logo
Greens senator's bombshell defection

Greens senator's bombshell defection

Perth Now2 days ago

Western Australian Greens senator Dorinda Cox has made a bombshell defection to the Labor Party, revealing the surprise news in a joint press conference alongside Anthony Albanese.
Greens Leader Larissa Waters was told just an hour-and-a-half before Senator Cox and the Prime Minister stood uptogether in Perth on Monday afternoon.
The Prime Minister said he was approached by Senator Cox, who was previously a Labor Party member, to represent Labor in the Senate and confirmed he had not spoken to Greens Leader Larissa Waters.
'She had come to a view that the difference that she wanted to make in the Senate and as a West Australian, were better served by being a member of the Labor Party,' he said.
'Senator Cox didn't ask for anything, just asked for this to be considered.
'The National Executive Committee of the Labor Party met yesterday afternoon, and Senator Cox will be admitted to the Labor Party as a member tomorrow to the Western Australian branch.'
Senator Cox said she was driven to Labor in order to 'make change'.
'What you can't do from the crossbench is make change and being in the government and alongside the wonderful team that the Prime Minister has,' she said.
Her defection will lower the minor party's Senate representation to 10 members.
More to come

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Coalition angry over super changes, Labor up for talks
Coalition angry over super changes, Labor up for talks

The Advertiser

timean hour ago

  • The Advertiser

Coalition angry over super changes, Labor up for talks

The federal coalition has drawn a red line on the government's plan to double the tax on superannuation balances above $3 million, as the prime minister welcomes possible negotiations. Labor plans to double the concessional tax rate on the proportion of superannuation balances above that level, to 30 per cent. The policy was formulated after Treasury noticed a small number of people appeared to be using the system as a tax reduction strategy rather than solely for their retirement, as intended. An aspect of the policy, to tax unrealised capital gains on those very large accounts, has proven contentious. Many are set up under self-managed super fund structures. Unrealised gains are 'paper profits' - increases in the value of assets such as properties or shares that haven't been cashed in. Treasurer Jim Chalmers has described the proposed change, first flagged more than two years ago and which is still before the Senate, as "modest". "What this change is about, it's about making concessional treatment for people with very large superannuation balances still concessional but a little bit less so," he said last month. "In terms of the calculation of unrealised gains, that's actually not unique in the system. "And if you make a loss you can carry the loss forward." Nationals senator Matt Canavan said taxing unrealised gains was a major sticking point for the coalition. "There's no way in hell we'll support attacks on people that don't have the means to pay for it," he told Nine's Today show on Wednesday. "This so-called tax on unrealised gains is incredibly unfair." Tax on unrealised gains is already part of the Australian tax system and is, for example, paid under land tax regimes. Greens Leader Larissa Waters told Nine her party, which holds the balance of power in the Senate, believes the threshold should apply to balances above $2 million, rather than $3 million. "It's important to remember that I reckon nobody watching your show would be impacted by this tax," she said. "It would touch only half a per cent of people - we are talking about folk who have an awful lot of money in their super accounts - that is not ordinary people." On Tuesday, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said that if the coalition was willing to negotiate a deal on the changes, then that was "good". "I welcome the fact that they're saying that they won't just say no to everything from the very beginning but we'll, of course, talk to people in the Senate." Mr Albanese noted that some super accounts are worth more than $100 million. "That's not really to provide for an adequate retirement, is it?" he told Perth radio 6PR. The federal coalition has drawn a red line on the government's plan to double the tax on superannuation balances above $3 million, as the prime minister welcomes possible negotiations. Labor plans to double the concessional tax rate on the proportion of superannuation balances above that level, to 30 per cent. The policy was formulated after Treasury noticed a small number of people appeared to be using the system as a tax reduction strategy rather than solely for their retirement, as intended. An aspect of the policy, to tax unrealised capital gains on those very large accounts, has proven contentious. Many are set up under self-managed super fund structures. Unrealised gains are 'paper profits' - increases in the value of assets such as properties or shares that haven't been cashed in. Treasurer Jim Chalmers has described the proposed change, first flagged more than two years ago and which is still before the Senate, as "modest". "What this change is about, it's about making concessional treatment for people with very large superannuation balances still concessional but a little bit less so," he said last month. "In terms of the calculation of unrealised gains, that's actually not unique in the system. "And if you make a loss you can carry the loss forward." Nationals senator Matt Canavan said taxing unrealised gains was a major sticking point for the coalition. "There's no way in hell we'll support attacks on people that don't have the means to pay for it," he told Nine's Today show on Wednesday. "This so-called tax on unrealised gains is incredibly unfair." Tax on unrealised gains is already part of the Australian tax system and is, for example, paid under land tax regimes. Greens Leader Larissa Waters told Nine her party, which holds the balance of power in the Senate, believes the threshold should apply to balances above $2 million, rather than $3 million. "It's important to remember that I reckon nobody watching your show would be impacted by this tax," she said. "It would touch only half a per cent of people - we are talking about folk who have an awful lot of money in their super accounts - that is not ordinary people." On Tuesday, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said that if the coalition was willing to negotiate a deal on the changes, then that was "good". "I welcome the fact that they're saying that they won't just say no to everything from the very beginning but we'll, of course, talk to people in the Senate." Mr Albanese noted that some super accounts are worth more than $100 million. "That's not really to provide for an adequate retirement, is it?" he told Perth radio 6PR. The federal coalition has drawn a red line on the government's plan to double the tax on superannuation balances above $3 million, as the prime minister welcomes possible negotiations. Labor plans to double the concessional tax rate on the proportion of superannuation balances above that level, to 30 per cent. The policy was formulated after Treasury noticed a small number of people appeared to be using the system as a tax reduction strategy rather than solely for their retirement, as intended. An aspect of the policy, to tax unrealised capital gains on those very large accounts, has proven contentious. Many are set up under self-managed super fund structures. Unrealised gains are 'paper profits' - increases in the value of assets such as properties or shares that haven't been cashed in. Treasurer Jim Chalmers has described the proposed change, first flagged more than two years ago and which is still before the Senate, as "modest". "What this change is about, it's about making concessional treatment for people with very large superannuation balances still concessional but a little bit less so," he said last month. "In terms of the calculation of unrealised gains, that's actually not unique in the system. "And if you make a loss you can carry the loss forward." Nationals senator Matt Canavan said taxing unrealised gains was a major sticking point for the coalition. "There's no way in hell we'll support attacks on people that don't have the means to pay for it," he told Nine's Today show on Wednesday. "This so-called tax on unrealised gains is incredibly unfair." Tax on unrealised gains is already part of the Australian tax system and is, for example, paid under land tax regimes. Greens Leader Larissa Waters told Nine her party, which holds the balance of power in the Senate, believes the threshold should apply to balances above $2 million, rather than $3 million. "It's important to remember that I reckon nobody watching your show would be impacted by this tax," she said. "It would touch only half a per cent of people - we are talking about folk who have an awful lot of money in their super accounts - that is not ordinary people." On Tuesday, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said that if the coalition was willing to negotiate a deal on the changes, then that was "good". "I welcome the fact that they're saying that they won't just say no to everything from the very beginning but we'll, of course, talk to people in the Senate." Mr Albanese noted that some super accounts are worth more than $100 million. "That's not really to provide for an adequate retirement, is it?" he told Perth radio 6PR. The federal coalition has drawn a red line on the government's plan to double the tax on superannuation balances above $3 million, as the prime minister welcomes possible negotiations. Labor plans to double the concessional tax rate on the proportion of superannuation balances above that level, to 30 per cent. The policy was formulated after Treasury noticed a small number of people appeared to be using the system as a tax reduction strategy rather than solely for their retirement, as intended. An aspect of the policy, to tax unrealised capital gains on those very large accounts, has proven contentious. Many are set up under self-managed super fund structures. Unrealised gains are 'paper profits' - increases in the value of assets such as properties or shares that haven't been cashed in. Treasurer Jim Chalmers has described the proposed change, first flagged more than two years ago and which is still before the Senate, as "modest". "What this change is about, it's about making concessional treatment for people with very large superannuation balances still concessional but a little bit less so," he said last month. "In terms of the calculation of unrealised gains, that's actually not unique in the system. "And if you make a loss you can carry the loss forward." Nationals senator Matt Canavan said taxing unrealised gains was a major sticking point for the coalition. "There's no way in hell we'll support attacks on people that don't have the means to pay for it," he told Nine's Today show on Wednesday. "This so-called tax on unrealised gains is incredibly unfair." Tax on unrealised gains is already part of the Australian tax system and is, for example, paid under land tax regimes. Greens Leader Larissa Waters told Nine her party, which holds the balance of power in the Senate, believes the threshold should apply to balances above $2 million, rather than $3 million. "It's important to remember that I reckon nobody watching your show would be impacted by this tax," she said. "It would touch only half a per cent of people - we are talking about folk who have an awful lot of money in their super accounts - that is not ordinary people." On Tuesday, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said that if the coalition was willing to negotiate a deal on the changes, then that was "good". "I welcome the fact that they're saying that they won't just say no to everything from the very beginning but we'll, of course, talk to people in the Senate." Mr Albanese noted that some super accounts are worth more than $100 million. "That's not really to provide for an adequate retirement, is it?" he told Perth radio 6PR.

Today show host shuts down super tax squabble between Matt Canavan and Larissa Waters
Today show host shuts down super tax squabble between Matt Canavan and Larissa Waters

West Australian

timean hour ago

  • West Australian

Today show host shuts down super tax squabble between Matt Canavan and Larissa Waters

A Today show host has stepped in to shut down a super tax squabble between the Greens leader and a Nationals senator, telling them to 'save it'. The Labor government's proposal, which will hit super balances of more than $3m with a 30 per cent tax, is unpopular with the opposition. Queensland Nationals senator Matt Canavan told Today's Jayne Azzopardi on Wednesday morning that the party was prepared to 'fight to the death' to oppose the tax. 'There's no way in hell we'll support attacks on people that don't have the means to pay for it,' he said. 'This so-called tax on unrealised gains is incredibly unfair. We should have a basic principle that we should only tax people where you've got some sort of income to be able to pay the tax man.' Senator Canavan said many Australians, including farmers, may be asset rich yet cash poor with no cash flow to pay the annual tax bill. 'There's no way in hell we'll support that. We'll fight that to the death,' he added. 'I hope the Greens won't give them the green light on this to put in such an unfair tax.' However, Greens leader Larissa Waters maintained the tax was needed to 'raise revenue' for things such as hospitals, schools and clean, cheap renewable energy. 'I think it's important to remember that nobody watching your show would be impacted by this tax,' she said. 'It would touch only half a per cent of people – we are talking about folk who have an awful lot of money in their super accounts. That is not ordinary people. 'So let's see what the government comes up with themselves about what the details should be (and) we will have those discussions when the government puts something on the table.' Senator Waters was swiftly cut off by Senator Canavan, who quipped: 'What about the farmers?' The Greens leader hit back with 'I'm sure they've probably got better things to do than be sitting around watching telly' as Senator Canavan repeated himself three times. The pair were cut off by Azzopardi, who was seemingly keen to wrap things up. 'You can save this argument for the Senate,' she told the disgruntled politicians. The Greens have already given the policy in-principle support, negating the need for Labor to seek bipartisan support in the Senate. However, the minor party has argued for the threshold to be lowered to $2m, with indexation requirements that would result in the threshold increasing over time. Although the Coalition has indicated that it is open for negotiations, this is contingent on including indexation provisions and excluding the tax on unrealised gains like property.

‘Save it': Host shuts down super tax rant
‘Save it': Host shuts down super tax rant

Perth Now

timean hour ago

  • Perth Now

‘Save it': Host shuts down super tax rant

A Today show host has stepped in to shut down a super tax squabble between the Greens leader and a Nationals senator, telling them to 'save it'. The Labor government's proposal, which will hit super balances of more than $3m with a 30 per cent tax, is unpopular with the opposition. Queensland Nationals senator Matt Canavan told Today's Jayne Azzopardi on Wednesday morning that the party was prepared to 'fight to the death' to oppose the tax. 'There's no way in hell we'll support attacks on people that don't have the means to pay for it,' he said. 'This so-called tax on unrealised gains is incredibly unfair. We should have a basic principle that we should only tax people where you've got some sort of income to be able to pay the tax man.' Nationals senator Matt Canavan says the party will 'fight to the death' to oppose the tax. Dan Peled / NCA NewsWire Credit: News Corp Australia Senator Canavan said many Australians, including farmers, may be asset rich yet cash poor with no cash flow to pay the annual tax bill. 'There's no way in hell we'll support that. We'll fight that to the death,' he added. 'I hope the Greens won't give them the green light on this to put in such an unfair tax.' However, Greens leader Larissa Waters maintained the tax was needed to 'raise revenue' for things such as hospitals, schools and clean, cheap renewable energy. 'I think it's important to remember that nobody watching your show would be impacted by this tax,' she said. 'It would touch only half a per cent of people – we are talking about folk who have an awful lot of money in their super accounts. That is not ordinary people. 'So let's see what the government comes up with themselves about what the details should be (and) we will have those discussions when the government puts something on the table.' Senator Waters was swiftly cut off by Senator Canavan, who quipped: 'What about the farmers?' The Greens leader hit back with 'I'm sure they've probably got better things to do than be sitting around watching telly' as Senator Canavan repeated himself three times. Greens leader Larissa Waters was questioned about the impact on asset-rich Australias, such as farmers, by Senator Canavan. Dan Peled / NewsWire Credit: News Corp Australia The pair were cut off by Azzopardi, who was seemingly keen to wrap things up. 'You can save this argument for the Senate,' she told the disgruntled politicians. The Greens have already given the policy in-principle support, negating the need for Labor to seek bipartisan support in the Senate. However, the minor party has argued for the threshold to be lowered to $2m, with indexation requirements that would result in the threshold increasing over time. Although the Coalition has indicated that it is open for negotiations, this is contingent on including indexation provisions and excluding the tax on unrealised gains like property.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store