Citigroup to face lawsuit over alleged involvement in Oceanografia's fraud
Citigroup is set to face a revived lawsuit alleging its role in a fraud at the now-bankrupt Mexican oil and gas services company Oceanografia, which led to more than $1bn (19.51bn pesos) in losses.
The 11th US Circuit Court of Appeals in Miami has ruled that the case, previously dismissed, holds merit and Citigroup may have substantially aided the fraudulent activities, according to a report by Reuters.
A panel of three judges found that the plaintiffs, including vendors, creditors and bondholders, presented adequate allegations against Citigroup.
The financial giant's Banamex unit had been providing cash advances to Oceanografia, which worked closely with Mexico's state-owned oil company Pemex, and collected interest on these advances.
Citigroup spokeswoman Danielle Romero-Apsilos declined to comment on the court's decision.
However, Juan Morillo, representing the plaintiffs, expressed their gratification regarding the revival of the lawsuit.
The plaintiffs, which comprise shipping and leasing companies, investment funds and Rabobank, have accused Citigroup of advancing $3.3bn to Oceanografia between 2008 and 2014, despite clear signs of the company's excessive debt and fraudulent activities.
According to the report, Citigroup had discovered nearly $430m in fraudulent cash advances and was subsequently fined $4.75m by the US Securities and Exchange Commission in 2018 for inadequate internal controls at Banamex.
Former Citigroup CEO Michael Corbat acknowledged the dismissal of 12 employees due to the scandal, while Mexican regulators found ten bank employees criminally liable.
Circuit Judge Britt Grant, in an 82-page decision, pointed out that Citigroup allegedly withheld crucial information from the plaintiffs and was likely aware of Oceanografia's fraudulent conduct, given the financial institution's sophistication.
The case has been sent back to US District Judge Darrin Gayles in Miami, who had dismissed it in August 2023. The case is Otto Candies LLC et al v Citigroup Inc, 11th US Circuit Court of Appeals, No. 23-13152.
"Citigroup to face lawsuit over alleged involvement in Oceanografia's fraud" was originally created and published by Offshore Technology, a GlobalData owned brand.
The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
HIVE Digital CEO Frank Holmes says U.S. crypto regulation needs AI
HIVE Digital CEO Frank Holmes says U.S. crypto regulation needs AI originally appeared on TheStreet. In an interview with TheStreet Roundtable, HIVE Digital Technologies Chairman Frank Holmes weighed in on the SEC's Crypto Task Force Roundtable, where Chair Paul Atkins emphasized moving from enforcement to formal rulemaking for crypto issuance, custody and trading. Holmes predicts artificial intelligence will be at the heart of those new guidelines — and he also assessed how a non-sellable treasury Bitcoin reserve might reshape markets. Holmes argued that AI and next-generation data processing will enable regulators to draft clear, comprehensive crypto rules. 'I think the US government today is much more using AI and the ability with the new Nvidia chips to take huge amounts of data and also come out and create rules and regulations,' he said. He pointed to jurisdictions such as Dubai and Bermuda, where AI-assisted frameworks have already taken hold, as models for U.S. authorities. Those 'little islands,' Holmes noted, 'function extremely well, they've had for several years now a crypto ecosystem that has regulations and rules.' Formalizing ground rules, he said, will help manage 'spectacular growth' and move beyond the current patchwork approach. Holmes recalled a board meeting in Paris where 'there were nine thousand people there spending a thousand dollars a ticket at the Louvre learning all about all these new meme coins. I didn't know most of them. I was just so impressed.' That level of enthusiasm, he maintained, underscores why comprehensive AI-driven rulemaking is essential: 'Some basic ground rules and regulations really will be helpful to see it flourish and prosper.' Turning to the March executive order directing the Treasury to build a non-sellable reserve of over 200,000 Bitcoin, Holmes said even partial execution could 'ignite Bitcoin — the confidence in the overall system.' He noted that a government-backed Bitcoin holding would improve price discovery, deepen market liquidity and reinforce investor trust. Addressing proposals to sell gold to fund the reserve, Holmes pushed back: 'That's like saying sell all my Andy Warhol art and I'm only going to go buy Brainwash. I'm not going to do that. I'll have both.' He explained that revaluing gold to market prices would alter key balance-sheet metrics and argued that pairing gold with Bitcoin 'makes it the most powerful currency in the world.' Holmes's insights point to a potential inflection point: AI-powered rulemaking could bring long-awaited clarity to U.S. crypto regulation, while a strategic Bitcoin reserve may redefine price discovery, liquidity and confidence across digital assets. HIVE Digital CEO Frank Holmes says U.S. crypto regulation needs AI first appeared on TheStreet on Jun 10, 2025 This story was originally reported by TheStreet on Jun 10, 2025, where it first appeared. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Been a victim of annuity fraud? Here's how to report scams
Annuities are often marketed as reliable retirement income tools, but the reality is more complicated. While annuities can be beneficial for the right person in the right situation, the industry is still dogged by a history of scams and unethical practices. These scams aren't always outright fraud. Sometimes they're technically legal but still predatory. Either way, these scams can be devastating. After all, your retirement savings are on the line. If you or someone you know is considering an annuity, it's essential to recognize the red flags. And if you've already been burned by a scam, it's important to understand your options. Here's everything you need to know. Annuity scams come in many forms. But the result is usually the same — the consumer loses money, access or trust. Here are four of the most common types of annuity-related frauds. Churning happens when an insurance agent convinces you to switch from one annuity to another — not because it benefits you, but because it generates a fat commission for them. The agent might claim the new product has better terms or features. But in reality, you're often hit with surrender charges, new lockup periods and subpar benefits. This kind of abuse violates state and federal rules requiring financial professionals to act in your best interests. However, some agents push annuities that clearly don't meet the needs of the client — and the results can be disastrous. In 2023, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) accused advisor Jeffrey Cutter of deceiving clients by pushing certain annuities to earn over $9 million in undisclosed commissions. Cutter allegedly engaged in annuity churning — repeatedly encouraging clients to sell and replace annuities, even when it triggered costly surrender charges. After Paul and Sue Rosenau won the Powerball in 2008, they set up a charitable foundation and hired an advisor to help. But in 2024, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) ordered Principal Securities to pay $7.3 million in damages after evidence showed one of their advisors steered the foundation into over $47 million in high-cost variable annuities — earning about $3.3 million from commissions in the process. These annuities offered little benefit to a tax-exempt nonprofit, while locking up funds and charging steep fees. Cheaper alternatives existed, such as index funds and mutual funds— but the advisor put his own financial interests ahead of his clients'. By 2017, despite a booming stock market, those investments had actually lost value — dropping from $28.3 million to $26.3 million. Another tragic example involves Jay Jacobson, an 84-year-old man with dementia who was sold $2 million worth of annuities he couldn't access, leading to his suicide. This kind of behavior is unethical at best and illegal at worst. But it still happens — especially when firms fail to supervise their agents. Scammers often hide behind impressive-sounding but meaningless titles like 'Certified Senior Advisor' or 'Annuity Consultant.' These labels may sound official, but they're often handed out by pay-to-play organizations with little or no training requirements. At seminars and over the phone, these fake titles are used to gain your trust. But the person giving you advice may not be qualified or legally required to act in your best interests. You can use FINRA's financial designations database to figure out what the letters after a financial advisor's name really mean. You'll see what training is needed (if any), continuing education requirements and if the organization behind the credential accepts complaints. That's helpful, considering the sheer number of titles in finance; there are over 200 designations logged in FINRA's database. Free dinner seminars may be marketed as educational, but they're usually sales pitches in disguise. Presenters may claim annuities are tax-free (they're not — they're tax-deferred), risk-free (also false) or 'better than a 401(k).' Some even claim an annuity is backed by the government. None of that's true. No investment is risk-free, and unlike an FDIC-insured bank account, annuities aren't backed by the federal government. Once you're in the room, though, the pressure ramps up. You may be asked to sign documents immediately or risk 'missing out' on a limited-time offer. These tactics are designed to override your ability to think clearly — or consult with someone you trust. Legitimate professionals won't mind if you want time to review documents or talk to someone else. If they act angry or annoyed, that's a huge red flag. Factoring companies promise quick cash in exchange for your future annuity payments. Here's how it works: You agree to sell your guaranteed stream of payments for a lump sum today — your chance to 'get cash now.' However, it's almost always a terrible deal. These companies can buy your payments for pennies on the dollar. In 2015, a Washington Post investigation exposed how factoring companies exploit vulnerable people with structured settlements — court-ordered agreements that pay out over time, often for life, similar to an annuity. The Post found that Access Funding, a Maryland-based firm, frequently targeted lead poisoning victims, many of whom were poor and young. Victims were often paid as little as 9 to 21 cents on the dollar of present value for their structured settlement payments. Future annuity payments, like future structured settlement payments, can be sold to factoring companies, which often use aggressive marketing. If you're struggling to pay medical bills or cover basic expenses, the pitch can feel like a real lifeline. But in reality, it's a trap. Getting scammed can be overwhelming, but you're not powerless. Here's what to do if you think you've been misled, exploited or outright defrauded. The first step is to report the scam. The sooner you act, the better your chances of stopping future damage and potentially recovering some of your money. If an insurance agent was involved, start by contacting your state insurance department. Many states have dedicated consumer protection units. You can usually file a complaint online or by phone. If the annuity had investment features — like variable returns tied to stock market performance — and was sold by a broker-dealer, you should also report the incident to the SEC and FINRA. You can file a complaint with the SEC here and with FINRA here. If the scam involved identity theft, impersonation or started online, file a fraud complaint with the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). The FTC tracks fraud patterns across the country and shares that data with law enforcement and other agencies to build legal cases. Even if you don't get your money back right away, creating a formal complaint builds a paper trail — and that can be critical if legal action is taken later. Don't try to untangle a financial scam by yourself — especially if large sums of money were involved. A qualified attorney who has experience with financial fraud, exploitation or elder abuse can help you sort out your options. They can review contracts, gather evidence and pursue compensation through individual lawsuits or class action suits. Legal action can also expose a wider network of fraud. If your advisor scammed you, they may have scammed others, too. A lawyer can help uncover additional victims. If you suspect financial abuse of an elderly person, some states have mandatory reporting laws and special legal procedures. Need help finding an attorney? Start with these resources: Find a lawyer through the National Academy of Elder Law Attorneys. Find free legal help through the American Bar Association. Visit to find information about your legal questions and access free legal forms. Annuity scams can drain your savings fast. Knowing how to spot the warning signs can help protect you from becoming a you sign anything, read the entire contract. If you don't understand it, don't sign anything. Always ask questions and get a second because someone says they're certified doesn't mean they are. FINRA's BrokerCheck is a free tool that lets you look up financial professionals and firms so you can verify their credentials, work history and any disciplinary someone's pushing you to make a decision immediately or warning that a deal won't last, walk away. It's a huge red you attend an educational event about retirement planning, assume there's a sales pitch coming. Bring a friend or family member for a second perspective. Don't sign anything on-site, and don't fall for too-good-to-be-true annuity contracts come with a free-look period — usually 10 to 30 days — where you can cancel without penalty. If something feels off after you sign, act fast and contact the insurance company directly to cancel it. Annuities can be a legitimate part of a retirement strategy, but it's important to be aware of misleading practices and outright scams in the industry. If you're buying an annuity, slow down, ask questions and verify everything. And if you've already been scammed, know your rights and the steps you can take to report the fraud. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Newark Mayor Ras Baraka sues Alina Habba over trespassing arrest at ICE facility
Newark Mayor Ras Baraka filed a lawsuit against the US Attorney for New Jersey on Tuesday over his arrest last month while protesting outside an ICE detention facility in his city. Baraka accused interim head attorney Alina Habba, who is also a personal lawyer of President Trump, of 'malicious prosecution' and violating his Fourth Amendment rights following the May 9 arrest. 'Defendant Habba issued the defamatory statement and authorized the false arrest of Mayor Baraka despite clear evidence that Mayor Baraka had not committed the petty offense of 'defiant trespass,'' the lawsuit stated. 'In authorizing and/or directing the arrest of Mayor Baraka without proper legal grounds, Defendant Habba was acting for political reasons and fulfilling her stated goal of 'turning New Jersey red' by instigating and/or authorizing the false arrest of Mayor Baraka, a Democrat,' the suit added. The trespassing charge against Baraka was later dismissed. Habba, however, appeared unfazed by the lawsuit and mocked the New Jersey Democrat. 'My advice to the mayor — feel free to join me in prioritizing violent crime and public safety. Far better use of time for the great citizens of New Jersey,' she wrote on X. Baraka was taken into custody at the Delaney Hall Detention Facility and charged with trespassing on May 9 while protesting the ICE facility that he had vowed to shut down. The charge was dismissed just 10 days later, prompting US Magistrate Judge André Espinosa to slam the ordeal as 'hasty' and 'worrisome.' 'The apparent rush in this case culminating today in the embarrassing retraction of charges suggests a failure to adequately investigate, to carefully gather facts, and to carefully consider the implications of your actions before wielding your immense power,' Espinosa slammed Haba and the DOJ. Along with Habba, Baraka's suit also names Ricky Patel, a supervising agent with Homeland Security who led the arrest at Delaney Hall. Habba claimed Baraka 'committed trespass and ignored multiple warnings from Homeland Security Investigations to remove himself from the ICE detention in Newark.' The mayor, however, alleges that he complied with the order to leave before agents came outside the gate and took him into custody. Baraka also alleges that he was allowed inside the center by the GEO Group, the private company running the private prison, to calm the protesters demonstrating the jail's use as a migrant detention facility. The Democrat also claims the agents violently pulled his arms and arrested him 'without probable cause,' according to the lawsuit. Baraka announced the lawsuit on the same day early in-person voting began in the Garden State, where the gubernatorial hopeful is one of six candidates running for the Democratic nomination. Baraka wasn't the only New Jersey lawmaker to find himself in hot water with the Justice Department over the demonstration at Delaney Hall. The DOJ has charged Rep. La Monica McIver (D-NJ) with assaulting, resisting and impeding law enforcement officials during the protest. Investigators say cameras captured McIver's actions during the melee that she assaulted the federal officers and tried to stop them from arresting Baraka. She faces up to eight years in prison if convicted. McIver, who has represented New Jersey's 10th Congressional District since last September, slammed the charges as 'purely political' and blamed ICE agents for the chaotic confrontation. The Trump administration has also sued several New Jersey cities, including Newark, over so-called sanctuary policies.
