Fox News host blasts Marjorie Taylor Greene
Trump ally Mark Levin has blasted Marjorie Taylor Greene for thinking she's 'the queen of MAGA.' Levin, a Fox News host and Homeland Security Advisory Council member, has been extremely supportive of Israel's missile attacks on Iran - going as far as to say they'll ultimately provide peace. He's one of several voices in the president's inner orbit urging him to take action against Iran - a cause of worry for anti-globalist members of MAGA.
Greene, a Georgia congresswoman, has been outspoken against the U.S. lining up to support Israel 's conflict with Iran after the two nations exchanged missile fire over the past week. She warned that 'fake' MAGA supporters are advocating for U.S. involvement in the Middle East in a post to X.
Greene is one of the president's most loyal allies in Congress and last month posted an ominous warnings about how the MAGA 'base' is not supportive of 'going to war with Iran.' She's been writing on X for for weeks about how average US citizens don't spend time worrying about Iran, noting that the conflict is not of interest to Americans.
Airing her concerns to her nearly 5 million followers on X, MTG posted on Sunday: 'Anyone slobbering for the U.S. to become fully involved in the Israel/Iran war is not America First/MAGA. Wishing for murder of innocent people is disgusting.' 'Real America First/MAGA wants world peace for all people and doesn't want our military killed and forever injured physically and mentally,' her lengthy post continued. 'Taking this position is NOT antisemitic. It's rational, sane, and loving toward all people.'
Her posts appear to be directed at a cohort of influential individuals with access to President Trump who are supportive of US intervention. But the Congresswoman is not going it alone. Like MTG, former Fox News host Tucker Carlson has recently warned of 'warmongers' close to Trump pushing him towards conflict in the Middle East.
'On that list: Sean Hannity, Mark Levin, Rupert Murdoch, Ike Perlmutter and Miriam Adelson,' Carlson wrote last Friday. 'At some point they will all have to answer for this, but you should know their names now.' It appears these influential 'MAGA' figures in Trump's orbit are the ones MTG is warning about. But Trump pushed back on Carlson on Monday.
'I don't know what Tucker Carlson is saying. Let him go get a television network and say it so that people listen,' Trump told reporters when asked about the pundit's comments at the G7. The Georgia Republican noted the staggering $36 trillion in debt the US has to pay off and how getting embroiled in further wars will only add to the ballooning number.
'We have spent TRILLIONS in the Middle East and we have dealt with the aftermath of death and disabling PTSD,' Greene's post said. 'All because they told us propaganda as to why we must sacrifice our own to defend some other country's borders and some other country's borders. I don't want to see Israel bombed or Iran bombed or Gaza bombed. I don't want to see Ukraine bombed or Russia bombed.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
34 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Starmer dismisses concerns on Trump's health after document gaffe
Sir Keir Starmer has dismissed concerns about Donald Trump's health after the US president dropped pages of the UK-US trade deal when holding it up for the cameras. Mr Trump's slip happened as he held the bundle of documents when standing alongside the Prime Minister after their talks at the G7 summit in Canada. Mr Trump also told reporters he was pleased to have signed a deal with the 'European Union', rather than the UK. Earlier this month, he had tripped when climbing the stairs of Air Force One. Sir Keir reached down to pick up the pages of the trade deal, which dropped to the floor. The Tories mocked an image capturing him crouched at the feet of the president. Joe Biden, Mr Trump's predecessor as US president, often had slips and gaffes leapt upon by Right-wing critics when he was in the White House. Mr Biden dropped his attempt to seek re-election after concerns soared after a stumbling debate performance against Mr Trump last summer. Mr Trump, 79, is just three years younger than 82-year-old Mr Biden. Asked whether he had concerns about the US president's health, Sir Keir told reporters at the G7 summit. 'No. I mean, look, there weren't many choices with the documents and picking it up, because as you probably know there were quite strict rules about who can get close to the president. 'I mean, seriously, I think if any of you had stepped forward other than me.. I was just deeply conscious that in a situation like [that] it would not have been good for anybody else to have stepped forwards – not that any of you rushed to! There's a very tightly guarded security zone around the President, as you would expect.' The comments referenced the pack of reporters, photographers and cameramen who were standing nearby and covering the remarks from Sir Keir and Mr Trump. 'He's slightly more liberal than I am' The Prime Minister and the US president appear to have struck up a warm, constructive personal relationship despite their differing political and personal backgrounds. Mr Trump joked after their meeting in Canada: 'We're very long-time partners and allies and friends, and we've become friends in a short period of time. He's slightly more liberal than I am. 'The Prime Minister has done a great job. I want to just tell that to the people of the United Kingdom. He's done a very, very good job.' The Prime Minister was asked by reporters to explain why Mr Trump likes him so much, given that other world leaders have had strained relationships with the US president. Sir Keir said: 'That's really for him to answer rather than me, but we do have a good relationship. I think that is in the national interest, frankly. There's long been a close relationship between the US and the UK. 'As I've said many times, on defence and security and intelligence sharing in particular, we are closer than any two countries, and I'm very pleased that I've got a good relationship with him – notwithstanding, as both he and I acknowledge, that our political backgrounds are different. 'But it just goes to prove that it is possible to work in a constructive way if you keep your focus on the national interest.'
The Guardian
34 minutes ago
- The Guardian
The Guardian view on Gaza's engineered famine: stop arming the slaughter – or lose the rule of law
Gaza's cries have been drowned out by Israel's strikes on Iran, and the diplomatic pressure on Benjamin Netanyahu over the suffering has ebbed. Yet as the industrialised world urges de-escalation in the Middle East, the devastation continues. On Tuesday morning, witnesses described Israeli forces firing towards a crowd waiting for trucks loaded with flour, leaving more than 50 dead. These are not stray bullets in wartime chaos, they are the outcome of a system that makes relief deadly. As Médecins Sans Frontières declared this week, what is unfolding in Gaza is 'the calculated evisceration of the very systems that sustain life'. That includes homes, markets, water networks and hospitals – with healthcare continually under attack. Last week, a UN commission found that more than 90% of the Gaza Strip's schools and universities have been damaged or destroyed by Israeli forces using airstrikes, burning, shelling and controlled demolitions. What's happening is not the collateral damage of military necessity, it is a programme of civic annihilation. In such circumstances, words without action are worse than meaningless. Western powers cannot decry war crimes and genocide while supplying the arms that cause them elsewhere. If they believe in international law, countries such as the UK should act to uphold it. The law is not law if no one enforces it. Israel is the occupying power in Gaza and has a clear duty under the fourth Geneva convention to ensure the population's access to food, water and medical care. Instead, it has imposed a blockade and driven out UN humanitarian operations. In their place, it has backed the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), a private aid scheme coordinated with its military and guarded by US mercenaries. Citing unproven claims of Hamas infiltration, Israel scrapped 400 UN-backed aid sites for just four GHF-run, militarised hubs. In a few weeks, around 300 Palestinians have reportedly died trying to access these food sites. UN officials are right to say the GHF scheme is 'engineered scarcity' that has made aid distribution 'a death trap'. The US-based Center for Constitutional Rights has also warned that the GHF may be prosecuted for aiding 'war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide'. Yet Donald Trump's state department is mulling a $500m grant. In the UK, ministers say allegations of genocide are for courts to decide upon, while government lawyers in court assert that there is no genocide. This is not just moral evasiveness but tactical contradiction, designed to sustain arms sales and diplomatic cover. This hypocrisy has consequences. By shielding Israel from accountability in Gaza, and now endorsing its illegal strike on Iran, western governments are not merely complicit – they are dismantling the legal order they claim to defend. They are falling in line with Mr Trump's attempts to undermine institutions designed to hold powerful actors accountable, replacing legal norms with political cover. As the former USAID official Jeremy Konyndyk has said, if GHF were a genuine humanitarian project it would have halted a model that produces daily massacres. According to the Carnegie Endowment's Katherine Wilkens, GHF imposes severe limits on food, subjects civilians to invasive biometric vetting and hands out aid at gunpoint under Israeli control – in clear breach of international law. What is collapsing in Gaza is not just infrastructure. It is the principle that even war has rules. When those rules are waived for allies, no one is safe. Do you have an opinion on the issues raised in this article? If you would like to submit a response of up to 300 words by email to be considered for publication in our letters section, please click here.
Reuters
35 minutes ago
- Reuters
ABA defends its diversity scholarships as protected free speech
June 17 (Reuters) - The American Bar Association said on Monday that a scholarship program designed to boost diversity among law students is protected free speech, in a bid to toss a lawsuit brought by a prominent conservative group alleging the program is discriminatory. The ABA's 25-year-old Legal Opportunity Scholarship is protected under the First Amendment, the organization said in a motion to dismiss, opens new tab filed in an Illinois federal court. The ABA also claimed that plaintiff American Alliance for Equal Rights lacks standing to sue. 'The ABA has a First Amendment right to distribute funds as it deems appropriate, consistent with its organizational goals,' the motion said. The Alliance, which is led by anti-affirmative action activist Edward Blum, had sued the ABA in April alleging that the Legal Opportunity Scholarship program discriminates against white applicants because they are ineligible to apply. Blum was the architect of the 2023 Supreme Court affirmative action case that barred the consideration of race in college admissions. The Alliance said it is representing an unnamed white male law school applicant who alleges he would apply for the $15,000 scholarship were he eligible. The ABA awards between 20 and 25 such scholarships annually to incoming law students, according to its motion to dismiss. That anonymous member lacks standing to sue because the lawsuit does not show he was 'ready and able' to apply for the Legal Opportunity Scholarship, the ABA claims. He did not take any 'concrete steps to express his interest in, or apply to' the scholarship program beyond 'words of general intent,' according to the motion. Reached by email for comment on Tuesday, Blum said none of the 18 lawsuits the Alliance has filed in the past two years alleging racial discrimination have been dismissed for lack of standing. 'It seems likely that this assertion will fail,' he said. Blum also called the ABA's First Amendment claim a "Herculean stretch." The ABA declined to comment on Tuesday. The ABA's motion also claimed that the Legal Opportunity Scholarships are discretionary gifts and not contracts that are subject to the federal law requiring equal rights in making and enforcing contracts. The ABA had in October revised the criteria for its judicial clerkship program, which encourages judges to hire diverse law clerks, to eliminate references to minority students and "communities of color." The ABA made that change after a different conservative legal group, the Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty, had filed a complaint against the ABA with the U.S. Department of Education in May 2024 and threatened further legal action, alleging that the ABA was illegally discriminating by using racial quotas. Read more: ABA sued over diversity scholarships by conservative group ABA strikes 'minority' and 'of color' from clerkship criteria amid lawsuit threat
