
Is this the most political fashion item ever?
Overlooked, familiar, homely… These are the words traditionally associated with the apron, a detachable, workaday garment that has historically functioned 'almost like an invisibility cloak.' So said Carol Tulloch, a professor of dress, diaspora and transnationalism at Chelsea College of Arts, in a telephone interview with CNN.
Just don't tell that to Jeremy Allen White's character Carmy Berzatto in hit TV drama 'The Bear' whose tightly-tied blue Bragard apron (a replica of those worn in chic Napa Valley eatery The French Laundry) only enhances his main character energy as the show's fourth season premieres this week.
Tulloch, alongside fellow London-based academic Judith Clark, a professor of fashion and museology at London College of Fashion, have recently come together for a three-month-long residency at the Chelsea Space gallery to reflect upon the apron's cultural and social values — its design and use, as well as role regarding issues of race, class, and gender identity.
It's timely as the apron is enjoying something of a renaissance in popular culture — featuring, for example, in recent collections from Hermès, The Row, Dior, Phoebe Philo and Ganni and on Kaia Gerber who wore a chic pinafore-style dress while out in New York in April — and it's ability to encompass unheard stories and experiences is starting to be critically appraised.
'They've been an unconscious part of many of our lives and childhoods,' said Tulloch. 'While they only really have one function — to protect clothes — they come in many forms.'
When Tulloch started critically examining aprons, they proved to be a fascinating insight into people across all strata of society, she said. 'Those I wouldn't expect to have a close relationship with aprons — academics, for example — become quite pensive when they start thinking about them.' Tulloch recalled a small show from some years ago, called 'Pinnies from Heaven' at the Makers Guild museum in Wales, exhibiting works created by artists based on their recollections of the apron. One artist talked about how, for them, the apron absorbed the detritus of all the things that happened in the home, not just the mess from cooking or cleaning, but emotional fallout too. 'That really stuck with me,' Tulloch said.
For Clark, the apron is 'talismanic.' Speaking to CNN via a phone call, she observed that the residency created an immediate sense of nostalgia for some people. 'Within two minutes of coming in, people recount something of their family history,' she said.
Tulloch has also looked at aprons as a tool of protection and activism for women through the lens of African Jamaican market women called 'Higglers'. 'The Higgler is still very much a part of Jamaican identity,' says Tulloch. 'She was visually defined by the apron, whether tied around the waist or as a full bib. Likewise they were worn by women who were pineapple or banana pickers, or domestic workers.'
Tulloch references contemporary South African artist Mary Sibande who explores the intersection of race, gender and labor in the country with her sculptural depictions of the apron-wearing 'Sophie,' the artist's self-proclaimed 'alter ego who plays out the fantasies of the maternal women in her family.'
'Sibande's great grandmother all the way up to her mother were all maids,' said Tulloch.
'The apron has served as a visual code in movies too: African American women were often defined as maids by the wearing of aprons in films and cartoons. Separately, the suffragettes reclaimed aprons, using pinafores emblazoned with slogans as activist tools, often when they had come out of prison for their campaigning work…'
But aprons weren't always a sign of domesticity, servitude or homeliness, or of being working class. Nor were they always worn predominantly by women. Research suggests that triangular apron-like garments were first worn by noblemen in Ancient Egypt, as evidenced in paintings from the time. In the Middle Ages, aprons made from leather and heavy canvas were worn by farriers, cobblers, butchers, blacksmiths and other tradesmen desiring heavy duty protection from the perils of their work. Then, during the Renaissance, European 'women of means' wore elaborate yet washable aprons adorned with lace and embroidery to keep their luxurious gowns clean. Aprons were a fixture of many employments during the industrial revolution, with strict codes delineating the styles to be worn by staff (plain, workaday) and the styles worn by the women holding the purse strings (elaborate, embroidered and made from more costly cloths).
In the 1950s, the apron came to be a symbol of homemaking particularly in the United States — think Lucille Ball's Lucy Ricardo character in the 1950s sitcom 'I Love Lucy' or more recently January Jones' portrayal of Betty Draper in 'Mad Men.'
Despite the garment being such a part of our collective consciousness, aprons have rarely been studied, said Clark.' Collections, such as the one held by the Fashion Museum (in Bath, England), are huge and of great cultural value and significance, but there hasn't really been sustained research done on them,' she explained.
While displaying aprons comes with its own set of challenges — the style is tricky to mount due to its flat construction — Clark also suspects aprons have 'not been considered of cultural importance because of their relationship to traditionally women's domestic work.'
But perhaps that's changing as the apron continues to be modernized, further cementing itself into popular culture. Thanks to Gen-Z's increasing interest in food and cooking, apron-wearing is finding a new genderless and more diverse audience. While alpha male chefs of old wouldn't often be seen in a pinafore (Gordon Ramsay aside, aprons were the preserve of a 'cook') Carmy's proud pinny-wearing is a case in point. Even Vogue magazine decreed the return of the garment (alongside the rise of what they termed 'gardening-core') in their June 2025 issue.
'There's some beautiful imagery of the late (fashion journalist and muse) Anna Piaggi with Karl Lagerfeld, using a Chanel cape as an apron,' said Clark. 'I love their shape, their mobility, that they're not fitted and so therefore are a truly inclusive garment… I love how easily the item can be subverted. It just refuses to be defined.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Princess Diana's 'Caring Dress' sold for $520K, her Lady Dior handbag for $325K. See what else people bought from the late royal's largest wardrobe auction.
Hopeful bidders and fans of Princess Diana were given the opportunity of a lifetime on Thursday morning: To own garments worn and beloved by the late royal herself. The auction, 'Princess Diana's Style & A Royal Collection,' took place in Beverly Hills, Calif., on June 26, and featured more than 200 items that showcased the princess's 'enduring influence as a fashion icon and humanitarian,' Julien's Auctions, the famed auctioneer company, said. Those who attended the live auction at the Verandah Ballroom in the Peninsula Beverly Hills were able to place first bids on items from the rare collection, though bidding online and over the phone with an auction house representative was also available. A portion of the proceeds from the auction will benefit the British charity Muscular Dystrophy UK, according to the auction house. Among Diana's auctioned items is her Belville Sassoon 'Caring Dress,' which sold for $520,000, her Lady Dior lambskin handbag, which sold for $325,000 and her beloved British Lung Foundation sweatshirt, which sold for $221,000. 'This collection is not only the most comprehensive offering of her wardrobe ever presented, but also a tribute to her elegance, grace, glamour, and enduring spirit. Each item is a window into a moment in history,' Martin Nolan, Julien's co-founder and executive director, said in a statement ahead of the auction. Here's a look at some of Diana's most coveted wardrobe staples, along with how much they were auctioned for. Scottish milliner John Boyd designed this custom hat, made of silk, ostrich feather plumes, feather stems and straw, for Diana's 1981 honeymoon send-off outfit. The headpiece, which she wore again in 1983, was dyed light pink to match her Belville Sassoon skirt suit. Diana wore this limited-edition ostrich feather fan to the Fanmakers' Banquet at Mason House in 1985. Inscribed on the three-plume fan's sterling silver handle is the Prince of Wales crest. Diana was famously photographed wearing this magenta nylon suit while skiing in Malbun, Liechtenstein, in 1985; Klosters, Switzerland, in 1986; and Lech, Austria, in 1992. The suit, with its dropped shoulders and funnel neckline, also features brass tone buttons and adjustable D-ring belts. Diana wore this coordinating yellow floral set to the Royal Ascot in 1987. Designed by Bruce Oldfield, the colorful coordinates feature a short-sleeve silk top with ruched sleeves and a pencil skirt in the same print. Diana was photographed wearing this wardrobe staple — a silk, floral-printed dress designed by Belville Sassoon — nine times between 1988 and 1992. The bright blue garment, with its puffed sleeves and inviting print, was dubbed the 'Caring Dress' because Diana often wore it during her visits with patients in hospitals. "It was colorful, approachable, likeable and huggable," Nolan told People. "When she would go to visit kids and people in the hospital, they gravitated toward the colors and felt they could hug her.' The winning bid belonged to Renae Plant, who runs a virtual Princess Diana museum. Immediately after learning she'd won the garment, Plant fell to the floor out of excitement. Another staple in Diana's closet was her three-piece Escada suit. The grey cashmere ensemble features a double-breasted blazer with bright blue pinstripes as well as a matching skirt and blue silk blouse. Diana was photographed wearing the ensemble on six separate occasions from 1988 to 1992. Diana stepped out in a pair of red-and-black leather heels designed by Rayne on Christmas Day at Sandringham in 1990. For the festive occasion, Diana paired the two-tone pumps with a black, white and red houndstooth skirt suit by Moschino Cheap and Chic, along with a Victor Edelstein blouse and Phillip Somersville brimmed hat. Diana was first photographed carrying the black Lady Dior handbag on her official visit to Argentina in 1995, and then later that same year during a visit to the Foundation for Conductive Education in Birmingham, England. Because of Diana's love of the silhouette, the box-shaped tote was later named Lady Dior in 1996, in her honor. The sleeveless black cocktail dress, with its delicate black beading on the bodice and subtly ruched skirt, was worn by Diana on a few occasions. The late princess wore the Catherine Walker garment at London Fashion Week in 1994 and again during her official visit to Hong Kong in 1995. Diana was photographed in a navy wool Catherine Walker coatdress while leaving the Carlyle Hotel in New York in 1995. The double-breasted garment features a black velvet collar and cuffs, and is adorned with gold anchor buttons. Featuring a long gold link handle and embossed Prada logo, the champagne-hued leather tote was worn by Diana on three separate occasions, in Moscow in 1995, and Pakistan and Chicago in 1996. No one did a slouchy sweatshirt like Princess Diana. The beloved royal had a knack for blending glamour and athleisure when it came to curating her everyday style. Included in her collection of sweatshirts was this British Lung Foundation crewneck, which she wore on several occasions. Here she's photographed wearing the sweater — with a blazer, light denim jeans, brown riding boots and a navy cap — at Guards Polo Club in 1988.


Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
‘The Bear' Season 4 Twist Ending Explained—Is This The End For Carmy And The Show?
THE BEAR — 'Groundhogs"— Season 4 Episode 1 (Streams Thursday, June 26th) Pictured: Jeremy Allen ... More White as Carmen 'Carmy' Berzatto. Warning: Spoilers ahead for The Bear Season 4. The Bear is back, and all 10 episodes of Season 4 are now streaming on Hulu. If you've watched the new season and are still processing that cliffhanger, you likely have quite a few questions. Is Carmy leaving The Bear for good? What will happen to the restaurant? And most importantly, what does the future of the series look like amidst all the uncertainty? Season 4 picks up in the aftermath of the disappointing Chicago Tribune review. While the article described the restaurant as chaotic, it did highlight some positives, including the success of The Beef's takeout window. Uncle and Computer proceed to set up an actual timer in the kitchen that's counting down the days, hours and minutes until The Bear is forced to shut down for good. Carmy has made significant strides this season toward being less controlling. He's begun letting go of some of his non-negotiables, like changing the menu every night, in an effort to make everyone's lives easier, especially Sydney. He also finally reaches out to Claire after the refrigerator debacle in Season 2 and apologizes to her (it's about time!). Although they're not back together, they remain friends and are in a much better place than before. As for Sydney, she finally makes the difficult decision to stay at The Bear rather than join Shapiro (who responds in a way that's rude but realistic). The job offer had been weighing on her all season. She hadn't been spending time with her father and was ignoring his calls, but her demeanor toward him changes after he suffers a heart attack. He's thankfully okay, and his health scare ultimately brings them closer than ever. Episode 7 saw members of The Bear crew, the Berzatto family, the Faks, and more come together to attend Tiffany and Frank's wedding, including guest stars Donna Berzatto (Jamie Lee Curtis), Stevie (John Mulaney), Michelle Berzatto (Sarah Paulson), Francie Fak (Brie Larson), Uncle Lee (Bob Odenkirk), and others. By Episode 9, time is quickly running out as The Bear's two-month parachute nears its end. At this point, the restaurant basically needs a miracle (aka a Michelin star) to stay afloat. But things are looking better than before; The Bear is on its way to becoming profitable after much-needed changes. Marcus also made Food & Wine Magazine's list of Best New Chefs. Is Carmy Leaving The Bear? THE BEAR — 'Groundhogs"— Season 4 Episode 1 (Streams Thursday, June 26th) Pictured: Ayo Edebiri as ... More Sydney Adamu. In the final moments of Episode 9, Pete informs Sydney that Carmy made a strange change to the partnership agreement. The agreement is split in two: 50% goes to Uncle, while the other 50% belongs to The Bear. But The Bear's half is further divided between Natalie (25%) and Sydney (25%). Carmy's name is shockingly no longer on it. The Season 4 finale takes place entirely in the alley behind the restaurant. In the opening scene, Sydney confronts Carmy about their agreement. 'You're leaving,' Sydney says, but Carmy assures her he isn't. 'I'm not leaving… that's not how it is.' (Spoiler alert, he is leaving, but he definitely has an interesting way of expressing it). He explains that the change is the best thing for The Bear and that he wants to put the restaurant first. When she says she'll need more of an explanation than that — and that he's leaving her with a dying restaurant — he clarifies that he's going to get The Bear in the clear before he goes. Why Is Carmy Leaving The Bear? Ultimately, Carmy comes to the realization that he doesn't love what he does anymore. 'I think I put a lot of things in the way of dealing with very real things, and I'm aware of that. I think I was trying to put hurdles in the way.' He also reveals to Sydney that he knows she was thinking about leaving The Bear. She apologizes for not telling him about Shapiro's offer and says she's sorry he and his family have had to endure so many things, but now, he's taking everything out on the restaurant. Carmy then says the only way the restaurant can go on is with him gone and Sydney at the helm. 'Syd, you're everything I'm never going to be,' Carmy says. 'You're considerate. You allow yourself to feel things. You allow yourself to care. You are a natural leader and teacher and you're doing all this stuff for' the right reasons. He continues, 'Any chance of any kind of good in the building, it started when you walk in. And any possibility of it surviving, it's with you… Because you're The Bear.' Richie then walks in on their argument, and to his disbelief, Carmy tells him he's done with restaurants entirely. 'No, just, of course, take off, that's just what you're good at,' Richie responds. 'We're down, we're getting the sh*t kicked out of us… so take off.' Carmy tries to apologize, but Richie doesn't want to hear it. Did Carmy Actually Attend Mikey's Funeral? THE BEAR — 'Groundhogs"— Season 4 Episode 1 (Streams Thursday, June 26th) — Pictured: (l-r) Ebon ... More Moss-Bachrach as Richard 'Richie' Jerimovich, Jeremy Allen White as Carmen 'Carmy' Berzatto. As Richie was about to head inside, Carmy drops the bombshell that he actually attended his brother's funeral. He explains that he walked into the funeral for a second, walked out and then sat in his car. Carmy says that when he came back, he didn't know how to process Mikey's death, so he returned home angry and scared. He apologizes for not realizing that Richie had lost someone important to him, too. 'I didn't know him like you did,' Carmy says. Richie reveals that he tried to get Mikey to talk to someone and thought that maybe, if he could save The Beef, he could keep an eye on his friend. 'I failed,' he says, but Carmy assures him he didn't. Richie says he thought that was the reason Carmy didn't go to the funeral. 'I love your family, and they love you. He f*cking loved you," Richie says, adding that Carmy's family's love for him is different because he's 'the cousin.' Richie also says that he missed Carmy and often thought about where he was and all the experiences he was having. Richie then describes going on a road trip with Mikey, where they had to drop something off for Jimmy. They were cruising down the lake, listening to good tunes, and for like half an hour, everything felt perfect — and he thought that was what Carmy's life must be like. Richie admits he was jealous and even bought The French Laundry cookbook to see what 'the big deal was.' Richie asks Carmy to reconsider walking away from everything he's worked so hard for. Carmy replies that he doesn't know who he is outside the kitchen. Once again, he says the restaurant's going to be fine — but do they really believe him? 'You in?' Sydney asks Richie. "I appreciate the gesture but, like, this is my home. I'm not going anywhere… This is real?' Richie asks. His friend tells him that it is. How Does The Bear Season 4 End? THE BEAR — 'Groundhogs"— Season 4 Episode 1 (Streams Thursday, June 26th) Pictured: Jeremy Allen ... More White as Carmen 'Carmy' Berzatto. Natalie eventually steps outside the restaurant and joins Carmy, Sydney, and Richie. She learns that Carmy is planning to leave the restaurant and that he did, in fact, attend Mikey's funeral. Overcome with emotion, Nat hugs Carmy and begins to cry. In the final scene, Uncle and Computer's alarm goes off. The countdown finally hits zero, signaling that time has officially run out for The Bear. Will they be able to save the restaurant in Season 5, and how will things go without Carmy there? FX has not yet renewed The Bear for a fifth season, so the future of both the restaurant and the show are up in the air. The cliffhanger ending suggests there's more story to tell, but whether they'll get the chance to tell it remains unknown. Sources told Variety that although no scripts currently exist for a fifth installment, series creator Christopher Storer has a 'clear direction in mind' if the show is able to return. However, the biggest challenge could be coordinating a filming schedule for the show's high-profile actors — Jeremy Allen White, Ayo Edebiri, and Ebon Moss-Bachrach — who have been tapped for new and bigger opportunities. All 10 episodes of The Bear are streaming on Hulu. Check out the official trailer below.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Are platonic kisses ever okay when you're in a relationship?
Scarlett Johansson and her Jurassic World Rebirth co-star Jonathan Bailey made waves last week when they kissed on the red carpet. Seemingly delighted to see her colleague at the film premiere in New York, it was Johansson who strode towards the Wicked actor, clasping his face in her hands, before planting a smacker squarely on his mouth. While the act wasn't exactly X-rated – or even remotely romantic – it certainly gave fans plenty to talk about. Indeed, if this had been an episode of Bridgerton (the Netflix period drama that gave Bailey his breakout role), it would have been plastered all over the front page of Lady Whistledown's gossip pamphlet. The reason for the heightened reaction? Well, ScarJo is married to Saturday Night Live comedian, Colin Jost (who was also in attendance, FYI). Doubling down on their right to lock lips at the London premiere a few days later, Johansson and Bailey once again shared a moment. He has also since defended the kisses, stating in an interview with Entertainment Weekly: "I believe in being able to show love in all different ways. And if you can't kiss your friends… life's too short not to." Still, the pair's embrace has prompted many to ask: Is this okay? According to Clare Patterson, a British Association for Counselling and Psychotherapy (BACP)-registered therapist, while a kiss is a sign of affection, it absolutely can be non-sexual. She tells Yahoo UK: "It is as innocent and platonic as the intention behind it." That said, she understands why there are sometimes blurred lines and mixed reactions to platonic kisses, adding: "Perhaps one or both parties read more into the action, and so unless there is a very clear understanding that it is 'nothing more', it may be said to be best to err on the side of caution." Similarly, senior BACP-accredited therapist Debbie Keenan stresses that the motivation behind the kiss is what matters, rather than the act itself. She adds: "What I always come back to is; what is the intention behind the action? "Some people are extremely tactile and that's okay," she continues. "People express affection differently. Physical touch is a primary love language for some, but what matters most is mutual understanding and trust within the romantic partnership. If the kiss is genuinely affectionate and non-romantic, and both partners are comfortable with it, it is not problematic." Keenan notes that, if you have a tendency to be very affectionate with friends, you may benefit from having that conversation with your partner – particularly at the start of your relationship. She advises: "Transparency and communication is key in any healthy relationship. If platonic kissing is a norm in your friendships, having an open, empathetic conversation with your partner helps avoid misunderstandings and affirms emotional safety. This is especially important if acts of physical touch or quality time are significant love languages for either partner." Keenan adds: "Before kissing a friend, consider your intention, the cultural context, your partner's comfort level, and the potential impact on all involved relationships. Entering a romantic relationship may require some recalibration of friendship dynamics – not out of control, but out of respect and prioritisation of the romantic bond. Boundaries aren't about restriction; they're about maintaining emotional safety for everyone involved." For Patterson, however, going out of your way to discuss this type of behaviour may be overkill and pique your partner's suspicion. She says: "If there is genuine trust in a relationship, it should not really be necessary. If there is any jealousy, that is on the partner to address and work through. As long as there is confidence and trust, any actions or shows of affection with other individuals can be automatically assumed as innocent. There is no need to over-explain." Noting the added dynamic of Bailey's sexuality in this particular instance (he's openly gay), Keenan believes this perhaps allows all parties to be more comfortable with the situation. "We're often more comfortable with physical affection in these contexts because there's a perceived lack of romantic or sexual threat," she comments. "The intent behind the kiss is more easily understood as platonic, and therefore less likely to be interpreted as a boundary-crossing. This reflects how we culturally code affection and trust, and it highlights the importance of understanding both context and intention in non-romantic touch." Read more about relationships: 7 of Eden Blackman's best relationship tips, as Celebs Go Dating coach dies aged 57 (Yahoo life UK, 4-min read) Why waiting for your partner to be 'ready' can (sometimes) pay off (Yahoo Life UK, 7-min read) I love being single, it's going to take someone extraordinary for me to give it up (Yahoo Life UK, 6-min read)