logo
Utah's latest data and social media laws could ‘change the world,' Gov. Cox says

Utah's latest data and social media laws could ‘change the world,' Gov. Cox says

Yahoo12-03-2025

Utah lawmakers passed laws requiring app stores to verify the age of their customers, and social media companies to share more data. (Photo by)
Utah lawmakers passed two first-of-a-kind bills this legislative session that take aim at social media and tech companies.
One of them has the potential to 'change the world,' Utah Gov. Spencer Cox said in the early morning hours Saturday, after lawmakers officially wrapped up the 45-day legislative session.
'I mean that sincerely, we're the first state to do it. It may be the most important thing we've done for a generation,' Cox said, pointing to freshman Rep. Doug Feifia, R-Herriman.
Cox was referring to Feifia's HB418, which could dramatically change the way social media companies interact with their customers, directing them to create a data sharing system similar to how different cell phone carriers operate — an AT&T customer can call a Verizon customer, and Feifia thinks that standard should apply to social media.
And Sen. Todd Weiler, R-Woods Cross, sponsored SB142 which would require Google and Apple to verify the ages of their customers before they make app store purchases.
In the early days of cell phones, customers often couldn't communicate with people on different networks. For instance, AT&T customers could only call people with AT&T phone plans — and if they wanted to switch carriers, they couldn't take their number with them.
By the late 1990s and early 2000s, cell phone carriers moved towards interoperability, which essentially means communicating and sharing data from different platforms. Fiefia is hoping to push social media companies in a similar direction.
'That's what we're seeing done in tech today, they have what we're calling walled gardens,' said Feifia. 'They've locked us into their platform, and essentially we can only call and communicate with those who are within that platform.'
His bill, HB418, passed the legislature this year with bipartisan support, making Utah the first state to approve a law pushing social media companies towards interoperability.
Today, your cellphone number belongs to you. If you want to switch carriers, you don't need to switch numbers. And you can call whoever you want, regardless of their phone plan. Feifia's bill, in a way, directs tech companies to view your personal data similar to how telecommunication companies view your phone number.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Under Feifia's bill, if you want to leave a social media platform, you can take your data with you. If you want to communicate or share content with people on a different platform, you can. If you want to leave a platform, you can make sure the platform isn't still using your data for advertising purposes.
It might sound like a big ask for social media companies, but Fiefia says it's something they already do.
The bill centers around what's called an interoperability interface, an existing idea that allows different systems to work together, share data and communicate. It's basically what already exists on Meta's platforms, where users can connect their Facebook and Instagram accounts.
'It's something that is already being used, and a lot of tech companies are already moving that direction,' he said on Tuesday. 'We're kind of just speeding that process up and also giving back ownership of data back to users.'
What exactly that would look like is still unclear, and mostly up to tech companies. The bill takes effect in July 2026, which Fiefia said gives companies time to figure out how to achieve interoperability. Users could have a personal identification number that links their various social media accounts, Users could also have multiple account numbers if, for instance, they don't want to connect their LinkedIn page with an anonymous X account.
The mechanics behind how they get there is up to the companies, as long as the interface does the following:
If you build a network of friends, messages and posts on one platform, you should be able to transfer that information to another platform. Tech companies currently don't do that because they want to keep users locked in, Fiefia said.
Users should be able to share content across different platforms without what Fiefia calls 'unnecessary restrictions.'
If someone doesn't want a tech company to keep their data when they leave, they should be able to remove it completely.
Most of the bill revolves around a user's consent. They should be able to download or port their data, or move it onto another platform if they don't agree with their existing platform's ideology, safety measures or other terms or conditions. If a tech company wants to do anything with your data, it needs your consent first.
'It allows the user to decide what happens with their data and information, versus being stuck and losing all of it once TikTok shuts down, for example,' Fiefia said.
Fiefia's bill received an endorsement from Jonathan Haidt, the author of the book 'The Anxious Generation,' which examines the impact smartphones and social media have on teen mental health. And Cox, on the final day of the legislative session, said it was one of the most exciting bills this year.
'I don't even know if the Legislature really understands how groundbreaking that piece of legislation is. I mean, this is getting attention all over the world,' said Cox in an interview with Utah News Dispatch on Friday.
It's the first bill of its kind to pass through a state legislature. Democratic Sen. Mark Warner, of Virginia, has proposed similar legislation at the federal level, although it has not been voted on yet. Six other states are considering bills that mirror Fiefia's.
'These tech companies, they are taking our data and information, informing an algorithm and using that to sell it to advertisers for billions of dollars,' Fiefia said. 'They are literally trading our free will for profit margin, and I think it's something that needs to change.'
Lawmakers also took aim at app stores this year, passing the first bill in the country requiring app stores to verify the ages of customers.
Sponsored by Weiler, SB142 nearly passed unanimously, receiving just one 'no' vote in the Senate and three in the House.
The bill mostly targets Apple and Google, which run the country's two major app stores, requiring them to verify a user's age. Weiler said companies could use a credit card as age verification.
If the user is identified as a minor, the bill would require the app store to tie their account to a parent or guardian's account — the minor would need parental approval before they download any app that requires a terms of service agreement.
Those terms of service agreements are binding contracts that allow app developers to access the device's data, microphone, camera and more — in no other circumstance are minors allowed to enter into a binding contract, said Weiler, comparing it to letting a child sign a rental car agreement. He described it as 'a contract bill.'
'Those terms and conditions can give that company access to their camera, their microphone. They're consenting that their data can be collected and shared,' Weiler said earlier in the session.
Unlike past social media laws, some of the country's largest tech companies were on board with Weiler's bill.
'We applaud Utah for putting parents in charge with its landmark legislation and urge Congress to follow suit,' reads a joint statement from Meta, X and Snap.
'Parents want a one-stop shop to verify their child's age and grant permission for them to download apps in a privacy-preserving way,' the companies said. 'The app store is the best place for it, and more than a quarter of states have introduced bills recognizing the central role app stores play.'
Weiler's bill also creates a private right of action, holding developers accountable if they misrepresent the app's content, allowing parents to bring legal action under Utah's deceptive advertising laws.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Too Busy to Read? Google's Audio Overviews Summarize Your Search Results Aloud
Too Busy to Read? Google's Audio Overviews Summarize Your Search Results Aloud

CNET

timean hour ago

  • CNET

Too Busy to Read? Google's Audio Overviews Summarize Your Search Results Aloud

The next time you wonder why school buses are yellow, you might not have to read a single word to get the answer. Google's latest experimental feature can literally tell you the answer, in a tiny audio clip that loads right inside your results page. Launched Friday in Search Labs, Audio Overviews uses Google's latest Gemini AI models to turn certain queries into 30- to 45-second, podcast-style explainers, complete with on-screen source links for fact-checking. The move pushes Google's AI Overviews beyond text, positioning Search for a semi-hands-free, voice-first future, while also raising more questions about what this means for publishers who rely on clicks. How you can try out Audio Overviews right now You can try out Google's Audio Overviews right now if you're interested. Go to the Google Labs website, opt in to the Search Labs program if you're not already signed up and then toggle on Audio Overviews. You can hit Try an example to test out the feature. Nelson Aguilar/CNET The next time you run a query, like "How do I stop apps from tracking my exact location on my iPhone," Google might show you a button that says Generate Audio Overview, which you'll have to scroll down a little to see. You can then tap on the Audio Overview to process the clip, and then press play. You can speed up the audio, mute the clip and rate it with a thumbs-up or thumbs-down, to better train it. Audio Overviews are only available in the US for now. Nelson Aguilar/CNET Below the player, Google lists the web pages it drew from, so you can click through to fact-check the information or just dig deeper. For those who might have visual impairments, this new feature offers a glimpse at what a voice-first Google might look like. But until Google expands language support and proves the summaries are dependable, consider this a nifty experiment for now, not a substitute for reading the full story.

New York passes a bill to prevent AI-fueled disasters
New York passes a bill to prevent AI-fueled disasters

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

New York passes a bill to prevent AI-fueled disasters

New York state lawmakers passed a bill on Thursday that aims to prevent frontier AI models from OpenAI, Google, and Anthropic from contributing to disaster scenarios, including the death or injury of more than 100 people, or more than $1 billion in damages. The passage of the RAISE Act represents a win for the AI safety movement, which has lost ground in recent years as Silicon Valley and the Trump Administration have prioritized speed and innovation. Safety advocates including Nobel prize laureate Geoffrey Hinton and AI research pioneer Yoshua Bengio have championed the RAISE Act. Should it become law, the bill would establish America's first set of legally mandated transparency standards for frontier AI labs. The RAISE Act has some of the same provisions and goals as California's controversial AI safety bill, SB 1047, which was ultimately vetoed. However, the co-sponsor of the bill, New York state Senator Andrew Gounardes told TechCrunch in an interview that he deliberately designed the RAISE Act such that it doesn't chill innovation among startups or academic researchers — a common criticism of SB 1047. 'The window to put in place guardrails is rapidly shrinking given how fast this technology is evolving,' said Senator Gounardes. 'The people that know [AI] the best say that these risks are incredibly likely […] That's alarming.' The RAISE Act is now headed for New York Governor Kathy Hochul's desk, where could either sign the bill into law, send it back for amendments, or veto it altogether. If signed into law, New York's AI safety bill would require the world's largest AI labs to publish thorough safety and security reports on their frontier AI models. The bill also requires AI labs to report safety incidents, such as concerning AI model behavior or bad actors stealing an AI model, should they happen. If tech companies fail to live up to these standards, the RAISE Act empowers New York's Attorney General to bring civil penalties of up to $30 million. The RAISE Act aims to narrowly regulate the world's largest companies — whether they're based in California (like OpenAI and Google) or China (like DeepSeek and Alibaba). The bill's transparency requirements apply to companies whose AI models were trained using more than $100 million in computing resources (seemingly, more than any AI model available today), and are being made available to New York residents. While similar to SB 1047 in some ways, the RAISE Act was designed to address criticisms of previous AI safety bills, according to Nathan Calvin, the Vice President of State Affairs and General Counsel at Encode, who worked on this bill and SB 1047. Notably, the RAISE Act does not require AI model developers to include a 'kill switch' on their models, nor does it hold companies that post-train frontier AI models accountable for critical harms. Nevertheless, Silicon Valley has pushed back significantly on New York's AI safety bill, New York state Assemblymember and co-sponsor of the RAISE Act Alex Bores told TechCrunch. Bores called the industry resistance unsurprising, but claimed that the RAISE Act would not limit innovation of tech companies in any way. 'The NY RAISE Act is yet another stupid, stupid state level AI bill that will only hurt the US at a time when our adversaries are racing ahead,' said Andreessen Horowitz general partner Anjney Midha in a Friday post on X. Andreessen Horowitz, alongside the startup incubator Y Combinator, were some of the fiercest opponents to SB 1047. Anthropic, the safety-focused AI lab that called for federal transparency standards for AI companies earlier this month, has not reached an official stance on the bill, co-founder Jack Clark said in a Friday post on X. However, Clark expressed some grievances over how broad the RAISE Act is, noting that it could present a risk to 'smaller companies.' When asked about Anthropic's criticism, state Senator Gounardes told TechCrunch he thought it 'misses the mark,' noting that he designed the bill not to apply to small companies. OpenAI, Google, and Meta did not respond to TechCrunch's request for comment. Another common criticism of the RAISE Act is that AI model developers simply wouldn't offer their most advanced AI models in the state of New York. That was a similar criticism brought against SB 1047, and it's largely what's played out in Europe thanks to the continent's tough regulations on technology. Assemblymember Bores told TechCrunch that the regulatory burden of the RAISE Act is relatively light, and therefore, shouldn't require tech companies to stop operating their products in New York. Given the fact that New York has the third largest GDP in the U.S., pulling out of the state is not something most companies would take lightly. 'I don't want to underestimate the political pettiness that might happen, but I am very confident that there is no economic reasons for them to not make their models available in New York,' said Assemblymember Borres. Sign in to access your portfolio

Posted Jun 13, 2025 at 4:16 PM EDT
Posted Jun 13, 2025 at 4:16 PM EDT

The Verge

time2 hours ago

  • The Verge

Posted Jun 13, 2025 at 4:16 PM EDT

Google explains Thursday's massive Cloud outage. Yesterday, a global outage on the Google Cloud platform knocked out Google Home, Spotify, Snapchat, and even some Cloudflare features, and today the company released a mini incident report as it continues to investigate. For Cloudflare's part, its report says the Google failure took out a central data store for one of its services. Google: From our initial analysis, the issue occurred due to an invalid automated quota update to our API management system which was distributed globally, causing external API requests to be rejected. To recover we bypassed the offending quota check, which allowed recovery in most regions within 2 hours. However, the quota policy database in us-central1 became overloaded, resulting in much longer recovery in that region.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store