logo
UK's oldest brewer to hike prices following Labour tax increase

UK's oldest brewer to hike prices following Labour tax increase

Independent19-03-2025

Britain's oldest brewer has said it will hike its beer prices in response to rising taxes and wage costs taking effect in April.
Shepherd Neame, which runs 290 pubs primarily in the South East, said the two policies announced by the Government last year will cost it about £2.6 million a year.
'We plan to mitigate the majority of these costs over the next 18 months through price increases and cost efficiencies,' chief executive Jonathan Neame said on Wednesday.
Chancellor Rachel Reeves increased employer national insurance contributions (Nics) in the October Budget while also raising the minimum wage.
The Nics increase, which comes in next month, is designed to help fund improvements to public services such as the NHS.
But some companies have criticised the policy for making it more expensive to employ people, with hospitality groups who employ lots of people on lower wages set to be especially hard hit.
Mr Neame, whose company employs about 1,600 people, described the current market as 'challenging'.
'The additional costs imposed on our sector are most unwelcome but the business model is flexible and we can adapt to the new circumstances,' he said.
'We have an excellent pub estate and our beer business is evolving to meet current consumer tastes and trends.'
Shepherd Neame is more than 300 years old and is the oldest company of its type in the UK.
It brews beers under a range of brands including Spitfire, Bishops Finger and Whitstable Bay.
But total beer volumes fell 12.6% in the second half of 2024 compared with the same period the previous year, the company said.
Meanwhile, revenue fell slightly to £85 million, amid an 'increase in pub sales and a decrease in sales from premium bottled ales'.
Nonetheless, underlying profit rose nearly 10% to £4.2 million after a fall in inflation last year.
Mr Neame added: 'We enjoyed buoyant summer trade in July and August, with consumer and business confidence high.
'During the autumn, confidence evaporated in the run-up to the Budget. Since then, activity picked up again and we enjoyed record Christmas trading, with good growth on 2023, with many individual pub records exceeded.'
He said the increase in labour costs has 'undermined business and consumer confidence in the short term', but that he remains 'hopeful that the economy will return to a growth trajectory, with net disposable income growing and interest rates falling'.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Independent water commission chair denies probe into reforms is ‘tinkering'
Independent water commission chair denies probe into reforms is ‘tinkering'

North Wales Chronicle

timean hour ago

  • North Wales Chronicle

Independent water commission chair denies probe into reforms is ‘tinkering'

Sir Jon Cunliffe addressed recent criticism that he has been 'tinkering' with the industry's deep-rooted issues as he was quizzed by MPs on Tuesday. The Independent Water Commission was tasked by the UK and Welsh governments to carry out the largest review of the sector since privatisation in the face of widespread public anger over pollution, bills and bosses' bonuses although ministers ruled out nationalising water companies. The final report is expected in mid-July but earlier this month, the commission published an interim report which said the industry needs a 'fundamental reset'. But this initial paper was criticised for not going far enough to deliver recommendations that would engender a complete industry overhaul. The Government outlined the scope of the probe to focus on what changes could be made within the current privatised regulated ownership model rather than considering a wholesale shift to other models such as not-for-profit or nationalisation. Giles Bristow, chief executive of Surfers Against Sewage, said the interim report was tinkering around the edges and he called for the commission's final recommendations to 'end pollution for profit' as well as 'reshape the water industry to put public health and environment first'. Asked by MPs if the review is 'tinkering' given the broken culture found across the sector, Sir Jon said: 'No I don't accept it at all. I just don't, I'm sorry. 'First of all, you wouldn't expect me to think, to accept, that this was a report that was tinkering. 'But just moving past that… I do not think the problems you see in the culture of the water companies that you've identified, and the problems we've seen in performance, are the inevitable consequence of the ownership model that we have.' Sir Jon continued to say the commission will look at other ownership models, such as not-for-profit, and make recommendations where companies are feasibly able to make a transition without public spending. Challenged on how he can assure MPs he will look at other models of ownership given the current failures, he said the commission could do so only in certain circumstances. 'But what we won't do is say: 'We need to move the whole sector to a different model' for two reasons,' he said. We've published our report on priorities for the water sector, calling on Sir Jon Cunliffe and the Water Commission not to shy away from 'root and branch' reforms. Read the report: — EFRA Committee (@CommonsEFRA) June 16, 2025 Sir Jon outlined that he is not sure how the sector can do this without large public spending to buy the assets but also that he has not found a 'strong correlation' between models and outcomes. 'It's not tinkering, it's trying to be evidence-based,' he said. His comments come after the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee released its own report into the sector on Tuesday morning, which concluded the industry is 'failing' while water firms are 'deaf to the crisis' it is facing. The MPs also argued the Government 'should feel able to use its temporary nationalisation powers' when needed. Sir Jon was also questioned about criticism that the review is not truly independent from the Government due to Environment Department staff helping to carry out the work. In response, he said: 'I'd like to put this on the record, if I can chair. 'I've been given a secretariat of high-quality Defra officials. 'I have not felt in any way that I am being channelled down any particular route outside of my terms of reference and I'd also say that they are incredibly hard-working, and they are in seeker after truth mode.' He added that while the commission has had to draw on some departmental expertise, the recommendations 'will be my own'.

Independent water commission chair denies probe into reforms is ‘tinkering'
Independent water commission chair denies probe into reforms is ‘tinkering'

Leader Live

timean hour ago

  • Leader Live

Independent water commission chair denies probe into reforms is ‘tinkering'

Sir Jon Cunliffe addressed recent criticism that he has been 'tinkering' with the industry's deep-rooted issues as he was quizzed by MPs on Tuesday. The Independent Water Commission was tasked by the UK and Welsh governments to carry out the largest review of the sector since privatisation in the face of widespread public anger over pollution, bills and bosses' bonuses although ministers ruled out nationalising water companies. The final report is expected in mid-July but earlier this month, the commission published an interim report which said the industry needs a 'fundamental reset'. But this initial paper was criticised for not going far enough to deliver recommendations that would engender a complete industry overhaul. The Government outlined the scope of the probe to focus on what changes could be made within the current privatised regulated ownership model rather than considering a wholesale shift to other models such as not-for-profit or nationalisation. Giles Bristow, chief executive of Surfers Against Sewage, said the interim report was tinkering around the edges and he called for the commission's final recommendations to 'end pollution for profit' as well as 'reshape the water industry to put public health and environment first'. Asked by MPs if the review is 'tinkering' given the broken culture found across the sector, Sir Jon said: 'No I don't accept it at all. I just don't, I'm sorry. 'First of all, you wouldn't expect me to think, to accept, that this was a report that was tinkering. 'But just moving past that… I do not think the problems you see in the culture of the water companies that you've identified, and the problems we've seen in performance, are the inevitable consequence of the ownership model that we have.' Sir Jon continued to say the commission will look at other ownership models, such as not-for-profit, and make recommendations where companies are feasibly able to make a transition without public spending. Challenged on how he can assure MPs he will look at other models of ownership given the current failures, he said the commission could do so only in certain circumstances. 'But what we won't do is say: 'We need to move the whole sector to a different model' for two reasons,' he said. We've published our report on priorities for the water sector, calling on Sir Jon Cunliffe and the Water Commission not to shy away from 'root and branch' reforms. Read the report: — EFRA Committee (@CommonsEFRA) June 16, 2025 Sir Jon outlined that he is not sure how the sector can do this without large public spending to buy the assets but also that he has not found a 'strong correlation' between models and outcomes. 'It's not tinkering, it's trying to be evidence-based,' he said. His comments come after the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee released its own report into the sector on Tuesday morning, which concluded the industry is 'failing' while water firms are 'deaf to the crisis' it is facing. The MPs also argued the Government 'should feel able to use its temporary nationalisation powers' when needed. Sir Jon was also questioned about criticism that the review is not truly independent from the Government due to Environment Department staff helping to carry out the work. In response, he said: 'I'd like to put this on the record, if I can chair. 'I've been given a secretariat of high-quality Defra officials. 'I have not felt in any way that I am being channelled down any particular route outside of my terms of reference and I'd also say that they are incredibly hard-working, and they are in seeker after truth mode.' He added that while the commission has had to draw on some departmental expertise, the recommendations 'will be my own'.

Protest against Government's purchase of CityWest hotel to be held this evening
Protest against Government's purchase of CityWest hotel to be held this evening

BreakingNews.ie

time2 hours ago

  • BreakingNews.ie

Protest against Government's purchase of CityWest hotel to be held this evening

A protest by a residents group against the Government's multi-million euro purchase of Citywest hotel in Dublin to increase international protection applicants accommodation is to be held this evening. The Minister for Justice, Jim O'Callaghan announced earlier on Tuesday that the Cabinet approved the State purchase of Citywest Hotel and Convention Centre as an international protection accommodation for €148.2m. Advertisement Minister O'Callaghan's announcement comes after several months of negotiations and disquiet among the local Citywest community. The Minister highlighted that owning the hotel and conference centre, rather than leasing it would provide great 'value for money' and long-term saving for the state. He added: 'In a sector that has seen extremely high costs in recent times, purchasing Citywest makes prudent financial sense for the State compared to costs of leasing the site. The purchase represents a payback period to the State of approximately four years, and over 25 years, the purchase and operating cost model offer savings of more than €1billion, while delivering a permanent State asset.' Minister O'Callaghan said he is 'committed' to reforming Ireland's international protection system to ensure its efficiency and robustness. Advertisement He noted that a 'stable and sustainable accommodation network' is a central element of that reform. 'My goal is to improve processing systems so that people can receive a decision quickly and fairly, curtailing the need for constant growth in our accommodation system. Purchasing Citywest is a hugely significant step towards achieving this,' he said. In a statement the Saggart Village Residents Association said they are 'very disappointed,' with the government's plans. The statement added: 'There was no indication that the decision was going to be made this quickly and that it happened without any community engagement is very disappointing. Advertisement 'Value for money is just one aspect of such a decision, the loss of the Hotel and Convention Centre, and the permanent addition of an IPAS centre is a significant impact on a village that was already under pressure.' The hotel has been used to accommodate Ukrainian refugees and asylum seekers since 2022. The site has the capacity to accommodate up to 2,300 people. It was first used by the state as a response to the Covid-19 pandemic. However, legal action is being considered by the Stop Citywest Hotel Purchase residents group also based in Saggart. The group held a drive slow protest on the N7 last Friday and a protest outside the Dáil last Wednesday. A spokesperson for the group claims that the government's decision to purchase Citywest Hotel and convert it into a permanent refugee center will have an 'irreversible effect on our village'. Advertisement The spokesperson continued: 'Such an action will not only strain local infrastructure and resources but also place significant stress on both the existing and newly arrived' people. 'Both groups are likely to suffer from inadequate integration efforts, which are essential for fostering mutual understanding and harmony.' The group pointed out that 'transforming such a significant local landmark into a permanent center is affecting local businesses reliant on tourism and disrupting the quiet ambiance many of us value. It is causing challenges in community integration and our security.' They claim the move will place a burden on public services, such as education, healthcare, and transportation, and 'we have seen very little help from the government for our village'. The group is holding another protest in Saggart village this evening at 6.30pm at Jacob's B

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store