Why Ranbir Canal matters as India plans to choke water flow to Pak? Key details
In a strategic move to choke the flow of water from the Indus Basin to Pakistan, India is considering doubling the length of the Ranbir Canal on River Chenab from 60 km to 120 km. The move will not only increase India's ability to divert water to Jammu for agricultural activities, but also reduce the flow into downstream Pakistan. This will directly hit Pakistan's Punjab province, which contributes 68% to the annual food grain production.advertisementChenab is one of the three rivers whose waters were allocated to Pakistan under the now suspended Indus Waters Treaty (IWT). The move will likely have profound implications for Pakistan's agricultural production.WHAT IS RANBIR CANAL?The Ranbir Canal, located in Jammu, is the lifeline for the city's agricultural production. Constructed in the early 20th century, it stretches nearly 60 km from its origin - upstream of the Akhnoor Bridge on the left bank of the Chenab, about 25 kilometres northeast of Jammu city.The canal was designed initially on net irrigated land of 16.460 hectares. The length of the main Ranbir Canal is 60 km and that of its distribution system is around 400 km.As per the Indus Water Treaty, 1960, the Ranbir Canal is allowed to carry 1,000 cusecs for irrigation purposes, 250 cusecs for hydropower use besides water withdrawal for silt extraction from April 15 to October 14.LOCATION AND STRUCTUREadvertisementOrigin: The canal takes off from River Chenab near Akhnoor, Jammu.Length: Originally about 60 kilometers, with current proposals to extend it up to 120 kilometres.Route: It traverses the Jammu region, providing water to agricultural lands and supporting local communities.BACKGROUND ON THE INDUS WATERS TREATYThe Indus Waters Treaty (IWT), signed in 1960, is a water-sharing agreement between India and Pakistan, brokered by the World Bank.It allocates the waters of the eastern rivers (Beas, Ravi, Sutlej) to India and the western rivers (Indus, Chenab, Jhelum) to Pakistan, while permitting India's limited use of the western rivers for irrigation and non-consumptive purposes.India has suspended the 1960 Indus Waters Treaty with Pakistan for the first time ever in response to the deadly April 22 Pahalgam terror attack that killed 26 people, mostly tourists.The decision to halt the treaty was taken by the Cabinet Committee on Security (CCS), the government's highest decision-making body on national security.WHY RANBIR CANAL MATTERS?The Ranbir Canal predates the IWT, having been built in the 19th century, and has long served as a key irrigation channel for the Jammu region.India's use of water from the Chenab (a western river) for irrigation via the Ranbir Canal has been regulated, with limits on how much water can be diverted to ensure downstream flows to Pakistan.advertisementFollowing the April 22 terror attack, India suspended its participation in the Indus Waters Treaty. In the aftermath, India began considering measures to increase its control over the Indus system, including major expansions of existing infrastructure like the Ranbir Canal.PROPOSED EXPANSIONThe government is weighing plans to double the Ranbir Canal's length from 60 km to 120 km, increasing its reach and capacity.The expansion would boost the canal's diversion capacity from 40 cubic meters per second to 150 cubic meters per second, potentially diverting significantly more water for Indian use before it reaches Pakistan's Punjab region.This move is seen as a way for India to exert pressure on Pakistan, as about 80 per cent of Pakistan's agriculture relies on the Indus system. Any reduction in water flow could have serious consequences for Pakistani agriculture and hydropower.GEOPOLITICAL IMPLICATIONSThe expansion of the Ranbir Canal is part of a broader Indian strategy to leverage its upstream position for geopolitical influence, especially after the suspension of the treaty.While such infrastructure changes would take years to fully implement, the holding of water in certain dams has already affected water levels at key points in Pakistan.RANBIR CANAL FACTSFeatureDetailsLocationJammu, IndiaSourceChenab River (upstream of Akhnoor Bridge)Original Length60 kmProposed Length120 km (under expansion plans)Construction Completed1905PurposeIrrigation, water supplyTreaty ContextRegulated under Indus Waters Treaty; now under reviewStrategic SignificancePotential tool for water leverage post-treaty suspension
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
10 hours ago
- India Today
Pakistan scales up defence budget, but who is really fuelling it?
Pakistan, which already has an overall debt of USD 274 billion, raised its defence budget by 20%. The massive hike from the previous budget comes even as Pakistan has cut its overall budget by 6.9%. This is one of the largest increases in decades and will require the government to slash spending accordingly. The hike in estimated defence expenditure by the 'security-state' comes after Pakistan suffered serious military setbacks from Indian strikes during Operation Sindoor. But how is Pakistan, which seeks loans from the International Monetary Fund (IMF) to repay the old ones, with a massive external debt funding its defence budget, and who is fuelling it?advertisementDefence forces have been allocated almost 14.5% of Pakistan's total annual budget, which is around 1.97% of its Finance Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb unveiled the annual federal budget for FY 2025-26 on June 10. This comes after Pakistan's Planning Minister, Ahsan Iqbal, previously confirmed on May 23 that the federal government would raise its defence budget for the upcoming fiscal year. He cited the recent military escalation with India and New Delhi's suspension of the Indus Waters Treaty as key factors behind the decision, according to a Pakistani daily, this, Pakistan's federal government approved an 18% hike in defence expenditure. It, too, cited the escalation in tensions with India as a key reason for the defence budget between India and Pakistan escalated after the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack, with India carrying out precision strikes on terror infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir on May has overused its military muscle and thereby its estimated military expenditure in its proxy wars against India. This, despite the Islamic Republic's lack of hesitation to seek monetary help, is a reality even acknowledged by PM Sharif. Yet, Pakistan continues to secure funding, loans, and bailouts, while evading meaningful accountability in curbing and acting on terror. At this juncture, one must ask: who is really funding Pakistan?PAKISTAN ON BORROWED FUNDS AND SUPPORT1. IMF SUPPORT FOR PAKISTAN: Pakistan has relied heavily on the IMF since 2023, securing a $3 billion Stand-By Arrangement to stabilise its September 2024, the IMF approved a $7 billion loan to cash-strapped IMF funds aren't directly used for military spending, they stabilise Pakistan's economy and allow the government to redirect domestic funds toward defence. This leaves the army-controlled Sharif's government to channel money into the areas where Rawalpindi would want it to be has taken more than 20 loans from the IMF since 1958 and is currently its fifth-largest debtor, noted a BBC a part of the deal, Islamabad agreed to a number of politically unpopular measures, including increasing the amount of tax it collects from people and effect, the IMF creates fiscal breathing space that enables military spending to rise.2. CHINA: BIGGEST EXTERNAL FINANCIER: Pakistan's "Iron-clad brother", China, remains its biggest external financier and key military has decided to seek a rollover of around $12 billion in debt from key allies such as China in the 2024-25 fiscal year to meet a whopping $23 billion worth of gap in its external financing, as the federal government aims to achieve budget targets before the expected arrival of an IMF team to the cash-strapped country, according to a report by The Finance Ministry insiders said $3.7 billion from China will be rolled over, adding that the estimate of further new financing from China would also be included in the next financial year's budget, The Express Tribune newspaper reported in a third of Pakistan's total external debt is owed to China, much of it tied to infrastructure and energy projects under is Pakistan's most significant external financier and arms supplier, which is a well-known just with diplomatic or military cushion, this is how China helps and enables Pakistan to go scot-free. Islamabad knows that, given its strategic location and contemporary geopolitical alignments, Beijing would have its back, even at the cost of huge interest HELP FROM GULF NATIONS: The Arabian states of Western Asia have consistently backed Pakistan through sizeable deposits and loan rollovers to ensure IMF support. In July 2023, Saudi Arabia deposited $2 billion into Pakistan's central bank, and the UAE added $1 billion, significantly bolstering foreign reserves ahead of crucial IMF board decisions, according to Arab recently, the UAE rolled over another $2 billion in January 2024 and again in early in December 2024, Saudi Arabia extended its $3 billion deposit for another top of these, Pakistan's central bank governor has signalled plans to raise up to $4 billion from Gulf-based commercial banks, including Saudi, UAE, and other regional lenders, to plug a $3-5 billion external financing it becomes clear that Pakistan's defence spending is indirectly enabled by a combination of IMF bailouts, Chinese loans, and Gulf deposits. Each lender offers a breathing room to Pakistan which lets it divert funds towards the military. While the IMF doesn't fund armed forces, and China and other lenders may not openly admit it, together they keep afloat the security state that continues to prioritise defence, and its byproduct, terrorism, over Watch
India Today
10 hours ago
- India Today
A month into India-Pakistan ceasefire, Uri on LoC declares: ‘Bunkers a necessity now'
Broken walls, shattered windowpanes, damaged rooftops, tattered floor covers, broken utensils, ripped blankets, torn books, hollowed out wardrobes and suitcases—these sum up the scene in shelling-hit Gingal village of Uri in north Kashmir, some 16 km from the Line of Control (LoC) with amidst the ruins of her two-storied home, destroyed in the long-range artillery fire by Pakistan on the night of May 9, 39-year-old Misra Begum is still unable to reconcile with the loss. 'We're homeless now; our valuables of an entire lifetime are gone. My husband is a labourer; how will we build a new one (home)?' says Begum, recounting to INDIA TODAY the family's relentless struggles over the years to put together their over a month now, Begum, her husband and children—13-year-old son and seven-year-old daughter—have been staying at a relative's home nearby. Their devastated home symbolises the carnage caused by long-range shelling in the village of around 750 households between May 8 and 10, when Pakistan responded to India's Operation the vicinity, retired armyman Mohammad Naseer's home has been left with broken windows and holes in the roof. Some 300 metres away, a tw0-storied house has had its left wing, comprising four of the total eight rooms, damaged completely. 'The shelling shook our bodies; it felt like our ears were being torn apart. Had we not gathered in the kitchen, which is on the other side of the house, we would've been dead,' says 38-year-old Zahida Banoo, holding her two children. Her husband works in the Jammu and Kashmir like thousands of others in Uri, had fled her home to safer places when intense shelling by Pakistan wreaked havoc on the villages of Gangil, Lagama, Gharkote, Salamabad, Paranpilla, Bandi, Lagama and Dachi, among others. She returned after spending a week at her sister's home in Baramulla and another at a rented house in which hosts the head office of National Hydroelectric Power Corporation (NHPC), overlooking the 480 MW Uri-I power project on the Jhelum river flowing beneath into Pakistan, was perhaps the worst hit. Some 30-40 artillery shells, as per locals, landed in the village. Four homes were completely damaged and another 87 partially. The highly-guarded NHPC office, spanning over six acres, was also hit by shells—the damages caused to its residential buildings.'Windowpanes broke. There was fear all over; we hid inside bunkers,' informs E. Srinivas, deputy general manager at the NHPC installations near the LoC were put on high alert during the India-Pakistan offensive, owing to a potential threat from Islamabad in the backdrop of New Delhi suspending the Indus Waters Treaty after the terror attack in Pahalgam on April though, says Uri-I, the 240 MW Uri-II and 330 MW Kishanganga projects were fully secured and power generation was Naseer, a 33-year-old woman, shudders at the mention of 'war'. The four-day horror, May 7 to May 10, has left her with nightmares. She blames the media for the war hysteria at the cost of people's lives. 'Take us out of Uri and engage in the war, as much as you can. It looks easy from inside newsrooms; if you've the guts, exchange places with us,' she says, fighting been a month since the post-Operation Sindoor ceasefire with Pakistan, yet the residents of Uri grapple with fear and uncertainty. In recent years, the border villages here have had travellers trooping in, thanks to the tourism push by the government. Now, it has all come to a standstill.'The bullet has no eye to distinguish or differentiate. The deadly shells have damaged our buildings and left us all with lifelong trauma. We have lost sleep,' says Hafiz Zahid Hussain, a Bihar-origin moulvi at Gingal's mosque for the past 32 recall past wars between India and Pakistan, but say the use of long-range artillery this time and the damage it caused is unprecedented. According to an official assessment by the district administration of Baramulla, Uri tehsil suffered damage to 513 buildings—60 homes and five cowsheds were razed to the ground while 436 homes and 12 cowsheds were partially Karnah, in north Kashmir's Kupwara, over 100 buildings were damaged. Overall, in Jammu and Kashmir, Poonch in Jammu suffered the most, with thousands of structures reported to have been damaged. Of the 21 lives lost, 16 were in Poonch conflict has also triggered a bunker crisis in the border areas. Except for a few places like Salamabad and Gharkote, the villages in Uri are largely without bunkers, making them vulnerable to Ali, a resident of Paranpilla village, plans to construct a bunker in his farmland by taking advantage of its terraced design. 'We'll dig through the height of this land from tomorrow and concretise the hole, followed by cementing,' says Ali, sitting in his farmland by a flowing serenity of the surroundings belies the complexity of the situation. 'Bunkers are a necessity now,' decides to India Today Magazine
India.com
18 hours ago
- India.com
Sindoor Part-2: No Missiles Fired, But India Just Pulled A Strategic Trigger
New Delhi: The BrahMos may be on standby. The Akash systems are quiet. But don't be mistaken. India's offensive against Pakistan under Operation Sindoor is far from over. In fact, the next phase has just been activated, not with firepower but with water. In what insiders are calling a strategic masterstroke, the Indian government is moving swiftly to greenlight the massive Sawalkot hydroelectric project – a long-pending Rs 22,700 crore infrastructure behemoth on the Chenab River in Jammu and Kashmir. Many describe it 'water warfare by design'. According to a Hindustan Times report, the government is expediting approvals for the 1,856-MW project – which has been stalled for years thanks to the now-suspended Indus Waters Treaty and red tape. The timing? Uncoincidental. Following the April 22 terror strike in Pahalgam, India made the bold move of freezing its water-sharing pact with Pakistan. The move shook Islamabad's corridors of power. The Silent Blow That Cuts Deep While India's missile systems like BrahMos and Akash remain on standby, it is the activation of long-term strategic infrastructure that has Pakistan worried. Two senior government officials revealed to the daily that construction on the project may begin as early as next year. The Ministry of Power is expected to soon appoint a central agency, most likely NHPC, to take charge of implementation. And make no mistake, this is not just another dam. The Sawalkot project is one of four key hydroelectric ventures in Jammu & Kashmir with a combined capacity of over 3,100 MW. It was previously stalled under the 1960 Indus Waters Treaty. With that treaty now off the table, India is no longer constrained. The message to Pakistan? We will control our rivers, our rules. A Strategic Nightmare The Chenab River, on which Sawalkot is based, flows directly into Pakistan and is a lifeline for its agricultural belt. By accelerating this project, India is not only generating electricity, it is tightening the tap. Former Water Resources Secretary Shashi Shekhar told the publication that India is now within its rights to pursue full-scale infrastructure on the Indus system within its territory. And Islamabad knows this. As one retired Pakistani diplomat reportedly remarked off-record: 'India has found a new front that does not require firing a single bullet. And we are unprepared for it.' Why It Matters The Sawalkot project also promises significant irrigation benefits across wide agricultural belts in Reasi and Udhampur districts of Jammu and Kashmir. It is being described as a run-of-the-river project, which means it will not store massive volumes of water, but generate consistent hydro power and regulate seasonal flow. It is an economic and ecological win for India and a strategic squeeze on Pakistan. The first phase of the two-stage project is set to receive final central approval soon. In 2021, the J&K Forest Department had already recommended environmental clearance, clearing the decks for fast-track execution. J&K's own government is pushing for a stake either through its state power companies or as a joint venture partner. The promise of massive revenue returns and job creation in the region makes this a politically appealing project too. So, Operation Sindoor just has gotten smarter. And Pakistan, once again, finds itself on the back foot.
