Cyber charter schools in Pennsylvania would see funding cut under bill passed by the state House
HARRISBURG, Pa. (AP) — A Democratic-sponsored proposal to limit per-student payments to Pennsylvania's cyber charter schools and make other changes to how they operate narrowly passed the state House on Wednesday over Republican objections that it would imperil the online learning programs.
The 104-98 vote, with only two Republicans in favor, sets down a marker on the perennially contentious issue of school funding as state lawmakers work to complete the coming year's state budget for the fiscal year that starts in July.
The bill's $8,000 limit on how much public school districts would have to reimburse the cyber charters was the central piece of the sprawling legislation and would be a boost to the districts and the property tax payers who bear much of the cost of public education in Pennsylvania. There currently is no cap for the districts' payments to cyber charters, an amount now linked to how much districts spent on their own students in the prior year.
Supporters said changes to the cyber charter rules are widely backed among the state's 500 school boards and that cyber school spending has been the subject of critical reviews, including recently by Republican Auditor General Tim DeFoor.
But opponents defended the existing system as a critical lifeline to the students and families that for various reasons have sought alternatives to traditional schools.
The bill's main provisionsThe bill would set annual tuition payments from school districts to cyber charters at $8,000 per student, with potential yearly increases. Special education funding would also see changes.
Cyber charters would not be able to maintain cash balances above 12% of their spending and would not be able to provide payments or gifts to parents as incentives to enroll their children.
The bill would bolster disclosure requirements regarding cyber charters' policies, instructional materials and budgets.
It would bar the state Education Department from approving any additional cyber charter schools through the 2029-30 school year. A new Cyber Charter School Funding and Policy Council would be set up to make recommendations concerning enrollment, governance and funding.
What did lawmakers say about it?
During floor debate Wednesday, Rep. Martina White, a Philadelphia Republican, said the measure will 'close real schools, displace real students, strip families of the very choices that they depend on to give their children a chance at success.'
The moratorium would be highly damaging to cyber charters, said Rep. Craig Williams, a Delaware County Republican.
'You limit the number of cyber charters now in existence, you choke off its funding, and eventually you can kill cyber charter. Sixty-plus thousand students in our school system, finding another way to learn, and we're going to choke it off with this bill,' Williams said.
The chair of the House Education Committee, Lehigh County Democratic Rep. Peter Schweyer, enumerated cyber charter spending issues raised in the auditor general's report, including staff bonuses, gift cards, vehicle payments and fuel stipends.
'Gift cards?' Schweyer asked his colleagues. 'We would all get in trouble if we were taking gift cards as part of our compensation.'
The money at stakeLeaders of existing public cyber charter schools say the measure would cut their funding by about $450 million or more across the state, with a third of the total reductions targeting special education student reimbursements.
A Democratic analysis put the figure at more than $600 million.
What are public cyber charter schools?
About 65,000 Pennsylvania students currently attend the state's 14 public cyber charter schools, which are public, nonprofit corporations. They do not have to follow all of the requirements mandated of public schools under state law.
Cyber charter school are considered independent public schools, approved to operate with a 'charter' issued by the Education Department. They use technology to provide much of the teaching. Students usually do not need to attend a physical location beyond certain events, such as standardized testing.
What happens now?
The proposal was sent over to the Republican majority state Senate for its consideration. The bill becomes part of a wider negotiations to determine the budget before lawmakers recess for the summer.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNN
31 minutes ago
- CNN
Venezuelans in Florida react to Trump's new travel ban
President Donald Trump signed a proclamation to ban travel from several countries to the US, citing security risks, with one of the countries being Venezuela. Venezuelans in Florida reacted to the ban, with one worrying about their visa.

31 minutes ago
Michigan House Republicans sue the secretary of state over election training materials
KALAMAZOO, Mich. -- Michigan Republicans are suing the battleground state's top elections executive over access to election training materials. The lawsuit filed Thursday is the latest escalation in a brewing dispute that began when the GOP took majority control of the state's House of Representatives last year. Since winning control of the chamber in the 2024 election, statehouse Republicans have repeatedly scrutinized the state's election processes and Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson, a Democrat who is running for governor in 2026. The conflict comes as some state Republicans echo past false claims of election fraud in Michigan, which was a prime target of President Donald Trump and his backers after his 2020 election loss. Republicans on the chamber's Oversight Committee subpoenaed Benson in April, seeking access to training materials for local clerks and staff who administer elections, including access to the Bureau of Elections' online learning portal. Benson's office released some requested materials in response to the subpoena, but not all, citing cybersecurity and physical security concerns related to administering elections and the voting process. The office has said it needs to review the online portal for 'sensitive information" and make redactions. 'Since the beginning of this saga, Secretary Benson has asked lawmakers to let a court review their request for sensitive election information that, in the wrong hands, would compromise the security of our election machines, ballots and officials,' Michigan Department of State spokesperson Cheri Hardmon said in a statement Thursday. House Republicans say the goal of reviewing the material is to ensure clerks are trained in accordance with Michigan law. The House voted along party lines in May to hold Benson in contempt for not completely complying with the subpoena. The request for training materials originally came from GOP state Rep. Rachelle Smit, who has pushed false claims that the 2020 election was stolen. Smit is the chair of the House elections committee, which was renamed to the Elections Integrity Committee with the new Republican majority. 'Secretary Benson has proven she is unwilling to comply with our subpoena and Michigan law,' Rep. Smit said in a statement Thursday. 'She's skirted the rules and done whatever she could to avoid public scrutiny. It's become overwhelmingly clear that she will never release the training materials we're looking for without direction from a court." The lawsuit asks the Michigan Court of Claims to intervene and compel Benson to comply with the subpoena. 'The public interest is best served if the constitutional order of the State of Michigan is preserved and the Legislature can properly perform its duty to regulate the manner of elections in the state and, if deemed necessary, enact election laws for the benefit of Michigan residents,' the lawsuit says. Benson gained national attention for defending the results of the 2020 election in the face of Trump's attempts to undercut the outcome nationwide and in Michigan. Multiple audits — including one conducted by the then-Republican-controlled Michigan Senate — concluded former President Joe Biden won the state in 2020 and that there was no widespread or systemic fraud. Benson has remained a subject of GOP scrutiny this year. A Republican state representative introduced three articles of impeachment against Benson on Tuesday, and several of the accusations continue to cast doubts on the results of the 2020 election. With Democrats in control of the state Senate, it's unlikely the impeachment articles will result in a conviction.
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump administration bans travel from 19 countries as San Diego prepares for peak tourism season
SAN DIEGO, Calif. (FOX 5/KUSI) — The Trump administration announced a travel ban against a dozen countries on Wednesday and restrictions on seven others, citing national security concerns as a major reason for the restrictions. 'We will not allow people to enter our country who wish to do us harm,' President Donald Trump said in a video posted to social media. The proclamation signed Wednesday bans people from the following countries: Afghanistan Myanmar Chad Republic of Congo Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Haiti Iran Libya Somalia Sudan Yemen It also restricts travel to the United States from these countries: Burundi Cuba Laos Sierra Leone Togo Turkmenistan Venezuela That makes traveling to San Diego potentially more difficult or impossible for visitors from these nations. 'In order for this ban, this travel restriction to stand up in court, it has to be tied to legitimate reasons, and the president is tying it to issues of national security,' said Wendy Patrick, FOX 5 and KUSI legal analyst. This isn't the first time Trump imposed a controversial travel ban. In 2017, during his first term in office, he also restricted travel from seven predominantly Muslim countries. 'It can't be tied to demographics that are impermissible such as religion, race, national origin,' Patrick said. 'It has to be tied to an issue for which these powers exist.' Advocacy groups like the Partnership for the Advancement of New Americans criticize the ban, saying, 'At a time when immigration enforcement agents are abducting immigrants and tearing families apart, this ban only magnifies the inhumane treatment of people under this administration.' Sen. Alex Padilla echoes these concerns, saying in a statement, 'This senseless, prejudicial policy is an abuse of power that also threatens U.S. citizen relatives from the targeted countries.' The administration cites a report from the Department of Homeland Security that tracks the number of visa overstays, singling out nations with the highest overstay rates and countries with what the administration calls a significant terrorist presence. 'In the 21st century, we've seen one terror attack after another carried out by foreign visa overstayers,' Trump said. Patrick says that clarity could make upholding the ban in court more successful, but not foolproof. 'The first ban had a time limit on it — 90 days, 120 days. This one doesn't. It's open-ended, and that in and of itself could form the basis for a lawsuit,' Patrick said. The San Diego Tourism Authority says it's too early to predict the impact, adding, 'It's worth noting that international visitors comprise a relatively small portion of San Diego's overall tourism economy — only about 10 percent of overnight visitors. This gives us more stability than other gateway cities.' 'Lawyers and citizens from all over the world who are seeking to enter the U.S. are going to try to get clarity and try to get court action between now and the next term,' Patrick said. This travel ban is set to take effect on Monday, giving airports time to prepare, but that also leaves plenty of time for lawyers to file lawsuits against the proclamation. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.