SBI Clerk Mains Result 2025 To Be Released Soon, Here's How To Check
SBI Clerk Mains Exam 2025: The State Bank of India (SBI) will announce the results for Clerk Mains Exam 2025 soon. Once declared, candidates who appeared for the examination will be able to check their results on the official website, sbi.co.in. The SBI Clerk Mains exam was held on April 10 and 12, 2025, respectively. A total of 13,732 candidates have appeared for the post of Junior Associate (Customer Support and Sales).
The SBI has announced vacancies for the post of Junior Associate, with a category-wise breakdown as follows: the Unreserved Category (UC) has 5,870 posts, Other Backward Classes (OBC) has 3,001 posts, Scheduled Caste (SC) has 2,118 posts, Scheduled Tribe (ST) has 1,385 posts, and Economically Weaker Section (EWS) has 1,361 posts.
SBI Clerk Mains Exam 2025: Steps To Check Your Result
Step 1. Visit the official website, sbi.co.in.
Step 2. Find the 'Careers' section on the homepage and click on 'Current Openings'.
Step 3. Find and click on "Recruitment of Junior Associates (Customer Support and Sales)".
Step 4. Click on 'SBI Clerk Mains Result 2025'.
Step 5. Press ctrl plus f to search for your result by entering roll number.
Step 6. Download and save the result for future use.
SBI Clerk Mains Exam 2025: Selection Process
The selection process for Junior Associates involves three stages: Preliminary Examination, Main Examination, and Language Proficiency Test (LPT). Notably, there's no interview round in the selection process. Candidates who clear the mains exam will undergo the LPT to assess their language proficiency, and upon clearing it, they'll be eligible to join as full-time SBI Clerks.
The preliminary exams for the post of SBI Clerk were conducted on February 22,27,28 and March 1, 2025 and the result for the same was declared on March 28, 2025.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Standard
an hour ago
- Business Standard
HDFC Bank Ltd Slips 0.21%
HDFC Bank Ltd has added 1.16% over last one month compared to 1.78% gain in BSE BANKEX index and 1.75% rise in the SENSEX HDFC Bank Ltd fell 0.21% today to trade at Rs 1945.5. The BSE BANKEX index is down 0.06% to quote at 63693.26. The index is up 1.78 % over last one month. Among the other constituents of the index, ICICI Bank Ltd decreased 0.11% and State Bank of India lost 0.09% on the day. The BSE BANKEX index went up 12.12 % over last one year compared to the 7.79% surge in benchmark SENSEX. HDFC Bank Ltd has added 1.16% over last one month compared to 1.78% gain in BSE BANKEX index and 1.75% rise in the SENSEX. On the BSE, 3670 shares were traded in the counter so far compared with average daily volumes of 4.14 lakh shares in the past one month. The stock hit a record high of Rs 1996.3 on 06 Jun 2025. The stock hit a 52-week low of Rs 1552 on 11 Jun 2024.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
State Bank of India (SBI) employee penalised for misbehavior: Bank's disciplinary action of cutting 2 salary increments upheld by high court
The High Court upheld State Bank of India's disciplinary action against an employee found guilty under the POSH Act. The court rejected the employee's appeal, affirming that SBI's inquiry followed due process and provided sufficient opportunity. Allegations of misconduct towards customers and staff were substantiated, leading to the stoppage of salary increments. Read below to know more about this case. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads How did this case start? April 17, 2015: This lady customer made a complaint that a bank officer misbehaved with her during her visit to the bank's branch for depositing cash. The regional office of SBI immediately appointed an investigating officer. This lady customer made a complaint that a bank officer misbehaved with her during her visit to the bank's branch for depositing cash. The regional office of SBI immediately appointed an investigating officer. May 26, 2015: The investigating officer submitted his report and considered the following allegations against the employee, such as misbehavior with the customer; sexual harassment of women employees/valued customers; acts done to attribute delay in customer service, passing of derogatory remarks on lady customers and staff and creating a negative atmosphere in the branch affecting business/customer service…. The investigating officer submitted his report and considered the following allegations against the employee, such as misbehavior with the customer; sexual harassment of women employees/valued customers; acts done to attribute delay in customer service, passing of derogatory remarks on lady customers and staff and creating a negative atmosphere in the branch affecting business/customer service…. May 2015: The report was handed over to the Sexual Harassment Committee. The Chairperson of the Internal Complaints Committee on Sexual Harassment submitted its report and recommended disciplinary action against the appellant/writ petitioner. The report was handed over to the Sexual Harassment Committee. The Chairperson of the Internal Complaints Committee on Sexual Harassment submitted its report and recommended disciplinary action against the appellant/writ petitioner. June 23, 2015: The Disciplinary Authority called for an explanation on the basis of the report submitted by the Internal Complaints Committee. The Disciplinary Authority called for an explanation on the basis of the report submitted by the Internal Complaints Committee. July 20, 2015: He submitted his reply about the internal complaints committee report. He submitted his reply about the internal complaints committee report. October 26, 2015: The Disciplinary Authority not being satisfied with the reply, issued an Article of Charge. The Disciplinary Authority not being satisfied with the reply, issued an Article of Charge. November 18, 2015: The SBI employee submitted a reply to the Article of Charge on, wherein he denied all allegations. The SBI employee submitted a reply to the Article of Charge on, wherein he denied all allegations. December 31, 2016: In terms of bipartite settlement, a departmental inquiry was initiated against him, and the inquiry report was submitted before the Disciplinary Authority. The Inquiry Officer found 03 charges proved and 03 charges partially proved of sexual harassment. In terms of bipartite settlement, a departmental inquiry was initiated against him, and the inquiry report was submitted before the Disciplinary Authority. The Inquiry Officer found 03 charges proved and 03 charges partially proved of sexual harassment. September 6 to September 25 of 2017: The Disciplinary Authority issued a first show cause notice on September 6, 2017, and the second show cause notice on September 20, 2017. The SBI employee against whom these sexual harassment charges were filled, submitted a reply to the show cause notices on September 14 and 25 of 2017. The Disciplinary Authority issued a first show cause notice on September 6, 2017, and the second show cause notice on September 20, 2017. The SBI employee against whom these sexual harassment charges were filled, submitted a reply to the show cause notices on September 14 and 25 of 2017. October 9, 2017: The Disciplinary Authority taking a sympathetic view altered the proposed punishment. The punishment was: lowering two increments from his present pay scale with cumulative effect till retirement and further penalty was inflicted to the effect that he would not be eligible for increment for a period of 2 years. The Disciplinary Authority taking a sympathetic view altered the proposed punishment. The punishment was: lowering two increments from his present pay scale with cumulative effect till retirement and further penalty was inflicted to the effect that he would not be eligible for increment for a period of 2 years. April 6, 2018: He filed a departmental appeal before DGM (B & O), Raipur Module. The Appellate Authority revised the punishment and inflicted the penalty of stoppage of two increments with cumulative effect. He filed an appeal against this order in the High Court. What did the State Bank of India's lawyers say in the High Court? There were serious allegations against the appellant (employee) and out of 6 charges, 3 were found proved and 3 were found partially proved. Further it's submitted that there were allegations of sexual harassment, therefore, the matter was referred to the Chairperson of the Internal Complaints Committee on sexual harassment and according to its report, the allegations were found proved. It has been contended that the appellant (employee) was afforded sufficient opportunity, and the Article of Charge was issued along with the relevant documents and a list of witnesses. During the course of the departmental inquiry, no objection was raised by the appellant (employee) and thereafter, a notice was issued to him and the Disciplinary Authority took a lenient view… The Appellate Authority considered his appeal and took a sympathetic view, modified the punishment and only imposed a stoppage of two increments with cumulative effect. There were serious allegations with regard to sexual harassment of women at the workplace and misbehavior with valued customers and staff and all the allegations were found proved. What did the employee say in the High Court? It submitted that the impugned order (SBI disciplinary action) is illegal and bad in the eyes of law. The allegations made are false. The statements of victims were not recorded and were not allowed to cross-examine those witnesses. It has been further contended that the inquiry was not conducted strictly in accordance with law and sufficient opportunity was not afforded. Chhattisgarh High Court final judgement From the records, it has been further reflected that the disciplinary enquiry has been conducted by the Competent Authority and there is no allegation with regard to competence of the authority. Initially, the punishment of penalty of lowering two increments from his present pay scale with cumulative effect till retirement was imposed which was modified by the Appellate Authority to stoppage of two increments with cumulative effect, thus, the penalty inflicted is neither shocking nor disproportionate. It has been reflected that the Disciplinary Authority as well as the Appellate Authority have recorded a concurrent findings and found the allegations of misbehavior with customers and staff and sexual harassment of women employees and valued customers proved against the appellant (employee). It has been further reflected that the allegations made by the complainant with regard to sexual harassment were found partly proved as the witnesses were supported the case of the prosecution. Thereafter, the appellant (employee) was afforded opportunity, the principles of natural justice were complied with and show cause notices from time to time were issued and the appellant (employee) filed a reply to those notices, but the appellant (employee) had nowhere stated in the writ petition that he was not permitted to cross-examine the witnesses or relevant documents were not provided. The chief justice of Chhattisgarh High Court on May 2, 2025, rejected a State Bank of India (SBI) employee's appeal about strong disciplinary action taken by the bank against him after the bank found him guilty of sexual harassment of a customer and the bank's employees. SBI's disciplinary committee and appellate authority found him guilty under POSH Act, 2013. However, he always maintained the position that he is innocent and did not sexually harass the lady customer of the bank, who filed the original complaint, and took the disciplinary action against this employee by stopping two salary increments from his present pay scale with cumulative effect. Though he was not fired from the job, there were six counts of legal charges against him and only 3 of them were fully proved and the other 3 were partially proved. The matter gradually reached the High Court after he filed an appeal against this disciplinary action order of employee said in High Court that SBI did not conduct the inquiry about this sexual assault in accordance with law and sufficient opportunity was not afforded to him. His lawyer also quoted six Supreme Court judgements which have already set a precedent in cases similar to Chief Justice of Chhattisgarh High Court rejected all the arguments presented by the employee. The chief justice said that the findings by SBI's disciplinary authority and SBI's appellate authority are concurrent and the allegations of sexual misconduct (namely POSH) by this SBI officer with both customers and staff has been proved. The chief justice also said that no principles of natural justice were violated, and everything was done by following the law of the below to know why the chief justice upheld SBI's disciplinary committee's findings and which legal reasoning(s) established that this SBI employee sexually harassed the branch employees and its customers to the order of the Chhattisgarh High Court dated May 2, 2025, here is a timeline of events:According to the order of Chhattisgarh High Court dated May 2, 2025, here are the details of what SBI's lawyers said:The employee against whom this sexual harassment allegation charge was pressed said:The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed the appeal of the employee against whom this sexual harassment charge was pressed and said:Alay Razvi, Managing Partner, Accord Juris, a law firm, says: 'The allegations, including delay in service and derogatory behavior, were proven through a departmental inquiry and an Internal Complaints Committee (ICC) investigation under the POSH Act. Wherein it was suggested for stoppage of two increments with cumulative effect, which was upheld by both the disciplinary and appellate authorities. The High Court found no procedural lapses or denial of natural justice and held that the penalty was proportionate. The judgment reinforces judicial deference to internal disciplinary processes and upholds accountability in workplace misconduct.'Razvi says: 'The Court emphasized that it would not interfere with departmental decisions unless there was a clear violation of principles of natural justice or procedural irregularity, which was absent in this case. The decision reiterates that Article 226 writ jurisdiction is not an appellate forum for re-evaluating factual disputes from internal inquiries, unless there's mala fide, bias, or violation of natural justice.'
News18
2 hours ago
- News18
RBI's Repo Rate Cut: What It Means For Your Fixed Deposit Returns And Tax Outgo
Last Updated: Banks have started cutting FD rates, reducing returns for retirees and conservative investors who rely on them The Reserve Bank of India's recent decision to reduce the repo rate by 50 basis points to 5.50% has created a ripple effect across the financial ecosystem. While the move is aimed at reviving economic momentum amid easing inflation, it carries notable implications for both borrowers and savers, particularly in terms of taxation on interest income. What This Means for Borrowers Home loan holders and other borrowers on floating interest rates will be among the immediate beneficiaries. A lower repo rate typically leads to reduced lending rates, meaning lower EMIs. For instance, a Rs 50 lakh home loan with a tenure of 20 years may see EMIs drop by approximately Rs 1,500 per month, offering relief to households juggling multiple expenses. With a cumulative deduction of 100 basis points in the repo rate in 2025, banks have been steadily decreasing the fixed deposit interest rates. According to SBI research fixed deposit rates have declined by 30 to 70 basis points since February 2025. Short and medium term fixed deposits are likely to witness the most serious rate cuts. For example, a 1 year fixed deposit rate dropping from 7% to 6.5% would result in Rs 5,000 less annual interest on a Rs 10 lakh deposit. So, the situation is less favourable for fixed deposit (FD) investors. Banks have already begun lowering FD interest rates, which means that savers, especially retirees and conservative investors who depend on FDs, may earn less on their investments, according to CA Shefali Mundra of ClearTax. 'A 6% FD for someone in the 30% tax bracket effectively yields just 4.2%—barely ahead of inflation. With rate cuts, this post-tax return may drop further," says Mundra. While the repo rate cut itself doesn't alter tax laws, its effect on interest income is undeniable. As deposit rates fall, so do the absolute interest earnings, which in turn reduces the tax liability in numerical terms. However, the relative tax burden increases, as a larger portion of the now-reduced interest income goes towards taxes. Smart Strategies for FD Investors in a Falling Interest Rate Scenario As interest rates continue to decline, fixed deposit (FD) investors may need to rethink their approach to safeguard returns. Here are some strategies to consider: 1. Ladder Your FDs: Spread your investments across FDs with different maturities. This helps manage reinvestment risk and ensures liquidity at regular intervals. 2. Explore Government-Backed Savings Schemes: Consider alternatives like the Senior Citizen Savings Scheme (SCSS) or National Savings Certificates (NSC), which often offer better returns and are less influenced by repo rate changes. 3. Look into Short-Term Corporate Bonds: Top-rated corporate bonds with 2–3 year tenures may offer higher yields than traditional FDs, with relatively manageable risk. 4. Evaluate Hybrid Mutual Funds: Hybrid funds, which invest in a mix of debt and equity, can provide better returns than FDs while keeping risk moderate. 5. Keep an Eye on Inflation: With CPI inflation estimated at 3.7% for FY26, real returns from FDs may be negligible. Diversifying into equity mutual funds could help preserve purchasing power over the long term. 'The key is diversification and tax efficiency. Investors must weigh not just returns, but also the post-tax impact," adds CA Mundra. tags : Fixed deposit Location : New Delhi, India, India First Published: June 12, 2025, 08:03 IST News business » tax RBI's Repo Rate Cut: What It Means For Your Fixed Deposit Returns And Tax Outgo
