
What to Know About mRNA Vaccines
Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., has repeatedly questioned the safety of mRNA vaccines against Covid-19. Scientists with funding from the National Institutes of Health were advised to scrub their grants of any reference to mRNA. Around the country, state legislatures are considering bills to ban or limit such vaccines, with one describing them as weapons of mass destruction.
While mRNA, or messenger RNA, has received widespread attention in recent years, scientists first discovered it in 1961. They have been studying it and exploring its promise in preventing infectious diseases and treating cancer and rare diseases ever since.
What is mRNA?
A large molecule found in all of our cells, mRNA is used to make every protein that our DNA directs our bodies to build. It does so by carrying information from DNA in the nucleus out to a cell's protein-making machinery. A single mRNA molecule can be used to make many copies of a protein, but it is naturally programmed to die eventually, said Jeff Coller, a professor of RNA biology and therapeutics at Johns Hopkins University and a co-founder of an RNA therapeutics company.
How do mRNA vaccines work?
Right now, there are three FDA-approved vaccines available that use mRNA, two for Covid-19 and one for R.S.V., or respiratory syncytial virus, in older adults. These vaccines consist of strands of mRNA that code for specific viral proteins.
Say you get a Covid-19 vaccine. The strands of mRNA, packaged into tiny fat particles, go into your muscle and immune cells, said Robert Alexander Wesselhoeft, director of RNA therapeutics at the Gene and Cell Therapy Institute at Mass General Brigham. Protein factories in the cells then take instructions from the mRNA and manufacture a protein like the one found on the surface of a Covid-19 virus. Your body recognizes that protein as foreign, and mounts an immune response.
Most of the mRNA will be gone within a few days, but the body retains a 'memory" of it in the form of antibodies, Dr. Coller said. As with other types of vaccines, immunity wanes both over time and as a virus evolves into new variants.
Why are mRNA vaccines being used now?
In the mid-2000s, scientists at the University of Pennsylvania figured out how to get foreign mRNA into human cells without it degrading first. That enabled researchers to develop it for use in vaccines.
The main use for such vaccines right now is to prevent infectious diseases, like Covid-19 and R.S.V., said Dr. Wesselhoeft, who founded a company that develops RNA therapies. The mRNA vaccines can be made very quickly because all of the components, other than the RNA sequence, remain the same across different vaccines.
This feature could be helpful for developing the annual flu vaccine, said Florian Krammer, a virologist at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, who has previously consulted for Pfizer and CureVac on mRNA therapies. Typically, scientists decide in February or March which influenza virus strains to include in a vaccine that will be rolled out in the United States in September. But by that time, a different strain may be dominant. Because an mRNA vaccine can be manufactured more quickly than the current flu shot, scientists could wait until May or June to see which strains are circulating, Dr. Krammer said, increasing the likelihood the vaccine will be effective.
Do these vaccines have risks?
A common question patients ask is whether an mRNA vaccine can affect their DNA, Dr. Boucher said. The answer is no. Our cells cannot convert mRNA into DNA, which means that it can't be incorporated into our genome.
The vaccine for Covid-19 can cause muscle aches and flulike symptoms, but these are expected side effects for vaccines generally, Dr. Krammer said.
It's been more than four years since the Covid-19 vaccine was first rolled out 'and there are not long-term safety signals,' said Dr. Adam Ratner, a pediatric infectious disease specialist in New York. Many parents were concerned about myocarditis, an inflammation of the heart muscle that was reported as a possible side effect of the vaccine. But, Dr. Ratner said, the risk of such inflammation from an actual Covid-19 infection, or of long Covid or multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children, was far greater.
What else can mRNA be used for?
Vaccines using mRNA are currently being studied for a wide range of diseases, including cancer, cardiovascular disease, autoimmune disorders like Type 1 diabetes and rare diseases like cystic fibrosis, a genetic condition that results in excessively thick, sticky mucus that can plug the airways and damage the lungs.
In cancer, the idea is that the mRNA codes for a tumor protein that the immune system will recognize as foreign, telling the body to attack the tumor. In a genetic disorder like cystic fibrosis, it codes for a functioning version of a deficient protein to replace the faulty one and restore the mucus to healthy state.
A paper in the journal Nature earlier this year showed that an experimental mRNA vaccine for pancreatic cancer provoked an immune response in some patients after they had undergone surgery for the cancer. Patients who experienced that immune response lived longer without cancer than patients who did not.
Another recent paper showed that, in monkeys, an inhaled mRNA therapy could produce a protein needed to form cilia, the hairlike structures that line our airways and move mucus out of them. These proteins malfunction in a debilitating respiratory disorder called primary ciliary dyskinesia.
This research is still in early stages: The pancreatic cancer study, a Phase I trial, included only 16 patients, and there may have been other differences between the two groups that accounted for the different survival times. There is a long history of research showing that interventions may lead to immune responses without actually changing patients' outcomes, explained Dr. Steven Rosenberg, chief of the surgery branch at the National Cancer Institute and an expert in cancer immunotherapy.
Dr. Richard Boucher, a pulmonologist at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, noted that for lung diseases, it's extremely difficult to safely get the particles carrying mRNA into exactly the right cells.
In general, Dr. Ratner said, mRNA vaccines are 'exciting' in that they offer hope for disease treatments where prior technologies have failed. But mRNA therapy is still a drug technology like any other: In some diseases it likely will work, he said, 'and in other cases it probably won't.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Wall Street Journal
18 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
Colonoscopies Beat the Alternative Every Day
I read Jim Sollisch's complaints about the discomfort of colonoscopy preparation with amusement and concern ('Colonoscopy Prep Is Worse Than IKEA,' op-ed, June 3). I have had 12 colonoscopies since I was 50 thanks to a family history of colon cancer. The prep is uncomfortable and inconvenient. The alternative is far worse. My father was diagnosed with this terrible cancer in 1958. Doctors gave him six months to live in a time before colostomies were common. He lasted five years—a time I cherish—but the cost to him was high. I think watching someone die from colon cancer might help Mr. Sollisch put the prep into perspective. It isn't as unbearable as he describes, and I would never want to see anyone decline a procedure for one of the most preventable cancers. If you are at risk for colon cancer, schedule your procedure today. Ken Gurak


Fast Company
20 minutes ago
- Fast Company
1 in 5 people are having fewer children due to fear of the future: UN
Falling fertility rates typically get blamed on the women of the world. But a new study published by the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) says both men and women 'face significant barriers to realizing their fertility aspirations.' It's not that they don't want to have children—rather, they just aren't able to in the ways they want to. According to the report, barriers in political discourse, healthcare policies, financial instability, and climate change are some of the leading causes for globally declining birth rates, and furthermore, they prevent many from realizing their preferred child status. 'The evidence is clear: We are moving from a world of rapid population expansion, in the mid-20th Century, to a period of declining fertility rates,' Dr. Natalia Kanem, Executive Director of UNFPA said. UNFPA partnered with YouGov to ask 14,000 people across 14 countries what they want for their reproductive futures and why. According to the report, nearly 1 in 5 participants cited fears of the future affecting their decisions to have fewer children than desired, including concerns about climate change, environmental degradation, wars, and pandemics. Meanwhile, 39% reported financial limitations affecting their decisions. The countries included in the study represent a third of the world population, and include North Korea (the country with the lowest fertility rate), Nigeria (the country with the highest fertility rate), and the U.S. (somewhere in the middle). All participants' reasons behind their reproductive status were divided into five factors: Health, including infertility and a lack of medical care Economic, including unemployment and housing situations Changed desires, including partner or personal decisions Concerns over future, including political or climate concerns Other, including lack of partner or societal pressure 'It is hard to escape the conclusion that these concerns—which certainly warrant policy responses—are rooted in outdated notions around who should be reproducing and why, and the notion that the achievement of a country's preferred birth rate will ensure economic and political security,' Dr. Kanem said.


CBS News
25 minutes ago
- CBS News
Chesapeake Bay watershed health declined in 2024, report shows
The Chesapeake Bay declined in health in 2024, according to an annual report published by the University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science (UMCES). During the annual assessment, officials look at the ecological, societal and economic indicators. The report, which uses data from 2024, gave the Bay a C grade, while watershed health was given a C+ grade. The C grade was a five-point decrease compared to 2023. Despite the decline in health in 2024, the Bay has shown long-term improvements over the last couple of decades, the report shows. Chesapeake Bay health declined in 2024 UMCES looked at seven bay indicators and 12 watershed indicators to grade the health of the waterways. According to the report, the bay indicators, like nitrogen levels, oxygen levels and water clarity, are used to assess the health of the aquatic ecosystem, while watershed indicators look at external factors like protected lands in the area, job growth and temperatures. UMCES said the decrease in score is not surprising due to the weather conditions in 2024. According to the report, 2024 was the hottest year on record, with extreme rainfall patterns. Parts of the watershed experienced drought with short, intense bursts of rainfall that caused runoff. "These downpours can cause water to flow over the ground rather than soak into it, increasing the fertilizer, dirt and debris carried into waterways," the report said. Despite the decreased 2025 score, the Bay has shown improvements since the 1980s, according to the report. According to the report, six regions - including Elizabeth, James, Patapsco and Back Rivers, Upper Western Shore, Upper Bay and Lower Bay - have shown long-term improvements. The Upper Eastern Shore was the only region to show declining trends. The Chesapeake Bay declined in health in 2024, according to an annual report published by the University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science (UMCES). University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science Some indicators, like dissolved oxygen and total nitrogen levels, have also shown long-term improvements, while chlorophyll a and water clarity scores have declined, the report shows. UMCES attributed the improvements to management and restoration efforts, including upgraded wastewater treatment plants, reduced nutrient and sediment, seagrass restoration and oyster plantings. "This year's report underscores the importance of continued investment and highlights the progress we've made over the last decade," said Dr. Fernando Miralles-Wilhelm, President of UMCES. Chesapeake Bay freshwater gets saltier With more than 100,000 miles of streams and millions of acres of lakes and reservoirs, the Chesapeake Bay region provides drinking water, resources for farmers and power. In its 2025 report, UMCES determined that the Chesapeake Bay's freshwater is becoming more salty due to an issue called freshwater salinization. The change is caused by rainfall patterns, drought, rises in sea level and human activities. The report shows freshwater salinization is expected to get worse as the population in the area increases and the environment continues to change. The report recommends switching to eco- and pet-friendly salt during the winter and using less de-icing product on roads and sidewalks. Baltimore waterways show declining water quality In May, a similar study from non-profit Blue Water Baltimore found that the water quality at the Inner Harbor and surrounding watershed has declined in the past decade. According to the report, water quality at the Baltimore Harbor, Gwynn Falls and the Patapsco River regions has declined between 2013 and 2024. Water quality in the Jones Falls region slightly improved. The report detailed that chlorophyll levels were poor in most areas, while bacteria levels and dissolved oxygen levels improved.