Sacramento funeral home delivered wrong body to family in Central America, lawsuit claims
SACRAMENTO – A Sacramento funeral home is accused of shipping the wrong body to a family in Central America, according to a new lawsuit filed this week.
The family of Francisco Quintanilla is suing La Paz Funeral Services in Sacramento for negligence and emotional distress for the mix-up, which led to Quintanilla's remains being misplaced, court documents allege, for nearly two weeks.
Quintanilla was born in Santa Tecla, El Salvador, and came to Sacramento in the aftermath of the El Salvadoran Civil War where he got permanent citizenship and stayed to work to provide for his family.
Along with his wife of 50 years, the couple had three children, who all stayed in El Salvador. He sent money back to his family from his work in Sacramento.
Quintanilla died in November 2024 and his family contacted La Paz Funeral Services in Sacramento to arrange bringing his remains back to El Salvador. They planned a traditional funeral which included an open casket, which is El Salvadoran tradition.
On the day of the funeral, his family opened the casket to find the body of a stranger inside. Court documents outline that when they contacted La Paz they were, "...told to bring the stranger's body back to the airport. La Paz did not know the whereabouts of Francisco's remains."
"The family was shocked and heartbroken," according to the lawsuit.
For "days and days" the family did not know where Quintanilla's remains were located. Two weeks later, after the original funeral, Quintanilla's family was told La Paz found his remains and they were shipped to El Salvador.
When the family opened the casket, Quintanilla's remains were in a "shocking state of decomposition", according to the lawsuit, that included, "his skin had turned purple and was shriveled, his body was leaking fluids that soaked his clothing, and a horrible smell was emitting from the casket."
The lawsuit accuses La Paz of not properly embalming the remains and that the body was left unrefrigerated for a prolonged period, court documents allege. Due to the condition of his remains, the family was unable to hold an open-casket funeral.
"Our family planned to have an open casket service and to honor Francisco and say goodbye in El Salvadoran tradition. What happened instead was shocking and heartbreaking. Our final memory of Francisco is one we wish we could forget," Quintanilla's wife said in a statement to CBS13.
The lawsuit accuses La Paz of failings including sending the wrong body; delaying the proper shipment; mishandling Francisco's remains, resulting in decomposition and an unviewable body; failing to properly embalm and preserve Francisco's body; mishandling transportation and storage of the body.
"The family didn't get answers, and part of the reason they wanted to file this lawsuit was to get those answers," said Rob Marcerau, the family's attorney in this case.
CBS13 contacted La Paz Funeral Services, and its owner, about this lawsuit and the claims, but did not receive a statement on Wednesday. The funeral home's attorney did confirm to CBS13 La Paz Funeral Services is still in business.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Kilmar Abrego Garcia officially enters not-guilty plea on trafficking charges
June 13 (UPI) -- Kilmar Abrego Garcia on Friday formally pleaded not-guilty to federal human trafficking and conspiracy charges. Abrego Garcia's wife, Jennifer Vasquez Sura, also said a court appearance this week was the first time she was able to see her husband since he was arrested and detained in March. The Salvadorian migrant was returned to the United States earlier this month after being deported to a prison in El Salvador. "Even though it was through a video screen, I was finally able to see Kilmar," Vasquez Sura, who is a U.S. citizen, told supporters at a rally in Nashville. "I'm grateful for everyone who has been fighting for this milestone, in this fight to bring my husband back home with our children." The couple were living in Maryland with their young children at the time Abrego Garcia was arrested. Lawyers will now argue in front of U.S. Magistrate Judge Barbara Holmes whether the 29-year-old should be granted bail before trial. Prosecutors have argued he "would have enormous reason to flee" if released. Abrego Garcia was detained by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents in March and eventually deported to El Salvador. Supporters argued Abrego Garcia was denied due process in the deportation proceedings A U.S. District Court judge later ordered the federal government to "facilitate" his return, after the Justice Department later acknowledged Abrego Garcia's deportation was made in error. President Donald Trump's administration pushed back against efforts to bring Abrego Garcia back to the United States. In 2019, a federal judge ruled in 2019 that Abrego Garcia could be deported, but not back to his home country of El Salvador. He was indicted on two federal charges last month before his return to the United States. Abrego Garcia is accused of playing a "significant role in an alien smuggling ring," dating back as far as 2016, Attorney General Pam Bondi said at the time of the indictment. Bondi said if Abrego Garcia is found guilty, he will be returned to El Salvador. Police stopped the vehicle he was driving in Tennessee in 2002 and found several Hispanic men with no identification. After he was returned to the United States, Abrego Garcia was immediately sent to Tennessee to face the federal charges. Federal officials also contend Abrego Garcia was a member of the El Salvadoran MS-13 gang, accusations he and his family deny. They argue Abrego Garcia fled El Salvador because of the threat of gang violence.
UPI
4 hours ago
- UPI
Kilmar Abrego Garcia officially enters not-guilty plea on trafficking charges
Kilmar Abrego Garcia (L) on Friday formally pleaded not-guilty to federal human trafficking and conspiracy charges, while his wife, Jennifer Vasquez Sura also said a court appearance this week was the first time she was able to see her husband since he was arrested and detained in March and deported to a prison in El Salvador. File Photo courtesy of President Nayib Bukele June 13 (UPI) -- Kilmar Abrego Garcia on Friday formally pleaded not-guilty to federal human trafficking and conspiracy charges. Abrego Garcia's wife, Jennifer Vasquez Sura, also said a court appearance this week was the first time she was able to see her husband since he was arrested and detained in March. The Salvadorian migrant was returned to the United States earlier this month after being deported to a prison in El Salvador. "Even though it was through a video screen, I was finally able to see Kilmar," Vasquez Sura, who is a U.S. citizen, told supporters at a rally in Nashville. "I'm grateful for everyone who has been fighting for this milestone, in this fight to bring my husband back home with our children." The couple were living in Maryland with their young children at the time Abrego Garcia was arrested. Lawyers will now argue in front of U.S. Magistrate Judge Barbara Holmes whether the 29-year-old should be granted bail before trial. Prosecutors have argued he "would have enormous reason to flee" if released. Abrego Garcia was detained by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents in March and eventually deported to El Salvador. Supporters argued Abrego Garcia was denied due process in the deportation proceedings A U.S. District Court judge later ordered the federal government to "facilitate" his return, after the Justice Department later acknowledged Abrego Garcia's deportation was made in error. President Donald Trump's administration pushed back against efforts to bring Abrego Garcia back to the United States. In 2019, a federal judge ruled in 2019 that Abrego Garcia could be deported, but not back to his home country of El Salvador. He was indicted on two federal charges last month before his return to the United States. Abrego Garcia is accused of playing a "significant role in an alien smuggling ring," dating back as far as 2016, Attorney General Pam Bondi said at the time of the indictment. Bondi said if Abrego Garcia is found guilty, he will be returned to El Salvador. Police stopped the vehicle he was driving in Tennessee in 2002 and found several Hispanic men with no identification. After he was returned to the United States, Abrego Garcia was immediately sent to Tennessee to face the federal charges. Federal officials also contend Abrego Garcia was a member of the El Salvadoran MS-13 gang, accusations he and his family deny. They argue Abrego Garcia fled El Salvador because of the threat of gang violence.
17 hours ago
Tennessee judge to hear arguments about releasing Kilmar Abrego Garcia from pretrial detention
NASHVILLE, Tenn. -- A Tennessee judge is scheduled to hear arguments Friday about whether Kilmar Abrego Garcia can be released from jail pending the outcome of a trial on human smuggling charges. In a motion asking U.S. Magistrate Judge Barbara Holmes to order Abrego Garcia detained, Acting U.S. Attorney for the Middle District of Tennessee Rob McGuire described him as both a danger to the community and a flight risk. Abrego Garcia's attorneys disagree. They point out that he was already wrongly detained in a notorious Salvadoran prison thanks to government error, and argue that due process and 'basic fairness' require him to be set free. Abrego Garcia is a citizen of El Salvador who had been living in the United States for more than a decade before he was wrongfully deported in March. The expulsion violated a 2019 U.S. immigration judge's order that shielded him from deportation to his native country because he likely faced gang persecution there. His case quickly became a rallying point for opposition to President Donald Trump's mass deportation agenda. While the Trump administration described the mistaken removal as 'an administrative error,' officials have continued to justify it by insisting that Abrego Garcia was a member of the El Salvadoran gang MS-13. His wife and attorneys have denied the allegations, saying he is simply a construction worker and family man. The motion for detention pretrial accuses Abrego Garcia of trafficking people, drugs and firearms and of abusing the women he transported, among other claims. It states that human smuggling was Abrego Garcia's actual job, not construction. It even accuses him of taking part in a murder in El Salvador. However, none of those allegations are part of the charges against him, and at Abrego Garcia's initial appearance June 6, Judge Holmes warned prosecutors that she can not detain someone based solely on allegations. One of Abrego Garcia's attorneys last week called the claims 'preposterous,' characterizing them as a desperate attempt by the Trump administration to justify the mistaken deportation three months after the fact. 'There's no way a jury is going to see the evidence and agree that this sheet metal worker is the leader of an international MS-13 smuggling conspiracy,' private attorney Simon Sandoval-Moshenberg said last week. In a Wednesday court filing, Abrego Garcia's public defenders argued the government is not even entitled to a detention hearing — much less actual detention — because the charges against their client are not serious enough. Although the maximum sentence for smuggling one person is 10 years, and Abrego Garcia is accused of transporting hundreds of people over nearly a decade, his defense attorneys point out that there is no minimum sentence. The average sentence for human smuggling in 2024 was just 15 months, according to court filings. Ohio State University law professor César Cuauhtémoc García Hernández said he would not be surprised if the judge releases Abrego Garcia because he's too well-known to pose a flight risk. 'The thought that this is somebody who can disappear or who might violate the law without anyone noticing seems farfetched,' García Hernández said. But even if Abrego Garcia is released on the criminal charges, Immigration and Customs Enforcement might immediately move to detain and deport him, García Hernández said. Most people in ICE custody who are facing criminal charges are deported, he said, and the idea that ICE would take Abrego Garcia to his court proceedings in Tennessee is 'next to unheard of.' 'This is an unusual situation in that most criminal defendants are not household names in the Oval Office,' García Hernández said. 'I would hope the folks in the Trump administration have thought this through.' The decision to charge Abrego Garcia criminally prompted the resignation of Ben Schrader, who was chief of the criminal division at the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Middle District of Tennessee. He posted about his departure on social media on the day of the indictment, writing, 'It has been an incredible privilege to serve as a prosecutor with the Department of Justice, where the only job description I've ever known is to do the right thing, in the right way, for the right reasons.' He did not directly address the indictment and declined to comment when reached by The Associated Press. However, a person familiar with the matter who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss a personnel matter confirmed the connection. Although Abrego Garcia lives in Maryland, he is being charged in Tennessee based on a May 2022 traffic stop for speeding in the state. The Tennessee Highway Patrol body camera video of the encounter that was released to the public last month shows a calm exchange between officers and Abrego Garcia. It also shows the officers discussing among themselves their suspicions of human smuggling before sending him on his way. One of the officers says, 'He's hauling these people for money.' Another says Abrego Garcia had $1,400 in an envelope. Abrego Garcia was not charged with any offense at the traffic stop. Attorney Sandoval-Moshenberg said in a statement after the video's release that he saw no evidence of a crime in the footage. Meanwhile, the lawsuit over Abrego Garcia's mistaken deportation isn't over. Abrego Garcia's attorneys have asked a federal judge in Maryland to impose fines against the administration for contempt, arguing that it flagrantly ignored court orders for several weeks
