logo
Why redistricting reform advocates oppose this redistricting reform bill

Why redistricting reform advocates oppose this redistricting reform bill

Yahoo27-03-2025

The Minnesota Capitol. Photo by Max Nesterak/Minnesota Reformer.
Legislation at the Minnesota Capitol aims to end 140 years of squabbling over legislative district boundaries by removing lawmakers from the redistricting process and putting it under the control of a bipartisan commission instead.
Bills in both chambers (HF550/SF824) would create an eight-member panel to oversee the redistricting process, with an equal number of panel members selected by each of the two major political parties.
The bill's supporters say the panel would ensure that the state's districts are drawn in the spirit of compromise, rather than the ferocious partisan brinkmanship that characterizes the redistricting process in some other states, including Wisconsin.
'It creates a transparent framework where political biases are exposed, rather than hidden, giving Minnesotans meaningful insight into how district lines are drawn,' Brian Cook of the Minnesota Chamber of Commerce said last month in support of the bill.
But the bill has run into opposition from a seemingly unusual quarter: good governance groups that have been pushing for redistricting reform for years.
'This legislative session started with unacceptable levels of partisanship and gridlock and this bill will accelerate it,' said Annastacia Belladonna-Carrera, executive director of Common Cause Minnesota. 'If Minnesota wants true redistricting reform that puts the people first, HF550 is not getting us there.'
The opponents fear that a bipartisan commission will fall prey to the same partisan disagreements that have derailed the existing legislative redistricting process over the years.
Consider what happened in New York.
In 2014, voters there approved the creation of a bipartisan commission almost identical to the one under consideration in Minnesota. Then-Governor Andrew Cuomo boasted at the time that the bill would 'permanently reform the redistricting process in New York to once and for all end self-interested partisan gerrymandering.'
The committee faceplanted right out of the gate by failing to agree on a plan. Instead, each party's representatives on the commission presented their own competing proposals to the state legislature.
The legislature rejected both proposals and told the commission to draw up a new one. It deadlocked again. The legislature went ahead and drew up its own plan, which was signed into law by the governor.
Less than a month later, state courts invalidated the entire process and struck down the congressional maps as an illegal partisan gerrymander.
The state Supreme Court ordered a special master to draw up temporary maps in time for the 2022 midterms, and then in 2023 it ordered the original redistricting commission to go back to the drawing board and give the whole thing another go.
That second independent redistricting attempt went marginally better: The proposed maps for state legislative districts were approved by April 2023. But legislators didn't like the congressional district maps. The Democratic supermajority threw them out and eventually drew their own, which were signed into law a little over a year ago.
The whole process took twice as long as the previous round of redistricting under the old rules.
HF550 is different from New York's setup in one critical respect: The Minnesota bill does not require state legislators to sign off on the new maps created by the commission.
And while the bill provides for judicial review of any legal challenges to a commission plan, it is silent regarding what might happen if the commission members can't agree on one to begin with.
Common Cause Minnesota and allied groups like the League of Women Voters want to see a bill more along the lines of one proposed last year. That bill would allow members of the public to apply to serve on the redistricting commission, with the state Legislative Coordinating Commission ultimately selecting a 15-member panel: Five Democrats, five Republicans, and five people who are politically independent or affiliated with a third party.
'Our goal is to advance grassroots, people-centered reforms by establishing a citizen-led independent redistricting commission,' Belladonna-Carrera said. 'This commission will focus on the needs and voices of the people, rather than political parties, incumbents or candidates.'
It's unclear whether anything will pass this legislative term, and the clock is ticking. Ongoing chaos at the federal level will inject even more uncertainty into the next round of redistricting: In February, the Trump administration abruptly halted the work of the committee planning the 2030 Census.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Legislature maintains support for education, but future is cloudier
Legislature maintains support for education, but future is cloudier

Yahoo

time8 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Legislature maintains support for education, but future is cloudier

A student exits a school bus as they arrive to Creative Arts Secondary School on Thursday, Jan. 9, 2025, in Saint Paul, Minn. (Ellen Schmidt/Minnesota Reformer) Democratic legislators and Gov. Tim Walz played defense on education funding this year, trying to preserve as many of their 2023 legislative gains as possible without pursuing bold new goals. The K-12 education bill, passed Monday, includes $25.7 billion for schools during the next two years, an increase of 4.8% over the current biennium. Although spending on education will increase in aggregate, the bill includes cuts to special education and libraries, as well as social workers, nurses and counselors. Overall, the 2025 Legislature passed a mostly status quo budget. With dark clouds on state government's fiscal horizon, the future of public schools, educators and students will be determined to a great extent by the 2026 election. Special education aid is shouldering the largest portion of cuts to the education budget. The state will reduce the amount it reimburses school districts for special education transportation services by $15 million next school year and $28 million the following school year. Walz was first to propose the cuts. Federal law protects services to special education students from cuts. The reductions in state aid means school districts will have to make cuts outside of special education — or find new local revenue — to make up for the lost state aid. The budget agreement also creates a commission to explore ways to cut state spending on special education in the next biennium. The bill sets a target of $250 million per year in cuts for fiscal years 2028 and 2029. But that comes after the next election — and the potential for a different balance of power. The next Legislature won't be bound by this one and can ignore the plan to cut special education funding. Legislation approved in 2023 finally began chipping away at the nearly $800 million gap that school districts faced each year in funding for special education. That gap is commonly referred to as the 'cross-subsidy' because districts pull money from their general per-pupil formula money to cover their unreimbursed costs for special education services. On average, districts were spending 12% of their general per-pupil aid to cover unreimbursed special education costs, with the amount varying from less than 5% to more than 20% in some districts. The cuts to special education funding come at the same time that districts face uncertainty about the future of federal aid for special education. Minnesota school districts can continue to expect an annual increase of at least 2% in basic per-pupil aid. The education bill preserves a provision enacted in 2023 that indexes the formula to inflation, with a minimum annual increase of 2% and a maximum of 3%. The per-pupil formula accounts for about two-thirds of all state funding for K-12 education. For the upcoming fiscal year, the basic formula is $7,481 per pupil, a 2.7% increase from the current year. In fiscal year 2027, the amount will increase to $7,705. The state will spend $17.2 billion on general formula aid in the 2026-2027 biennium. Overall, state funding makes up 64% of education spending in Minnesota, with federal funding providing 8%, and the balance made up by local funding. The state will also continue to provide funding for universal school meals. The cost is expected to grow from $584 million in the 2024-2025 biennium to $659 million in 2026-2027, or 13%. Hourly school workers, like paraprofessionals, bus drivers and culinary workers, will continue to be eligible to collect unemployment insurance during the summer. Minnesota was the first state in the nation to provide this benefit when it was enacted in 2023. House Republicans pushed to eliminate the program, while unions representing the workers, including SEIU and Education Minnesota, lobbied their DFL allies to preserve the program. The state expects to have paid out $102 million from the initial $135 million set aside in 2023 to fund the program by the end of the fiscal year. Walz proposed adding another $40 million to the program. At the end of the regular session, the Legislature approved an additional $100 million to fund the benefit by canceling funding for the Northern Lights express train to Duluth. This sets up a conundrum in the future, with Democratic lawmakers seeking to stand with the workers — and the unions that represent them — while also confronting rising costs for school districts or the state or some combination. Unlike for salaried school workers, like principals and teachers, the current law does not allow districts to directly levy local taxpayers for the cost of the unemployment benefits for hourly workers. The state will delay for one more year changes to how it calculates what's known as compensatory revenue, a form of state aid linked to the number and concentration of low-income students under federal poverty guidelines. For next school year, compensatory revenue sent to school districts will receive a boost of $55 million. Under current law, the state was supposed to eliminate the use of paper forms for counting qualifying students, starting next school year. Instead of paper forms, the state would use enrollment in other government programs — like Medical Assistance and SNAP — to determine if a child is low income and thus qualifies their school district for more help. But going away from paper forms would mean that some students who meet the qualifications, but don't participate in programs like SNAP or Medicaid, wouldn't be included in the funding formula. The Legislature will also form a task force to make recommendations about how to change the low income student formula in the future. The state will cut nearly $20 million of aid to schools that support libraries, and an additional $29 million in aid for social workers, school nurses and counselors. The cuts roll back some of the increases in funding the Democratic trifecta made in 2023. School library aid was first enacted in 2023, providing districts with $16.11 per pupil or $40,000 per year, whichever is greater. Starting next year, library aid will be reduced by 34% per pupil, and the minimum amount of aid per school district will be cut in half, from $40,000 per year to $20,000 per year. The 2023 education law would have almost tripled the per-pupil amount next year for nurses, counselors and social workers. Instead, the per-pupil funding will only double to $34.32. Smaller school districts will continue to receive a minimum of $40,000 per year in aid.

Why lesbian Rep. Angie Craig says she's ‘ready for the fight' in her run to be Minnesota's next U.S. senator
Why lesbian Rep. Angie Craig says she's ‘ready for the fight' in her run to be Minnesota's next U.S. senator

Yahoo

time9 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Why lesbian Rep. Angie Craig says she's ‘ready for the fight' in her run to be Minnesota's next U.S. senator

As U.S. Rep. Angie Craig steps into the national spotlight with a U.S. Senate bid, she brings with her a battle-tested strategy forged in one of the most politically divided districts in America — and a record of standing firm for LGBTQ+ rights while building unlikely coalitions. Keep up with the latest in + news and politics. Now in her fourth term representing Minnesota's Second Congressional District, Craig is aiming higher at a moment when both democracy and queer equality feel precariously under siege. Following the November election that returned President Donald Trump to the White House over Vice President Kamala Harris, Craig is clear-eyed about what's at stake. Related: Minnesota Rep. Angie Craig battles for reelection to continue path toward LGBTQ+ equality 'We're in the fight of our lives,' she said in an interview with The Advocate. 'But I'm holding up pretty well, and I'm up for the fight.' Craig, a Democrat and the first out LGBTQ+ person elected to Congress from Minnesota, won her D+1 district by nearly 14 percentage points in 2024. 'Because rural Minnesotans know I'll meet them where they are,' she said. 'They know I'll listen and deliver.' Angie CraigCourtesy Angie Craig for Minnesota Her ability to connect across political lines has earned her unusual traction in a state increasingly seen as a bellwether for the cultural and electoral divisions reshaping the nation. 'I outperformed the top of the ticket more in my most rural county,' she noted. 'I don't stay in my blue bubble.' Related: Her own story deeply informs Craig's political approach. 'Yes, I'm a lesbian. I've been happily married to my wife for 18 years now,' she said. 'We've got four sons, and we now are the proud Mimi and Gigi's — the grandparents of three grandsons.' She added, 'It does make a difference. When you have visibility, and [people in communities] meet you on a human level, they get to know you.' But Craig is not just a symbol — she's also a legislative force. As the top Democrat on the House Agriculture Committee, she has helped shape federal farm and food policy in a state where agriculture is the economic bedrock. 'I came back, I took on the status quo, became the top Democrat,' she said. 'I can go anywhere in Minnesota and talk with family farmers.' She's also among the few Democrats willing to tackle complex, often uncomfortable conversations, like transgender athlete inclusion in youth sports. 'We have to be clear-eyed that voters don't understand the trans community as well as we thought they did,' Craig said. 'But I don't know how anyone could argue against standing up for and supporting a community that is being targeted for discrimination.' Related: Now, with a Senate seat on the line, she's bringing that same philosophy statewide. Equality PAC, the political arm of the Congressional LGBTQ+ Equality Caucus, has endorsed her bid, praising her visibility and legislative commitment as both historic and essential. Craig is one of several high-profile LGBTQ+ candidates looking to counter the Trump administration's hardline policies. Those policies include a sweeping executive order Trump signed in February, reinterpreting Title IX to bar transgender girls and women from competing in women's sports. The Republican-controlled House passed a companion bill, and Senate Republicans forced a test vote in March on legislation to define Title IX 'based solely on a person's reproductive biology and genetics at birth.' That bill failed 51-45, with Democrats voting uniformly against it. But the cultural pressure hasn't abated. Craig has been clear: She opposes blanket federal bans and supports leaving sports governance to local school systems and associations. On proposed federal bans, she was unequivocal: 'The idea that we're going to subject all girls' sports to invasive checks .… It's ridiculous how Republicans have proposed to deal with this.' Related: Instead, she argues, those decisions should be made locally. 'Every sport differs so dramatically,' she said. 'I very much believe that these decisions should be up to our local schools and our local sports associations.' It's the existential threats to LGBTQ+ people under Trump that most animate her candidacy. Craig called the reinstated ban on transgender military service members 'immoral' and 'fundamentally unfair.' 'What the hell are you doing?' she asked bluntly. 'Where are your values when people who are willing to die for this nation — you want to eradicate them from the U.S. military?' Angie CraigCourtesy Angie Craig for Minnesota Craig says she sees the danger as not just political but deeply personal. 'I wake up every single day and watch an administration take away the rights of communities that I care about and people that I love,' she said. 'This is a fight I've been fighting my whole life.' That fight has included marriage equality — she and her wife saw the fight for it firsthand. 'We got married in California in 2008, and the next month, Proposition 8 passed,' she recalled. 'We didn't know whether we would still be married or not.' Now, with the future of Obergefell in doubt after conservative Justice Clarence Thomas indicated in the Dobbs decision, which revoked the national right to an abortion, that the ruling that allowed same-sex couples to marry should be revisited, Craig remains vigilant: 'Progress is never linear in this country.' At the heart of her message is a call for Democrats to resist both authoritarianism and complacency. 'We've got to both have a fist up and fight like hell … and have a hand extended to some of these people to come back,' she said. 'That's the only way that we're gonna win again.' So is her hand out? 'Well, my fist is up, and my hand is out. One hundred percent,' Craig said.

Legislature meets deadline to pass $66 billion two-year budget
Legislature meets deadline to pass $66 billion two-year budget

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

Legislature meets deadline to pass $66 billion two-year budget

Legislature meets deadline to pass $66 billion two-year budget originally appeared on Bring Me The News. Minnesota lawmakers reached agreements on a $66 billion budget for 2026-27 on Monday, passing a series of bills that were left unresolved during the regular session. A flurry of outstanding bills, some of which were hammered out behind closed doors in the weeks leading up to Monday's special session, passed in the House and the Senate, and in doing so avoided a state government shutdown that could have followed in July. The $66 billion pricetag for the budget contains a series of savings designed to reduce Minnesota's projected budget deficit, estimated at $6 billion by 2028-29, to $1.9 billion. While haste was required to pass the remaining bills before Tuesday morning's deadline, there were still lengthy debates about contentious issues, namely the proposal to remove MinnesotaCare access for undocumented immigrant adults, which narrowly passed on Monday evening. But this may not be the only special session of the year, with the Minnesota Reformer reporting that another one may be required later in 2025 as the federal funding cuts imposed by the Trump administration – including those to Medicaid and SNAP – are formalized. Here's a look at some of the bills that passed on Monday: – A $25.73 billion K-12 education bill that keeps schools funding stable during 2025-26 (a small, $4.2 million funding increase), but which also cuts $420 million in 2026-27. Session Daily reports this will include cuts to reimbursements for special education transportation, charter school aid, and teacher pipeline programs. – The repeal of MinnesotaCare access for undocumented immigrant adults, a GOP demand that sparked a significant amount of pushback from DFLers who believe it will strain emergency departments and discourage people from seeking care. – A $700 million bonding bill that includes funding for road, bridge, water and other infrastructure. The Star Tribune notes that $250 million of that will go towards roads and bridges. – A transportation bill that removed a controversial provision that would have shifted $93 million in sales tax income from the seven-county Twin Cities metro to the Metropolitan Council to pay for rapid bus transit. This had sparked objections from county council members, and was taken out of the final budget deal. The overall bill cut public transit funding by a combined $83 million, most of which impacts the Twin Cities. – Measures for data centers that will remove tax breaks on electricity for data center providers, with an exemption if they strike clean energy deals, and also introduce limits on water use. The bill also stipulates that utilities can't pass on data center costs to Minnesota consumers, and includes several measures designed to attract tech giants to build data centers in Minnesota, such as funding for weatherization and energy efficiency. – A higher education bill that provides just over $4 billion in funding for the Office of Higher Education, Minnesota State, University of Minnesota and the Mayo Clinic, per Session Daily. It also allocates an extra $44 million a year to fill a $239 million budget hole in the Minnesota State Grant program, which helps low-income Minnesotans with college fees. This story was originally reported by Bring Me The News on Jun 10, 2025, where it first appeared.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store