logo
Earthquake Brace + Bolt Grants Now Available to More Eligible California Homeowners

Earthquake Brace + Bolt Grants Now Available to More Eligible California Homeowners

Seismic-retrofit program offers grants of up to $3K to help improve safety of older homes in more than 1,100 ZIP Codes
SACRAMENTO, CA, February 12, 2025 (EZ Newswire) -- The 2025 Earthquake Brace + Bolt grant application window is open, according to an announcement today by the California Residential Mitigation Program (CRMP). The California Residential Mitigation Program (CRMP) announces the opening of their Earthquake Brace + Bolt grant application window for 2025. California homeowners are now eligible to apply for Earthquake Brace + Bolt ( EBB) seismic retrofit grants, to help make their home less vulnerable to earthquake damage. This year, 303 new ZIP Codes have been added, making the total number of eligible ZIP Codes 1,118. Opening January 15, 2025, and continuing through, March 26, 2025, eligible homeowners can apply for up to $3,000 in seismic retrofit grants at EarthquakeBraceBolt.com.
More than $20 million in grant funding will be available to help offset the cost of seismic retrofits that bolt older houses to their foundations and brace the crawl space walls, when present, making them less vulnerable to earthquake damage. Since the 2013 EBB program launch, more than 28,500 California homeowners have received grant assistance for strengthening their homes against earthquake damage. The EBB grant program is administered by the California Residential Mitigation Program ( CRMP), a Joint Powers Authority between the California Earthquake Authority ( CEA) and the California Governor's Office of Emergency Services ( Cal OES).
'Strengthening homes through the Earthquake Brace + Bolt program not only reduces the risk of costly damages but also gives homeowners peace of mind knowing their properties are better prepared to withstand seismic events,' said Janiele Maffei, Chief Mitigation Officer, California Earthquake Authority. 'By striving for more applications this year, we are working to make a significant impact in protecting California homes and families from the devastating effects of earthquakes.'
Income-eligible homeowners may also qualify for supplemental grants. Up to $7,000 in additional grant funds are available for households with an annual income at or below $89,040, which may provide up to 100% of the funds needed to cover a seismic retrofit. Grants are contingent upon meeting eligibility requirements and available funds.
'Earthquake retrofits are a cornerstone of creating a safer and more resilient California. By securing older homes with proven seismic strengthening measures, we not only protect families and their investments but also reduce the potential strain on communities during a major earthquake,' said Tom Welsh, Chief Executive Officer of the California Earthquake Authority. 'Every home retrofit brings us closer to a more resilient California.'
Beginning January 15 through March 26, 2025, eligible homeowners can apply for a retrofit grant at EarthquakeBraceBolt.com, where they can also find detailed program information, select a trained California-licensed general contractor and view the full list of ZIP Codes and program areas. New EBB program ZIP Codes include areas in and around Los Angeles County, Riverside and San Diego.
About Earthquake Brace + Bolt (EBB)
Established by the California Residential Mitigation Program, EBB offers up to $3,000 to help California homeowners retrofit their house to reduce potential damage from earthquakes. A residential seismic retrofit makes a house more resistant to earthquake activity, such as ground shaking and soil failure, by bolting the house to its foundation and adding bracing around the perimeter of the crawl space. For more information, including an online media kit, please visit http://www.earthquakebracebolt.com. About the California Residential Mitigation Program (CRMP)
CRMP was established in 2011 to help Californians strengthen their homes against damage from earthquakes. CRMP is a joint powers authority created by the California Earthquake Authority (CEA) and the California Governor's Office of Emergency Services (Cal OES). For more information, please visit: .

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Hedge Funds Face California Rebuke Over Role in Wildfire Claims
Hedge Funds Face California Rebuke Over Role in Wildfire Claims

Yahoo

time19 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Hedge Funds Face California Rebuke Over Role in Wildfire Claims

(Bloomberg) -- Hedge funds are facing pushback in California as their bets tied to insurance claims stemming from the Los Angeles wildfires are attacked as unethical. Next Stop: Rancho Cucamonga! Where Public Transit Systems Are Bouncing Back Around the World ICE Moves to DNA-Test Families Targeted for Deportation with New Contract Trump Said He Fired the National Portrait Gallery Director. She's Still There. US Housing Agency Vulnerable to Fraud After DOGE Cuts, Documents Warn The transactions in focus are tied to so-called subrogation claims, which hedge funds, private equity firms and other alternative investment managers have been buying from insurers over the past few months. Subrogation kicks in if a third party such as a utility is suspected of being responsible for losses covered by insurers. Hedge funds buying these claims from insurers are now under attack from the California Earthquake Authority, which is the administrator of the California Wildfire Fund. It has described such transactions as 'opportunistic, profit-driven investment speculation,' and says it's planning to take on 'hedge funds and other speculators' that it claims 'are actively seeking to profit from California's devastating wildfire catastrophes.' In practice, that means the authority will try to block the payout of what it says could end up being 'billions of dollars' to the investors that bought the claims, according to materials prepared ahead of a meeting that took place last month with the California Catastrophe Response Council, which oversees the fund. To that end, it plans to engage California's state legislature, according to a transcript of comments made during the meeting and seen by Bloomberg. A spokesperson for the authority declined to comment. Bradley Max, a director at Cherokee Acquisition, a New York-based investment bank that trades and invests in subrogation claims, says the development has 'put a chill on bidding,' which is already visible in pricing. Subrogation rights tied to the Eaton Fire that ripped through Southern California in January were trading as high as 50 cents on the dollar at one point, but have now dropped 'at least a few points lower,' Max said. Still, even though the political development has led to lower prices on the subrogation claims, it hasn't held back transactions, he said. Cherokee said in April it had brokered deals linked to the Los Angeles fires for 'larger, more sophisticated distressed debt hedge funds.' And by April 15, investment bank Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. had executed 10 transactions tied to the Eaton and Palisades fires totaling over $1 billion worth of recovery rights, Ronald Ryder, co-head of special assets at Oppenheimer, told the California Earthquake Authority. That includes over $125 million in claims traded in just one day, Ryder wrote. A spokesperson for Oppenheimer declined to comment. Cherokee didn't name the hedge funds for which it brokered deals. In an email to the California Earthquake Authority, Ryder said that as catastrophic weather events become 'more prevalent,' insurers are increasingly resorting to 'recovery subrogation in the secondary market to fortify the balance sheet.' There's a growing consensus that insurers can't cover the rising costs of weather-related catastrophes alone, especially as climate change fuels more extreme events. For that reason, the industry is looking for ways to shift part of its financial risk over to capital markets, with alternative asset managers often the only investor class willing to step in. Efforts to prevent investors from profiting from the subrogation claims they've bought represent 'a politically motivated attempt to not pay legitimate obligations,' Max at Cherokee said. They're 'trying to beat up deep-pocketed hedge funds, despite the ethical and legal implications,' he said. Recovery of subrogation claims is costly and can take years to play out, which is why insurers have started selling them in exchange for an upfront cash payment. The hedge funds buying them are betting that the recovery sum at the end of the process will exceed the amount they paid the insurer to buy the claim. The market for investing in subrogation claims is characterized by over-the-counter deals with little to no transparency. Subrogation deals had a seminal moment more than half a decade ago, when faulty power lines and equipment failures at California utility PG&E Corp. were blamed for wildfires in the state. Back then, hedge fund Baupost Group LLC purchased claims against PG&E worth $6.8 billion. Bloomberg has previously reported that Baupost may have generated an estimated $1 billion of profits. The California Wildfire Fund, which is administered by the state's Earthquake Authority and overseen by the California Catastrophe Response Council, was set up in 2019 to help reimburse claims arising from wildfires caused by utility companies. If hedge funds prevail in their subrogation claims, some of the money could end up coming from the California Wildfire Fund. The fund, which sits on about $13 billion in liquid assets, is partly capitalized by three utilities — San Diego Gas & Electric Co., Edison International's Southern California Edison and PG&E. While the cause of the January fires remains under investigation, it's already clear that the Eaton Fire started inside the service territory of Edison and therefore leaves the fund potentially exposed, the authority said. With current estimates for insured losses as high as $45 billion, the January Southern California wildfires are expected to be the costliest in US history, according to the California Earthquake Authority. The Earthquake Authority and Catastrophe Response Council are now reviewing claims and administration procedures as they take the matter to the state legislature. Cavs Owner Dan Gilbert Wants to Donate His Billions—and Walk Again The SEC Pinned Its Hack on a Few Hapless Day Traders. The Full Story Is Far More Troubling Is Elon Musk's Political Capital Spent? What Does Musk-Trump Split Mean for a 'Big, Beautiful Bill'? Cuts to US Aid Imperil the World's Largest HIV Treatment Program ©2025 Bloomberg L.P.

Hedge Funds Face California Rebuke Over Role in Wildfire Claims
Hedge Funds Face California Rebuke Over Role in Wildfire Claims

Yahoo

time20 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Hedge Funds Face California Rebuke Over Role in Wildfire Claims

(Bloomberg) -- Hedge funds are facing pushback in California as their bets tied to insurance claims stemming from the Los Angeles wildfires are attacked as unethical. Next Stop: Rancho Cucamonga! Where Public Transit Systems Are Bouncing Back Around the World ICE Moves to DNA-Test Families Targeted for Deportation with New Contract US Housing Agency Vulnerable to Fraud After DOGE Cuts, Documents Warn Trump Said He Fired the National Portrait Gallery Director. She's Still There. The transactions in focus are tied to so-called subrogation claims, which hedge funds, private equity firms and other alternative investment managers have been buying from insurers over the past few months. Subrogation kicks in if a third party such as a utility is suspected of being responsible for losses covered by insurers. Hedge funds buying these claims from insurers are now under attack from the California Earthquake Authority, which is the administrator of the California Wildfire Fund. It has described such transactions as 'opportunistic, profit-driven investment speculation,' and says it's planning to take on 'hedge funds and other speculators' that it claims 'are actively seeking to profit from California's devastating wildfire catastrophes.' In practice, that means the authority will try to block the payout of what it says could end up being 'billions of dollars' to the investors that bought the claims, according to materials prepared ahead of a meeting that took place last month with the California Catastrophe Response Council, which oversees the fund. To that end, it plans to engage California's state legislature, according to a transcript of comments made during the meeting and seen by Bloomberg. A spokesperson for the authority declined to comment. Bradley Max, a director at Cherokee Acquisition, a New York-based investment bank that trades and invests in subrogation claims, says the development has 'put a chill on bidding,' which is already visible in pricing. Subrogation rights tied to the Eaton Fire that ripped through Southern California in January were trading as high as 50 cents on the dollar at one point, but have now dropped 'at least a few points lower,' Max said. Still, even though the political development has led to lower prices on the subrogation claims, it hasn't held back transactions, he said. Cherokee said in April it had brokered deals linked to the Los Angeles fires for 'larger, more sophisticated distressed debt hedge funds.' And by April 15, investment bank Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. had executed 10 transactions tied to the Eaton and Palisades fires totaling over $1 billion worth of recovery rights, Ronald Ryder, co-head of special assets at Oppenheimer, told the California Earthquake Authority. That includes over $125 million in claims traded in just one day, Ryder wrote. A spokesperson for Oppenheimer declined to comment. Cherokee didn't name the hedge funds for which it brokered deals. In an email to the California Earthquake Authority, Ryder said that as catastrophic weather events become 'more prevalent,' insurers are increasingly resorting to 'recovery subrogation in the secondary market to fortify the balance sheet.' There's a growing consensus that insurers can't cover the rising costs of weather-related catastrophes alone, especially as climate change fuels more extreme events. For that reason, the industry is looking for ways to shift part of its financial risk over to capital markets, with alternative asset managers often the only investor class willing to step in. Efforts to prevent investors from profiting from the subrogation claims they've bought represent 'a politically motivated attempt to not pay legitimate obligations,' Max at Cherokee said. They're 'trying to beat up deep-pocketed hedge funds, despite the ethical and legal implications,' he said. Recovery of subrogation claims is costly and can take years to play out, which is why insurers have started selling them in exchange for an upfront cash payment. The hedge funds buying them are betting that the recovery sum at the end of the process will exceed the amount they paid the insurer to buy the claim. The market for investing in subrogation claims is characterized by over-the-counter deals with little to no transparency. Subrogation deals had a seminal moment more than half a decade ago, when faulty power lines and equipment failures at California utility PG&E Corp. were blamed for wildfires in the state. Back then, hedge fund Baupost Group LLC purchased claims against PG&E worth $6.8 billion. Bloomberg has previously reported that Baupost may have generated an estimated $1 billion of profits. The California Wildfire Fund, which is administered by the state's Earthquake Authority and overseen by the California Catastrophe Response Council, was set up in 2019 to help reimburse claims arising from wildfires caused by utility companies. If hedge funds prevail in their subrogation claims, some of the money could end up coming from the California Wildfire Fund. The fund, which sits on about $13 billion in liquid assets, is partly capitalized by three utilities — San Diego Gas & Electric Co., Edison International's Southern California Edison and PG&E. While the cause of the January fires remains under investigation, it's already clear that the Eaton Fire started inside the service territory of Edison and therefore leaves the fund potentially exposed, the authority said. With current estimates for insured losses as high as $45 billion, the January Southern California wildfires are expected to be the costliest in US history, according to the California Earthquake Authority. The Earthquake Authority and Catastrophe Response Council are now reviewing claims and administration procedures as they take the matter to the state legislature. Cavs Owner Dan Gilbert Wants to Donate His Billions—and Walk Again The SEC Pinned Its Hack on a Few Hapless Day Traders. The Full Story Is Far More Troubling Is Elon Musk's Political Capital Spent? What Does Musk-Trump Split Mean for a 'Big, Beautiful Bill'? Cuts to US Aid Imperil the World's Largest HIV Treatment Program ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

The DOJ's Apple Ruling Could Spark the Super App Revolution and Redefine Retail
The DOJ's Apple Ruling Could Spark the Super App Revolution and Redefine Retail

Yahoo

time6 days ago

  • Yahoo

The DOJ's Apple Ruling Could Spark the Super App Revolution and Redefine Retail

In March 2024, the Department of Justice filed a case against Apple — accusing the tech giant of monopoly practices. This May, a federal judge ruled that Apple was in contempt of an injunction related to App Store restrictions — Apple is currently appealing the ruling. In short, Apple's App Store is being ordered to loosen its strict regulations. The judge ruled that Apple must allow App Store developers to direct users to other alternative payment methods and now prohibits Apple from collecting commissions on these external transactions. More from WWD Suite Talk: Samsung's Allison Stransky Envisions a Bright Future With AI Radar's Spencer Hewett on How to Build Resilient, Intelligent Store Networks EXCLUSIVE: Wellness Tech Company HigherDose Launches Three-in-one Sculpting Body Recovery Device Should the ruling be upheld, developers will finally be free to innovate and integrate seamless payments, loyalty payments and crypto wallets without having to navigate the platform's strict rules and pay steep 30 percent fees to Apple. Moreover, this ruling could see the boom of super apps — multifunctional platforms that are already popular in places like Asia — in the U.S. Here, Ryan Breslow, chief executive officer of Bolt, sat down with WWD to discuss why super apps are poised to thrive for the first time in the U.S. market, the potential opportunities for retailers and brands, the future of connected retail and financial integration and more. WWD: With the recent DOJ Apple ruling, how can super apps now succeed in the U.S.? What opportunities are there for retailers and brands? Ryan Breslow: The DOJ's ruling against Apple is a game-changer. For the first time, developers have the freedom to innovate without Apple's 30 percent tax or restrictive platform rules. This means super apps can finally bring seamless payments, loyalty and crypto wallets directly into iOS apps. For retailers, this is about reclaiming control: recovering lost margins, building deeper customer relationships and unlocking new ways to engage shoppers without ceding control to Apple or other gatekeepers. It's a chance to redefine what seamless, personalized retail can be across mobile, web and in-store. I know Bolt is going to lead the way. WWD: In your opinion, why have super apps failed in the U.S. in the past — but thrived in other markets, particularly Asia? R.B.: Super apps have struggled in the U.S. because of three major roadblocks. Apple and Google tightly restricted 'apps within apps,' while platforms like WeChat and Alipay in China had government support to become multiservice giants. Unlike Asia, the U.S. already had mature payment systems like credit cards and PayPal, where consumers leapfrogged to mobile payments with QR codes and real-time bank transfers. Building a super app in the U.S. means navigating a fragmented regulatory landscape — 50 state money transmitter licenses and multiple federal agencies — while a single license in China or Indonesia can cover hundreds of millions of users. But this is changing. The DOJ ruling, combined with innovations like FedNow — the Federal Reserve's new real-time payment system — will soon make instant 24/7 bank transfers a reality in the U.S. This is a critical piece of infrastructure that could finally give super apps the foundation they need to thrive here: faster payments, lower fees and a more seamless user experience. WWD: Consumers now expect seamless shopping experiences in-store and online. How do super apps facilitate an integrated omnichannel strategy for retailers and brands? R.B.: Super apps create seamless shopping by unifying identity, payments and loyalty across channels. Imagine a shopper using a single Bolt ID to log in online, pay in-store and redeem rewards in real-time. The app can even shift into 'store mode' as a customer walks in, surfacing personalized offers or connecting them directly to a sales associate. It's about building continuous, personalized relationships at every touchpoint — the holy grail of omnichannel retail. WWD: How do super apps leverage data analytics to provide personalized experiences without compromising privacy and data security? R.B.: Personalization and privacy aren't mutually exclusive — you can have both. Super apps can keep sensitive data on-device using cutting-edge encryption, tokenization and techniques like federated learning to deliver personalized experiences without exposing raw user data. At Bolt, we prioritize zero-party data, where users choose to share their preferences directly rather than being tracked without consent. This isn't just a better way to do business; it's the future of digital trust. Tools like verifiable credentials let users prove facts, like being over 21, without revealing personal details, ensuring personalization and privacy. We believe the next wave of digital experiences will be built on this kind of transparent, user-first data philosophy. WWD: How can Bolt's integrating features like one-click payments, crypto wallets and peer-to-peer transactions enhance the shopping experience and loyalty programs for large retailers? R.B.: Bolt is moving from 'one-click checkout' to 'one-click everything' — transforming how people shop, pay and connect. Our 80 million users already drive higher conversions, but adding crypto wallets, NFT-based loyalty rewards and peer-to-peer payments takes this to the next level. Imagine turning loyalty into an asset: customers earn tokens they can trade, redeem or sell. Peer-to-peer payments mean shoppers can split bills, share expenses or even resell items without leaving the app. This keeps engagement high and transactions inside your ecosystem, with a unified ledger giving brands real-time visibility, whether customers pay with cards, crypto or points. This is the future of connected commerce. WWD: What challenges do you foresee with this financial integration into retail apps and how is Bolt preparing to address compliance across different markets? R.B.: Regulatory compliance is a critical piece of the puzzle for super apps, but we've built Bolt to tackle these challenges head-on. We hold money transmitter licenses in 45 U.S. states and e-money licenses in Europe, giving us a strong foundation for global growth. We've also developed a unified Know Your Customer and Anti-Money Laundering system, which means users only need to verify their identity once across all merchants on our platform. KYC is the process of verifying a customer's identity to prevent fraud and ensure security, while AML is a set of safeguards that prevent criminals from using financial systems to disguise the origins of illegally obtained money. To further enhance security, we monitor crypto transactions in real time and work with insured banks to safeguard digital assets like stablecoins, which are digital currencies designed to maintain a stable value. Our platform is also designed to be modular, allowing brands to toggle features based on local regulations, whether GDPR in Europe or state-specific privacy laws in the U.S. We've made these early investments so brands can confidently integrate financial tools without worrying about constantly shifting regulatory landscapes. It's about building trust at scale. Best of WWD The Definitive Timeline for Sean 'Diddy' Combs' Sean John Fashion Brand: Lawsuits, Runway Shows and Who Owns It Now What the Highest-paid CEOs at U.S. Fashion and Retail Companies Make Confidence Holds Up, But How Much Can Consumers Take? Sign in to access your portfolio

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store