Republican Senator Says 'Best Health Care Is a Job' in Response to Cuts
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
During a debate over President Donald Trump's sweeping legislative package, known as the "Big Beautiful Bill," Senate Majority Leader John Thune said that "the best health care is a job," according to news outlet kotatv.com.
The South Dakota senator added during Monday's discussion with other Republican lawmakers that this was because jobs can provide helpful benefits that give employees access to health care.
Newsweek contacted Thune's press office outside of regular working hours via email for comment.
Why It Matters
The ongoing budget and tax debate has profound implications for American families and individuals dependent on Medicaid and other social support programs.
The Republican-backed proposal aims to curb government spending with reforms that could reduce eligibility for programs like Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), stirring fears among advocates that millions could lose essential benefits.
Estimates from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office suggested up to 10 million Americans risk losing Medicaid coverage if proposed work requirements pass.
Senate Majority Leader John Thune at the Capitol in Washington D.C. on Monday, June 2, 2025.
Senate Majority Leader John Thune at the Capitol in Washington D.C. on Monday, June 2, 2025.
J. Scott Applewhite/AP
What To Know
Thune's comments came during a conversation about the proposed changes to Medicaid.
Part of the budget bill includes adapting eligibility for the program, meaning that enrollees would have to work for 80 hours a month as a minimum, unless medically exempt, in order to receive the benefit.
Thune reportedly said: "You know a lot of times health care comes with a job and so creating those better paying jobs that come with benefits is ultimately the goal here."
His remarks reflect a broader Republican strategy to tie access to health care directly to employment benefits.
Proposed stricter work requirements for benefit recipients have provoked vocal protests during recent Republican town halls, including an incident involving Iowa Senator Joni Ernst.
When confronted by constituents who warned of tragic outcomes from the policy, Ernst replied, "Well, we are all going to die," a comment that generated criticism for its perceived insensitivity.
House Democrats have unanimously opposed the legislation, calling it an attempt to "rip health care and food assistance away from millions of people in order to provide tax cuts to the wealthy, the well-off, and the well-connected."
Thune also said extending Trump's 2017 tax cuts remained a priority in ongoing negotiations in the Senate, and that he hoped to "make some of these tax provisions permanent."
He warned that without immediate action, "the average family that makes $80,000 dollars a year is going to see a $1,700 tax increase if Congress doesn't act."
He also noted that the child tax credit would revert from $2,000 to $1,000 with a halved standard deduction, and that there would be a $2.6-trillion tax increase next year for American families.
What People Are Saying
John Thune, Senate Majority Leader, said, according to the news outlet kotatv.com: "I talked about growing the economy. There are certain policies that generate growth in the economy. And that ultimately is what you want. A rising tide lifts all the boats."
What Happens Next
The Senate will continue deliberations on the "Big Beautiful Bill," with possible amendments, before an expected vote ahead of the July 4 deadline. The future of tax extensions and Medicaid work requirements will be determined by negotiations between Republican leaders, moderates, and Democrats.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Judge largely declines to block Florida law restricting ballot-initiative drives
A federal judge on Wednesday largely denied a request from petition groups to block parts of a Florida law that changes how citizen-led amendments make it to the ballot. In passing the law earlier this year, Gov. Ron DeSantis and the bill's Republican sponsors said the petition process needed reform because it is riddled with fraud. But groups like Florida Decides Healthcare, which is trying to get an amendment that will expand Medicaid access on 2026 ballots, quickly sued, saying the new law stifles people's ability to use the petition process. Other groups, including the recreational marijuana campaign Smart & Safe Florida, joined the lawsuit. U.S. District Judge Mark Walker largely denied the plaintiffs' request to block three sections of the new law. Plaintiffs had asked Walker to temporarily block a requirement that campaigns turn in all petitions within 10 days to county elections offices. They also contested changes that increased fines for organizations that turn in petitions late and that added new criminal penalties for filling in missing voter information. The plaintiffs argued that the law violates the First Amendment right to engage in political speech. But Walker, who was nominated to the bench by former President Barack Obama, said court precedent makes clear that the initiative process doesn't have to be the most user-friendly version possible. Walker said the challenging groups hadn't yet proven they were 'severely burdened' by the new law's requirement to turn petitions in within 10 days and the increased late fines. Instead, he said, 'the record shows that these provisions simply make the process of getting their proposed initiatives on the ballot more expensive and less efficient for Plaintiffs.' The marijuana and Medicaid expansion campaigns have said they've been affected by slowed petition collection and discouraged volunteers since the law took effect in early May. The groups hoping to qualify for the 2026 ballot need about 900,000 verified petitions by early next year. Out of all the groups' asks, Walker granted only one plaintiff an injunction on one point. Jordan Simmons, a project director for the Medicaid expansion group, challenged part of the law that includes election code violations for petition fraud in the racketeering statute. Walker sided with Simmons' argument that the racketeering law change was too vague. Despite Walker rejecting most of the Medicaid expansion groups' asks, Mitch Emerson, a spokesperson for Florida Decides Healthcare, called the ruling a 'major victory.' 'While the Court did not grant every part of our motion for preliminary relief, this is far from the final word,' Emerson said in a statement. 'This ruling was an early, extraordinary step in the legal process—and we are optimistic about what comes next, both for the remaining parts of HB 1205 that we're challenging and for the future of citizen-led democracy in Florida.' Groups have for years used Florida's ballot initiative process as a way to pass changes to the state constitution that lawmakers have refused to put forward. Through petition collection, groups have gotten voters to approve things like medical marijuana, felon voter restoration and a $15 minimum wage. Last year, DeSantis used the power of his administration to successfully oppose two amendments put on the ballot through the petition process: the recreational pot amendment and one that would have protected abortion access. Months after both those measures failed, DeSantis' office suggested a draft bill that would have made petition collection virtually impossible. During the injunction hearing in May, Glenn Burhans, an attorney for Smart & Safe Florida — which sponsored a failed 2024 ballot initiative to legalize recreational marijuana and is hoping to get a similar amendment on 2026 ballots — said that he thought lawmakers passed the petition change bill because the marijuana measure 'is very popular.' The challenge to the new law is ongoing, and the amendment groups are seeking to block other provisions of the law in another request for a temporary injunction.
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Legislative recap for Wednesday, June 4
Members of the Maine House of Representatives during the first session of 2024 in the State House in Augusta. Jan. 3, 2024. (Photo: Jim Neuger/ Maine Morning Star) Lawmakers are divided on what to do with a proposal to modify the law born out of a 2021 referendum question requiring the Maine Legislature to approve any new high-impact transmission lines. Although legislators who worked on the campaign saw it as an effort to clarify the law, LD 810 fell shy of passage in the House of Representatives on Tuesday with lawmakers voting 72-75 before ultimately killing the bill under the hammer. However, the Senate passed the bill 18-16 on Wednesday. It is now up to the House to determine if it will hold its ground or join the Senate in supporting the bill. With papers shuffling between chambers this week, Maine Morning Star has compiled a slightly more pared down roundup for Wednesday, forgoing the list of all bills voted on and focusing on the biggest items of debates as well as legislation and issues that we've followed all session. Here's an overview of what happened Wednesday. Both chambers The Maine House of Representatives and Senate have now backed LD 1668, which would change the voting requirements to extend the data of adjournment for the Legislature. Currently, a two-thirds vote in each chamber is needed to do so. The bill would change it to only an affirmative vote of a simple majority in both chambers. After the Senate voted 20-14 in favor of the bill on Monday, the House narrowly voted 72-71 in favor on Wednesday. Both chambers also passed a bill that would expand summer school programming, LD 1624, with the Senate approving it without a roll call after it passed the House with a 75-71 vote on Tuesday. The Senate also followed the action taken by the House earlier this week to reject LD 1982, a late-session bill that wanted to change how perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances, also known as PFAS, are defined in state law. (Read more on that proposal here.) After the House backed it, the Senate approved LD 1248, a bill proposing to loosen the restrictions on restraint and seclusion in schools. (Read more about restraint and seclusion here.) Both chambers have also now passed LD 437, which would develop a pilot program to place child care facilities in a few school districts statewide. Legislation (LD 10) that would add political affiliation as a protected class to the Maine Human Rights Act. The House voted against it on Wednesday, after the Senate did on Tuesday. (Read more about this bill here.) The chambers can't agree on LD 1960, which would exempt electronic smoking devices or other tobacco products containing ingestible hemp from the tax imposed on tobacco products. The House voted against the bill on Wednesday after the Senate voted for it on Tuesday. The chambers also still can't agree on a bill submitted by the Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife (LD 402), which would move the Natural Areas Program from the Department of Agriculture, Conservation and Forestry to the Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife, among other technical tweaks. Earlier this week, the House passed the bill with one amendment, while the Senate passed it with another. On Wednesday, the House and Senate insisted on their positions, essentially killing the bill. On Wednesday, the House also insisted, 81-61, on its vote against LD 544, aimed to create parity in the taxation of medicine by exempting sales of cannabis for medical use. This position is counter to the committee recommendation and Senate vote in favor of passage. With the Senate insisting on its position Wednesday, this bill is also essentially dead. With a narrow 72-71 vote, the House did change its position on LD 588. The bill seeks to grant agricultural workers the right to engage in concerted activity. After initially voting against its passage, the House on Wednesday receded and concurred with the Senate, which passed it. The bill now heads back to the Senate. Though the Housing and Economic Development Committee was evenly split, the Senate passed a proposed pilot project that would allow 30 small businesses from the farming, fishing and logging industries to set aside up to $250,000 of revenue, sheltered from income tax, to use for capital expenses in the future. Senate Minority Leader Trey Stewart (R-Aroostook) said he introduced this bill again this session because it could provide flexibility for the most critical components of Maine's economy: its heritage industries. LD 195 includes a sunset date of 2029. Sen. Jeff Timberlake (R-Androscoggin),whose family has been farming in Maine since 1803, encouraged his colleagues to let the state try this out because it could help counter the year-to-year financial swings farms experience. The Senate voted 17-16 to reject a bill (LD 1535) that would require the Public Utilities Commission to gather a group of municipal, police and fire officials to discuss the high electricity usage related to illegal cannabis grows in the state. While Sen. Craig Hickman (D-Kennebec) agreed the state should look into that issue, he said the Veterans and Legal Affairs Committee is carrying over legislation into the next session that could provide a more comprehensive approach, including this sort of study. The House passed a bill, LD 957, that would require Asian American, Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander history to be included in the next review of content standards and performance indicators. (Read more about this bill here.) The House passed and enacted LD 1664, a proposal to amend the Dirigo Business Incentives program, which offers eligible businesses the opportunity to greatly reduce state taxes for up to five years. While the bill initially sought to repeal the program, the amended version passed would only change some program criteria. LD 613, a bill supported by the Maine Medical Association that allows terminally ill patients to waive the current 17-day waiting period for access to life-ending medication, also the House 74-64 Wednesday. Several members shared stories about their loved ones' end-of-life care. However, Rep. Kathy Irene Javner (R- Chester) argued the bill 'removes the very pause that gives patients, families and physicians, the opportunity to reflect, to seek counsel to consider alternative palliative options.' After a lot of discussion, lawmakers voted 72-70 to pass LD 1036, which would prohibit landlords from refusing to rent to tenants solely because they rely on programs such as General Assistance or housing vouchers. Some lawmakers objected to the restrictions the bill would put on landlords, but others, including bill co-sponsor Rep. Cheryl Golek (D-Harpswell) said many residents relying on General Assistance are rejected from renting because of stigma, which the bill aims to address. (Read more about the proposal here). 'We as a state can only create fair housing once we take the steps to remove the discrimination within the housing opportunities,' Golek said. 'Protection from source-of-income discrimination, protection is one significant way we can apply and protect this to people.' The House also passed an amended version of LD 396 that would establish a grant program to encourage schools to adopt start times at 8:30 a.m. or later. A heavily amended version of LD 1787, passed the House. The bill initially sought to allow candidates for district attorney, sheriff and county commissioner to participate in the Maine Clean Election Act, but the version now being considered was amended to increase the contribution limits for gubernatorial seed money donations. (Read more about other proposals related to changing Maine's clean elections here.) The House also passed an amended version of LD 1726, which seeks to improve planning for the future of the energy grid, with a 75-69 vote. Legislation (LD 1900) to grant authority to certain Wabanaki Nations to develop tribal power districts and recognizes the authority for child support enforcement passed the HOuse fter heated discussions about the effectiveness of masks in schools during which Rep. John Eder (R-Waterboro) asked Speaker Ryan Fecteau if he would like to apologize for mandating masks, the House voted 73-69 to reject a proposal (LD 1461) to prohibit school boards from instituting future mask mandates. SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Budget framework agreed, property tax relief still absent
TALLAHASSEE, Fla. (WFLA) — House and Senate leadership reached a framework for the budget, but the details are still being worked on behind closed doors. One major proposal seems to be missing: Governor Ron DeSantis' property tax relief plan. However, that could change as negotiations continue. For months, Governor DeSantis pushed his property tax relief plan, touting potential savings of around $1,000 per homestead property. 'If we do that, we would end up with about $1,000 in property tax cut for every homestead Floridian,' said Governor DeSantis. However, House Speaker Danny Perez has taken a different approach. Rather than fast-tracking DeSantis' proposal, he created a special select committee to take a deeper look. 'I will be appointing a select committee on property taxes to do this important work,' said Speaker Perez. That committee has met twice and is expected to continue meeting through summer and fall. So far, lawmakers have found there's no one-size-fits-all solution to this issue. 'It's complicated,' said State Rep. Adam Anderson, (R-Palm Harbor). 'Every county is different. Every city is different. Special districts are all different. And the percentage of tax revenue that they receive from property taxes varies widely.' Anderson introduced legislation this past year to boost property tax transparency and offer tax relief for homeowners in flood zones making improvements. Though the proposals were overshadowed this session, he plans to revisit them next year. 'It's not about doing this quickly, it's about doing it correctly and we have plenty of time to make sure that a good solid proposal ends up on the ballot for the voters to approve,' said Anderson. Most lawmakers are eyeing the skies for property taxes to end up on the 2026 ballot, however, some argue this topic requires more time and dedication. 'I'm hoping that we don't get to craft anything for the 2026 ballot, and they push it out a few years because that's not something that you should jump right into and make a decision like that,' said State Rep. Dianne Hart, (D-Tampa). Hart says the committee needs to plan on hearing from constituents all across the state together. And while a game of political tug-of-war plays out behind the scenes with the state budget, Florida homeowners are left with rising bills and only a few answers on the table. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
