
Echo Chamber, Budget 2025 edition: Who is Mr Bo-Jandals?
It may not have been a lolly scramble budget, but there were plenty of lollies in parliament during the debate – plus a curious new nickname for one MP.
Our Budget 2025 coverage is thanks to The Spinoff Members. The Spinoff is not backed by billion-dollar budgets or billionaires, we're backed by you. To meet our current goal, we need 500 new members by the end of June. Please donate now.
The debate in parliament on budget day usually hits the same beats. The finance minister gives a long, dry speech listing everything they want to emphasise from their budget and patting themselves on the back for being so clever. The leader of the opposition pre-writes half of their attack lines before the budget comes out. The prime minister delivers a smug self-congratulation. Then, the leaders of the minor parties have their turn, which can be raucously entertaining or veer way off topic. When it's a controversial budget, it can be the best debate of the year. When it's a so-so budget, like this one, it can be a bit underwhelming.
Nicola Willis laid out her budget soberly, the only identifiable joke a reheated line about 'defunding da police' ('woop woop' sang Tim van de Molen, who is apparently not tired of this yet). She gave a shoutout to her kids in the public gallery, and got a kiss on the cheek from Chris Luxon as she finished.
For his response, Chris Hipkins dialled his outrage as high as he could muster, lashing the government's pay equity change. It was 'the budget that left women out', he said. 'The country that was first to allow women the vote has nothing to be proud of today when it comes to advancing the cause of women.' Carmel Sepuloni, Megan Woods and Barbara Edmonds formed a chorus of 'shame', 'shocking', and 'that's right' after every second sentence. 'You don't even know what a woman is,' Winston Peters heckled.
Hipkins claimed an 18-year-old would be $66,000 worse off by retirement due to the government's KiwiSaver changes. 'Boring,' Shane Jones moaned. 'Yeah, you're boring,' Katie Nimon echoed.'I thought he was finished, he's still talking,' David Seymour said.
Mark Mitchell had a packet of M&Ms on his desk and looked very pleased about it. He ate them methodically, one at a time, every three seconds, like a pendulum of candy-coated chocolate. He offered them to Todd McClay and Scott Simpson, each time with a cheeky grin as if to say 'haha, look at me, I'm eating M&Ms in parliament'. Andy Foster and Jamie Arbuckle shared some Mackintosh's Toffees (an on-brand lolly for New Zealand First). Winston Peters scrolled through a group chat that seemed to be entirely people sending context-free GIFs.
As Luxon stood, Tama Potaka pumped his fist and whooped, 'leshgo'. Luxon was in full attack dog mode; he was so preoccupied with Labour that it took him 22 minutes to mention any positives about his government's budget. He was particularly proud of a new nickname he'd invented for Hipkins: 'Mr Bo-Jandals', which he repeated four times throughout his speech. It meant absolutely nothing to me, but it is apparently a mashup of Mr Bojangles, a song about a travelling entertainer who hides their true identity (it peaked at number two on the New Zealand Music charts in 1971) and the word 'jandals', alternatively known as flip-flops. It was a convoluted way to call Hipkins a flip-flopper who hasn't taken a clear position on some key issues.
It might not make the annals of political attack lines, but Simeon Brown loved it. Every mediocre joke from his leader's mouth looked like it might kill him with laughter. After Luxon said Labour, the Greens and Te Pāti Māori 'couldn't run a pub', Brown slapped his desk and repeated the line to himself. 'Can't run a pub,' he muttered, shaking his head as if it was the funniest thing he'd ever heard.
The writing left much to be desired, but Luxon's delivery was impassioned, and his MPs responded to his energy. He finished with the same line he used last year – 'Get New Zealand back on track' – and the government benches erupted in applause.
Chlöe Swarbrick had had a few too many Weetbix and was feeling extra excitable and/or frustrated. She started yelling into her microphone, causing government MPs to moan 'shut up' and 'too loud'. Winston Peters walked out of the chambers, plugging his ears with his fingers. She dubbed it the 'let them eat cake budget' and called the decision to cut jobseeker benefits for 18 and 19-year-olds 'a cruel and callous decision to punch down on young people'. Chris Penk wandered around the back benches until he found a container of Fruit Bursts in an empty desk. He picked out three grape ones and ate them with his head down, like he was trying to hide. I saw you, Chris, and I'm going to tell your F45 instructor.
David Seymour spent half of his speech attacking the opposition, and half promoting the Regulatory Standards Bill. 'You know, you can always tell when a politician's speechwriter doesn't like her very much, and that was certainly one of those circumstances,' he began, following Swarbrick. 'She wrote it herself,' James Meager said. 'That's not very nice,' Seymour replied, deadpan. He hit Labour with the same attack line as Luxon but landed a much better joke: 'Their whole electoral strategy is kind of the opposite of the Kama Sutra; they don't have a position on anything.'
Shane Jones was a last-minute call-up to give New Zealand First's speech. For unknown reasons, Winston Peters subbed his deputy in with 45 minutes' notice. In typical Jones fashion, he delivered a soliloquy to fossil fuels, praising the $200m in new funding for new gas fields. He held up a small bottle of Māui-1 crude oil, 1969. 'I'd like to take the lid off and invite the Green Party to sniff it,' he said. 'We don't want your mung bean, pronoun version.'
Te Pāti Māori co-leaders Debbie Ngārewa-Packer and Rawiri Waititi were notably absent for the entire debate. In fact, no one stuck around long. Both Labour and National's front benches cleared out after their leaders' speeches. Tākuta Ferris rounded out the debate on his leaders' behalf with a sermon about how no budget had ever given an appropriate proportion of funding or focus to Māori and a history lesson about the harms of colonisation. It was a generic Te Pāti Māori budget response, almost identical to Waititi's speech last year, and it didn't seem like his heart was really in it. Certainly, no one else in the chamber was paying much attention.
Three hours of debate ended with a whimper, and Chris Bishop moved to enter urgency for the first reading of the Regulatory Standards Bill. The wheels of parliament keep on turning, and MPs keep on snacking.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


NZ Herald
12 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Te Pāti Māori haka sanctions debate continues in Parliament today
The debate on whether Te Pāti Māori co-leaders will face the toughest Parliamentary sanctions ever dished out continues today after it was abruptly adjourned last month to give way to the Budget. The debate is set to begin around 3pm. It will be livestreamed at the top of this article. ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW Labour and the Greens MPs are expected to push fiercely for a weaker punishment while National is not expected to budge. Parliament's Privileges Committee has recommended suspending Te Pāti Māori co-leaders Rawiri Waititi and Debbie Ngarewa-Packer for 21 days and MP Hana-Rāwhiti Maipi-Clarke for seven days after a controversial haka in the House last year. The longest suspension in Parliament's 171-year history is three sitting days. The committee's recommendations will be put to the House for debate and likely pass. Labour's shadow leader of the House Kieran McAnulty said Labour believed Te Pāti Māori had overstepped and that they should be sanctioned but that 21 days was disproportionate. 'Our contributions to the debate will be focused on that and not trying to defend their actions.' National minister and Leader of the House Chris Bishop said he was keen to get the matter sorted. Last month, Bishop had unexpectedly called for the debate to be adjourned. Bishop's justification was that if the Te Pāti Māori MPs were suspended from Parliament that particular week, they would miss the debate on the Budget. He also believed delaying the debate would bring the temperature 'down a notch' after recent heated commentary. 'My strong preference would be for Parliament to deal with it, deal with it once, have a big debate about it and then finish it,' he told reporters on Wednesday. 'It's before Parliament, we've had the report, frankly New Zealanders expect us to get on with the business of governing. This is a distraction from the major issues as to why we were elected to this Parliament.' The haka at the centre of the matter happened during the first reading of the controversial Treaty Principles Bill, which was eventually voted down at second reading. The haka has since gone viral globally, amassing hundreds of millions of views on social media. Maipi-Clarke, Parliament's youngest MP, brought Parliament to a standstill when she began the haka while ripping up a copy of the Treaty Principles Bill, a proposal from Act leader David Seymour to replace the many Treaty principles developed over time by experts and the court with three new ones. Many perceived the bill as a threat to Māori and detrimental to Te Tiriti o Waitangi. It was a catalyst of the massive hīkoi protest to Parliament in November last year. Waititi and Ngarewa-Packer stood up and joined Maipi-Clarke in the haka, moving from their seats towards the Act party benches. Labour's Peeni Henare also moved away from his seat to perform. Henare later apologised to the Judith Collins-led Privileges Committee for knowingly breaking the rules by stepping away from his seat, but said he stood by his haka and would do it again. The trio from Te Pāti Māori were referred to the Privileges Committee but ignored the initial summons to appear in person, arguing they had been denied legal representation and the ability to appear together. At the time, they promised to hold a separate 'independent' hearing. Te Pāti Māori have been defiant in their defence of the haka. Waititi told reporters on Wednesday afternoon it was not clear exactly what the trio were being punished for. 'Some of the House found it intimidating, some of the House found it exhilarating because half of House stood up. We don't know what the reasons are for the 21 days sanctions.' Waititi spoke with The Hui soon after the committee's unprecedented recommendations were released. He said he was thinking about the people who had entrusted him to 'represent them the best way I know'. 'And that is to be unapologetic, that is to be authentic and honest and respectful of who we are. We should be able to do that without fear or favour and be able to do that without being ashamed of being Māori,' Waititi told The Hui host Julian Wilcox. 'What I feel is that we are being punished for being Māori. The country loves my haka, the world loves my haka, but it feels like they don't love me.'


Scoop
14 hours ago
- Scoop
Disability Taskforce Extended As Budget Funding Boosts System
Press Release – New Zealand Government Disability Support Services Taskforce was established to lead the implementation of these recommendations. That important work is progressing well, and I am now looking to the Taskforce to lead more work to further strengthen the system. Minister for Disability Issues The Disability Support Services Taskforce will be extended for a year to continue its progress in stabilising the disability support system and shaping it for the future. Minister for Disability Issues Louise Upston says the Taskforce has been extended to 30 June 2026, with its work further enhanced by a billion-dollar funding boost announced in last month's Budget. 'This Government is committed to the ongoing support of the disability community and delivering better outcomes for disabled people, their families and carers,' Louise Upston says. 'We've demonstrated this in Budget 2025, where the DSS Budget received $1 billion in additional funding over four years – that's about $250 million a year of new money. 'This includes $60 million a year in residential care funding increases and about $190 million a year for increases across all DSS services for cost pressures, including care in the community. 'We are making good progress in delivering for disabled people, and the Taskforce will continue to play a key role. 'In August 2024, the Independent Review made recommendations to manage increasing cost pressures faced by DSS. 'The Taskforce was established to lead the implementation of these recommendations. That important work is progressing well, and I am now looking to the Taskforce to lead more work to further strengthen the system. 'The Taskforce has already made significant progress to stabilise DSS, including: reviewing pricing and contracting arrangements for residential care, which are being implemented following Budget 2025 improving systems and processes for assessing performance and forecasting expenditure reviewing needs assessment and allocation, and flexible funding settings so they better meet the needs of disabled people, their whānau and carers. 'My expectation is that DSS will continue to involve the disability community in discussions about how disability support services are delivered. I'll have more to say on the next phase of work in the coming months,' Louise Upston says. Notes: New funding for DSS in Budget 2025 included: $1 billion over four years towards meeting the increasing costs of disability support services (including $240 million for residential care) and to support more people to access those services. $10 million over two years to address the increasing costs for services and support for people with an intellectual disability and complex care needs who live in secure or supervised care under the High and Complex Framework. This will also fund critical workforce training initiatives and essential infrastructure, including repairs and maintenance upgrades. $9.5 million over four years to recognise and respond to the Abuse in Care Royal Commission of Inquiry. This includes work to strengthen how DSS audits the quality of its services, critical incident and complaints management processes and systems, and to contribute to other cross agency work to improve recordkeeping and the capability of the disability workforce.

RNZ News
15 hours ago
- RNZ News
Parliament's contrary responses to Kashmir attacks spur debate
In February 2019, a vehicle-borne suicide bomber targeted a convoy of Indian security personnel in Pulwama in India-administered Kashmir, killing 40. At the time, Foreign Minister Winston Peters introduced a motion in Parliament condemning the attack. "That this House condemn the 14 February act of terrorism against Indian Central Reserve Police Force personnel in the Pulwama district, leading to a very large loss of life; offer its condolences to the people and Government of India; and express its support and solidarity for the Government of India at this difficult time, as well as offer our deep sympathy for all those who are grievously affected," Peters said. The motion was agreed to and passed. In the wake of another attack in India-administered Kashmir more than six years later, New Zealand's response appears to be starkly different. In April, at least two dozen people died after gunmen opened fire on tourists near the picturesque town of Pahalgam in the Himalayas. Parmjeet Parmar Photo: RNZ / Blessen Tom In May, Indian-origin ACT MP Parmjeet Parmar introduced a motion in Parliament that condemned the attack. "My motion was: I move that the House condemns the terrorist attack that occurred in the town of Pahalgam, Kashmir, on 22 April 2025," Parmar told attendees at a community event on Saturday organised by Kiwi Indian Global Connect. "We express our deepest condolences to those who lost friends and family in this tragic event, and we stand in solidarity with the people of Kashmir during this difficult time. "We also acknowledge the impact on the Indian diaspora and communities in New Zealand and India, extending our heartfelt sympathies to those affected. We recognise the shared grief and commit to supporting those impacted." Parmar told the meeting the Green Party had blocked the motion. "The Green Party said they would not support the use of [the phrase] 'terrorist attack' in my motion. And I decided not to take it out," Parmar said. "I felt removing these words would mean minimising the evil motivations behind the action." Failing to get consensus, Parmar's motion failed to pass. Mahesh Bindra Photo: RNZ / Jane Patterson "My question is, 'What changed this time as our Parliament failed to condemn the 22 April terrorist attack in India which took 26 innocent lives?'," said former New Zealand First MP Mahesh Bindra, referring to the 2019 motion. "That's my main problem with it," said Veer Khar, president of New Zealand Indian Central Association, who also addressed the gathering of about 100 people at Bruce Pullman Park in the Auckland suburb of Takanini. "Because of what happened [between ACT and the Greens], the message has gone - New Zealand Parliament failed to condemn the killings of civilians in Kashmir," Khar said. "I would have agreed to the wording as proposed by the Greens and ensured the motion is passed. "Moving forward, the Indian community would try engaging with the Green Party and exchange each other's perspectives on issues." Ricardo Menéndez March Photo: RNZ / Samuel Rillstone Responding to the allegations, Green Party MP Ricardo Menéndez March said the Greens wanted to put forward a motion that centred on victims, remained consistent with standing orders and avoided enflaming tensions surrounding the conflict. "We proposed alternative wording, as we understood [that] what the ACT Party had proposed was not consistent with standing orders - in particular SO 102(1), quote '… include only such material as may be necessary to identify the facts or matter to which the motion relates'," Menéndez March said. "The effect of SO 102 is that motions without notice of this kind are succinct statements of the House's recognition of tragedies and significant events," he said. "We would have been entirely supportive of a statement of that kind on the tragic Kashmir attack, consistent with the types of motions without notice that are regularly used in the House," he said. "We proposed an alternative that acknowledged the tragedy in Kashmir but fit within the standing orders. "We would have been open to negotiating this further with Parmjeet, however, we only heard back from them 20 minutes before Question Time." Prithi Pal Singh Basra Photo: RNZ / Blessen Tom Prithi Pal Singh Basra, chairperson of the New Zealand Central Sikh Association, said the issue was important to the Indian community. "My family has been in New Zealand for over 100 years," Basra said. "Still, we are culturally and socially linked to India. All of us have strong family ties even now. What happens there affects us here." Former National MP Kanwaljit Singh Bakshi called on Indian New Zealanders to be ambassadors for their homeland. "Talk to as many as locals as possible and explain what is happening in India [in terms of terrorism]," he said. Siva Kilari, a former National Party candidate for Manurewa, called on mainstream media to reach out to members of the Indian community when reporting on South Asia issues. "I urge the New Zealand media to make use of the almost 300,000 [people of Indian origin] we have here to understand a complicated place like the Indian subcontinent," Kilari said. Sunny Kaushal, chair of the ministerial advisory group on retail crime, termed terrorism a global issue. "Terrorism has no religion, no race, no nationality and no place in the world," he said. "New Zealand should always send a united message against any act of terrorism in the world." Dinesh Pahuja Photo: RNZ / Blessen Tom Dinesh Pahuja, a spokesperson for the event, acknowledged the condemnation of the April terrorist attack by the government. Both Prime Minister Christopher Luxon and Foreign Minister Winston Peters have repeatedly issued statements condemning the attack. "On 22 April, India suffered a devastating terrorist attack in Jammu and Kashmir," Luxon said early May at a business event welcoming Pabritra Margherita , India's minister of state for external affairs, to New Zealand. "New Zealand condemns terrorism, and we sent our heartfelt condolences to the families of the victims of the attack." "[But] the government is not the voice of the nation, Parliament is," Pahuja said. "It was our expectation all lawmakers condemned the act of terrorism in Kashmir in one united voice, which unfortunately didn't happen."