logo
'Russia-Ukraine war has blurred regional lines, exposing global threats'

'Russia-Ukraine war has blurred regional lines, exposing global threats'

China and North Korea's support for Russia in its war against Ukraine has exposed how lines between regions have blurred, and the need for a global approach toward defence, top security officials said Sunday.
North Korea has sent troops to fight on the front lines in Ukraine, while China has supported Russia economically and technologically while opposing international sanctions.
Lithuanian Defence Minister Dovile akaliene told delegates at the Shangri-La Dialogue, Asia's premiere defence forum, that if Ukraine were to fall, it would have a ripple effect in Asia and suggested it could embolden China in its territorial claims on Taiwan and virtually the entire South China Sea.
If Russia prevails in Ukraine, it's not about Europe. It's not about one region," she said. It will send a very clear signal also to smaller states here in Indo-Pacific that anyone can ignore their borders, that any fabricated excuse can justify invasion.
The comments echoed those from French President Emmanuel Macron as he opened the conference on Friday advocating for greater European engagement in the Indo-Pacific.
On Saturday, US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth suggested European countries should focus their defence efforts in their own region and leave the Indo-Pacific more to the US, but akaliene said the regions were clearly intertwined.
It's not a secret that when we talk about the main perpetrators in cyber security against Japan it's China, Russia and North Korea, she said.
When we talk about main cyber security perpetrators against Lithuania it's Russia, China and Belarus two out of the three are absolutely the same.
She added that the convergence of Russia, China, Iran, and North Korea into an increasingly coordinated authoritarian axis, demands a unified response. Iran has been a key supplier of attack drones to Russia for its war effort.
"In this context, the United States' strategic focus on Indo-Pacific is both justified and necessary, but this is not America's responsibility alone, she said.
Australian Defence Minister Richard Marles told reporters on the sidelines that his main takeaway from the three-day conference, hosted by the International Institute for Strategic Studies, was the real intent in the way in which European countries have engaged in the debates.
It reflects the sense of connection, interconnectedness ... between Indo-Pacific on the one hand and the North Atlantic on the other, he said.
China sent a lower-level delegation from its National Defence University this year to the conference, but its Foreign Ministry on Sunday responded to comments from Hegseth that Beijing was destabilizing the region and preparing to possibly seize Taiwan by force.
No country in the world deserves to be called a hegemonic power other than the US itself, who is also the primary factor undermining the peace and stability in the Asia-Pacific, it said, while reiterating its stance that the Taiwan issue was an internal Chinese matter.
The US must neve play with fire on this question, the ministry said.
Philippines Defence Secretary Gilberto Teodoro Jr, whose country has been involved in increasingly violent clashes with China over competing claims in the South China Sea, scoffed at the idea that the US was the problem.
What the Chinese government considers fair and just may stand in stark contrast to the norms and values accepted by the rest of the world, especially the smaller countries, he said.
"To envision a China-led international order, we only need to look at how they treat their much smaller neighbors in the South China Sea.
He also underscored the international implications of the tensions in the Indo-Pacific, noting that the South China Sea was one of several maritime routes that are arteries of the global economy.
Disruption in any of these maritime corridors triggers ripple effects across continents, impacting trade flows, military deployments, and diplomatic posture, he said.
(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Piece talks! Kyiv & Moscow end negotiations in an hour
Piece talks! Kyiv & Moscow end negotiations in an hour

Economic Times

time24 minutes ago

  • Economic Times

Piece talks! Kyiv & Moscow end negotiations in an hour

Live Events (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel ISTANBUL: Russia and Ukraine said they had agreed at peace talks on Monday to exchange more prisoners of war and return the bodies of 12,000 dead warring sides met for barely an hour in the Turkish city of Istanbul, for only the second such round of negotiations since March President Tayyip Erdogan described it as a great meeting and said he hoped to bring together Russia's Vladimir Putin and Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelenskyy for a meeting in Turkey with US President Donald Trump But there was no breakthrough on a proposed ceasefire that Ukraine, its European allies and Washington have all urged Russia to says it seeks a long-term settlement, not a pause in the war; Kyiv says Putin is not interested in aide Vladimir Medinsky said Russian negotiators had handed their Ukrainian counterparts a detailed memorandum outlining Moscow's terms for a full who heads the Russian team, said Moscow had also suggested a "specific ceasefire of two to three days in certain sections of the front" so that the bodies of dead soldiers could be collected. Each side said it would hand over the bodies of 6,000 dead soldiers to the addition, they said they would conduct a further big swap of prisoners of war, after 1,000 captives on each side were traded following a first round of talks in Istanbul on May 15.

Tesla not interested in manufacturing in India, says Kumaraswamy; government issues guidelines for domestic EV manufacturing
Tesla not interested in manufacturing in India, says Kumaraswamy; government issues guidelines for domestic EV manufacturing

India Gazette

time41 minutes ago

  • India Gazette

Tesla not interested in manufacturing in India, says Kumaraswamy; government issues guidelines for domestic EV manufacturing

New Delhi [India], June 2 (ANI): Tesla, the Elon Musk-owned electric vehicle giant, is not interested in manufacturing in India and is keen on opening showrooms, Union Minister for Heavy Industries HD Kumaraswamy said on Monday. The remarks came amid government's push to promote domestic manufacture of passenger cars, with a special focus on electric vehicles (EVs). ' are only to start showrooms. They are not interested in manufacturing in India,' the minister said. Heavy Industry Secretary Kamran Rizvi, however, added 'the real intent we'll know when we open the application'. 'If the company still feels like investing. What the minister sir is telling is about what come and told informally,' he said. The minister added that many European companies like Hyundai, Mercedes Benz, Skoda and Kia have shown interest in manufacturing units in India under the new EV policy. Earlier, there were reports that Tesla was interested in importing Tesla car into India and subsequently sell it through their showrooms in India. Tesla boss Musk had in the past indicated that he was interested in investing in India, but 'high import duty' structures were a bone of contention. Tesla's intention to come into India had intensified after India announced its new EV policy, under which import duty was reduced to 15 per cent and many incentives were provided for setting up manufacturing plant in India. Meanwhile, Elon Musk's father Servotec's Errol Musk, who is in India, appeared keen on Tesla's presence in the country. 'That is something that I have to be careful not to say too much about. Tesla is a public company. It's not you look at India and the population, the kind of people you've got here, the energy and everything and when I hear that, with great respect, BYD and various others are coming in, and Tatas and Mahindra are making great cars, I'm very inclined to say, wait, why aren't we having Teslas here. But I can't say too much. That's just a personal point of view,' he said. He was answering a query about plans for Tesla's presence in India. The central government on Monday notified guidelines for the Scheme to Promote Manufacturing of Electric Passenger Cars in India. The central government approved a forward-looking scheme to promote the domestic manufacture of passenger cars, with a special focus on electric vehicles (EVs). The initiative is aligned with India's national goals of achieving net zero by 2070, fostering sustainable mobility, driving economic growth, and reducing environmental impact. It is designed to firmly establish India as a premier global destination for automotive manufacturing and innovation. Ministry of Heavy Industries (MHI) has issued a notification regarding detailed guidelines for the 'Scheme to Promote Manufacturing of Electric Passenger Cars in India' (SPMEPCI / the Scheme)MHI had issued the Scheme notification on March 15 2024. The Department of Revenue also issued the notification on March 15, 2024 for reduced import duties in line with the provisions of the Scheme. The Notice for inviting applications under the Scheme is proposed to be notified shortly, whereby the prospective applicants would be able to submit online applications. The scheme shall help to attract investments from global EV manufacturers and promote India as a manufacturing destination for e-vehicles. The Scheme will also help put India on the global map for manufacturing of EVs, generate employment and achieve the goal of 'Make in India'. To encourage the global manufacturers to invest under the Scheme, the approved applicants will be allowed to import Completely Built-in Units (CBUs) of e-4W with a minimum CIF value of USD 35,000 at reduced customs duty of 15% for a period of 5 years from the Application Approval Date. Approved applicants would be required to make minimum investment of Rs. 4,150 crore in line with the provisions of the scheme. (ANI)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store