Eastleigh driving test backlog hits 6 months with one learner travelling 100 miles
An MP has welcomed new measures to combat driving test-buying bots and deliver 10,000 extra tests monthly.
Eastleigh's Liberal Democrat MP, Liz Jarvis, had sent a letter to the transport secretary earlier this month, urging action on Eastleigh's six-month test booking backlog.
The scarcity of tests has led learners to unofficial test-cancellation apps, which the DVSA warns against due to privacy issues and scam risks.
The government plans to investigate potential abuse of the booking system and prevent bots from accessing tests.
READ MORE: Weedkiller ban could help swifts, starlings and toads thrive, says MP
MP Liz Jarvis hails measures to deliver 10,000 extra driving tests monthly (Image: Supplied) The number of permanent trainers will be doubled to quickly upskill new driving examiners.
Ms Jarvis said: "Once learner drivers pass their theory tests, they face wait times to book a practical test of up to six months in Eastleigh – a problem exacerbated further by the April 2022 closure of a local centre in Southampton.
"One illuminating case has seen a 17-year-old learner in my constituency having to book a test for January 2025 in Yeovil, nearly 100 miles away."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Battery energy store agreed despite concerns
Plans for a battery energy storage facility have been given the green light, despite opposition. Root Power North Limited wants to build a 38MW facility on agricultural land at Hastings Hill Farm, close to the A19, near Sunderland. The city council's planning and highways committee said the plan would help achieve net zero greenhouse gas emissions and it was not an "inappropriate development" on green belt land. Local councillor Margaret Crosby, Liberal Democrat, said she hoped the Labour-led council would not "live to regret" the unit's proximity near the Hastings Hill Round Barrow ancient monument. Developers said the facility would store energy in times of energy surplus and release it back to the grid when demand exceeded supply, according to the Local Democracy Reporting Service. During a public consultation, 14 objections were lodged raising concerns about impact on the landscape, as well as highway and pedestrian safety and fire risk. The planning committee said the development would have a "low to moderate level of harm to the significance" of the Hastings Hill Round Barrow, which is 590ft (180m) from the site. Crosby, who represents Grindon and Hastings Hill, said: "This industrial development is totally out of keeping with the agricultural land and rural nature of the area and risks damaging the ability of people to enjoy a scheduled ancient monument and the surrounding countryside. "There is no shortage of brownfield site or industrial estates that would be much better to locate an energy storage system." She said that she feared a "big fire" could cause disruption to the A19 and nearby houses, as well as damage to the landscape. Councillors were told the site would be screened through landscaping and the land would be restored to its original condition after 40 years, along with fire safety and monitoring measures built into the scheme when it is operational. A representative for the applicant Root Power (North) Limited said the proposed site was the "only site available", as alternatives were not large enough or "landowners did not come forward". Follow BBC Sunderland on X, Facebook, Nextdoor and Instagram. Council approves battery energy storage facility Battery energy storage facility backed The highly charged green energy battery debate Sunderland City Council
Epoch Times
14 hours ago
- Epoch Times
9 Million Pensioners to Receive Winter Fuel Payment This Year, Reeves Says
Some 9 million pensioners in England and Wales will receive the winter fuel payment this winter, the chancellor has announced. The payment, worth up to £300, will be restored to the vast majority of pensioners who previously received it because anyone with an income of under £35,000 a year will now get the payment automatically. Those with an income above this threshold will also receive the payment, but it will then be reclaimed from them in tax. To be eligible for the winter fuel allowance, a person will need to have reached state pension age by the week starting Sept. 15 this year. Devolved authorities in Scotland and Northern Ireland will each receive a funding uplift so they too can meet the new threshold. Pensioners who do not want to receive the payment will be able to opt out, according to the Treasury. Related Stories 6/4/2025 5/15/2025 The decision to limit the winter fuel payment to only those who claimed pension credit was one of Labour's first acts in government, aimed at balancing what was described as a £22 billion 'black hole' in the public finances. This meant the number of pensioners receiving the payment was reduced by around 10 million, from 11.4 million to 1.5 million. But Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer announced there would be a partial U-turn on the policy in May, after it was thought to have contributed to Labour's drubbing in the local elections. The Treasury claims the new arrangement will cost £1.25 billion in England and Wales, while means-testing winter fuel will save the taxpayer £450 million. Chancellor Rachel Reeves said: 'Targeting winter fuel payments was a tough decision but the right decision because of the inheritance we had been left by the previous government. 'It is also right that we continue to means test this payment so that it is targeted and fair, rather than restoring eligibility to everyone including the wealthiest. 'But we have now acted to expand the eligibility of the winter fuel payment so no pensioner on a lower income will miss out. 'This will mean over three-quarters of pensioners receiving the payment in England and Wales later this winter.' Some 2 million pensioners who earn more than £35,000 will see their winter fuel payments clawed back via the taxman, the Treasury estimates. Kemi Badenoch, leader of the opposition, claimed the prime minister had 'scrambled to clear up a mess of his own making.' The Conservative leader added: 'I repeatedly challenged him to reverse his callous decision to withdraw winter fuel payments, and every time Starmer arrogantly dismissed my criticisms. 'This humiliating U-turn will come as scant comfort to the pensioners forced to choose between heating and eating last winter. The prime minister should now apologise for his terrible judgment.' Liberal Democrat leader Sir Ed Davey said: 'Finally the chancellor has listened to the Liberal Democrats and the tireless campaigners in realising how disastrous this policy was, but the misery it has caused cannot be overstated. 'Countless pensioners were forced to choose between heating and eating all whilst the government buried its head in the sand for months on end, ignoring those who were really suffering. 'We will now study the detail of this proposal closely to make sure those who need support actually get that support. The pain they went through this winter cannot be for nothing.'
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Labour MPs in call for benefits U-turn after change to winter fuel payment cut
Labour backbenchers have called for a Government U-turn on planned disability benefit cuts, after Chancellor Rachel Reeves restored winter fuel payments to a majority of pensioners. Ms Reeves' £1.25 billion plan unveiled on Monday will see automatic payments worth up to £300 given to pensioners with an income less than £35,000 a year. It followed last year's decision to strip pensioners of the previously universal scheme, unless they claimed certain benefits, such as pension credit. Nadia Whittome, the Labour MP for Nottingham East, warned ministers they risked making a 'similar mistake' if they tighten the eligibility criteria for personal independence payments, known as Pip. Leeds East MP Richard Burgon called on pensions minister Torsten Bell to 'listen now' so that backbenchers can help the Government 'get it right'. In her warning, Ms Whittome said she was not asking Mr Bell 'to keep the status quo or not to support people into work' and added: 'I'm simply asking him not to cut disabled people's benefits.' The pensions minister, who works in both the Treasury and Department for Work and Pensions, replied that the numbers of people receiving Pip is set to 'continue to grow every single year in the years ahead, after the changes set out by this Government'. In its Pathways to Work green paper, the Government proposed a new eligibility requirement, so Pip claimants must score a minimum of four points on one daily living activity, such as preparing food, washing and bathing, using the toilet or reading, to receive the daily living element of the benefit. 'This means that people who only score the lowest points on each of the Pip daily living activities will lose their entitlement in future,' the document noted. Mr Burgon told the Commons: 'As a Labour MP who voted against the winter fuel payment cuts, I very much welcome this change in position, but can I urge the minister and the Government to learn the lessons of this and one of the lessons is, listen to backbenchers? 'If the minister and the Government listen to backbenchers, that can help the Government get it right, help the Government avoid getting it wrong, and so what we don't want is to be here in a year or two's time with a minister sent to the despatch box after not listening to backbenchers on disability benefit cuts, making another U-turn again.' Mr Bell replied that it was 'important to listen to backbenchers, to frontbenchers'. Opposition MPs cheered when the minister added: 'It's even important to listen to members opposite on occasion.' Liberal Democrat MP Mike Martin warned that 'judging by the questions from his own backbenchers, it seems that we're going to have further U-turns on Pip and on the two-child benefit cap'. The Tunbridge Wells MP asked Mr Bell: 'To save his colleagues anguish, will he let us know now when those U-turns are coming?' The minister replied: 'What Labour MPs want to see is a Labour Government bringing down child poverty, and that's what we're going to do 'What Labour MPs want to see is a Government that can take the responsible decisions, including difficult ones on tax and on means testing the winter fuel payment so that we can invest in public services and turn around the disgrace that has become Britain's public realm for far too long.' Conservative former work and pensions secretary Esther McVey had earlier asked whether the Chancellor, 'now that she and the Government have got a taste for climbdowns', would 'reverse the equally ridiculous national insurance contribution (Nic) rises, which is destroying jobs, and the inheritance tax changes, which is destroying farms and family businesses'. Mr Bell said: 'This is a party opposite that has learned no lessons whatsoever, that thinks it can come to this chamber, call for more spending, oppose every tax rise and expect to ever be taken seriously again – they will not.' Labour MP Rebecca Long-Bailey pressed the Government to make changes to the two-child benefit cap, which means most parents cannot claim for more than two children. 'It's the right thing to do to lift pensioners out of poverty, and I'm sure that both he and the Chancellor also agree that it's right to lift children out of poverty,' the Salford MP told the Commons. 'So can he reassure this House that he and the Chancellor are doing all they can to outline plans to lift the two-child cap on universal credit as soon as possible?' Mr Bell replied: 'All levers to reduce child poverty are on the table. 'The child poverty strategy will be published in the autumn.' He added: 'If we look at who is struggling most, having to turn off their heating, it is actually younger families with children that are struggling with that. 'So she's absolutely right to raise this issue, it is one of the core purposes of this Government, we cannot carry on with a situation where large families, huge percentages of them, are in poverty.' Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
