Watch: Sturgeon refuses to apologise to women over gender ruling
Well, well, well. Nicola Sturgeon has finally broken her silence over the Supreme Court judgment that backed the biological definition of a woman. Speaking to journalists in Holyrood today, Sturgeon insisted that while she accepts the ruling from the highest court in the land, she remains concerned about the impact on the lives of transgender people. And when she was asked whether she would now apologise to women's rights campaigners – who she has previously criticised while pushing through her gender reforms – Scotland's former first minister declined. How curious…
Former SNP MP Joanna Cherry previously called for an apology from the party's former Dear Leader in the Spectator, writing that: 'No less a person than Scotland's former first minister Nicola Sturgeon called women right's campaigners like us bigots, transphobes, racists and homophobes. An apology to the women of Scotland is in order.' Yet no apology came. Today, the ex-FM was pressed by a reporter: 'For Women Scotland and Joanna Cherry feel that their views were ignored during the passage of the GRR bill and say that you owe them an apology following the Supreme Court ruling.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
an hour ago
- The National
Top SNP figures in secret meeting to discuss John Swinney's leadership
Attendees said that the First Minister has two weeks in which to come up with a new strategy on independence or face a 'bloodbath' at the SNP conference, The Herald reported. A source told that paper: 'It feels like Groundhog Day. The last time John was in charge he dropped independence, surrounded himself only by people who agreed with him, and pushed out the likes of Margo [McDonald] and anyone who challenged his devolutionist strategy. 'For those with short memories, that ended in a bruising defeat. If he stays, we will be heading for a repeat. What is left of the membership will not tolerate it.' READ MORE: Controversial Loch Lomond Flamingo Land plans recalled by Scottish ministers It comes after SNP insiders made a similar argument to The National, warning that it felt like the party was being headed up by a small, private leadership group and 'heading back into the same old internal splits'. The Herald reported that the Monday meeting was ostensibly about forcing the party to move forward on independence, but there was a unanimous view that the First Minister 'has no intention of putting independence anywhere near the party's narrative whatsoever". Previously, the SNP's former policy chief Toni Giugliano told The National that independence had never been so far off the party's agenda as currently under Swinney. One source told The Herald: 'If there is nothing in the next couple of weeks from the leadership, then conference will be a bloodbath.' Though they doubted that any MSP or MP would challenge Swinney directly, they said it did not matter if the only competition came from an activist, as any contest would be 'hugely damning and damaging, and make the party look utterly ridiculous". Under SNP rules, any member who can secure 100 nominations from 20 different branches ahead of party conference can trigger a leadership vote. (Image: PA) Last year, Swinney faced a leadership challenge from party activist Graeme McCormick, who claimed to have secured the necessary nominations. However, McCormick was later talked out of the challenge after a 'lengthy and fruitful conversation' with Swinney. An SNP insider predicted similar challenges, saying: 'NEC members better start looking for new hobbies unless the leadership announces a change of direction soon — because at this rate we are heading for a mass clear-out.' They went on: 'The ability to make the case for independence is not a desirable part of the job description – it is essential – and he has failed on probation. 'The Presbyterian schoolmaster might fly in Perthshire – but in the rest of Scotland it just does not land. Stabilising the party only works for a short time. There is no energy, no fire, no boldness, no long-term vision.' Last week's Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election saw the SNP lose to Labour by 602 votes. READ MORE: 'Absurdity' of UK position on Israel while still supplying arms called out by SNP MP The party had been favourites, with Swinney calling it a two-horse race between his party and Nigel Farage's Reform UK. Yesterday, the constituency's new MSP, Davy Russell, took his oath at Holyrood and, in a speech on the steps of the garden lobby, said his win could be a 'springboard' to Labour winning power next year. The seat had been held by Scottish Government minister Christina McKelvie until her death earlier this year at the age of 57. At a press conference on Friday, Swinney insisted there had been progress for his party when the result was measured against their dire performance at last year's general election. One MSP told The Herald on Sunday that that was not enough. They said it was time for Swinney to make changes to his top team. 'I think a proper ministerial reshuffle is required, and an exercise undertaken to seek new policies. For example, I would call in the former MPs who have experience but have had time to refresh their perspective. 'I can sense that many – for the first time – are now nervous, and rightfully so. 'On independence – again, it can never be enough to simply run a competent devolved government without a vision of what could be.' The First Minister is expected to conduct a limited reshuffle of his ministerial team in the coming days. Swinney's previous time in charge saw the party's vote share and number of seats fall. He resigned in 2004, paving the way for the return of Alex Salmond. Asked by the BBC on Sunday if he was still the man to lead the party, Swinney said: 'Yes. Twelve months ago, the party turned to me. 'I was not seeking high office – I had held high office for a long time in my life – and the party turned to me, at a moment of real jeopardy, and asked me to use all of my skills and experience, and the loyalty I command in the party, to bring people together and focus us on the future.' Professor Sir John Curtice said the close battle for Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse did not mean Anas Sarwar was a shoo-in for Bute House. READ MORE: These key economic truths show how independent Scotland and Wales can succeed The election expert told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: 'The recent message from opinion polls is the SNP is running at just over 30%, Labour is around 20%, so it seems a reasonable expectation that such a result would not mean Anas Sarwar is Scotland's next first minister.' An SNP spokesperson said: 'Since John Swinney became leader last year he has brought the SNP back together and the party is back to doing what it does best – standing up for the people of Scotland. 'In the run-up to next year's Scottish Parliament election, the SNP will continue to deliver for people across the country, while setting out a clear and hopeful vision for their future as an independent country. 'With the latest polling putting support for independence at 54%, the SNP will continue to focus on demonstrating how having the full powers of an independent country is key to addressing the everyday concerns of people across Scotland and creating a more prosperous society for us all.'
The Herald Scotland
2 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Trump's travel ban is here: What to know as U.S. shuts the door
An unconventional approach melding immigration reforms and national security policy has resulted in the most dramatic restructuring of admissions policy in a generation, with the second Trump administration taking full advantage of a rare do-over in government. President Trump bans travel from 12 nations, partially restricts entry from seven others Trump expands first term policies to target new countries The Supreme Court in 2018 gave Trump permission to keep out foreign nationals whose presence the administration says would be detrimental to U.S. interests. Trump reinstituted and expanded a program last week that puts full or partial restrictions on travel to America from the citizens of 19 nations, with notable exceptions. Citizens of 12 countries were completely banned from entry beginning on June 9: Afghanistan, Chad, Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Myanmar, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. Visitors from another nine countries, including Cuba and Venezuela, were hit with partial immigration and travel bans. More: LA, Olympic officials have 'every confidence' travel ban won't disrupt 2028 Games Athletes, relatives and coaches traveling for sporting events like the 2026 World Cup and the Los Angeles Summer Olympics in 2028 were exempted. So were immediate family members of some existing visa holders, Afghan nationals who were employed by the U.S. and ethnic and religious minorities facing persecution in Iran. Trump's administration also said Chinese students connected to China's communist party or studying in critical fields would no longer be welcome. And tried to stop international students from studying at Harvard. A leaked State Department cable also revealed the administration may require prospective international students at other universities to undergo social media vetting. The administration has also taken steps to deport pro-Palestinian demonstrators. Trump crackdown on legal entry draws less attention On his first day in office, Trump signed an executive order that slammed America's doors to new refugees, halting admissions from Syria, Afghanistan, Ukraine, Iraq and other war-torn countries. Trump moved to end temporary protected status for roughly 350,000 Venezuelan nationals in February, and is not expected to renew TPS for an upcoming batch. His administration also declined to extend TPS for Afghans and rescinded an extension for 521,000 Haitians that had been approved by the Biden administration. Citizens of Cameroon, in West Africa, will lose the protections in June. Without an extension, Hondurans' TPS will expire in July. Supreme Court lets Trump revoke safe-haven program for Cubans, Haitians, Venezuelans and Nicaraguans The administration also ended humanitarian parole for Cuban, Haitian, Nicaraguan and Venezuela immigrants, making them eligible for deportation. Trump's claw-back of temporary protected status for citizens of countries experiencing conflict - a program run through the Department of Homeland Security that former President Joe Biden greatly expanded - also removes work authorizations and deportation protections. Alex Nowrasteh, vice president for economic and social policy studies at the libertarian Cato Institute, said Trump is pursuing the "same sort of anti-legal immigration push" he pursued in his first term, the refugee program was substantially curtailed. "The areas that he has the clearest legal authority over are the ones that he is reducing," Nowrasteh said. While the number of refugees who come to America varies from year to year, 60,050 people were admitted in 2023, according to DHS. Trump's administration is only allowing refugees from one nation, white South Africans known as Afrikaners. He has repeatedly alleged, without evidence, that they are the victims of genocide. Stephen Miller, the president's Homeland Security adviser, told reporters in May, as he sought to justify the policy, that the U.S. refugee program has historically been used as a solution to global poverty and it should not be. "Wherever there's global poverty or wherever there is dysfunctional governments, then the U.S. refugee program comes in, swoops them up, relocates them to America, and you have multi-generational problems," Miller said. "The U.S. refugee program has been a catastrophic failure." Trump administration cites national security concerns The administration has cited broad national security concerns for many of its actions while refusing to go into detail on individual cases. State Department spokeswoman Tammy Bruce told reporters during a May 29 briefing that seemingly disparate actions such as Trump's slashing of foreign aid, directives to universities and revisions to visas were all part of the administration's pledge to get serious about security. Bruce, who was being pressed to say how many Chinese students would be affected by new visa restrictions, stressed: "What the story is here is that the issue of being serious about safety for the country matters, and we're going to look at that at every single front." Trump's approach "perhaps has not been done before," Bruce said in the remarks, which preceded Trump's travel ban. An analysis of State Department data by the American Immigration Council, which opposes Trump's moves, found the policy could prevent 34,000 immigrant visas and more than 125,000 non-immigrant visas - typically for business and tourism - from being issued each year. The group's analysis of 2022 data found that 298,600 people from affected countries came to the United States. The countries included were identified by the Trump administration as nations "for which vetting and screening information is so deficient" to warrant a full or partial travel ban and those whose nationals "pose significant risks of overstaying their visas in the United States." Of the countries on Trump's list, Haiti had the most overstays in 2023, by far. Stephanie Gee, the senior director for U.S. Legal Services at the International Refugee Assistance Project, a group that has taken Trump to court, criticized "very arbitrary exceptions" for people like athletes. "I think it raises questions around that rationale that they're picking and choosing how to say and when to say somebody is a national security threat," she said. Trump did not explain in his order why athletes were a lesser concern. But the Olympics allows athletes from all nations to participate, and Los Angeles is hosting in 2028. Contributing: Erin Mansfield, USA TODAY
Scotsman
3 hours ago
- Scotsman
Gender row Scotland: Public 'none the wiser' about Police Scotland's gender ruling stance
Concern raised over public confidence in Police Scotland and its stance on the gender ruling from the Supreme Court. Sign up to our Politics newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... People are still 'none the wiser' as to how Scotland's national police force has amended its policies in light of the landmark Supreme Court ruling on gender, according to a board member of the Scottish Police Authority (SPA). The comment made at a SPA committee meeting on Tuesday comes amid warnings the force's stance risked impacting its operational impact and public confidence. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Katharina Kasper said while Police Scotland was working in a 'dynamic environment', she had a 'degree of frustration' that after the Supreme Court ruling, its position was still unclear. Celebrations outside the Supreme Court in London after the ruling on gender. Picture:Addressing a meeting of the SPA's policing performance committee, which discussed the ongoing review in relation to sex and gender within Scottish policing, Ms Kasper said: 'For a member of the public at this stage looking at this, I don't think anybody is still none the wiser as to whether or not the Supreme Court judgement, which was very, very clear, has been adopted into Police Scotland's policies 'When it comes to recording the sex or gender of people who come into contact with the police, what is the current policy?' Asking if there was a 'policy vacuum", Ms Kasper, who also chairs the SPA's complaints and conduct committee, said while she understood the reasons for the process taking time, she had misgivings about the knock-on effects. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Police Scotland officers | PA 'I am concerned about the operational implications on this,' she said. 'I'm concerned about the public confidence in Police Scotland because this process has been taking so long, and I'm also concerned about the impact on officers and staff.' The force's deputy chief constable, Alan Speirs, said last month that Police Scotland planned to bring forward an 'extensive and advanced' document to this week's SPA meeting. But the six page-long document in question does not set out a definitive stance, noting the force was continuing with its ongoing review. The report, prepared by Assistant Chief Constable Catriona Paton, states: 'It is critical that we take time to consider all relevant legislation, national guidance and stakeholder feedback, to ensure our proposals are well-informed and evidence based. Our aim is to conduct this review carefully and to do it right and in a way which builds trust and confidence across all communities.' Reflecting on the report, Ms Kasper said she was 'a little bit disappointed' by it. She said: 'We had been promised a substantial product by DCC Spiers and having read this paper, it is an interim update on all the work that's been done. But I'm still none the wiser as to the actual substance of the issue.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Responding to Ms Kasper's criticisms, Ms Paton stressed 'context is everything', telling her: 'I appreciate your comments around the approach we've taken and I certainly acknowledge aspects of your frustration around pace. 'I think the Chief [Constable Jo Farrell] also acknowledged the desire for people to move quickly in this space, and the importance to get it right when we do that. Policing is not immune to the reality and the complexity of this, around how our terminology and understanding, as it is related to sex and gender, has changed, has at times been used interchangeably.
