Barnaby Joyce does not rule out run at Nationals leadership after Coalition crisis
Barnaby Joyce will not rule out a bid for the National Party leadership after the Coalition's collapse and rekindling in a chaotic two weeks.
The senior Nationals MP has not hid his criticism of David Littleproud's handling of Coalition negotiations with the Liberal Party, calling last week's split a 'complete shocker'.
Mr Joyce said on Monday he was not actively vying to oust his boss, but it was up to the party room.
'I'm not challenging, I'm definitely not,' he told Seven.
'I've got other things I'm thinking about, but if the party room decides to do something … that's up to them.'
Mr Joyce went on to say he wanted 'it sorted out'.
Asked if Mr Littleproud would stay on as leader, Mr Joyce said he did not know.
'That's a question for the (party) room,' he said.
'I mean, that's up to the room, what they decide to do.'
Fellow former leader Michael McCormack last week sparked rumours he was considering a challenge.
'I'm not planning to roll David any time soon,' he told the ABC.
In his remarks on Monday, Mr Joyce said it was Mr McCormack's 'right' if he wanted it.
'If he decides to go for the leadership, it's his right to go for it,' he said.
'He's a good bloke, I respect Mike. If he decides to do it, he decides to do it.'
Mr Joyce and Mr McCormack were among several senior National Party figures Sussan Ley reached out to in a last-ditch bid to save the Coalition.
Despite the talk of threats to his leadership, Mr Littleproud on Sunday said he was 'pretty relaxed'.
'The vast majority of my party room decided to leave the Coalition,' he told Sky News.
'I enacted what was directed by me, and as a matter of days, because we took a principled position. The Liberal Party decided to revisit their position and yield to the fact that we wanted those four policy areas,' he added, referring to nuclear energy, divestiture powers, a regional fund and better mobile phone coverage in the regions.
Mr Littleproud said he would 'rather go to (parliament) standing for something, and if I have to lose my job for it, I don't care'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
41 minutes ago
- ABC News
Queensland government to begin social housing rent reviews to free up spaces for those in 'most need'
Social housing recipients in Queensland earning more than they should will soon be evicted from their homes to make way for new tenants. The state government claims there are some recipients earning well above the income limit that determines who is eligible for social housing. This includes a couple in Brisbane taking home more than $200,000 a year while paying less than $200 a week to live in their social housing unit. The government says another family in Townsville is paying less than $190 per week in rent despite earning an annual income of more than $160,000. From July 1, the government will launch annual rent reviews to determine if social housing recipients are still within the income limit. In Queensland, the income limit for a single person with no children is $609 per week, while for a couple it is set at $755. Tenants pay 25 per cent of their income. Those who are found to earn more than the limit will be charged at market rental rates, before they are evicted and transitioned to other housing options. Tenants who are within the housing limit but not paying 25 per cent of their income will have their rent increased, but the increase will be capped at $15 per week. Housing Minister Sam O'Connor said the government wants to make social housing available for vulnerable people and families. "We're empowering our housing officers to do what they do best — support the Queenslanders who most need a roof over their heads," he said. "These are long overdue changes to fix the system so it's better targeted to help the people who need housing most." In a bid to free up properties that are underoccupied, the government will also introduce a scheme to incentivise tenants to downsize to smaller social homes. The government hopes this will allow more families to move into social housing. The incentives will include rent free periods, as well covering the costs of removalists. The government estimates thousands of bedrooms in the state's social housing stock are vacant. About 50,000 people were on Queensland's social housing register as of December last year.
The Age
an hour ago
- The Age
How much more will the superannuation tax cost you?
The Nationals have vowed to 'fight to the death' to stop Labor's plans to increase tax on big superannuation accounts. The Liberals have claimed the plan delivers special treatment to politicians such as the prime minister who have older defined benefit superannuation. But Treasurer Jim Chalmers has trashed those criticisms, saying it's a 'modest' change aimed at making super more sustainable. The legislation to double the tax rate on earnings from super balances over $3 million from 15 per cent to 30 per cent will be among the first on Labor's agenda when parliament returns in July, but if you're still a bit confused, you're not alone. Below, we show what will happen for Australians who will be hit by the tax – and how much more they'll pay, drawing on calculations by the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia. With the Coalition set against the change, and Labor needing to secure the support of the Greens to get its bill through, the exact form of the tax is yet to be confirmed. Loading Earnings on all superannuation accounts will continue to be taxed at 15 per cent, but we do not include this in our examples because they require their own set of calculations with changes based on personal circumstances. Our examples just show the extra 15 per cent that will be levied on earnings from accounts over $3 million. But what does all this look like in practice? And how would the tax change affect you? Using four examples, we step through the way the new, additional tax bill would be calculated for a range of people in different occupations and life stages. We only examine the effect of the tax over the first year, and do not look into the number of Australians affected over time.
Sydney Morning Herald
an hour ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
How much more will the superannuation tax cost you?
The Nationals have vowed to 'fight to the death' to stop Labor's plans to increase tax on big superannuation accounts. The Liberals have claimed the plan delivers special treatment to politicians such as the prime minister who have older defined benefit superannuation. But Treasurer Jim Chalmers has trashed those criticisms, saying it's a 'modest' change aimed at making super more sustainable. The legislation to double the tax rate on earnings from super balances over $3 million from 15 per cent to 30 per cent will be among the first on Labor's agenda when parliament returns in July, but if you're still a bit confused, you're not alone. Below, we show what will happen for Australians who will be hit by the tax – and how much more they'll pay, drawing on calculations by the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia. With the Coalition set against the change, and Labor needing to secure the support of the Greens to get its bill through, the exact form of the tax is yet to be confirmed. Loading Earnings on all superannuation accounts will continue to be taxed at 15 per cent, but we do not include this in our examples because they require their own set of calculations with changes based on personal circumstances. Our examples just show the extra 15 per cent that will be levied on earnings from accounts over $3 million. But what does all this look like in practice? And how would the tax change affect you? Using four examples, we step through the way the new, additional tax bill would be calculated for a range of people in different occupations and life stages. We only examine the effect of the tax over the first year, and do not look into the number of Australians affected over time.
