Most case review applicants unrepresented, CCRC chief tells MPs
Most applicants for criminal case reviews are 'simply not represented', the chief executive of the Criminal Cases Review Commission told MPs this week. Defending the body's value for money, Karen Kneller told the House of Commons justice committee that more funding would allow the organisation to 'do more' to support applicants.
Kneller was appearing with Amanda Pearce, the CCRC's casework operations director in a one-off evidence session on the work of the commission.
Asked by Labour MP Sarah Russell about the CCRC's running costs of 'about £10m, expenditure of £9.5m in 23/24 up from £6.5m in 22/23', Russell said: 'I am wondering…whether you feel overall that £10m a year for 30 referrals a year, looks like value?'
Kneller, a barrister, said: '[If it is] good value for money, I am not sure that is a question for me to answer. I would say every referral we find is good value for money. No-one has, I think, said what we should be finding, what is the right number of referrals because the majority of cases that we see, we do not see anything in there that would lead to a successful referral if I can use that as shorthand.'
In response to Russell's question of what the pair believed would be 'the right number of referrals', Pearce, a solicitor, said: 'I do not think there is a right number of referrals. We can only refer those cases that meet the statutory test.
'You would be absolutely right that would be an awful lot of money if we had only looked at the 30 cases that were referred, but of course to find those 30 cases we have to look at everything that comes through the door, so that is 1,500-1,600 cases a year that we have to work on.
Read More At least 500 Bahraini prisoners on hunger strike over conditions
'We have to look at each of those cases carefully to assess whether they meet the test for referral. If you were only looking at such a small number of cases that would not be good value for money but we have to look at everything and we have to look at it carefully.'
Pearce told the committee the CCRC looked at and decided on 1,482 cases last year.
The committee also dealt with remote working, the CCRC's leadership, training, and the Andrew Malkinson wrongful conviction case.
On Malkinson, Kneller said: 'Without a doubt we got that case wrong, Mr Malkinson was failed. We made mistakes on that case, we apologised, the organisation apologised, the decisions made then around when to apologise are probably decisions that would not be made today. Absolutely I extend my apology to Mr Malkinson. Everyone in the organisation deeply regrets what happened on that case.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Feds didn't follow procurement rules in contracts with company behind ArriveCan app
OTTAWA — Federal organizations failed to follow procurement and security rules when awarding contracts to a company behind the controversial ArriveCan app, the auditor general said Tuesday. Last year Karen Hogan published an audit of ArriveCan, finding the government did not deliver value to taxpayers and that three federal departments disregarded federal policies and controls in awarding contracts for the development of the app. GCStrategies was granted the largest share of those contracts. It lost its security status last year and last week the government banned it from federal contracts for seven years over its conduct. On Tuesday Hogan published a wider audit of 106 other contracts awarded to GCStrategies by 31 federal organizations between 2015 and 2024, and found in many of those cases procurement rules were also not followed. Hogan also found federal organizations and departments often provided little evidence to show the work they had paid for had actually been done. The maximum value of those contracts was more than $90 million but only about $65 million was paid out. The report says that, for half of the contracts requiring security clearances, federal organizations weren't able to show that those doing the work had the appropriate clearances before the contract was awarded. Federal organizations lacked documentation to show that they had confirmed security clearances for just over one in five of the contracts Hogan's office examined. The report also found that federal organizations failed to monitor contract work and performance. Many accepted poorly drafted timesheets or failed to collect them at all. Others couldn't show that the people doing the work had the required experience and qualifications. Hogan said that in more than 80 per cent of the contracts examined, organizations couldn't prove that the fees paid didn't exceed market rates. In just under half of the contracts, the report says, organizations had "little to no evidence" to show that deliverables were received. Despite that, payments were still made. The report says most contracts were awarded without organizations assessing whether they should call for bids. Many organizations justified the need for the contracts by pointing to increased workloads or public servants' absences. In September, the House of Commons agreed unanimously to ask Hogan to look into contracts. Hogan said the audit findings echoed those from previous audits by her office. "I said it back then, and I'll repeat it now: I have no reason to believe that this is unique to two vendors," she said. "And that's why I believe the government needs to take a step back and look at why this behaviour is happening." Hogan noted she did not make any recommendations in the report, because she said, the rules don't need to be updated, they just need to be followed. "It's already happening, to make sure that the rules that are in place are followed, well understood across departments," Procurement Minister Joël Lightbound told reporters, following the Liberal cabinet meeting Tuesday. He said it is up to departments overseeing contracts "to make sure that in each and every department, the rules are followed" and that proper documentation is submitted and reviewed. Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre said Tuesday that the government needs to go to GC Strategies and "get our money back." He said all public servants who failed to follow procurement policies should be fired and that politicians should be held accountable too. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 10, 2025. Catherine Morrison, The Canadian Press
Hamilton Spectator
7 hours ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Auditor general finds F-35 costs soar amid project delays, pilot shortages
OTTAWA - The estimated cost of Canada's incoming fleet of advanced stealth fighters exploded by nearly 50 per cent in just a few years, auditor general Karen Hogan said Tuesday in a new report. The fighter jet audit was one of eight tabled in the House of Commons by Hogan and environment commissioner Jerry DeMarco. The reports flag problematic procurement contracts, a backlog in applications for First Nations status and a delay in reducing the amount of federal office space. An investigation by the auditor general concluded that costs associated with the F-35 advanced fighter jet program are running $8.7 billion higher than the original estimates. And it warns the program is being plagued by delays and critical shortfalls — including a lack of qualified pilots. The report lands in the middle of an active review ordered by Prime Minister Mark Carney to examine possible alternatives to the F-35. He ordered the review in response to U.S. President Donald Trump's trade war with Canada. National Defence said in 2022 the base price for the F-35s would be $19 billion. Just two years later, the number has climbed to $27.7 billion. That estimate does not include figures for infrastructure upgrades or weapons. The report says the department's 2022 estimates relied on outdated data from 2019 — despite the availability of better estimates showing 'that costs of the aircraft had already increased substantially.' The audit says issues associated with the global pandemic — such as runaway inflation, rising costs for facilities and munitions and volatile foreign exchange rates — pushed the price tag sky high. Defence Minister David McGuinty's office sent out a written statement to media that blamed the increased costs on 'external economic conditions driven by the COVID-19 pandemic, including global supply chain disruptions, workforce shortages, and increased inflation and foreign exchange rates.' 'In combination with increased global tensions and related impacts on the availability and demand for materials, we would not have been able to deliver the full scope of this project under our previous budget,' he said in the statement. But Hogan also warned Tuesday that the program faces 'significant risks that could jeopardize the timely introduction of the new fleet.' She said the department successfully identified the risks but has not planned appropriately to mitigate them. Construction of two new fighter squadron facilities — in Cold Lake, Alta., and Bagotville, Que. — is running three years behind schedule. The report says the facilities will not be ready until at least 2031 because the department needs to 'redo important elements' of their design. The department started planning the new facilities in 2020 before the government had settled on the F-35. The aircraft comes with significant infrastructure security requirements. 'Costs to develop an interim solution to support the new jets will further increase infrastructure expenses,' the report warned. It said the department produced a contingency plan to operate the aircraft from temporary facilities but the plan fell short because it was incomplete and offered 'no proposed actions nor a cost estimate.' Canada is also still short of qualified pilots to fly the advanced aircraft — despite being warned about this in 2018. The report said the F-35 program lacks measures to minimize potential risks and the department failed to produce robust contingency plans. It notes that the department identified cost overruns from inflation and currency fluctuations as potential risks to monitor, but plans to track those risks were never approved by officials. The Liberal government announced in 2017 it planned to purchase 88 new fighter jets. It signed a contract with Lockheed Martin for the F-35s in 2023. The modern jets are needed to replace Canada's aging CF-18 fleet, which is nearing the end of its service life. The fighter jets are expected to be delivered between 2026 and 2032. Over the next two years, the initial eight will be sent to a U.S. air force base in Arizona, where Canadian pilots will be trained to fly them. The rest will be delivered to Canada starting in 2028. The report said the Joint Strike Fighter Program Office conducted various assessments that uncovered 'significant issues,' such as 'insufficient departmental engineering personnel to service support equipment for both the CF-18 Hornet and CF-35A during the transition.' The audit said that at the end of the last fiscal year in March, National Defence earmarked $935 million for the U.S. government for the first four jets and related items needed to produce another eight aircraft. It says about $197 million has been paid out already. On top of that, National Defence spent another $516 million on the project, including $270 million in infrastructure costs. This report by The Canadian Press was first published on June 10, 2025.
Hamilton Spectator
8 hours ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Government failed to follow procurement, security rules with ArriveCan contractor
OTTAWA - Federal organizations failed to follow procurement and security rules when awarding contracts to the company behind the controversial ArriveCan app, the auditor general said Tuesday. The report on GCStrategies — one of several audits tabled in the House of Commons on Tuesday — says the company was awarded 106 contracts by 31 federal organizations between 2015 and 2024. The maximum value of those contracts was more than $90 million but only $65 million was paid out. Auditor general Karen Hogan looked at a sample set of contracts to see whether they fell in line with federal policy and whether the government got value for taxpayers' money. Her report says many contracts did not follow procurement rules and organizations often provided little evidence to show the work had actually been done. The report says that, for half of the contracts that required security clearances, federal organizations weren't able to show that those doing the work had the appropriate clearance before the contract was awarded. Federal organizations lacked documentation to show that they had confirmed security clearances for just over one in five of the contracts Hogan's office examined. The report found that federal organizations failed to monitor contract work and performance. Many accepted poorly drafted timesheets or failed to collect them at all. Others couldn't show that the people doing the work had the required experience and qualifications. Hogan said that in more than 80 per cent of the contracts examined, organizations couldn't prove that the fees paid didn't exceed market rates. In just under half of the contracts, the report says, organizations had 'little to no evidence' to show that deliverables were received. Despite that, payments were still made. The report also says that most contracts were awarded without organizations assessing whether they should call for bids. Many organizations justified the need for the contracts by pointing to increased workloads or public servants' absences. In September, the House of Commons agreed unanimously to ask Hogan to look into contracts. In a news release, Hogan said the audit findings echo those from previous audits by her office which 'found deficiencies in how public servants applied federal procurement rules.' 'There are no recommendations in this report because I don't believe the government needs more procurement rules,' Hogan said. 'Rather, federal organizations need to make sure that the rules that exist are understood and followed.' Minister of Government Transformation, Public Works and Procurement Joël Lightbound said in a media statement that while the report did not make any new recommendations, the government has taken 'significant actions' on past recommendations and continues to take steps to 'improve oversight and management of federal procurement.' 'Our new government remains committed to strengthening federal procurement practices,' he said. 'We also expect public servants and departments to operate with the highest standards of integrity when procuring professional services to support their program delivery.' GCStrategies was banned last week from entering into contracts or real property agreements with the federal government for seven years. Last year, the government suspended the company's security status. Hogan's previous report on the app's development found it did not deliver the best value to taxpayers and concluded that three federal departments disregarded federal policies, controls and transparency in the contracting process. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 10, 2025. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
