Japan joins China in trying to lure foreign students from US after Trump's visa crackdown
Japan has asked its universities to consider accepting international students affected by the Donald Trump administration's decision to block Harvard from enrolling foreigners.
Toshiko Abe, the education minister, has asked universities nationwide to report, within a week, possible support measures for both Japanese and international students affected by the Trump administration's move to restrict foreign enrolment at Harvard.
'We have asked universities to consider possible support measures such as accepting international students enrolled in US universities so that the students can continue their studies,' Ms Abe said on Tuesday.
There are 110 students and 150 researchers from Japan at Harvard. In all, around 16,000 Japanese students are enrolled in American institutions, according to The Japan Times.
International students make up 27 per cent of Harvard's student body, totalling about 6,800.
Ms Abe said her ministry would do its 'utmost to ensure young people with ambition and talent can continue their studies'.
A few days ago, China extended 'unconditional offers' to foreign students at Harvard after the US government revoked the university's certification to enrol international students, effectively forcing thousands of them to transfer to other colleges or face losing legal status in the US.
Mr Trump's homeland security secretary Kristi Noem justified the decision by accusing Harvard of 'fostering violence, antisemitism, and coordinating with the Chinese Communist Party '.
The department said the move followed Harvard's refusal to hand over information Noem had asked for about certain foreign student visa holders.
The move represented a sharp escalation of the administration's campaign against Harvard University, one of its most prominent institutional targets.
Harvard denounced the move as illegal and retaliatory and pledged to support the affected students.
'This retaliatory action threatens serious harm to the Harvard community and our country, and undermines Harvard's academic and research mission,' the university said in a statement.
On Monday, the administration threatened to divert $3bn in grants from Harvard to trade schools.
Although a federal judge late last week temporarily blocked the ban and set a hearing for 29 May, Harvard's international students say they face ongoing uncertainty.
The temporary injunction allows them to remain at the university for now, but they must consider whether to transfer to another US institution to preserve their visa status in case Harvard loses the legal battle or finish their studies abroad.
It is against this backdrop that a growing number of overseas universities, particularly in Asia, are stepping in to offer the affected students transfer opportunities.
Top institutions in Hong Kong, Japan, Macau, and Malaysia have begun actively inviting these students to continue their studies there, offering streamlined admissions, academic support, and credit transfers.
The University of Tokyo, one of Japan's most prestigious institutions, is considering temporarily accepting international students from Harvard affected by the US government's ban, according to Kyodo News.
The university has prior experience with providing such support, having hosted displaced students and researchers from Ukraine in 2022.
A spokesperson for Kyoto University, another prestigious institution, told AFP on Wednesday that it was considering accepting young researchers from US universities and assessing ways to assist Japanese students currently in America.
Last week, Hong Kong education secretary Christine Choi called on universities in the Chinese city to welcome 'outstanding students from all over the world'.
The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology on 23 May issued 'an open invitation to international undergraduate and postgraduate students currently enrolled at Harvard University, as well as those holding confirmed offers for Harvard degree programmes, to continue their academic pursuits at HKUST'.
The university said it was 'extending this opportunity to ensure talented students can pursue their educational goals without disruption'.
The City University of Hong Kong said it was 'extending support to international students facing academic disruption, inviting them to continue their education in Hong Kong'.
In Malaysia, Sunway University CEO Elizabeth Lee said it was ready to welcome Harvard's international students for 'immediate transfer'.
'Dear Sunway and other international students at Harvard, I am truly sorry to hear you're all caught in a bind with the US Department of Homeland Security 's recent announcement that Harvard would lose its Student and Exchange Visitor Programme certification, which places the university's current and incoming international students at serious risk of losing their legal right of passage and abode in the USA,' she wrote on LinkedIn.
'You're most welcome to immediately transfer to us at Sunway Education. We can directly take any students who are affected into our range of programmes at Sunway University. We have a partnership with the Arizona State University where we can work on the transfer of all your credits earned from Harvard to ASU, or even to any of our own Sun-U degree programmes which can also earn you additional British certification from Lancaster University.'
Macau 's Education and Youth Development Bureau has urged local universities to offer transfer support to students affected by the situation. In a statement released on Saturday, the bureau confirmed it had reached out to Macanese students at Harvard to provide assistance.
'I believe that Macau's universities are strong and attractive,' Pang Chuan, Macau University of Science and Technology vice president told local news outlet TDM.
'Now we need to let these students know that Macau is willing and able to help them, and the credits they earned at Harvard can be transferred to universities here.'
Analysts have warned that Mr Trump's crackdown on academic institutions could diminish the global prestige of American higher education and accelerate the shift of top talent to Asia. Simon Marginson, a professor of higher education at Oxford University and founding director of the Center for Global Higher Education, told Time: 'Harvard attracts some very, very good people from all over the world, so it hurts the university quite substantially to lose that talent.'
He said universities in Asia, which have steadily climbed the global rankings in STEM disciplines, stood to gain significantly, especially given that a substantial portion of international students in the US came from Asia.
Meanwhile, secretary of state Marco Rubio on Wednesday announced that the Trump administration would 'aggressively' revoke visas of Chinese students – key contributors to American university revenues – especially those studying sensitive subjects or found linked to the Communist Party of China.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
3 hours ago
- BBC News
Indira Gandhi: The forgotten story of India's brush with presidential rule
During the mid-1970s, under Prime Minister Indira Gandhi's imposition of the Emergency, India entered a period where civil liberties were suspended and much of the political opposition was jailed. Behind this authoritarian curtain, her Congress party government quietly began reimagining the country - not as a democracy rooted in checks and balances, but as a centralised state governed by command and control, historian Srinath Raghavan reveals in his new Indira Gandhi and the Years That Transformed India, Prof Raghavan shows how Gandhi's top bureaucrats and party loyalists began pushing for a presidential system - one that would centralise executive power, sideline an "obstructionist" judiciary and reduce parliament to a symbolic in part by Charles de Gaulle's France, the push for a stronger presidency in India reflected a clear ambition to move beyond the constraints of parliamentary democracy - even if it never fully materialised. It all began, writes Prof Raghavan, in September 1975, when BK Nehru, a seasoned diplomat and a close aide of Gandhi, wrote a letter hailing the Emergency as a "tour de force of immense courage and power produced by popular support" and urged Gandhi to seize the moment. Parliamentary democracy had "not been able to provide the answer to our needs", Nehru wrote. In this system the executive was continuously dependent on the support of an elected legislature "which is looking for popularity and stops any unpleasant measure".What India needed, Nehru said, was a directly elected president - freed from parliamentary dependence and capable of taking "tough, unpleasant and unpopular decisions" in the national interest, Prof Raghavan model he pointed to was de Gaulle's France - concentrating power in a strong presidency. Nehru imagined a single, seven-year presidential term, proportional representation in Parliament and state legislatures, a judiciary with curtailed powers and a press reined in by strict libel laws. He even proposed stripping fundamental rights - right to equality or freedom of speech, for example - of their urged Indira Gandhi to "make these fundamental changes in the Constitution now when you have two-thirds majority". His ideas were "received with rapture" by the prime minister's secretary PN Dhar. Gandhi then gave Nehru approval to discuss these ideas with her party leaders but said "very clearly and emphatically" that he should not convey the impression that they had the stamp of her approval. Prof Raghavan writes that the ideas met with enthusiastic support from senior Congress leaders like Jagjivan Ram and foreign minister Swaran Singh. The chief minister of Haryana state was blunt: "Get rid of this election nonsense. If you ask me just make our sister [Indira Gandhi] President for life and there's no need to do anything else". M Karunanidhi of Tamil Nadu – one of two non-Congress chief ministers consulted - was Nehru reported back to Gandhi, she remained non-committal, Prof Raghavan writes. She instructed her closest aides to explore the proposals further. What emerged was a document titled "A Fresh Look at Our Constitution: Some suggestions", drafted in secrecy and circulated among trusted advisors. It proposed a president with powers greater than even their American counterpart, including control over judicial appointments and legislation. A new "Superior Council of Judiciary", chaired by the president, would interpret "laws and the Constitution" - effectively neutering the Supreme sent this document to Dhar, who recognised it "twisted the Constitution in an ambiguously authoritarian direction". Congress president DK Barooah tested the waters by publicly calling for a "thorough re-examination" of the Constitution at the party's 1975 annual idea never fully crystallised into a formal proposal. But its shadow loomed over the Forty-second Amendment Act, passed in 1976, which expanded Parliament's powers, limited judicial review and further centralised executive amendment made striking down laws harder by requiring supermajorities of five or seven judges, and aimed to dilute the Constitution's 'basic structure doctrine' that limited parliament's also handed the federal government sweeping authority to deploy armed forces in states, declare region-specific Emergencies, and extend President's Rule - direct federal rule - from six months to a year. It also put election disputes out of the judiciary's was not yet a presidential system, but it carried its genetic imprint - a powerful executive, marginalised judiciary and weakened checks and balances. The Statesman newspaper warned that "by one sure stroke, the amendment tilts the constitutional balance in favour of the parliament." Meanwhile, Gandhi's loyalists were going all in. Defence minister Bansi Lal urged "lifelong power" for her as prime minister, while Congress members in the northern states of Haryana, Punjab, and Uttar Pradesh unanimously called for a new constituent assembly in October 1976."The prime minister was taken aback. She decided to snub these moves and hasten the passage of the amendment bill in the parliament," writes Prof December 1976, the bill had been passed by both houses of parliament and ratified by 13 state legislatures and signed into law by the Gandhi's shock defeat in 1977, the short-lived Janata Party - a patchwork of anti-Gandhi forces - moved quickly to undo the damage. Through the Forty-third and Forty-fourth Amendments, it rolled back key parts of the Forty Second, scrapping authoritarian provisions and restoring democratic checks and was swept back to power in January 1980, after the Janata Party government collapsed due to internal divisions and leadership struggles. Curiously, two years later, prominent voices in the party again mooted the idea of a presidential 1982, with President Sanjiva Reddy's term ending, Gandhi seriously considered stepping down as prime minister to become president of India. Her principal secretary later revealed she was "very serious" about the move. She was tired of carrying the Congress party on her back and saw the presidency as a way to deliver a "shock treatment to her party, thereby giving it a new stimulus".Ultimately, she backed down. Instead, she elevated Zail Singh, her loyal home minister, to the serious flirtation, India never made the leap to a presidential system. Did Gandhi, a deeply tactical politician, hold herself back ? Or was there no national appetite for radical change and India's parliamentary system proved sticky? There was a hint of presidential drift in the early 1970s, as India's parliamentary democracy - especially after 1967 - grew more competitive and unstable, marked by fragile coalitions, according to Prof Raghavan. Around this time, voices began suggesting that a presidential system might suit India better. The Emergency became the moment when these ideas crystallised into serious political thinking."The aim was to reshape the system in ways that immediately strengthened her hold on power. There was no grand long-term design - most of the lasting consequences of her [Gandhi's] rule were likely unintended," Prof Raghavan told the BBC."During the Emergency, her primary goal was short-term: to shield her office from any challenge. The Forty Second Amendment was crafted to ensure that even the judiciary couldn't stand in her way."The itch for a presidential system within the Congress never quite faded. As late as April 1984, senior minister Vasant Sathe launched a nationwide debate advocating a shift to presidential governance - even while in power. But six months later, Indira Gandhi was assassinated by her Sikh bodyguards in Delhi, and with her, the conversation abruptly died. India stayed a parliamentary democracy.
The Independent
3 hours ago
- The Independent
Trump orders law enforcement to ‘liberate' LA from ‘migrant invasion' amid clashes over ICE raids
Donald Trump has vowed to 'liberate Los Angeles from the Migrant Invasion,' amid violent clashes between members of the state national guard and anti-immigration enforcement protesters. The president took to Truth Social on Sunday, where he promised that 'the Illegals will be expelled' and that the city would be 'set free.' 'A once great American City, Los Angeles, has been invaded and occupied by Illegal Aliens and Criminals,' he wrote. Now violent, insurrectionist mobs are swarming and attacking our Federal Agents to try and stop our deportation operations — But these lawless riots only strengthen our resolve. 'I am directing Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, and Attorney General Pam Bondi, in coordination with all other relevant Departments and Agencies, to take all such action necessary to liberate Los Angeles from the Migrant Invasion, and put an end to these Migrant riots. 'Order will be restored, the Illegals will be expelled, and Los Angeles will be set free. Thank you for your attention to this matter!'
Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
BREAKING NEWS Trump announces drastic move to 'liberate Los Angeles from the migrant invasion' as National Guard arrives
President Donald Trump has vowed to restore order and 'liberate Los Angeles' from illegal aliens which have 'invaded and occupied a once great American city.' Trump issued an extraordinary directive on Sunday after the National Guard was forced to step in amid mounting civil unrest and pro-migrant riots throughout California. A combined effort led by Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, and Attorney General Pam Bondi will restore order, Trump said. He has directed his key personnel to 'to take all such action necessary to liberate Los Angeles from the Migrant Invasion, and put an end to these Migrant riots. 'Order will be restored, the Illegals will be expelled, and Los Angeles will be set free,' Trump wrote on Truth Social on Sunday afternoon. Trump lamented the current state of the city, expressing concern that 'a once great American City, Los Angeles, has been invaded and occupied by Illegal Aliens and Criminals. 'Now violent, insurrectionist mobs are swarming and attacking our Federal Agents to try and stop our deportation operations.' But he vowed 'these lawless riots only strengthen our resolve' as images emerge of troops on the ground in the downtown area of the city ready to defend the city from more violent demonstrations. Trump earlier said he has deployed 2,000 California National Guard troops to Los Angeles to quell the protests, which he called 'a form of rebellion.' The president congratulated the National Guard on doing a 'great job' in the city in the early hours of Sunday morning, although they hadn't arrived yet. Early Sunday, the deployment was limited to a small area in downtown Los Angeles, with the rest of the city of 4 million people largely unaffected. Their arrival follows days of protests that began Friday in downtown Los Angeles before spreading on Saturday to Paramount and neighboring Compton. Hegseth had warned on Saturday that 'active duty Marines' were on 'high alert' as the riots created havoc on the streets. On Sunday, Noem said the National Guard would 'keep peace and allow people to be able to protest but also to keep law and order.' The troops included members of the 79th Infantry Brigade Combat Team, according to a social media post from the Department of Defense that showed dozens of National Guard members with long guns and an armored vehicle. Governor Gavin Newsom called Trump on Friday night and they spoke for about 40 minutes, according to the governor´s office. It was not clear if they spoke Saturday or Sunday. Newsom described Trump's decision to call in the National Guard as a 'provocative show of force' that would only escalate tensions. He added that Hegseth's threat to deploy Marines on American soil was 'deranged behavior.' The Los Angeles Police Department warned rioters on Saturday night that the use of non-lethal munitions has been authorized. 'The Incident Commander has authorized the use of less lethal munitions to be deployed,' the LAPD Central Division wrote on X, urging people to 'leave the area' as non-lethal weapons 'can cause pain and discomfort.' The threats to use force came as activists set cars on fire and threw rocks and flaming projectiles at the authorities. 'We are going to bring the National Guard in tonight,' Tom Homan, President Trump's point man on border security, said on Fox News on Saturday evening. We are making Los Angeles safer. Mayor (Karen) Bass should be thanking us.' Federal agents clashed with angry protestors in the Los Angeles area for a second day Saturday, shooting flash-bang grenades into the crowd just after 4pm, shutting part of a freeway amid raids on undocumented migrants. The standoff took place in the suburb of Paramount, where demonstrators had gathered near a Home Depot that was being used as a staging area by federal immigration officials. They were met by federal agents in riot gear and gas masks. The mob was warned to leave in both Spanish and English. Tear gas and smoke filled the air as confrontations between immigration authorities and demonstrators extended into a second day. The agents appeared to include members of Border Patrol, the US Marshals Service and Homeland Security Investigations. By Saturday night federal agents reported having arrested more than a dozen 'agitators who impeded agents in their ability to conduct law enforcement operations. In his Fox News interview, Homan said those arrested included child sex offenders, gang members and national security threats. 'They arrested a lot of bad people yesterday and today,' Homan asserted. 'We're making Los Angeles safer.' Homan also remarked that ICE agents were often wearing masks as they conducted raids because they were worried about their families being doxxed. Border Patrol personnel in riot gear and gas masks stood guard outside an industrial park in Paramount, deploying tear gas as bystanders and protesters gathered on medians and across the street. Some jeered at officers while recording the events on smartphones. On Saturday, amid chants for ICE agents to get out, some protestors waved Mexican flags while others set a US flag on fire. Cement blocks and overturned shopping carts from Home Depot served as crude roadblocks. A crowd swarmed a US Marshals Service bus exiting a nearby freeway, with authorities later closing on and off ramps to keep protesters from taking over the highway. Smoke rose from burning shrubbery and refuse in the street, and demonstrators kicked at a Border Patrol vehicle. A boulevard was closed to traffic as Border Patrol agents circulated through the area. The immigration raids are part of Trump 's ongoing crackdown on undocumented immigrants.
