Citigroup to face lawsuit over alleged involvement in Oceanografia's fraud
Citigroup is set to face a revived lawsuit alleging its role in a fraud at the now-bankrupt Mexican oil and gas services company Oceanografia, which led to more than $1bn (19.51bn pesos) in losses.
The 11th US Circuit Court of Appeals in Miami has ruled that the case, previously dismissed, holds merit and Citigroup may have substantially aided the fraudulent activities, according to a report by Reuters.
A panel of three judges found that the plaintiffs, including vendors, creditors and bondholders, presented adequate allegations against Citigroup.
The financial giant's Banamex unit had been providing cash advances to Oceanografia, which worked closely with Mexico's state-owned oil company Pemex, and collected interest on these advances.
Citigroup spokeswoman Danielle Romero-Apsilos declined to comment on the court's decision.
However, Juan Morillo, representing the plaintiffs, expressed their gratification regarding the revival of the lawsuit.
The plaintiffs, which comprise shipping and leasing companies, investment funds and Rabobank, have accused Citigroup of advancing $3.3bn to Oceanografia between 2008 and 2014, despite clear signs of the company's excessive debt and fraudulent activities.
According to the report, Citigroup had discovered nearly $430m in fraudulent cash advances and was subsequently fined $4.75m by the US Securities and Exchange Commission in 2018 for inadequate internal controls at Banamex.
Former Citigroup CEO Michael Corbat acknowledged the dismissal of 12 employees due to the scandal, while Mexican regulators found ten bank employees criminally liable.
Circuit Judge Britt Grant, in an 82-page decision, pointed out that Citigroup allegedly withheld crucial information from the plaintiffs and was likely aware of Oceanografia's fraudulent conduct, given the financial institution's sophistication.
The case has been sent back to US District Judge Darrin Gayles in Miami, who had dismissed it in August 2023. The case is Otto Candies LLC et al v Citigroup Inc, 11th US Circuit Court of Appeals, No. 23-13152.
"Citigroup to face lawsuit over alleged involvement in Oceanografia's fraud" was originally created and published by Offshore Technology, a GlobalData owned brand.
The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Getty's landmark UK lawsuit on copyright and AI set to begin
By Sam Tobin LONDON (Reuters) -Getty Images' landmark copyright lawsuit against artificial intelligence company Stability AI begins at London's High Court on Monday, with the photo provider's case likely to set a key precedent for the law on AI. The Seattle-based company, which produces editorial content and creative stock images and video, accuses Stability AI of breaching its copyright by using its images to "train" its Stable Diffusion system, which can generate images from text inputs. Getty, which is bringing a parallel lawsuit against Stability AI in the United States, says Stability AI unlawfully scraped millions of images from its websites and used them to train and develop Stable Diffusion. Stability AI – which has raised hundreds of millions of dollars in funding and in March announced investment by the world's largest advertising company, WPP – is fighting the case and denies infringing any of Getty's rights. A Stability AI spokesperson said that "the wider dispute is about technological innovation and freedom of ideas," adding: "Artists using our tools are producing works built upon collective human knowledge, which is at the core of fair use and freedom of expression." Getty's case is one of several lawsuits brought in Britain, the U.S. and elsewhere over the use of copyright-protected material to train AI models, after ChatGPT and other AI tools became widely available more than two years ago. WIDER IMPACT Creative industries are grappling with the legal and ethical implications of AI models that can produce their own work after being trained on existing material. Prominent figures including Elton John have called for greater protections for artists. Lawyers say Getty's case will have a major impact on the law, as well as potentially informing government policy on copyright protections relating to AI. "Legally, we're in uncharted territory. This case will be pivotal in setting the boundaries of the monopoly granted by UK copyright in the age of AI," Rebecca Newman, a lawyer at Addleshaw Goddard, who is not involved in the case, said. She added that a victory for Getty could mean that Stability AI and other developers will face further lawsuits. Cerys Wyn Davies, from the law firm Pinsent Masons, said the High Court's ruling "could have a major bearing on market practice and the UK's attractiveness as a jurisdiction for AI development".
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Artist speaks out after client scammed by fraudulent tattoo page
ST. JOSEPH, Mo. (News-Press NOW) — A local tattoo shop is warning the public about fraudulent social media accounts after a client was scammed out of money for tattoo services. Jeff Zuptich, owner of The Tat Shack Tattoo in St. Joseph, recently discovered that someone had been using his tattoo artwork online under the name of another artist. I don't have much of a social media presence," Zuptich said. 'I just post pictures of my tattoos. I don't have a ton of followers, so I'm not sure why they picked me, but maybe that's exactly why." A Facebook user operating under the name "Ink By Davis," with multiple accounts using variations of the name in different text fonts, has been targeting potential clients and scamming them out of money by falsely claiming to work out of The Tat Shack's address. Using these fake accounts, the individual has reportedly scammed several people across the metro area and beyond. Dozens of confirmed victims, including some from Topeka, Kansas, have left online reviews describing their experience with the fraudulent service. "This specific page that targeted my client has also gone after people from Pennsylvania to Joplin." Zuptich said. "The scam seems to originate from this 'Ink By Davis' page in Potosi, Missouri. He even shows a Colorado tattoo license to appear legitimate and convince people to send deposits." Zuptich was alerted to the scam by a Platte County officer who had sent a deposit to the scammer and then followed up to confirm whether the individual worked at The Tat Shack. "This person is telling clients that they'll either work at my shop or do tattoos at their house, but to my knowledge, no one's actually received a tattoo from them yet," Zuptich said. Feeling frustrated by the lack of recourse, Zuptich reached out to the media to raise awareness, stating that law enforcement options appear limited in cases like this. "There doesn't seem to be much law enforcement can do with these types of crimes," he said. "At least by speaking out to the media, it might do more good. If we can keep people from falling for their tricks, maybe they'll just stop." Digital Payment Apps Add Complexity to Internet Fraud News-Press NOW spoke with Buchanan County Sheriff Bill Puett about the complexities of prosecuting internet scams. He explained that payment methods such as Venmo and Cash App make it especially difficult to recover funds or catch the perpetrators. "That's the problem with things like Venmo, Cash App, and other applications,' Puett said. "It's really easy for someone to pose as a legitimate business, take payments through those apps, and then disappear. Once the money's sent, it can be extremely difficult to recover or trace, especially if the person is in another country." With scams continuing to evolve, Puett emphasized the importance of vigilance. "Going forward, we all have to do our due diligence," he said. "Just because something appears on social media doesn't mean it's trustworthy. Do your research before you type in any account numbers or send money." How to Protect Yourself from Tattoo Scams Zuptich advises potential clients to verify the identity of any artist before sending payments, and ideally, to choose tattoo artists through trusted referrals. "Get referrals from family members, friends, or people who someone has tattooed," Zuptich said. "Before giving any money, try to schedule an in-person consultation. I personally like to see exactly what arm or leg I'm tattooing. That's a good sign that you're working with a legitimate artist.
USA Today
11 hours ago
- USA Today
How the House Settlement will reshape Texas A&M athletics
How the House Settlement will reshape Texas A&M athletics It's time for the universities and colleges to back up the Brinks trucks as they get ready to deal with all the financial obligations as a result of the House settlement approval on Friday evening. After years of lawsuits and the rise of NIL in college athletics, regulation is finally being introduced. However, the legal battles are far from over, and precedent-setting cases will likely continue for years. For now, we can examine how this approval, alongside the Texas bill, will shape Texas A&M athletics, particularly with universities now permitted to directly pay athletes. Financial Impact The most significant factor is money. The landmark case, approved by Judge Claudia Wilken, allocates $2.5–$3 billion to former players from 2016–2024 who were unable to benefit from NIL. Additionally, a revenue-sharing model essentially establishes a salary cap, beginning at approximately $20 million for the upcoming season and increasing annually over the next decade. Scholarship & Roster Changes Another major shift is the removal of scholarship limits, replaced by roster restrictions. Texas A&M head football coach Mike Elko has repeatedly highlighted the challenges this presents when shaping a team while awaiting regulatory clarity. These uncertainties complicate roster management as teams prepare for rapid policy implementation. Title IX Implications An unresolved concern is how funding will be allocated across various sports, particularly women's athletics. Even though money is earmarked for women's sports, the exact distribution under the settlement remains unclear. Following their strong season, fans are calling for increased funding for Texas A&M's softball team, led by Coach Trisha Ford. With the sport's popularity on the rise, financial investments may shift in the coming years. Texas A&M's Position Athletic Director Trev Alberts has faced criticism for his early fiscal conservatism, yet he has positioned Texas A&M ahead of the curve. At the annual SEC meetings, Alberts reinforced the university's commitment to expanding scholarships. Current & Future Scholarship Allocations: Overall: 255 → 400+ 255 → 400+ Football: 85 → 105 85 → 105 Men's Basketball: 13 → 15 13 → 15 Women's Basketball: 15 → 15 15 → 15 Baseball: 11.7 → 34 11.7 → 34 Softball: 12 → 25 12 → 25 Men's Track & Field: 12.6 → 45 12.6 → 45 Women's Track & Field: 18 → 45 While changes will impact each university differently, Texas A&M is well-positioned to provide a strong student-athlete experience without cutting sports. However, the future remains uncertain as college athletics enters a new era of free agency, where players may seek better opportunities elsewhere if an opportunity to secure their future financially presents itself. Contact/Follow us @AggiesWire on X (formerly Twitter) and like our page on Facebook to follow ongoing coverage of Texas A&M news, notes and opinions. Follow Jarrett Johnson on X: @whosnextsports1.
