
The Lens: American woman killed by hippo during safari raises safety concerns
If you are interested in being a regular contributor for The Lens, please apply by clicking this link.
Thoughts from last week
Charis Chan, 15, Malvern College Hong Kong
Charis Chan raises questions over safety measures and guide qualifications at wildlife excursions. Photo: Handout
There is currently an ongoing lawsuit against the safari tour company African Portfolio following the tragic death of an American woman in a hippo attack.
I believe that African Portfolio should take some responsibility for this incident. First and foremost, they arranged the walking safari and should have been aware of the specifics of the trip, including potential dangers and the qualifications of the tour guides.
Given the well-documented risks associated with wildlife encounters, African Portfolio should have provided the couple with thorough warnings about possible dangers and outlined the steps to take in case of an accident.
However, it is important to note that African Portfolio is not solely to blame for this tragedy.
As stated by Rodney Gould, the company's lawyer, they do not have full control over operations in Zambia. Their focus is to arrange lodging, and the owners of the lodging provide the guides. Being based in the US makes it challenging for African Portfolio to ascertain how tour guides are trained and how the animals and tourists behave.
This lack of direct oversight complicates their ability to prevent such incidents.
To minimise risks on future safaris, companies could make it mandatory for customers to remain in a safe vehicle while observing wildlife.
If customers desire closer contact with animals, the company should provide protective gear to ensure safety from potential bites.
Additionally, tour guides should possess proven skills in handling weapons to effectively address emergencies, thereby protecting customers from severe animal attacks.
Read up on the issue in last week's The Lens
Read and observe
The US joined Russia in voting against a UN resolution that called for an end to the war in Ukraine and condemned Russia's aggression. Photo: AFP
The administration of US President Donald Trump is temporarily suspending US military aid for Ukraine, the White House confirmed last week.
The suspension was announced just days after Trump clashed with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in the Oval Office.
During his election campaign, Trump had questioned the necessity of US aid to Ukraine.
Under Trump's predecessor, Joe Biden, the US was Ukraine's largest supporter in the defensive struggle against Russia.
The United States also split with its European allies last month by refusing to blame Russia for its invasion of Ukraine in votes on three UN resolutions seeking an end to the three-year war.
In the UN General Assembly, the US joined Russia in voting against a Europe-backed Ukrainian resolution that called out Moscow's aggression and demanded a withdrawal of Russian troops.
The US pushed for a vote on its original draft in the more powerful UN Security Council, where resolutions are legally binding, and it has veto power along with Russia, China, Britain and France.
The vote in the 15-member council was 10-0, with five European countries abstaining.
The duelling resolutions reflect the tensions between the US and Ukraine after Trump suddenly opened negotiations with Russia to resolve the conflict quickly.
In the first vote, the General Assembly approved the Ukrainian resolution 93-18 with 65 abstentions.
The result showed some diminished support for Ukraine because previous assembly votes saw more than 140 nations condemn Russia's aggression.
The assembly then turned to the US-drafted resolution. The resolution acknowledges 'the tragic loss of life throughout the Russia-Ukraine conflict' and 'implores a swift end to the conflict and further urges a lasting peace between Ukraine and Russia', but never mentions Moscow's aggression.
Research and respond
What is the role of the United States and President Donald Trump in the UN General Assembly?
What are the implications of the US stance on the Russia-Ukraine conflict?
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


South China Morning Post
39 minutes ago
- South China Morning Post
Hong Kong students eyeing US universities advised to check social media accounts
Hong Kong students hoping to attend universities in the US should review their social media for content related to the country's politics, an education consultant has advised, as uncertainties swirled amid reported flip-flopping over whether consulates could process visa applications for Harvard. Consultants on Sunday told the Post they were still trying to get confirmation on what American authorities required and were unclear about whether they would be able to book visa interviews for their clients in the coming days. The US State Department on Friday told the country's consulates around the world to resume processing visa applications for overseas students who were planning to study at Harvard University, according to a report by The Washington Post. A day earlier, the department reportedly told consulates to keep visa appointments and assess whether applicants were eligible to study in the United States, while providing explicit instructions to reject those looking to study at Harvard. The order marked a sudden about-face after a judge blocked efforts by US President Donald Trump to bar international students from the top university. The flip-flop came just after Chinese President Xi Jinping and Trump held a much-anticipated phone call in which the leaders agreed to reverse the move on blocking visas for Chinese students in the US, among other measures.


RTHK
2 hours ago
- RTHK
Russia says pushing offensive further into Ukraine
Russia says pushing offensive further into Ukraine A road sign marks the entrance to the Dnipropetrovsk region. Photo: AFP Russia said on Sunday it was pushing into Ukraine's eastern industrial Dnipropetrovsk region for the first time in its three-year offensive – a significant territorial escalation amid stalled peace talks. Moscow, which has the initiative on the battlefield, has repeatedly refused calls by Ukraine, Europe and US President Donald Trump for a full and unconditional ceasefire. At talks in Istanbul last week it demanded Kyiv pull troops back from the frontline, agree to end all Western arms support and give up on its ambitions to join the Nato military alliance. Dnipropetrovsk is not among the five Ukrainian regions over which Russia has asserted a formal territorial claim. It is an important mining and industrial hub for Ukraine and deeper Russian advances into the region could have a serious knock-on effect for Kyiv's struggling military and economy. Dnipropetrovosk was estimated to have a population of around three million people before Russia launched its offensive. Around one million people lived in the regional capital, Dnipro. Russia's defence ministry said forces from a tank unit had "reached the western border of the Donetsk People's Republic and are continuing to develop an offensive in the Dnipropetrovsk region". The advance of Russian forces into yet another region of Ukraine is both a symbolic and strategic blow to Kyiv's forces afer months of setbacks on the battlefield. There was no immediate response from Ukraine to Russia's statement. Moscow in 2022 said it was annexing the frontline Donetsk, Kherson, Lugansk and Zaporizhzhia regions, which it did not have full control over. In 2014, it seized the Crimean peninsula following a pro-EU revolution in Kyiv. In a set of peace demands issued to Ukraine at the latest talks, it demanded formal recognition that these regions were part of Russia – something Kyiv has repeatedly ruled out. (AFP)


HKFP
7 hours ago
- HKFP
China vice premier to meet US delegation for trade talks, Beijing says
Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng will meet a US delegation for talks next week in Britain, Beijing announced Saturday amid a fragile truce in the trade dispute between the two powers. He will visit the United Kingdom from June 8 to 13 at the invitation of the British government, China's foreign ministry said in a statement. It said He and American representatives will co-chair the first meeting of the China-US economic and trade consultation mechanism. US President Donald Trump had already announced on Friday that a new round of trade talks with China would kick off in London beginning Monday, after he spoke by phone with Chinese counterpart Xi Jinping in a bid to end a bitter battle over tariffs. Trump posted on his Truth Social platform that Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer would meet the Chinese team. The discussions will mark the second round of such negotiations between the world's two biggest economies since Trump launched his trade war shortly after returning to the White House in January. A first meeting, held in mid-May in Geneva, brought a pause to the US-China trade dispute. But Trump then accused Beijing of not respecting the terms of the de-escalation agreement. On Thursday the Republican president finally discussed the issues with Xi for the first time since the trade tensions soared, assuring that the conversation had been positive. Xi for his part told Trump the two should 'correct the course' of bilateral relations, according to remarks quoted by official Chinese media.