logo
Disconnect leaves wheels spinning on legislative audit law

Disconnect leaves wheels spinning on legislative audit law

Yahoo24-03-2025

BOSTON (SHNS) – Attorney General Andrea Campbell accused Auditor Diana DiZoglio over the weekend of delaying a legal showdown in her longstanding quest to probe the Legislature.
Campbell warned the pair would currently be 'laughed out of court' as uncertainty swirls over DiZoglio's proposed audit.
'There are constitutional limitations, so I need the auditor to tell me and my team what's the legal strategy, what's the legal basis, what's the scope of her audit, and then we bring that to court,' Campbell said in a TV interview that aired Sunday. 'But until we have that, if we go into court, we will be laughed out of court.'
Campbell sought to 'correct the record' on WCVB's 'On The Record' as she reiterated why her office has yet to intervene and enforce the new voter law that gives DiZoglio the explicit authority to audit the Legislature. Top Beacon Hill Democrats have resisted DiZoglio's audit, citing constitutional concerns, while the auditor contends lawmakers are breaking the law that 72% of voters backed in November.
'I absolutely support all of those voters that voted in favor of this question, but we cannot go into court saying 72% voted in favor of it — and just look cute, and we look good going into court,' Campbell said. 'The judge, and any judge assigned to a case, wants to hear what's your legal argument and why should we give you some type of relief and why should we allow you to audit the Legislature? And we've asked the auditor to give us that information.'
Campbell claimed the ongoing sparring stems partly from a flaw in the initiative petition process that might need to be remedied in the future. While Campbell's office certified the audit ballot question as ballot eligible, she said that review did not delve into whether the referendum could pose constitutional challenges.
The AG, in a November 2023 letter to DiZoglio, had separately warned about 'constitutional limitations' if the question were to win voter approval.
'The ballot question, and this is just stupid by government from the past, we don't get to assess what's constitutional or not,' Campbell said on OTR. 'So people are actually voting on a ballot question, and it could be actually unconstitutional in some of its implementation, but we don't assess that when approving the ballot question. So clearly, we gotta change that or someone does.'
DiZoglio fired back at Campbell's remarks on social media Monday morning.
'Actually ⁦@MassAGO you did weigh in on constitutionality when you approved Question 1 for the ballot,' DiZoglio said on X. 'That's why there's no ability to change your mind now that we, the voters, passed it. Thankfully it's now up to the courts, not you or the Legislature, to decide.'
DiZoglio has repeatedly and unsuccessfully called for Campbell's support in the feud with House and Senate leaders, who did not hand over documents the auditor requested once the voter law took effect in January. Campbell says her office must follow a process to determine which branch of government to represent in court.
'We represent almost every state agency in the commonwealth. Anytime we go to court, we ask them for information,' Campbell said. 'The auditor, she's saying publicly she's giving us that information. She has not, and so I'm going to correct the record. We're happy to go into court where necessary, but we cannot go into court until she provides us the legal strategy, the information we need to create a case to then go into court.'
DiZoglio told the News Service earlier this month that her office provided all the information the AG requested. DiZoglio said Campbell's office keeps coming back with more questions.
A Senate subcommittee handling the voter law has also berated DiZoglio for not answering questions about the scope of her probe. The panel is holding a hearing next week as senators seek clarity on 'serious constitutional questions.'
'Recently, the Senate received the Auditor's latest letter in response to the Subcommittee's questions that, while containing several inaccurate accusations as to the motives of the Subcommittee, does not contain the substantive, clear, or consistent response the Senate requested,' chair Sen. Cindy Friedman said in a statement Friday. 'Therefore, the Subcommittee will gather facts and information from subject matter experts and hold a hearing on April 2, following the traditional process of legislative committees. The Subcommittee invited the Office of the State Auditor to participate, but they have declined.'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Freedom Caucus warns it will ‘not accept' Senate changes on green energy tax credits
Freedom Caucus warns it will ‘not accept' Senate changes on green energy tax credits

The Hill

time24 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Freedom Caucus warns it will ‘not accept' Senate changes on green energy tax credits

The conservative House Freedom Caucus said on Friday that it would 'not accept' changes that 'water down' its cuts to green energy tax credits as the Senate weighs whether to alter the legislation. The House version of the 'big, beautiful bill' would make drastic changes to tax cuts for low-carbon energy sources passed in the Democrats' 2022 Inflation Reduction Act (IRA). Climate-friendly energy projects, including wind and solar, would only be able to qualify for the credits under the House bill if they begin construction within 60 days of the bill's enactment. This brief window would likely make many projects ineligible for the credits, and is expected to significantly hamstring the development of new renewable power. In a post on social media on Friday, the Freedom Caucus warned the Senate against loosening that restriction or others included in the bill. 'We want to be crystal clear: if the Senate attempts to water down, strip out, or walk back the hard-fought spending reductions and IRA Green New Scam rollbacks achieved in this legislation, we will not accept it,' said the post, which was attributed to the Freedom Caucus's board. 'The House Freedom Caucus Board will stand united holding the line. The American people didn't send us here to cave to the swamp — they sent us here to change it,' they added. The Senate has been widely expected to consider changes that could slow the rapid elimination of the tax credit passed under the House version of Trump's 'big beautiful bill.' Republican Sens. Lisa Murkowski (Alaska), Thom Tillis (N.C.), Jerry Moran (Kan.) and John Curtis (Utah) released a letter warning against a 'full scale' repeal of the tax credits. Senate Republicans can only afford three defections and pass their bill. On Friday, a group of 13 House GOP moderates released a letter calling on Senate leadership 'to substantively and strategically improve clean energy tax credit provisions' in the legislation. 'We believe the Senate now has a critical opportunity to restore common sense and deliver a truly pro-energy growth final bill that protects taxpayers while also unleashing the potential of U.S. energy producers, manufacturers, and workers,' said the letter, which was led by Reps. Jen Kiggans (R-Va.) and Brian Fitzpatrick (R-Pa.). Altogether, the letters illustrate what could be a tough task ahead of the Republican leadership as they look to find a measure that will keep at least 50 senators on board and appease the House. Emily Brooks contributed.

Shift4 appoints new CEO
Shift4 appoints new CEO

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Shift4 appoints new CEO

This story was originally published on Payments Dive. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily Payments Dive newsletter. Shift4 named founder Jared Isaacman as executive chairman after President Donald Trump abruptly dropped the executive's nomination to run NASA over the weekend, the digital processor said in a regulatory filing Thursday. "Mr. Isaacman will remain an executive officer and Class I member of the Board," the filing said. The change is effective on Thursday, according to the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Allentown, Pennsylvania-based payments processing company had selected Shift4 President Taylor Lauber to succeed Isaacman if Trump's December nomination was confirmed by the Senate, but the chamber never voted on it. Isaacman, who has been the company's CEO and chairman since it was founded in 1999, will retain his super voting shares in Shift4, according to the filing. Lauber said during an April earnings call that Isaacman would convert his class B and class C shares into class A shares, which are worth a single vote per share. That agreement was "subject to several conditions, including the ratification and confirmation by the U.S. Senate of Mr. Isaacman's appointment as administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration," the SEC filing said. "As a result of this condition not being met, Mr. Isaacman is no longer required to reduce his voting shares." Isaacman had a 76% voting power ownership stake in Shift4, according toan April 30 proxy filing. Trump cited Isaacman's "prior associations" when he withdrew the NASA nomination. The president pulled the nomination over the Shift4 founder's past contributions to Democrats, according to a report from the New York Times. However, Isaacman suggested on a Wednesday episode o fthe All-In podcast that his ties to billionaire SpaceX and Tesla CEO Elon Musk cost him the nomination, Bloomberg reported. Musk may also have helped him win the nomination from Trump, given Isaacman's participation in past SpaceX missions. Recommended Reading Shift4 CEO likely to keep post

McCAUGHEY: Democrats waging war on small-town values and property values
McCAUGHEY: Democrats waging war on small-town values and property values

Yahoo

time32 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

McCAUGHEY: Democrats waging war on small-town values and property values

Across the U.S., Democrats are waging war to crush a lifestyle they abhor. Call it small-town America: Single-family neighbourhoods, quiet streets, town centres stamped with their historic character and almost no signs of the vagrancy and homeless encampments that plague cities. Democrats want you to have none of this. If you've worked for years to save up for a home in one of these havens, forget about it. The Democratic Party is using brute legal force to remake towns using a cookie-cutter formula that forces each to have the same proportion of houses and apartments, the same mix of low-, middle- and upper-income residents and the same reliance on public transit, all controlled by state politicians. Any town that resists gets shamed as 'segregated', though this isn't about race, and 'snobby.' On May 31, the Connecticut legislature passed H.B. 5002, which should be called the Destroy Connecticut Towns Act. It's headed to Gov. Ned Lamont's desk for a signature. The new law dictates how many low-income and moderate-income apartments each Connecticut town must provide and mandates that towns also foot the bill for the schools, parks, public transportation and other services low-income residents will need. Local taxes will soar. The bill explicitly says its purpose is to ensure 'economic diversity' in each town. This is about social engineering, not remedying housing shortages. Democrat Bob Duff, the state senate majority leader, says 'it's extremely important … that we don't segregate people based on a ZIP code.' Everyone, regardless of income, should have the opportunity to choose to live in any town. The bill mandates that the wealthiest towns, mostly in lower Fairfield County, provide most of the new housing, even though that raises the cost. Land costs less in other towns and lower-income people, who this bill is supposed to serve, are more likely to find bus transportation and affordable stores in these other towns as well. Connecticut lawmakers are nixing local rules. Ordinances that protect the appearance of a town have to be overruled. The bill states that multifamily buildings of up to 24 units will no longer have to provide off-street parking. Envision cars lining every residential street. Towns will also be forced to welcome vagrants who want to sleep in parks and public lots. The bill outlaws 'hostile architecture,' meaning park benches with armrests and divided seating, or stone walls with spikes on top that deter sleeping in the rough. Instead, the bill launches a program of mobile showers and mobile laundry services on trucks to serve the homeless wherever they choose. Picture the mobile showers pulling up to Greenwich Common Park on the town's main street, or Waveny Park in New Canaan. How can kids walk around town with their pals if there are homeless encampments? Judge Glock, director of research at the Manhattan Institute think tank, points out that the homeless amount to 1% of the population in Los Angeles but commit 25% of the homicides. Inviting the homeless means inviting crime and drugs. Californicating the small towns of Connecticut by encouraging public camping and vagrancy 'is frightening,' says Glock. New York Democrats are also taking aim at small-town living. A bill sponsored by state Sen. Brad Hoylman-Sigal would outlaw local towns from setting minimum lot sizes over one-eighth of an acre near the town centre and a half acre everywhere else. Postage stamp sizes. Riverhead, New York, town supervisor Tim Hubbard is vowing to sue. 'We're trying to keep our community as rural as it can be … We don't think the state should be zoning our town.' Hoylman-Sigal chooses to live on the west side of Manhattan, but who is he to impose a population-dense lifestyle on small-town New Yorkers? Similarly, in New Jersey, Democratic Gov. Tim Murphy is pushing lawmakers to override local ordinances and impose the same kinds of 'reforms' as those in the Connecticut bill. In all these states and across the country, small-town Americans need to fight back. There is no constitutional right to live in a wealthy town with single-family homes and leafy, quiet streets. It's something you earn. Once you've purchased a home, you have the right to protect its value. It's time to put blue-state politicians on notice that their battle to destroy our suburbs and small towns will be resisted at the voting booth and in court.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store