seventh-grade students will have the opportunity to apply for the inaugural STEM+M cohort, which kicks off with a neuroscience elective. In eighth grade, participating students will explore scientific decision-making through another elective course.
High school students interested in pursuing healthcare careers can apply for the Biomedical Science pathway starting in ninth grade. This track will provide an in-depth look at medical science, equipping students with the knowledge and skills needed to excel in health-related fields.
'This will allow us to introduce students to advanced medical and scientific topics, laying a strong foundation for those interested in pursuing a medical pathway,' said Dr. Amanda Melchor, Executive Director of Teaching and Learning at MISD. 'Our goal is to inspire the next generation of healthcare professionals, scientists, and innovators.'
To qualify for the STEM+M program, students must show strong academic performance in science and math, as well as a passion for hands-on experimentation and collaborative learning.
Baylor College of Medicine will play a central role in developing the curriculum and training educators to deliver the program effectively. By leveraging BCM's expertise, MISD aims to provide students with high-quality, relevant educational experiences that align with the latest advancements in medical science.
'This partnership represents a significant step forward for Midland ISD,' said Jeff Horner, MISD's Executive Director of CTE. 'STEM+M will prepare students for academic and professional success and empower them to become future healthcare leaders.'
MISD also expressed gratitude to the Scharbauer Foundation for its generous support, which has made the STEM+M program possible. As the district continues to expand its educational offerings, leaders are confident that this initiative will have a lasting impact on students and the broader community.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
21 hours ago
- Yahoo
Meghan to speak as guest of honour at LA museum's Night of Wonder
The Duchess of Sussex will speak as the guest of honour at a museum's Night of Wonder in the US, as part of her work championing community wellbeing. Meghan will be joined by other high-profile guests at the Natural History Museum in Los Angeles, as the space is transformed into an enchanted nocturnal garden on June 14. The event will feature live music and installations representing local ecosystems and the LA landscape, and guests will be treated to a farm-to-table dinner that uses ingredients from the museum's nature gardens. The duchess's mission to advance community wellbeing and uplift young women 'dovetails with the museums' approach to connecting community and science by fostering meaningful educational experiences that empower young minds', the Office of Prince Harry and Meghan said. Among the programmes shared on the website of their charity, the Archewell Foundation, is The Welcome Project, where Meghan focuses on addressing 'the social isolation recently resettled women experience around the world and building more inclusive and connected communities'. The Natural History Museums of Los Angeles County (NHMLAC) hold one of the biggest and most valuable collections of natural and cultural history in the world, with more than 35 million objects. Their collections are used for ground-breaking scientific and historical research and in a range of community science programmes, including creating indoor-outdoor visitor experiences. NHMLAC's president and director Lori Bettison-Varga said: 'We are proud to honour Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, a native Angeleno, whose work to advance community wellbeing and expand opportunity, especially for underserved communities, aligns with our equity-focused approach to developing science literacy for the next generation, including through our Stem and Steam Pathways programmes.' Meghan and Harry, who celebrated their seventh wedding anniversary last month, live in the US with their two children, Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet, after stepping away from the working monarchy.
CNN
a day ago
- CNN
Kennedy's HHS sent Congress ‘junk science' to defend vaccine changes, experts say
Vaccines Federal agencies Congressional news Respiratory virusesFacebookTweetLink Follow A document the Department of Health and Human Services sent to lawmakers to support Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s decision to change U.S. policy on covid vaccines cites scientific studies that are unpublished or under dispute and mischaracterizes others. One health expert called the document 'willful medical disinformation' about the safety of covid vaccines for children and pregnant women. 'It is so far out of left field that I find it insulting to our members of Congress that they would actually give them something like this. Congress members are relying on these agencies to provide them with valid information, and it's just not there,' said Mark Turrentine, a professor of obstetrics and gynecology at Baylor College of Medicine. Kennedy, who was an anti-vaccine activist before taking a role in the Trump administration, announced May 27 that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention would no longer recommend covid vaccines for pregnant women or healthy children, bypassing the agency's formal process for adjusting its vaccine schedules for adults and kids. The announcement, made on the social platform X, has been met with outrage by many pediatricians and scientists. The HHS document meant to support Kennedy's decision, obtained by KFF Health News, was sent to members of Congress who questioned the science and process behind his move, according to one federal official who asked not to be identified because he wasn't authorized to discuss the matter publicly. The document has not been posted on the HHS website, though it is the first detailed explanation of Kennedy's announcement from the agency. Titled 'Covid Recommendation FAQ,' the document distorts some legitimate studies and cites others that are disputed and unpublished, medical experts say. HHS director of communications Andrew Nixon told KFF Health News, 'There is no distortion of the studies in this document. The underlying data speaks for itself, and it raises legitimate safety concerns. HHS will not ignore that evidence or downplay it. We will follow the data and the science.' HHS did not respond to a request to name the author of the document. One of the studies the HHS document cites is under investigation by its publisher regarding 'potential issues with the research methodology and conclusions and author conflicts of interest,' according to a link on the study's webpage. 'This is RFK Jr.'s playbook,' said Sean O'Leary, chair of the Committee on Infectious Diseases for the American Academy of Pediatrics and an assistant professor of pediatrics at the University of Colorado School of Medicine. 'Either cherry-pick from good science or take junk science to support his premise — this has been his playbook for 20 years.' Another study cited in the document is a preprint that has not been peer-reviewed. Under the study's title is an alert that 'it reports new medical research that has yet to be evaluated and so should not be used to guide clinical practice.' Though the preprint was made available a year ago, it has not been published in a peer-reviewed journal. The FAQ supporting Kennedy's decision claims that 'post-marketing studies' of covid vaccines have identified 'serious adverse effects, such as an increased risk of myocarditis and pericarditis' — conditions in which the heart's muscle or its covering, the pericardium, suffer inflammation. False claims that the 2024 preprint showed myocarditis and pericarditis only in people who received a covid vaccine, and not in people infected with covid, circulated on social media. One of the study's co-authors publicly rejected that idea, because the study did not compare outcomes between people who were vaccinated and those infected with the covid virus. The study also focused only on children and adolescents. The HHS document omitted numerous other peer-reviewed studies that have shown that the risk of myocarditis and pericarditis is greater after contracting covid for both vaccinated and non-vaccinated people than the risk of the same complications after vaccination alone. O'Leary said that while some cases of myocarditis were reported in vaccinated adolescent boys and young men early in the covid pandemic, the rates declined after the two initial doses of covid vaccines were spaced further apart. Now, adolescents and adults who have not been previously vaccinated receive only one shot, and myocarditis no longer shows up in the data, O'Leary said, referring to the CDC's Vaccine Safety Datalink. 'There is no increased risk at this point that we can identify,' he said. In two instances, the HHS memo makes claims that are actively refuted by the papers it cites to back them up. Both papers support the safety and effectiveness of covid vaccines for pregnant women. The HHS document says that another paper it cites found 'an increase in placental blood clotting in pregnant mothers who took the vaccine.' But the paper doesn't contain any reference to placental blood clots or to pregnant women. 'I've now read it three times. And I cannot find that anywhere,' said Turrentine, the OB-GYN professor. If he were grading the HHS document, 'I would give this an 'F,'' Turrentine said. 'This is not supported by anything and it's not using medical evidence.' While members of Congress who are physicians should know to check references in the paper, they may not take the time to do so, said Neil Silverman, a professor of clinical obstetrics and gynecology who directs the Infectious Diseases in Pregnancy Program at the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA. 'They're going to assume this is coming from a scientific agency. So they are being hoodwinked along with everyone else who has had access to this document,' Silverman said. The offices of three Republicans in Congress who are medical doctors serving on House and Senate committees focused on health, including Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.), did not respond to requests for comment about whether they received the memo. Emily Druckman, communications director for Rep. Kim Schrier (D-Wash.), a physician serving on the House Energy and Commerce Committee, confirmed that Schrier's office did receive a copy of the document. 'The problem is a lot of legislators and even their staffers, they don't have the expertise to be able to pick those references apart,' O'Leary said. 'But this one — I've seen much better anti-vaccine propaganda than this, frankly.' C.J. Young, deputy communications director for the House Energy and Commerce Committee, confirmed that Democratic staff members of the committee received the document from HHS. In the past, he said, similar documents would help clarify the justification and scope of an administration's policy change and could be assumed to be scientifically accurate, Young said. 'This feels like it's breaking new ground. I don't think that we saw this level of sloppiness or inattention to detail or lack of consideration for scientific merit under the first Trump administration,' Young said. On June 4, Rep. Frank Pallone (D-N.J.) and Schrier introduced a bill that would require Kennedy to adopt official vaccine decisions from the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, or ACIP. Young said the motivation behind the bill was Kennedy's decision to change the covid vaccine schedule without the input of ACIP's vaccine experts, who play a key role in setting CDC policies around vaccine schedules and access. Kennedy announced June 9 on X that he would remove all 17 members of ACIP, citing alleged conflicts of interest he did not detail, and replace them. He announced eight replacements June 11, including people who had criticized vaccine mandates during the covid pandemic. KFF Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs at KFF — the independent source for health policy research, polling, and journalism.
Medscape
a day ago
- Medscape
Daytime Sleepiness Tied to Risk for Early Death in Women
SEATTLE — Excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) was associated with a significantly increased risk for all-cause mortality in women, results of a large observational study showed. After adjusting for health and demographic factors, women aged 50 and 65 years with high scores on the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) were 16% more likely to die from any cause than their counterparts who had normal levels of sleepiness on this tool. This association was not found in younger women or in those over age 65 years. 'Identifying middle age as a critical period suggests clinicians should prioritize an Epworth Sleepiness Scale assessment and excessive daytime sleepiness management in women approaching their 50s and early 60s,' lead author Arash Maghsoudi, PhD, with Baylor College of Medicine in Houston, said in a news release. The findings were presented on June 9 at SLEEP 2025. Data Gap in Women EDS has been associated with all-cause mortality in previous studies, which primarily focused on men. Maghsoudi and colleagues analyzed the medical records of 40,250 female veterans (mean age, 48 years) from 1999 to 2022, focusing on individuals with sleep-related International Classification of Diseases, 9th/10th Revision codes, or those who had received clinical sleep services. They used a validated natural language processing tool to extract ESS scores from clinical notes, with scores categorized as normal (0-10) or high (11-24). Participants were further stratified into three age groups: Young (< 50 years), middle-aged (≥ 50 to < 65 years), and older adults (≥ 65 years). The results were adjusted for age, race, ethnicity, BMI, and Charlson Comorbidity Index. In the overall cohort, the adjusted odds ratio for all-cause mortality in those with high ESS scores compared to those with normal ESS scores was not statistically significant. However, when stratified by age, middle-aged women with high ESS scores had a significantly higher likelihood of all-cause mortality (adjusted odds ratio, 1.16), with no significant associations seen in the younger or older age groups. The researchers said further studies are needed to explore potential mechanisms, including sex-specific responses to sleepiness and the role of age in this association. 'Intriguing' Data Commenting on this research for Medscape Medical News , Indira Gurubhagavatula, MD, MPH, director of the Sleep Medicine Fellowship and professor of medicine at the University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine in Philadelphia, said the finding that subjectively reported EDS in middle-aged women is associated with mortality strengthens the American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) position that 'sleepiness matters.' The AASM recently published a position statement highlighting how sleepiness can interfere with daily functioning and serve as a marker for other conditions such as mental health problems, sleep disorders, or side effects of medications, as previously reported by Medscape Medical News . 'For these reasons, it is important for clinicians to ask their patients about sleepiness,' said Gurubhagavatula, a spokesperson for AASM. 'The Epworth Sleepiness Scale is a method to get quick, subjective responses and can help guide next steps in clinical evaluation. Improving sleepiness by treating the underlying cause can help restore daytime functioning at home and work, reduce risks of chronic health conditions, and improve people's quality of life,' Gurubhagavatula said. She noted that mechanistic reasons for the relationship between sleepiness and mortality in middle-aged women remain unknown. 'We need more studies to investigate the causal factors that would explain why this association exists,' she added. That said, 'the adjusted odds ratio is just above 1 (average 1.16) in the middle age group. If this is confirmed to be true, even though the risk seems small at an individual level, when you consider it across an entire population, the risk burden to society may be significant,' Gurubhagavatula told Medscape Medical News . She also cautioned that the study involved women veterans, whose risks for sleepiness and mortality may be different than those in other populations. Moreover, the results may not necessarily generalize to other groups. 'The bottom line is that the report is intriguing and calls for more studies to confirm this finding and help explain the mechanism,' Gurubhagavatula concluded.
