Water sector suffering from ‘deep-rooted' failures, review warns
The Independent Water Commission was tasked by the UK and Welsh governments to carry out the largest review of the sector since privatisation in the face of widespread public anger over pollution, bills and bosses' bonuses although ministers ruled out nationalising water companies.
Its interim report has been published as Britain's biggest water company Thames Water is again facing the spectre of temporary nationalisation after private equity firm KKR pulled out of plans for a £3 billion bailout.
Another of England's private water firms, South West Water, reported widening financial losses after an outbreak of a parasite in water supplies cost it millions.
Water supplies are under pressure from the dry spring (Owen Humphreys/PA)
And water supplies are under pressure after the driest spring in decades has left farmers struggling and millions of households facing the possibility of hosepipe bans, while ministers have warned climate change, a rising population and crumbling infrastructure is putting future supplies at risk.
In the interim report published on Tuesday, the commission said multiple issues need to be tackled to rebuild public trust in the ailing sector.
It called for regulator Ofwat's role to be strengthened and for the watchdog to adopt a more 'supervisory' approach to oversight of water firms.
Former Bank of England deputy governor Sir Jon Cunliffe, who led the review into the water sector in England and Wales, told the BBC that more effective regulation was a huge part of solving the problem, with a regulator that could step in early before things got worse.
He said: 'Because when they get worse, as you can see, they are very difficult to sort out, and we need an environmental regulator with the capability to monitor and enforce.'
He also said that having regulators with different remits and responsibilities for different parts of the process had made the water system 'expensive and incoherent'.
The interim review urges the Government to provide clearer long-term direction on what is needed from the water system, and warns key elements of current legislation are 'badly in need of review and rationalisation'.
It proposes greater regional decision-making around local water systems, and emphasises the need for a greater focus on long-term, responsible investment and ownership within the industry.
It is also considering new standards for the water sector's crumbling infrastructure, warning there is insufficient understanding of the health of assets such as pipes and water treatment plants.
Companies should plan for long-term resilience of 'critical assets', not simply fix things when they fail, it warned.
Sir Jon said: 'There is no simple, single change, no matter how radical, that will deliver the fundamental reset that is needed for the water sector.
'We have heard of deep-rooted, systemic and interlocking failures over the years – failure in Government's strategy and planning for the future, failure in regulation to protect both the billpayer and the environment and failure by some water companies and their owners to act in the public, as well as their private, interest.
'My view is that all of these issues need to be tackled to rebuild public trust and make the system fit for the future. We anticipate that this will require new legislation.'
Anger has been growing over the polluted state of rivers, lakes and coastal waters, leaks and sewage spills at the same time as significant shareholder payouts and bosses' bonuses, and bills which were hiked in April to pay for investment to fix creaking infrastructure.
On Tuesday, Thames Water announced private equity giant KKR has pulled out of plans to invest in the company, in the latest blow to the struggling and heavily indebted utility.
Thames Water – which supplies 16 million customers – had hoped KKR would invest more than £3 billion of new equity amid fears the supplier was running out of cash, and its withdrawal from the deal raises the spectre of a temporary government nationalisation once more.
And South West Water's owner Pennon has reported widening losses after a parasite outbreak in Brixham, South Devon, cost it around £21 million.
The outbreak put some people in hospital and left thousands of homes without safe drinking water – some for weeks.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Rhyl Journal
13 minutes ago
- Rhyl Journal
Northern Ireland Secretary set to meet EU trade commissioner Maros Sefcovic
Mr Benn will travel to Brussels for the meeting with Maros Sefcovic which comes after the announcement of the proposed SPS (Sanitary and Phytosanitary) deal between the UK and EU last month. The Government has said it will make a 'huge difference to consumers and businesses in Northern Ireland'. Under the Windsor Framework, Northern Ireland remains aligned with EU single market rules for goods following the UK's departure from the EU. The new deal between the UK and EU has been described as aiming to facilitate the smooth flow of agrifood and plants from Great Britain to Northern Ireland, protecting the UK's internal market, reducing costs for businesses and improving consumer choice. It is also aimed at saving businesses hours of time and money by removing swathes of paperwork and numerous health certificates, checks and processes – with those using the red lane expected to save close to £1 million per month. Mr Benn said he will emphasise the UK Government's commitment to continue to deliver the Windsor Framework, in the meeting which the minister for EU relations Nick Thomas–Symonds will also attend. 'The agreement the UK Government recently reached with the EU will help us to deliver on our core mission to grow the economy, and shows the benefits of a closer partnership with our friends in Europe,' he said. 'I look forward to meeting with Commissioner Sefcovic today, to emphasise this Government's commitment to continuing to implement the Windsor Framework and to delivering the new SPS agreement as soon as possible. 'This will facilitate the smooth flow of agrifood and plants from Great Britain to Northern Ireland and protect the UK's internal market.' Mr Benn added: 'Northern Ireland will, of course, continue to enjoy its unique access to the EU's single market, a key competitive advantage. 'All of this means that Northern Ireland is set to become an even more attractive destination for investment in the years ahead.' Mr Benn is also to meet representatives from the EU diplomatic community and attend a roundtable of business stakeholders including the British Agriculture Bureau and the Confederation of British Industry.
Rhyl Journal
13 minutes ago
- Rhyl Journal
UK must tackle energy bills as firms face £24bn in extra costs
Rain Newton-Smith, chief executive of the business group, will tell business leaders and politicians at the CBI's business dinner on Thursday that sky-high energy costs are an 'anchor on our ambition'. At the event in London, she will call on the Government to come up with a 'serious plan' to cut energy costs and invest in energy security to help make the UK and businesses more competitive. The CBI said almost 90% of British businesses have seen their energy bills rise over the past three years, with a third seeing them rocket by more than 50%. Four in 10 firms are reducing investment as a result, according to the group. Higher energy bills come on top of significant increases in staff costs, with the CBI estimating the recent rise in national insurance contributions (NICs) and past three minimum wage hikes since 2023-24 is costing companies an extra £24 billion each year. Ms Newton-Smith will say: 'Business is now straining under £24 billion in extra costs per year. 'That's more than the cost of Crossrail. More than the Home Office budget – on business, every year.' She will add: 'With costs running so high, there is one issue we absolutely must tackle. 'Without it, any industrial strategy, any serious plan for economic security will fall flat on its face. Energy.' She will say the rising cost of energy 'isn't just a cost issue'. 'It's a jobs issue. An investment issue. A security issue. 'Because how can UK business compete with one hand tied behind its back – and the other straining to keep the lights on? 'This is an anchor on our ambition. A crack in our economic security. And it must be fixed.' Britain is becoming less competitive for business and industry due to expensive energy, with firms finding it 'harder and harder to stay in the UK' when power is far cheaper abroad, according to the CBI. Ms Newton-Smith will warn UK firms 'pay among the highest electricity bills in the world – 50% more than France or Germany, four times more than the US and Canada'. The CBI is making a plea to the Government to remove policy costs from electricity bills, but it also wants it to focus on low-carbon energy to help achieve economic security. Its recent economic report showed the UK net zero economy grew 10% and supported 900,000 jobs. Ms Newton-Smith will say: 'If economic security is our destination, then make no mistake: affordable, reliable, low-carbon energy is the road that gets us there, 'What we need now is a serious plan alongside the industrial strategy: to cut energy costs, to manage the shift from fossil fuels, to boost efficiency, storage and system flexibility. 'This Government has already shown it can put prosperity over politics on the world stage. Well now it must do the same for energy at home. 'Because this isn't about culture wars. It's about common sense.' A Government spokesperson said: 'Through our sprint to clean power, we will get off the rollercoaster of fossil fuel markets – protecting business and household finances with clean, homegrown energy that we control. 'We are already bringing energy costs for key UK industries closer in line with other major economies through the British industry supercharger – saving businesses £5 billion over the next 10 years.'
The National
an hour ago
- The National
SNP are erring far too much on the side of caution in indy fight
Of course, it is also informative to read the different arguments around independence and to read the views of various columnists on this core topic of the newspaper, especially when columnists such as Tommy Sheppard are prepared to engage with critics. Most without a personal gripe against the SNP sensibly realise that there are often good reasons why the SNP and the Scottish Government cannot reveal every step that is undertaken to further Scotland's self-determination, but while I personally accept much of Tommy's reasoning, it still appears that overall the SNP are erring on the side of caution rather than seeking to exploit every opportunity, no matter how seemingly tenuous. Moving ahead on all possible fronts, from progressing the ICCPR petition to advancing a Scottish constitution, the SNP have much to gain in mobilising support for the party and independence while those who do not see that real reform of the UK is necessary to address the many problems of broken Brexit Britain will simply vote in a mistaken attempt to delay the inevitable anyway. It seems a no-brainer that the Scottish Parliament should have the right to represent the people of Scotland 'on how they should be governed', including on UK constitutional matters, but the question remains that even if the SNP succeed in winning a majority of the seats in the next Holyrood election, or better still a majority of the votes are gained by pro-independence parties, what actions will follow to ensure that this time such a mandate is exercised? My personal view is that a timescale must be set from day one that makes it clear to the UK Government that refusal to respect the views of the people of Scotland will have significant consequences. If within the set period – perhaps a maximum of one year – the UK Government has not enacted legislation to effectively enable the Scottish Parliament to exercise its mandate, including the legal right to conduct a constitutional referendum, then MPs should be withdrawn from Westminster. And it should be made crystal clear to all that the next General Election will be a de facto referendum on the basis that the views of the people of Scotland will only be truly respected and represented when Scotland regains its independence. In the meantime, the common cause of independence would be aided if frustrated individuals could resist falling into the trap of repeating the slanted partial framing of BBC Scotland and the grossly misleading soundbites of scurrilous commentators in newspapers such as the Daily Mail. Kenny MacAskill's crude attempt to use John Swinney's condemnation of alleged calls to kill MPs in order to justify his criticism of John not doing more to end the slaughter in Gaza reeks of political opportunism that does not reflect well on a politician seeking to replace Scotland's First Minister. Iain Wilson's misguided attempt (Letters, June 2) to imply that the SNP Scottish Government is more concerned with the parliament's toilet arrangements than with those struggling to obtain NHS appointments is straight out of the Daily Mail and Nigel Farage playbooks. We can and must do better to achieve our common goal. Stan Grodynski Longniddry, East Lothian
